SONY A95L VS LG G4. SIDE BY SIDE COMPARISON. 4K HDR DEMO COMPARISON. 

Oof the g4 is choking on that one honestly

@edgedoctoe8389. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. I agree. But that's specifically in standard mode.

And you can make either one look like the other by turning the brightness up or down a click or two. The little stuff people sweat and rant about in videos 'wow this tV OWNZ the other one" are small things you can adjust.

Is this something that shows because of the technical differences on the qdoled and woled? Because I have had problems getting my samsung s90c as contrasty and sharp as my lg c2. The brightness and color volume are obviously better on the samsung, but lg c2 is more sharp/contrasty/3D. Specially in game mode.Have tried many picture settings for the s90c but this ”problem” seems to remain. I prefer the lg c2 presentation more and usually end up gaming more on that tv.

@@jake9012 This! 👆I had to sell my S90C (unlocked to S95C) because I missed the contrast my LG Oled provided. No matter what settings I changed, believe me i tried them all, I just couldn’t get that true Oled feel. If I understand correctly, this lack of contrast in comparison to Woled is inherent to QD- Oled tech which is such a bummer because otherwise, my S90C was better in every way. It didn’t matter if I was in a semi lit room or completely dark room, the raised backs were always there, resulting in a flatter picture presentation than what i’m used to. In the end, I had to go back to Woled for their true blacks.

@exhibitD79. Hey, nice to hear from you again. It's the age-old shadow detail vs. inky blacks for better true blacks and depth perception debate. I also feel like it has some to do with processing, too. Out of the box, the g4 had more clarity and generally more fine details. The way to perceive this, it's lime the processing just optimizes the fine details more clearly. Kind of makes them pop and look even more 3d. Hard thing to give up, and lg knows it. But if you had to choose one, it all depends clearly on what you like best for you and what your primary use case is. I would imagine

lol

Timestamp off by a few seconds oops

LG oleds default at 10, not 50. It’s a debate online if 10 or 0 is neutral on lg oleds. 50 is 100% sharpness on these TVs. It goes 0-50

Thank you.

Bad choiche dude.. the g4 is the best oled this year

@@interistapazzo1.9.0.8lol

@@interistapazzo1.9.0.8 Why? Sony model is the best for everyone, and you can see it by yourself with a simple comparison video

You get quite big variations stream from stream. I think you can easily favour anyone, depending on the camera make, positioning and exposure . Given in other streams S95D and G4 slugging it out, and S95D is meant to more vibrant than the Sony. QD-OLED is better in color highlights , G4 is meant to be better in highlights white a white presence. Also most Cameras can not catch the full contrast, Even top movie cameras only do say 14 Stops. My take is all these TVs are great. get best one suited for needs, at best price. Just remember if QD-OLED and WOLED are increasing the stack layers from 3 to 4 next year . These TVs will be blown away. The point is differences here won't matter as much as next years increase. Plus you will enjoy movies on all these TVs, just because you saw a better TV in the shop so FN what. For most content now in existence they can look almost the same. Plus more important the overall picture , tone handling, processing. Harder to see this from these streams Don't sweat the small stuff, fun to watch. More important is to have a great buying strategy - My one is to go discount until full BT2020, full 4000 HDR tonemap , then go big and premium , it will get better after that, but practically no movies will be mastered at 10000 Nits for a long time , or another colour space. Plus I can get new tech in a monitor form for PC gaming

@@nimblegoatIncreasing layers (?), meaning their panels? Please explain if you can and what you mean by blowing current models out of the water. Ty.

