Stalingrad (1993) - Unofficial Trailer - English subs 

Putin Wouldnt agree lol Do you think russian cinema is as bullshit as hollywood? At least in ww2 films

@@gabrielaznar6644 Haha lol. I do. But just some of them. You can find good and bad WW2 movies either in Hollywood or any other international studios. For example, FURY and T-34 were bad, whereas 1944 and Saints and Soldiers were good. Greetings, bro.

Sure, the Stalingrad movie from 1993 was a really good one, whereas 99% of all war movies are crap. Hmm... I did not even know that there is another movie from 2013

@@gabrielaznar6644 even russians hate modern russian ww2 films.

I agree. The Russian "Rah, rah" plot was absurd. Nevertheless the 3-D version on the big screen ($25!) added a cool touch.

Thanks, Yash!

I did. Excellent work.

The music is perfect: the Lacrimosa from Mozart's Requiem. Lacrimosa = Weeping. Because of all the death. RIP

@@DeltaSniperZRR X

It is very professional indeed ☺️

Das ist gut! Ich agree with you :) a FANTASTIC, OUTSTANDING Movie!

why are you talking about the Second World War? What did you do there? Did your grandfathers liberate Stalingrad? Or maybe they took Berlin? Actually, it was the Russians who did it)

The fuck are you saying?​@@BadBoy-bt6lb

​@@TomszplUnfortunately, history repeats itself. We are on the threshold of the third world war. Since 1939, the NSDAP party has been promoting the extermination of Russians and Jews. Look around, what do you see? Don’t the sanctions and restrictions against Russians remind you of anything? They remind me. This is pure Nazism.

​@@TomszplWhat's wrong? The biggest mistake of the Russians is that they did not destroy the Germans when they entered Berlin. Now history is repeating itself. The only thing is that the Russians are not burned as it was in 1941... Everything that happens on the part of the NATO countries is similar to the Axis countries. NATO will lose to Russia. This country has always been at war with associations. It was attacked by Charles, Napoleon, Hitler. They all created some kind of alliances against Russia. And?

Reagan e kung ....totalmente de acuerdo !!

@Phillip Hickman its another question

@Phillip Hickman tell it to chinese. They ve just landed a martian rover.

@Phillip Hickmanlol, that might be the weakest comment I've seen all year.

@Phillip Hickman I like communist and hate americans!!!!

Because they were marching in circles

@otto Lincoln I think you are correct, more Russian military died than Germans. But the Germans could not sustain the losses to the extent the Russians could. At the beginning of Barbarossa the Germans were clearly superior due to a number of factors. But as the invasion progressed, the Russians hardened. Once the defense materialized, and the weather worsened, the Germans were doomed. It is amazing to think three quarters of all German losses in WW2 was inflicted by the Russian military and winter.

@otto Lincoln The weather shut down the supply flow. They were handling the miles, but couldn’t handle mud, snow and sub zero temps.

@otto Lincoln Very possibly correct. I don’t know what the fleet could have contributed. They were not equipped for supply missions. As to using airlift capabilities, they were able to play a significant role early, but as the end drew near, all attempts at establishing an air bridge for supplies and the return of wounded, never met levels required to sustain the Sixth Army. The losses of transport aircraft was heavy due to a lack of maintenance, fuel and fighter cover. The unarmed, unprotected transports were easy pickins for Russian interceptors, which were being built in increasing numbers. What supplies reached German held airfields were often never distributed to combat units because they didn’t have the capability to retrieve them. In other words, they didn’t have enough gas to go get gas.. As a result hundreds of tons of war materials, rations, and medical supplies stacked up at the airfields, only to be claimed later by the Russians.

Wow a civil discussion about WWII that's really rare

That already happened in winter 1941

It is a great movie alright. Your great grandad must have been a tough character to survive all that.

@@Buggsy61 yeah he was pretty fucked up though,drank like a fish and smoked like a chimney. Told the most bone chilling story’s about the war and russian captivity.

