Russian KV-1 Tanks vs German Panzers - Tankers Clip HD - WWII Action Movie 

North of Main Better, and free of charge, to simply access the RU-vid posting, here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LHJMapNHXAI.html

tank you very much

I HATE CABBAGE Don’t munch on it ☺️

Dude, why didn't you make it for South Africa? I can't watch it cuz you didn't allow it to my country. 😞

I can't watch the movie cuz you didn't allow it for it to be watched by people in SA

exactly what im thinking I SEARCHED FOR THAT COMMENT

Trapný

@@milancurda8753 není, je to pravda... Ty tanky nemají tolik místa

Tank KV-1! Super!

They could put a table inside and then sit around playing cards.

3 rd point😂😂😂😂

Underrated

Ruslan , You have forgotten the fourth thing - unbeatable stupidity of your mind.

Unfortunately, the Good Indian guy is unbeatable only in the movies! 🤪

@@billwhelpley6825 those are not tiger mockups, they are Panzer 4s with the late war modifications against AT explosives. If Im not mistaken versions H and J had those.

It's like in fury with Bratt pitt😂

T-34 85 was Help The KV-1

@@user-dx8en9bc6l Nah, this is even worst.

@@user-dx8en9bc6lFury has a stabilizer, Tiger killed 3 tanks

@@OH-SIX-SPIT The tiger wouldve destroyed every tank if it wasnt plot armor

Ah a man of class

😐

totally no russian bias going on here

@@yousaywhat3363 like Fr how is that Kv 1 doing a 3v1

​@@yousaywhat3363 Bro the KV during ww2 had insane storys ☠️

prefer a movie biased to the russians rather than to the germans to be fair :D

@@milckshakebeans8356 id watch a german one rather than russian

@@milckshakebeans8356 they were both mass-murderin war machine governments, just different flavors

@@johnnyjohnson7022 you are right but i just wrote my comment as a joke. And if u compare by the ideology, than the nazi one is much more cancerus than the comminist ideology. Comparing stalin and hitler is a differnt topic, but we can agree both were extremely evil.

what radio? teh soviet tanks lacked radios..

I see you haven't played war thunder yet. 😌

Да братука 😂😂😂

@@thelastdaygamer8702 кв 1 Сильные 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

@@greenscreen1248 Да, товарищ, да

Slap a turbo charger and suspetion on the fucker, smooth ride and prem consumables

You forgot this is the type of WWII movie representing about their "great" allies with weak Germans running around without strategy and tactics

Yes, even if kv1 did not have a guidance system, he would have won at a distance, his gun penetrates t3, but the Germans do not have this

This film is russian fairytale. It has nothing from a real actions

Fury russian edition

@@ripandteartillthelast keep crying,the panzer 4 armor is thin and can be pen by any soviet tanks.

No wonder those dipshits lost the war

@@lasselippert3892 yeah , german tank is strong and powerful but still defeated by their own stupidity and greediness

@@lasselippert3892 It's a movie, not a documentary.

[WR] Pilot Exactly. Which is what makes all the comment section wehraboos sound so ridiculous.

German tank has high quality but allies tank has high quantity

@Lịch sử Đường sắt Vlog Fury has a multitude of problems, but we will not get into that.

Yeah, right away I thought no way would they be bunched up like that. They would spread out wide.

Russian movies are not for sense or story, Russian movies are all for loving mother Russia and proud of handmade history no matter what. Don't look for a logic there.

And missing a stationary target or direct hits bouncing off like small arms fire.

@@LastZeel ok if you look at any war movie, or even just a movie. Russians fighting against Americans or anyone else, who’s gonna win? Russians. In American movies who’s gonna win against another? Americans. The list goes on. Everyone wants to prove they’re better than the other

Panzer IVs only had 75 mm guns (short then long). The 37 mm was on Panzer IIIs (which then got the 50 mm and then the long 50 mm which finally could do damage)

This is based off a real tank battle, however the KV-1 fought PZ2 and PZ38s. Not sure if PZ3s were there but I dont think so.

LOL

Yeah... good joke

I was in a decommissioned sherman tank when I like 12 there was enough room for me and 2 more children if none of us had a big lunch.