@@AeroDude73 All the main OLEDS in the last years are very good, My point is debating minor differences this year seems mute when both Samsung Display and LG Display are saying next year they will stack another emissive layer. So LG will have 4 levels of OLEDS stacked , not 3. Samsung will stack 4 layers of Blue OLED , so this should increase colour volume and overall NITs . Plus we don't know if they will have other new tech. Eleap is promising cheap very stackable true RGB in coming years. True RGB quantum dots are coming will should be greatly improved on Samsungs solution when fully realised. If they finally master the Blue PhoLED , good gains there ( I think it's coming, but still a couple of years away . My point is worrying about minor stuff now is kind of silly. Buy overall package. Eg LG G4 does such a good job color mapping now. That watching a G4 in isolation , it will look amazingly vibrant . For classic 1950 1960 movies , none of this even matters, as blown out color would be garrish and off putting . For Audio a great speaker today will most likely be a great speaker in 20 years ( unless some new tech , material science happens ). Not so with today's TV , in 20 years it will be just OK

All LG TVs since the old CRT ones have a greenish tone, always turning towards green, this is normal on LG TVs regardless of the image configuration.

@@MariaJose-nv3tj Bullshit. He just has it screwed up.

QD OLED usually looks red on camera. The sony looks like it pushes red and then also has more blue than references, since it def has extra blue. The green push on the LG is probably at least a little real, though the camera likely exagerrates it. Normally WOLED looks blue on camera, so I'd say there is at least some legit green tint here and the blue isn't noticed because of just how blue the Sony is. Go take a pic of your TV with your phone, you'll see the colors aren't the same as what you see in real life. Especially if you have an oled or qd oled.

@@paulcox2447 The A95L didn't look all that red though, the colors looked proper

Price is also king of the A95L

quality costs😊

QD inferior to webos

QD inferior to webos

Sony wanks over LG

Sony good in do highlight LG note do good job on highlight

Upscaling : g4

Color is great on my a95l but Sony glitches are not. My a95l always jacks up hdmi sources when they’re plugged into the soundbar feeding into tv on e-arc. My other lg c3 integrates perfect. Also Sony a95l randomly flashes

@@keithskoglund10 sorry you’re experiencing that man, I haven’t come encountered that issue as I don’t have a soundbar. What do you mean by it flashes? The only other issue I had with mine is the WiFi constantly disconnecting, but I resolved that

@@Mugen____ you can google search about a flicker that happens due to refresh rates on some content. Doesn’t happen often but it happened streaming content on a firestick. Still haven’t figured out how to get the a95l to not act stupid for about 3 minutes after turning it on and properly detecting all inputs plugged into my soundbar then into tv on hdmi 3

Hey, thank you for the comment and checking out the video . Yes, through white balance settings. Just take your time and fine-tune it without losing color in other areas of full color range.

Beautiful TV's in their most dull modes that turn off all the processing that you paid for. I'd rather see a mode with processing turned on and just adjust the color balance to warm 50 to get the colors accurate. If not then detail is just a game of which brand keeps the most processing on in their "filmmaker" mode.

@@paulcox2447 custom and filmmaker modes do not turn off processing in the sense of upscaling and contrast. It’s essentially just accurate colors, white balance ect. that reflect the creators intent. That is not “dull”. Once you’re used to a realistic image other modes look terrible.

So are you sorry or are you not?

@@gameztopcollectibles 😅🤣🤣🤣

@nesteaa6433. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. The brightness is noticeable. But they still trade blows. The A95L has the wow factor cause the processing of a Sony is really good and it's paired with the qd oled technology. Which means colors are the another reason you get that wow factor. Where the G4 Imo shines is the clarity and fine details. Plus it still has the best 4d effect from my experience. So it depends what one gives you the wow factor more lol

How do you know without an A95L nearby? I've had them all, there's no going back from the Qd oled especially if mounted on a Sony

@@dalecooper7233I’m just comparing my G4 to the one in this video and it doesn’t look like this IRL. At least not to me. I’m still in my return period so if it did I’d return it in a heartbeat.

8:34 G4 is crushing shadow detail lol

@DarkLionn83. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. Upgrade worthy in terms of size yes. But if you were asking me if it's a worthy upgrade staying within the same size tv of what you currently own, I would not personally think it is. The S95c is an amazing tv

You mounting it? G4. You want a 5 year panel warantee? G4. Better contrast? G4. G-sync (certified) for gaming? G4. You want extra colours you’d never notice are missing? A95L.