Just wow! 😮

@@ramcharger9449 I drink like a fish and smoke cigars like a chimney but have been through nothing like that luckily!😄.I am so interested in stuff like that. When I was a kid I used to deliver newspapers to an old people’s home which was full of British First World War veterans. You could see they had been through a lot in their lives and were real hard men just like your great grandfather must have been. Wish I had taken a pen and paper and wrote all their stories down. Thanks for sharing.

Can you share your grandfather's experiences

me too :-/

Try to watch the movie "Come and See" 1985 from the USSR. Unless, of course, you want big nightmares to appear.

Come and See is one of the most overrated war/anti war films ever.

Excuse my language but in depiction of the third empire Germans give a shit about military pride. Even today most Germans will at max be proud of the foot soldiers and not "the military". Concerning the Nazis there is not one reason to be proud of them. They were maniacs that brought evil to the world and the worst suffering to Germany that it has ever experienced. If there is any depiction of nazi authority in a proud manner it is due to historical accuracy. It would certainly not be implement to honor them.

Oh please America did not win s*** we had allies from the British French Dutch we never won anything by ourselves I'm just going to tell you the truth what invading Grenada and f****** Island with people that didn't have nothing but hunting rifles that was a military victory oh give me a f****** break man what the f*** have we ever want as soon as we go to war we quickly give up and surrender and that is a fact

@@kystars Germans used 80% of their troops on Eastern Front. 420k Axis troops vs 540k US+Britain troops in The North African campaign. 1.4mln allied troops vs 300k Germans in the Operation Overlord. Compare it to 4,5mln Axis troops vs 2.8 mln Soviet troops in operation Barbarossa. 1.8 mln Soviet troops vs 800k German troops in Kursk, 1.5mln Soviets vs 1.4 mln Germans in Rzhev. Also you don't quite understand that Japan was not able to help Germany. There is literally nothing in Siberia but it will consume 2 million army to secure 6000km railways from guerilla warfare. Also China could take initiative if Japan would stretch themself too wide. Chinese communists got weapons and trainings from USSR and they became real threat to Japanese occupation forces, so in 1941 Japan considered that they won't attack USSR because they CAN'T. War with USA was their last attempt to secure some resourses because their supplies were getting low. Japan's sutuation was desperate in 1941. That's why they wanted to finish it fast and attacked Pearl-Harbor. For Germany situation was quite different. They lost Romanian resourses only in 1944. Germany tried to capture Soviet food-production fields and oil. Hitler knew that if they won't succeed USSR will simply grind them with infinite manpower and resourses. And yeah, it happened. USA's help was usefull for USSR, but look: USA wasn't able to liberate Europe without USSR's help. But USSR could do this even if they would suffer greater losses. Imagine that USA would have to attack from a sea on 7mln German army instead of 300k. Absolutely impossible. So yes, defeating Germany is made by USSR by 80%

@@kystars With all the respect mate, it seems like you've studied American movies about WW2 but not the subject itself.

Sorry, I don't want to be a noodge but I'm a history professor and kind of feel obligated to say this: I get a bit frustrated when I see people characterize history teaching in the US this way. It's not that you're entirely wrong. There's an American perspective that's present in our history teaching ... But that's only up to the end of high school and it's primarily in WHAT parts of history get taught up to that level, but not really how ... (Exception: states like Texas which include actual propaganda in their required curriculum.) But you know ... That's all normal. Every country teaches the history they think their students most need to be an effective citizen, especially in democracies After all, your voters should know what they're doing, ideally! What's different in the US is that the wider culture is (1) not especially intellectual and curious, and (2) VERY focused on the USA and uninterested in the rest of the world. So when you try to watch history documentaries as an adult in the USA, there's LOTS on WWII, especially the Western front and the Pacific War against Japan, and not so much on wars the US lost or is otherwise not proud of - and very little on world events that don't affect the US. Sorry. I kno it's an irritating correction on my part. I just feel obligated to defend history teachers. They are underpaid and unfairly take the blame for so much American ignorance. Half of their time is spent trying to get the students interested. I totally agree with your assessment of this film, however. And it's especially powerful because it's a German film from just after German reunification when that nation was doing lots of introspection about its dark past. There are other German films from this period which show a similar national mood. I'm sure you know Das Boot.