In Russia, they laugh at modern Russian films about the war. They are all saturated with falseness according to the rules of Hollywood, the lack of logic, the ridiculous tantrums of the heroes and inappropriate religion, but real history in the society of the prevailing scientific approach and atheism. All this is nonsense and lies about the real war that the USSR and the Soviet people waged against Hitler, who was armed with the money of the capitalists, and who was supposed to destroy the state of workers and peasants, which prevented the rich from exploiters from all over the world. In Russia, they love films about the war made in the 60s and 80s, during the Soviet era, they were honest about people, albeit weak in terms of effects.

That tanks there are no even panzer

You are a foreigner and you don’t know that in KV 1 it’s uncomfortable and all the more so in a place. Most of the place is occupied by the reservation of the tank. This is the biggest mistake in our tanks, and yes I am from Russia

@@mejlokbshoptax577 Apparently you guys don't have sarcasm in Russia either.

Looks so real totally not like they put a cardboard cover over a car

@@mejlokbshoptax577 all russian ww 2 tanks are uncomfortable

@@mejlokbshoptax577 My goodness, it's sarcasm calm down.

KV-1's Gun = Death Star

Recoil:off

@@daubeny7386 I think not

@@darthsidious6167 oh... HELLO THERE Emperor Palpatine i reallllllllly dont know of any death star and i LOVE the Empire and i even want to be a Stormtrooper.....ok ?

@@washyourhands2359 What are you talking about? Proton cannon has no recoil.

Sounds like Fury to me

And even better is that panzer crews were trained to stop and fire, being instructed that firing on the move was nothing more than a waste of ammunition

and on top of that, they had to close in when the long barrel 75mm L48 can take on that KV at those ranges..

Never shoot while moving. War thunder has taught me this much about tanks.

This movie is fraude...

Yeah, like Fury's any better.

@@reven06 The Germans in Fury and this film are concistent... lets drive towards them!

@@Lazarenko93 there is a tactic called blitzkrieg

@@wanderingman50 You really need to do some reading/research if you call this blitzkrieg...

@@Lazarenko93 I never did say the tactics on this movie was blitzkrieg I just said there was a tactic called blitzkrieg and basically what the panzers was trying to do was rush the tank and out flank it.

Whaaat? I didn’t think it was so bad.

You know that teh scenes were pretty real compared to other ww2 movies, both of em

the tiger scene were the fakes, no tiger would charge forward, the tanks could hit the tiger into the driver area, both literally gave up their advantages.

@@paknamchan664 and Fury has a 76mm wich could already kill the Tiger!!!!!!!!!! Odd huh?

@@MaliqIbrahim-1306 and the Tiger were suppose the hit the first tank of the tank squad not the last tank, that's how WWII Nazi Germany tactics works for tank battles, Fury have a very heavy plot armor for sure lmao

and the amount of propaganda that was, convenient that most of the crew and their relatives "disappeared"

Wrong translation, they're just armor piercing and high explosive shells

Very bad subtitles

It is not KV-1 tank it is modifated T-34/85

@@urbangng496 depending on the suspension,it seems like it's a modified IS or IS-2

@@Kriegloaf I'm not seeing what you are. Where does the tank look like an is1 or is2?. I see a kv1 chassis and turret.

I mean this is pretty much how it went when German tanks met KV's and T-34's in 1941. They got completely rolled over when ever they had actual meeting engagements, with panzers being unable to penetrate Russian armor from as little as 10 meters away in some cases.

@@pxatm Yeah but German tanker knew how to aim at least...

@@bonkedwoofy4240 and not just drive towards the enemy like a Headless Chicken.

@Ok Ok the 76mm gun on the T-34 was more powerful than anything mounted on German armor at the start of Barbarossa, the Panzer III would remain the most common tank in German service for the entire war. German armor on a technical level never outperformed its competition, exceptional gains were made by the German armor corps through strategic level decisions and widespread adoption of radio, but from the first weeks in France to the last days in Germany, German tanks faced better guns, armor and engines everywhere they looked.

@@nwomaimun821 don't need to read past your first line to know that you're a nazi and here to bad faith argue. German tanks were garbage, you get your tank knowledge from Mein Kampf? Don't reply, I know your type is willing to lie since this is directly attached to your world view so no evidence would actually be worth saying.

Rng

No i think they are hacker but the hacker 5 years old

It's from the Russians Germany was way much better..