Clearly from an LG fan.

@goldeneye8425. Hey, thank you for the comment and checking out the video. Means allot. Yes, you certainly can use live color in game mode.

@adamjahani4484. Hey, thank you for the comment and checking out the video. That's a tough call. Especially if you are mostly a fan of Sony. But it may depend on your primary use case. If you really like to game, then the LG would be the better way to go, particularly in more competitive gaming. It has many more gaming features and a slightly better input lag. If you don't game as much and prefer colors to natively be more colorful, then the A95L is most likely the way to go.

Def the G4, Lg is king for upscaling content in sdr. Sony has the better colors.

@@kjell9745I disagree. My lg g3 had juddering issues for sports. A95l is smooth and perfect

You need a tiebreaker. 😄

@@jerryjazzbo2845 update: I just got a G4 and I had a Sony a95l. Out of the box Sony better for low quality tv and sports. Lg has judder streaming baseball. Probably can fk with settings but that’s kind of lame for a $3000 tv.

I had a g3…got an a95l. And Dolby vision on the a95l destroys what lg looked like. I don’t imagine it being substantially better on g4. Low light shadows have so much better detail on a95l

@@keithskoglund10 Thanks for your reply . I also own the Sony A95L since seven months. and I love watching my movies in Dolby Vision. LG Oled is famous for having Black crush. 😁. Please tell me, does the Sony A95L show better colors than LG G3 in Dolby Vision ?

the term 3D pop is an invention... 3D pop doesn't exist, it's all nonsense

Out of the box, G4 has more 3D pop as I own the tv. I'm sure you can get a similar result on a95l by tweaking the settings, but the new processor on LG does the most of heavy work.

yes G4, I see it that way too...I generally think that qdoled always seems a bit flat🤷

@tylerstirling2843. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. Yes the G4 definitely has the mire 3d look to it 90% of the time. There are times where the A95L can look more 3 dimensional but it is more rare.

@@consumerreview2k lol you have set 11 to sharpness please change hobby

Definitely agree here, G4 colors look way off

Usually OLED's look blue or green on camera and QD-OLED pushes red. They likely look closer in person.

Camera shows it more

@Canuck1976. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. I think the warm temp looks better then expert because the colors look a little more washed out in expert. Plus I notice a little bit more of a cloudy haze in expert. I think if you want a more cinematic look expert plus helps especially in cinema. For those who like a more accurate look. I get it. I'm not much of a purist as you can obviously tell at this point. I like color pop and brightness and lots of detail.

yeah, i've been thinking the same. a bigger tv is always gonna be more immersive than a smaller one which is a BIG plus. the A95L doesn't have an 83" model and even if it did, it would probably be so expensive compared to the G4, it would still not be worth it.

This particular video actually is recorded in HDR

@sj460162. Hey nice to hear from you again. Thank you for checking out the video. In thus particular comparison I do lean more towards the A95L. It looks brighter and has better hdr impact and better color purity and luminance. Also has better highlights that have a nice glow to it. But in game mode I like the G4 better

@@consumerreview2k Ok thanks bud. Im enjoying my mini led qn95c at the mo but might upgrade.

@sj460162 nice bright tv you got there. How about the colors? Nice I assume huh?

@@consumerreview2k Really nice bud..especially the reds. But oled interests me.

@sj460162 I don't think any other brand can display reds better then Samsung to be quite honest.

GatCat. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. Means allot. There are moments where the A95L shines over the G4. And moments where the G4 shines over the A95L. It really depends on the content and mode your in.