Hollywood has a few that are accurate to combat

Even the ones made by Spielberg and Tom Hanks?

@The governor What r u talking about? At least in Spielberg's movies you can see the allies committing war crimes as well

@The governor USA and Russia and Britain, Canada, Australian, Free French, Polish are all heroes. The movie is told from the American point of view, there's no reason to bring up Russia. Everyone loves to use the "this many Russians died" as why they singlehandedly won the war but that was due to their own incompetence. Same thing with the more Germans were stationed on the Eastern front it was easier to defend the western front due to the geography, D-Day wasn't a give in and neither was crawling up the mountainous Italian peninsula. Defending the entire Russian front requires a lot of resources, resources the Russian ended up having.

@The governor alone🤪🤪🤣🤣🤣

Еще есть Берлин в котором положили совдеповские руководители немало своих бойцов в жертву к 1 мая.

@@lgorbabich9284 а ты по ходу и историк и военный стратег в одном лице

@@lgorbabich9284 вообщем красный "мясник" обделался по полной! как говорил: бабы еще мясо нарожают... кто мясо гулага считал там...

@@pa3bathehuejionat560 историю поучи по документам, а не по своей фантазии.

@@lgorbabich9284Берлинская операция:безвозвратные потери германии и союзников(включая фольксштум, гитлерюгенд и т. д) около 500т. РККА 81т. и 2,5т.поляков. Но история не твой конек, так серануть себе в штаны и улыбаться что все ок.

Aye, a great trailer worthy of the film.

Haha facts bruh.. I went and I talk to my friends about stalingrad.. the og name.

Hmm well.. each year on 8th 9th and 10th of May Volgograd is being renamed back to Stalingrad for symbolic purposes. So technically you still can visit Stalingrad sometime. Strongly advise to do it though. Victory spirit on the 9th of May is special there. It is hugely celebrated.

@@invgvrbo3051 My geography teacher once told us to name citys beginning with S and i said Stalingrad and he told me that is wrong because the city is now named different. Today, 20 years later i find out i was right! Damn now i am pissed.

@@jx4219 well this initiative is a newborn one, it was presented to a wide audience and then put into operation in 2010 or so. So your teacher was right back then. Though if you had this argument not 20 years ago but at least 5, you could kick his ass mentally lol

@@Eruptor1000 Technically the OG name is Tsaritsyn. Stalin fought the Russian civil war there in 1918.

Mongols did it :)

Why? On other fronts, they beat these generals for 4 years. Because the real Russian generals sat behind their own lines, partied, drank vodka and raped their own girls. And the officers who stood up for the girls shot dead as traitors. That is why the real Russian generals were called butchers by their own people.

@@AS-pb6sw it’s the three winter months in Russia for a reason…because there military generals were crap. Winter is the only thing they had going for them.

@@TheHuscarl101 Plus a pretty large pool of men to draft to the army. You think the german ones weren't crap? A good percentage of them were. As per usual the highest positions were given to those who were kissing Hitler's ass, not to those who were capable.

@@rsimko Poland did it in XVII century. Just check it.

FEGELEIN FEGELEIN FEGELEIN !!!!

Ja

Fegeleeeeein!)))

We found him!