@@felixb840 they wouldn't have shot on the move

Maybe a russian film 👎🏼

i mean they were moving and german tanks didnt have stabilizers so everything is possibe

Ber Bo they are firing on the move like bellends

@@stealthcone yea thats what i said too its weird that people dont notice that stuff instantly

@@user-cm7uo3yc8z I mean if they hit the hull the shot would be an easy penetration since 75mm guns could easily go in the 90mm hull

@@user-cm7uo3yc8z that 7,5cm kwk 40 is strong enough on that distance againts KV series armours, but again, they are shooting on the move so that could be an issue.

🤣🤣🤣 yes. And the Germans were blind.

LMAO!!

@@StephanO.-qy6ny nah they are just moving without stabilizers

Try KV2

yes, due to budget cuts, they only showed you this. We never saw it's cellar, bedrooms and kitchen.

Орк Ур-Шак By 1942 the Tiger had come out and ruined that armour record. And the next year in 1943, the Panther, Ferdinand and Brummbar existed. The Pak 40 could also penetrate it.

@Орк Ур-Шак Not true, the KwK 40 L/48 of those Panzer IV could pierce it at 700m

They're sloped like hell. The Panzers kept hitting the turret's head and side areas, which could easily deflect those 76mm rounds. If it was a Tiger II round, then it would most likely penetrate it. A T-34's opticals were less advanced compared to the Panzer IV's, but its sloped armour is strong enough to deflect a 76mm AP round from the Panzer IV

Yeah but these are panzer 4s we talking bout the could go through that armour like a hot knife through butter

@@deVeresd.Kfz.1515 All I'm saying is that this Russian tank is obviously equipped with the rare but highly effective unexplodium armor plating.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-b9FunEkhTNo.html ,.,..

Ya only that part apparently

Gets shot more then enough with no damage at all and even when it misses it still damages enemy tanks, idk but I think they were pressured that the Russians must win

@@kons37flyingreaperoldchann21 This actually happened but in 1941 (on that day 5 KV-1 tanks took out 43 panzers) so the T-34/85 and Pz IV ausf. H tanks are completely out of place (and out of time) and the only tank this scene got (mostly) right is the KV :D It faced mostly early Pz.IV (with short gun) and Pz 35(t) tanks which really couldn't cause much damage to it. Here's a good informative video on this battle :) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UELuC69pszE.html

I guess they also got wrong the point where Germany loses the war.

They definitely get points off for not following established doctrine for either attacking or defending.

And also let's just blindly fire at the KV. It's not like all 3 of us would miss hitting a tank that is standing still right?

actually the stupid thing on this scene is, an tank never takes shots while he is driving because it make the shots incredibly inaccurate, because your turret is wiggling and aiming is very difficult for your tank-crew.

Low on Pervetin.🤣

Panzer 4 is flat

Tank looks like a empty box from the inside..

@@Mirda-bg3pi yea lol

They don't show scale - each tanker was probably only 5 foot 2 !

Ja

it was really like that. the kv 1 was the most spacious tank of ww2.

@@pepperminth8085 you fucking okay? Hes not even talking anything related to the Nazis

@@pepperminth8085 dude check what you are writing here

@@pepperminth8085 please tell me this is a joke, are you fucking insane???

@@pepperminth8085 lol what the dog doin

shut up usa kid en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinoviy_Kolobanov

Meanwhile in reality from captured German ww2 letters telling how the Soviets always attacked with 50 tanks and even a single 88mm could take all of them out

ty chyba historii nie rozumiesz cymbale jak walczyli na 2 fronty i nie mieli zasobów to co się dziwić

@@synek702 please use world wide understandable language. Thank you.

@@mrki412 use Google translate. Polska mova ничем не хуже английской.

@@user-zj7fv8my8t for that bot languages? No way, TY.

​@@user-zj7fv8my8t Польская мова нафиг никому не нужна в России особо, как и любая другая славянская. Да она и сложная такая, что просто ппц. Даже мой брат-полукровка и то бросил идею польский выучить.

А Т 34-85 вас не смутили? По фильму лето 1942 года))

Good mocks ups, way better than the old movies where tigers where pattons and p4s were chaffees lol

Son panzer 3

They look really good tho

No this t44

Right those Tigers are monsters

@@zeparthe16thspiritofarsgoe15 Those are Panzer 4s

@@zeparthe16thspiritofarsgoe15 that KV-1 gun could slice through a Panzer 4 armour easily, and a Tiger 1's armour from the front if the tiger wasnt angled like the KV-1 is in the video

Is-7

@@user-pu4eh2su1i ?