Samsung. The idea that Sony is some juggernaut only exists on the internet due to Sony marketing and a small group of "videophiles". Samsung makes up 30-40% of the market and LG is around 20%. Between the 2 of them they have over half of all TV sales. Sony is a whopping 5% of TV sales. They are barely staying in business in that division. It's the other departments like gaming that keep it afloat. In the real world, the goal is to sell TV's. Samsung, Sony and LG all make a great product. The sales numbers are what they are and Sony isn't "winning" anything other than "king of TV's" the past few years. AKA 1 TV, that most people can't afford. Sony LCD's up until this year have been hot garbage using the cheapest parts available.

@@paulcox2447quantity never equals quality. And I’ll leave it at that. Toyota isn’t better than Ferrari.

The lg is clearer in game modus

@snoepkont84. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. Means allot. I think in game mode the G4 looks better. But out of game mode and in standard mode the A95L I think overall looks better.

the matter is complex, it's not about personal preferences but about accuracy you like your G2 ok but your G2 will never be able to be accurate and reproduce the colors necessary to get close to the real scene fine... wrgb is finished.

No one can convince me what the right colors are. Look at the real environment, nothing poppy. So you can't convince me. I'm sticking with my G2, I have a 5-year warranty, I can continue for the time being, I think the prices are not worth the TVs.

@@eugenecia9424 lol ok😂

@@dalecooper7233 I understand everyone, when I was young I looked at everything differently, when you get older you put things into perspective. I used to want the most beautiful cars, now I just want to drive as cheaply as possible. Every year a newer version comes out, my interest is yes, but my Reason says don't do it, there's no need for it.

@@eugenecia9424 I have had and still have many Manil Qdoled TVs which are superior... it doesn't mean that the colors are too saturated but that even at very high brightness the colors remain full and natural and not faded and this fact is not subjective but objective.

@HalfLife333. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. Yes I have experienced audio loss for sure and it does drive me crazy when it happens too. I'm not to sure what you mean by frame drops. Motion I haven't really noticed that either.

People like to pretend that watching an OLED with no interpolation is a "quality" experience too. You really can't trust a lot of them. Before I bought my first OLED I heard Vincent and RTING's talk about "Mild stutter" that "most people don't notice". Borderline delusional statements, if it isn't delusion, it's just an outright lie. If you don't see the screen shake back and forth every time something moves you need your eyes checked. Perhaps they are all hardcore alcoholics and used to it? I'd say my vision starts to get OLED like after a 6 pack or so. It's legit that bad, no quality at all if things are moving. 24fps movies and 30hz games are both unplayable without some interpolation, again unless you really like watching things shake. Same thing with RTING giving all the uber glossy OLED's high anti-reflection scores. If I can use my TV as a mirror, it's not good antireflection handling. I can understand seeing a light, but you don't just see a light. You see literally the entire room. Even my dark blue couch reflects enough light to be seen. A lot of these companies and reviewers gloss over real issues.

Correct, not many people like to mention any negatives of the sony.

Also, nobody ever mentions the screen scratching or damage to the coating from the poor packaging with no screen protective film.

"this year beacause sony no launched other models ... A95l kill G4 aniway😂"

@@dalecooper7233 lol the a95l are full of fake colors🤣 and the blacks are really shitty my friend😌 sony fanboy be like

@@interistapazzo1.9.0.8 poveraccio si vede che si terra terra guarda l' ultimo video di hdtv test e leggi le risposte di vincent theo, nennun wrgb puo' eguagliare un Qd oled e la recensione del G4 di rtings te lo dice pure che A95l ha colori migliori e un processing migliore... samsung e lg sono per i poveracci.

@@interistapazzo1.9.0.8 magna... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9kKLba82e0E.htmlsi=vgOo3ADclXWha6bn

There is no a95 replacment this year, so it's the still the best TV Sony makes. Also you realize that LG won the award every year for many years right? Sony winning has only been true since like 2020.

@trapt29. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. Means allot. Hope to see you in the comments more often

Depends on the content, slow panning shots looks worse on a95L

A95l is beeestttt. Fack youuu