Real Name of the Actor is "Thomas Kretschmann"

1. Come and see. (1985)

Fortess Brest was a garbage for me, it was pretty broing and was looking like every russian war movie ever made, also its stupid that in movie there were russian citizens in the city, Brest was in poland back then

"Свои" (2008) Дмитрия Месхиева

Most russian movies are bad

@@Sven-ql3ch Brest had soviet garrison and civilians since it became territory of USSR

John, absolutely agree. Have you seen ""Unknown soldier"? Its a movie from Finland about winter war. And no doubt outstanding russian movie "Hot snow". If we see movies about war from one and another sides, it makes our mind out of walls(imho). Greetings from Russia

Ivan

And Downfall...

And das boot

And "Our Fathers Our Mothers"

And the Lego movie

And 'Geile Omas 4'

We should be learning life lessons from people like your grandfather, not from sports players and idiot politicians.

Sounds too "fantastic" to be true...

@the simpson cz if it wasent multiple inches thick, then i dont belive it

@the simpson cz well if you do not care why post it on youtube ?

@the simpson cz also just out of interest how thick was the metal plate

Where can I find this movie with English subtitles?

The ending is so sad

@@setharnold3699 You can still buy a dubbed version-although it is a little distracting in places. You can usually pick these up in CEX stores. Hope this helps.

@@gmartinz01 I'll never condone crimes committed by The Third Reich but no army should be allowed to fight in such appalling conditions

@@jasonmussett2129 well hitler was pumped on meth and other drugs by his physician so he felt invincible and that extended to his army in his head. Everyone could have saved so many lives if german top brass just killed hitler themselves a year before the end of the war maybe.

"Go and see" by E Klimov the best

​@@MrBurtur Also known as "Come and See". Definitely a must see.

Better being always the german officer then always Rey from star wars!

In Stalingrad 2013, he seems to have saved this movie (but he didn't because this move is crap). He had the most realistic movement, and of course he played great

😂😂

its from 1993 bro

@@peterhurst4717 i know lol

Saving private ryan was comedy xDDD saving 1 fucking guy bcs of rdm mother

@@rengarrsesh9524 It starts really well but slowly gets progressively more and more dodgy. And the sniper seemed way too accurate all throughout IMO... Band of Brothers though, which was derived from Private Ryan, is awesome

@@zxbzxbzxb1 Yeah, Saving Private Ryan was known for doing an incredible job with reenacting the combat at Omaha Beach, but the rest of the film is alright at best. Jumping on a tracked motorcycle (Kettenkrad) to go play mouse & cat with a German tank so that it would go down a specific street in a city where they would plant sticky bombs was... a bit far fetched. Or the wall that falls down and the Americans & Germans have an old West showdown...

@mex10yo no está en Netflix ni Amazon yo la compre en DVD a la antigua 🤣

Come on. Sure the treaty of Versailles was a step in the direction of WW2 but only one step of many steps. The Hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic together with the Great Depression did also thier part amongst other reasons.

@@gerhardswihla1099 The occupation of the Ruhrgebiet by our Belgian troops (being the cronies of leading France) to enforce the impossible conditions of that Treaty in 1922 was a major factor that lead to an acceleration of money creation and hyperinflation in 1923. Humiliation was added to starvation. BTW: The 'Clemenceau' is still a French navy vessel and the EU Treaty of Maastricht was hailed in the French press as "Versailles without War" because it allows for a transfer of German money to France via the ECB ...

@@gerhardswihla1099 Wie geschrieben: Die Besatzung des Ruhrgebiets durch unsere belgischen Truppen, "selbstverständlich" Seite an Seite mit den französischen, hat wesentlich dazu beigetragen, die deutsche Bevölkerung zu erniedrigen und vollends in die Verzweiflung zu treiben. Es ist eine Schande, dass die Franzosen einem ihrer Kriegsschiffe den Namen Clemenceau verpasst haben. Nordeuropäische Steuerzahler zahlen übrigens jetzt die französischen Gläubiger der südländischen Schwarzarbeiter-Frührentner. In der BRD wird der ör internationalsozialistische Grünfunk sehr geschickt eingesetzt.