- how is that? - i have read a screenplay

That's just what you think, maybe the panzers couldn't penetrate it at long range? This was a tactic often used against heavily armoured enemies

Ozjasz Goldberg That’s where the kicking comes in. You exit your tank, enter your teammates tank and kick him in the head with 45 N exactly. Now he’ll know to say roger the next time you repeat this process and command him to fire.

I was about to mention that. Didn't the commanding tank use red flags?

@@Mr_Fancypants depends what time period this movie takes place. For example, if it were in 1941, then the Russian tankers would be using the flags. Because they don't have radios in their tanks yet. But If this movie takes place between 1943-44, then, yes, they uses radios.

@@gmwpphs1899 during the time of my military service from 1983 through 2014, most American combat vehicles had three flags (Green, Red, Yellow) to use during times of Radio silence, or if our radios malfunctioned. Keeping modern (1980's) radios such as the VRC 46 all up on a platoon/Company radio net was difficult. Even the SINGARS and other "ultra" modern radios up was not easy in Afghanistan, Iraq, or even in Training! More than once, we would perform a "commo check" in the motor pool, everybody would be up... We would drive the short distance to the ECP (Entry Control Point) of the FOB (Forward Operating Base) and one of the vehicles would have dropped off the net! Not to mention failures while we were on a Mission! That was a significant improvement from the 1980's! Now, imagine all the troubles with vacuum Tube AM Radios of the 1930's & 1940's! Russian Company, and Battalion Command Tanks had Radios, Platoon Leaders only had Receivers! Weirdly, a higher percentage of Pre-war Russian tanks had radios! ALL German tanks had radios.

Mid 1944 / 45 they could have

@@matztertaler2777 well since there's t-34-85 it's probably around 1944. They have radios on their tanks back then. The soviet isnt exactly lacking radio. But more like lacking reliable radios

You would think that with a half-baked knowledge of history.

@@cyka7705 that’s partially true, I didn’t recognise that these were t 34 85, anyway the soviets started to equip their tanks with radios in 1944, but only the new ones and very few of the old ones, so all of their tanks wouldn’t have radios, and also they broke very frequently, so it was nearly impossible to have a platoon of tanks all equipped with radios.

Me + your Comment + 68 like + I'm a man of culture = You have 69 like

**waves Flag to pay respects to panzers**

Beautiful like a lada!

yeah most did not have radio sets early on and even mid way through the war

it's around 1944 tho, there're T-34-85s with S-53 gun in the film

@@namduong6051 This is not a documentary, but since the film about Semyon Konovalov should be 1942.

Yeah the russians didn't have radio in the tanks in 1941. They actually communicated using flags. Now, how easy do you think it was so see the flags during combat with all the smoke from the engine and gun? He-he. The russians had a lot of losses in 1941-1942.

You mean for Russians? Because radio was existend in every German tank

World of tanks

3000 dmg wat? Even my IS Won’t do that much in a match lol

Lmao 3k dmg?

Don't forget: We did it! We won!

Actually, The ZiS-5 gun has less destructive performance if you compare this to HwK40 gun that mounted on Panzer IV H, and HwK 40 gun that can penetrate up to 176mm. at 100m. can easily penetrate KV1 turret armor as it thick for only 90mm. destroying turret ring and injure crew member or worse trigger the ammunition rag and shit everything up.

Wasn't the Panzer actually not yet the uber-tank realized ? Thought that didn't happen 'Till The Tiger 1 &Also, I believe the 2 was even tougher than that !

"Only Imperial Stormtroopers Are So Precise"

To be fair, they didnt have stabilizers and were shooting while moving on uneven field so yeah they wouldve missed a lot actually

You could call them SturmPanzerd

@@monarch4417 lol

@@_ZERO there are is such thing as an excuse for missing a shot -master oogway of tonks

best comment underrated

Wrong translation, in Russian they said High-Explosive and Armor-Piercing. Not HEAT and Sabot.

@@sting2death2 and HEAT shells are only for tank destroyer at that time

@@randomguyontheinternet6885 HEAT shells were developed for a number of guns and tanks, but they were very rare.

Hahaha my thoughts, underrated

Maybe in reverse.

You forgot the bedrooms for each person

Eh, these tropes are more common than not with most WW2 related movies.

The ap shells of the panzers were apcbc-he-t, they died have3 some explosive, albeit very little

From what I understood, I agree with what you say, but still the amount of explosion in an AP shell isn’t very much and not nearly as much as this movie showed

@@stopmotionwarehouse8986 yea dont mind the typos

Yeah, it’s ok, English is hard. Where are you from?

Propaganda at it’s finest

Ozy yep allied propaganda

Why the hell did they approached at all? I don't think a 75 mm can pen a KV-1 frontally.

Russian tanks is a best! 😊

@@carlphilipedmundbertil625 not even close

Thats true... Tank crews always wrote letters...during fight or when they wounded...or still dying... LOL

Is there a video n link available about that tank??

I love Soviet fake letters of propaganda XD

@@kamilnowak7015 не понял

@@user-sd9dl5hp6n реально

its a movie, not some PhD mandata

you can see they tried to aim at the drivers cupola and the mg mantlet where the armour is thinner, may they actually hit it?

Thanks dude

IIRC, the movie is set in 1941, so the Germans would not have long 75 PZIVs anyway (or the Soviets T34/85s for that matter).

@@user-mo7dd1vt1s It is biased

Simple history?

Clever 😂

Hahaha comrade

Burn!! 😂

How funny can you get!

U got the whole battalion laughing.

Russian tanks were destroyed by the Germans. Stupid unrealistic clip.

@Christopher Fischetti indeed. And the Russians missed while the Germans produced hit after hit.

@Christopher Fischetti i totally agree, the supply lines were to long. Nevertheless a big mistake of the Germans to fight at two fronts. The Russians had a non ending supply of troops, equipment and others. War is stupid, nobody wins, everyboby loses.

tolik lisiy Stalin wanted to buy time and stay on the defensive as to not show signs of agression to the Nazis. Hitler had to invade the USSR, destroying communism and exterminating the Slavs was a part of mein kampf and of the fascist ideology.

@@you4love2me a film maker.. 😉

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-WbEDoNzBuOQ.html Сейчас. Я не хочу идти за немецкой , американской техникой. Хочу остаться дома. Мир.

@@dynamomachine2782 Тоді тобі прийдеться піти за "русскім міром". На Соловки!

На самом то деле вина лежала не на качестве и мощности танков, а на организации. Неопытность танкистов и командиров, нехватка топлива и бронебойных снарядов и не организованность общего ведения боя советских войск сыграли решающую роль в итоге сражения. И да, противник потерял не 85, а 300 танков, 85 - безвозвратно, а 215 находились на глубоком ремонте. Большинство советских танков были просто брошены в исправном состоянии без топлива и остались на оккупированной территории без возможности эвакуации.

The battle between Panzer Group 1 and the Soviet mechanized corps was the fiercest of the whole invasion, lasting four full days. The Soviets fought furiously, and crews of German tank and anti-tank guns found to their horror that the new Soviet T-34 tanks were almost immune to their weapons. The new KV-1 and KV-2 heavy tanks were impervious to virtually all German anti-tank weapons, but the Red Army's logistics had completely broken down due to Luftwaffe attacks. The German Kampfgeschwader bomber wings, namely KG 51, KG 54, and KG 55, contributed a series of heavy low-level attacks against Soviet ground targets. The headquarters of the Soviet 15th Mechanised Corps was destroyed, and its commander, General-Major Ignat Karpezo, was wounded. The Luftwaffe destroyed some 201 Soviet tanks in this area.[28] The five Red Army corps were mishandled while being concentrated into large powerful groups. The German troops sought to isolate individual units and destroy them. Meanwhile, the Luftwaffe ranging over the battlefields was able to separate the supporting infantry and deny them resupply of fuel and ammunition.[29] Ultimately due to lack of adequate planning and overall coordination, the Soviet counter-attack failed to meet at Dubno.

@@user-ko1ji2mn6w А вот что пишет московсая ВИКИ - Безвозвратные потери в 1-й танковой группе вермахта к 5 июля 1941 года - 85 танков Так что не надо ВРАТЬ!

i think it's the director of the movie Fury, not Stalingrad

Absolute garbage director. His father (Bondarchuk) was a legend in Soviet cinema but unfortunately the son makes absolute garbage movies. Most modern Russian movies are total crap. Soviet movies are where it's at all day every day

Even if they would, german panzer had better guns, better sights even more preper crew. Totally unimpressive.