@@vanbrabant6791 Ich gebe ihnen recht, dass die Besetzung des wirtschaftlich starken Ruhrgebietes Deutschland in Bedrängnis brachte und auch beschämte. Hinzu kamen noch die Reden von Woodrow Wilson, die Hoffnung auf einen milderen Friedensschluss machten. Das Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Völker wurde jedoch den Deutschen und deutsch Österreichern zum Gutteil verweigert. Um einen Waffenstillstand 1918 zu erreichen musste Deutschland etliche Waffen an die Siegermächte abgeben. Es war also kein einfacher Waffenstillstand. Der polnische Korridor, mit seinen Abgaben an Polen für die Verbindungsrechte nach Ostpreußen, verursachte zusammen mit dem Einschreiten polnischer Milizen in Südschlesien und dem passiven Schutz französischer Truppen gegen das Einschreiten der Reichswehr gegen diese Milizen, auch Spannungen mit Polen. Was gerne auch übergangen wird, ist das beim Friedensvertrag von Versailles, Deutschland nicht beteiligt war und somit auch keine Argumente vorbringen konnte und die britische Flotte weiterhin Deutschland bis zum Friedensschluss 1919 blockierte und nicht mal Lieferungen dringend benötigter Lebensmittel zuließ. Es war ein reiner Diktatfrieden. Was ihre restlichen Ausführungen betrifft kann ich ihnen nicht ganz folgen und bin mir überhaupt nicht sicher ob ich dem auch zustimmen kann.

@@gerhardswihla1099 Bzgl. Polen habe ich noch etwas hinzugelernt. Meine letzte Bemerkung hatte ich nur hinzugefügt um anzudeuten, dass die allgemeine Ausbeutungsmentalität, die bei Clemenceau zum Ausdruck kam, sich besonders auf französischer Seite noch nicht geändert hat. All zu EU-leichtgläubige BRD-Bürger sollten hinsichtlich des Geldtransfers lesen (RU-vid hören) was der frühere IFO-Leiter Hans-Werner Sinn dazu schreibt bzw. sagt. Grüße aus Flandern.

Very lucky dude

what are the other 4? I need some to watch.

@@SK8SURFEAT Das Boot (pretty much any version you want to watch), Saving Private Ryan, Schindler's List, Sophie Scholl. But I could name 5 others equally as good. One that is always left out of discussions, which I found fascinating - although it comes across as a one set play, is "Conspiracy," about the Wannsee conference.

@@martinzaehringer1697 thanks for the movies, Ill watch them all

Cd was already there, so you could play it on cd

you are rerry crever

@@thespitefuldodger #RacismForLife

mozart requiem

Film name is Stalingrad?

@@emindemirov3177 Yes

a tragedy? i find it wonderful that Nazi germany lost WW2. the loss of human life is, of course, the tragedy.

@@bast1an975 you just answered your own statement. I think my comment is pretty self explanatory

@@bast1an975 dont get political here under a movie about the bloodiest battle ever of all human history.

@@Number-py1bs what’s political about enjoying the nazis lose? Unless you wanted them to win ? Lmao

Going for pointless cities instead of the oil Germany desperately needed was Paulus's decision and NOT what Hitler ordered him to do. Open a history book, man.

To my surprise, this movie had no 'real' world wide release, it was only shown in New York City, and a few European countries.

Political correctness. It’s wasn’t good politics to show the human side of the German army.

@@georgiamule Or maybe downer foreign language movies don't play too well outside art-house circles.

Most war movies Who Dare to show That germans Soldiers are also Humans Are banned from American Cinemas I suspect that this is Against the whole We are saints so we are the heros Propaganda. I don't know for sure but that's the only reason I can think of Because Some Americans even asked why they never heard anything about some movies like this

@@colshotlp9692 The Japanese are also people, and as I understand it, there are a lot of films about how civilians died when a nuclear bomb exploded in Hiroshima and Mnogosaki. Or how the Japanese violently destroyed the Pearl Harbor base.