@@andresdubon2608 Yep Russian tanks were made to run for about 1 battle. Just goes to show the ideology of quality vs quantity.

agree, german tankers use ambush tactical or long range attack most of the time, this is just dumb

@@andresdubon2608 you got it have right. You said that the German panzer 4 have better gun than the KV-1. Actually, KV-1 is armed with a 76mm gun, while the panzer 4 is equipped with a 75mm.

@@gmwpphs1899 I'm not just talking about the power, there is accuracy, resilience, general quality. And just for you, yes. Germans did gott you on the power side as well. Remember me the most powerful/effective tank gun of mid 1941- 1942. Oh, yeah. 88mm of the panzerkampfwagen VI.

Can you stop having sex?

Those are the guns that were fitted to Panzer 4 specifically to deal with KV-1 and T-34

@@armchairgeneralissimo Little did the Germans know what KV-1 armor is made out of stalinium

@@BobuxGuy 75mm Panzer IV H variants can even kill a T-72. Yes Stalinium isn't match against Panzer IV Hs

@@timothyjonathan1599 penetrate a t72 from where? It's roof?

APFSDS!

Кв 1

Thats a Thin looking KV-1 But *damn* those are some thicc Panzers

@@Gabriel-he6ih Ignore everything i put down before... The KV driver was center hull. It might be an IS with a removed turret like the T-54/PZ3... But it could actually be a real KV-1 with maybe a fake turret. Edit: Actually it is a turretless IS-1, because the driver is in the middle!

American-like fire commands and modern ammo selections. Still, fun to watch. (I try not to overthink these kind of movies)

Facts

I honestly thought those are Tiger tanks, which made the movie all the more ridiculous.

Pretty sure they're in the KV-1E. A KV-1 modded with thicker bolted armor.

Aye this guy plays warthunder/world of tanks and now he's a historian!

What year is this supposed to happen. T-34-85 operating with a kv-1. Seems mighty unlikely.

Uhm those T-34-85s are a sign ww2 was drawing close already

@@Akeno0002 KV2's actually

@@muki2259 Nope, they were T-34-85s medium tanks and a single KV-1 heavy tank.

@@Empirehog I tought genneraly, that KV2 tanks were the point of counter offensive, but you are right. We just didn't understand each other well

Lol but Kalabanov on kv1 kill more enemy tanks ! Learn History

Ads are getting smarter

@Adam Elektrik enerjisiコメント欄、返信等は殆ど観ません i don't speak chinesse!!!

ini film apa bro?

@@raxel436 T-34

Tier 5/6 match - in a nutshell.

They hit different for how unrealistic and dumb they are that KV-1 has more room then a family home😂

And german tank crews would of never rushed so stupidly and they would of penetraged that kv-1 in no time 😅

@@bonkey8235 KV-1 were easily penetrated by Panzer IV as we see in this scene. KV-1 were good against panzer II and III (version without 75mm long gun), but in this scene we have Panzer IV and Panzer III Ausf.G so it's a great mistake. Except for the T-34 in the mobility capacity, that was perfect for mud and swamp, Soviet tanks were not at the same levels of German Panzers, till JS.2, and this is history, no fiction! Russians last 15 years war-movies are the most unreallistic things ever created, see T-34, this one and lot of others.

They wouldn't,but in this fight,they were firing while movin',so no wonder they couldn't hit

@@redsoldier568 Tank crews are trained for hit target in every situation, even movin and expecially the germans, who were the master of tanks in the world during that time. This scene is completely inaccurate and irrealistic but not problem: russian war movies during the Putin Era are made for create such myths of Red Army against Wehrmacht, so I can understand this. Red Army had good points and excellence as snipers, spy, some single soldier weapons (PPSH > MP40), good artillery, rocket katiuscia...but in panzers they always were under the germans from the beginning till the end, except for the T-34 in late 1941 early 1942. One of the last soviet tanks (JS-2) was created for oppose the King Tiger but it was used in the last two-three months of war in 1945 and it was perfectly at the range of King Tiger, even if he had a 122mm gun, but the high-velocity AP 88mm of King Tiger were enough for penetrate the flank of the tanks making him useless...

@@michelegiampieri4237 Trainin',well,inaccuracy goes up greatly while moving,better training won't mean that there's a high chance to hit the target.I understand that Germans were the best tankers,but firing on the move,especially a medium tank,and a T-4 Heavy,not too sensible.The Putin thing,ofc,propaganda has gone to a new lvl now,it's more complex than before,ofc they r just puttin' propaganda in their films,understandable.Then,the IS-2 wasn't there ONLY in the last 2-3 months,it was there from before that late,and even tho 122mm shells didn't penetrate the Tiger's armor reliably,it displaced major parts,deformed and deshaped most of the armor,many crews would die,and the shell would often reach the ammo rack,and thus kill the Tiger;IS-2 could do this from 600m.And T-34s,oh god,can ppl just stop overrating this?I mean,ofc,T-34-mod.45 was the best medium tank of WWII,but in 1942,they OVERsimplified the design of the tank,which led to loss of many parts,this was worsened cuz workers weren't well trained,and the tanks were rushed into production,so these tanks often broke down VERY quickly.Moreover,the T-34 tank's commander couldn't do his job effectively,crew survivability was WAY too low,and Panzer IVs(When equipped with those long cannons) could pen the armor.Also,it wasn't INVULNERABLE,as many ppl say.Many destroyed T-34s from the Pz-III times,were from shots from the sides,Pz.IVs could pen the frontal armor,not that it was invulnerable anymore,armor's thickness and crampedness led to even HOWITZERS havin' good effects,altho Germans just used their long Pz.IV guns more,and overall,the T-34s did perform very badly in 1942.In 1941,the only place they did good was head on facing,from around a mile,where they could easily penetrate the Pz.IIIs with inferior pen and armor,other than that,very few places where the T-34s had actual trained crews,and/or had a good kill:loss ratio. But this scene,well,it seemed weird to me too,even with more tanks,and a newer T-4 heavy being on their side,Germans wouldn't act THIS dumb out of overconfidence,that they'd straight up just rush the KV-1 and fire,whereas they could just move a little outwards,and fire

It's possible one of them broke down. It happens. The reason they're moving towards the KV is that they had to get close to penetrate its armour, even when equipped with a KwK 40. KVs didn't have as much armour as a Tiger, but could still take a lot of hits. Although this was in 1942 and Panzer IVs weren't equipped with KwK 40s until later in the war. Grey was a common colour on German vehicles of every type at that time. The ones in Africa were painted tan to help camouflage them with the sand. Some were painted camo, but most were grey. The German troops and Officers wore grey uniforms. It made them harder to spot.

@@baddriversofmoosejaw8681 Bad Drivers of Moose Jaw the cannon I actually a kwk 40, a modified pak 40 to fit in the turret, also, the penetration of said gun could easily get through the kv1s armour as it has a penertating power of 97mm at 1000m. The kv1s armour is 90mm at the front, they were at a downwards angle, reducing the armour effectiveness, and thus could not of been over 90. The crew said 700m away, they were well within range of the panzers to destroy. The panzers would've stayed there for an ambush or flanked round, but not shot on the move. Even if it was the kv1e varient with added armour, it wouldn't of done anything as it only added armour on the sides of the turret. Send a Pzgr shell right through the 90m upper or lower plate, kaboom.

@@kimjongun7148 True, but I was also implying that the Panzer IVs used in this scene are wrong, since they weren't equipped with KwK 40s until later in the war, so if they used the designs that were used in 1942, this scene would be more accurate. Another thing wrong with this scene is that the T-34s are equipped with 85 mm guns and 3-man turrets. They never received those upgrades until 1944. They did that on Saving Private Ryan too. The 2 Tiger tanks at Ramelle were just T-34 85s with plywood attached and painted grey to make them look like Tigers. Another thing wrong with that scene was that the German division in that area didn't have any Tigers. They used Panzer IVs, so having 2 Panzer IVs like the ones in the video would've been accurate. That and the US Army only encountered 3 Tigers in the weeks after the breakout from Normandy. Most of the Tigers on the Normandy front were faced by the British and Canadian armies fighting north of the US Army and they too didn't encounter many, since the Germans didn't build many. Just over 1,400. Same thing as the KV. The Russians didn't build many and cancelled them after finding that an 85 mm gun could be fitted on the T-34. Also, the KV originally had the same 76 mm as the T-34, proving it was a waste to continue manufacturing them. Some KVs had howitzers, but still weren't many of them, although more than there were Tigers.

Because its typical infantile Russian propaganda

@@baddriversofmoosejaw8681 lol, I guess we are never gonna get a historically accurate movie. The closest I can think of is. Actually I don't know to be honest, but a historical film is probably gonna be boring, you have to throw in some Hollywood otherwise people won't be interested.