Star Wars™ Outlaws | DLSS 3.5 World Premiere 

NVIKEA

Can see no real difference between RTX on and off. Would rather turn it off and take the extra frame rate.

@@supamario3055 there is no off/on comparison of RTX raytracing in this video. Just ray reconstruction which is another feature ontop of RTX raytracing.

It's Wilber Roget II composer CoD WW2 and HELLDIVERS 2! FREEEEDOM!

Amen to that, 💯

I swear man, Ubisoft has had a great year with two Price of Persia games out and hopefully AC Shadows and Outlaws deliver on the quality front.

@@ajitjagdale6593 OK WOKIE

Oh I'm sure it'll still be the same old tired Ubisoft formula.

@@user-lz5vh9bb5w Ubi games are like junk food to me tbh, like I know it’s no fine dining but I still eat it up

Just like what that price is doing to my wallet

Amen to that, I'm wondering who the composer is Not sure if it's the same as Battlefront or Jedi Fallen order/Survivor composer?

@@_atinsy It's Wilbert Roget, who was another one of the composers for SWTOR (and later Vader Immortal).

7 out of 10 fo sure

star wars × zelda

big fan Mr. ACG

i GOT IT FREE WITH iNTEL cpu

@@sakibkhondaker If you wanna change it because upgrade nice, if u wanna change it because want a excuse to have the have it´s like pre order

@@sivorifrancisco5055 Actually i didn't even know. Almost dumped it. But finally noticed and acquired.

I'M TRYING!

i already pre ordered i'm a big fan of star wars

Old games were very limited in polycount, texture resolution, and materials. Materials being the difference between something reflective like metal and something matte like certain plastics. The further back you go, the more things look matte, whereas modern games have materials that are closer to real life but still held back by game engines and consumer hardware. Same thing with polygon counts and texture resolutions. Old games had really low polycounts and blurry textures. New games have almost movie level polycounts and high enough texture resolutions that you can actually read signs and newspapers in games now. So we're at the point where you can make something that looks 98% photoreal, but getting it to render in real time means you have to sacrifice certain details so players can run it smoothly. That can mean either a huge or subtle decrease in quality. Modern graphics improvements are really just about slowly adding in details that used to be present only in films but games are starting to be able to handle. Stuff like Aloy or Senua having vellus hairs on their faces. And then gradually making those things run better in real-time. Anything physics related still has quite a ways to go though. TL;DR: A rock in a 2005 game looked about 30% like a real rock. A rock in a 2024 game may look 98% like a real rock. So there isn't much to improve about that rock itself, but rather the engine, hardware, and effects that render that rock need to be improved before the rock can look 100% like a real rock.

Yes you are right. the next leap will be with AI and how we interact with it and VR

@@thewatcher7940Thank you! I was considering upgrading my RTX 970 and this explains the changes made in the past decade and will help me plan my rebuild/upgrade in the near future.

Man didn't mention nothing on how good it looks bc it's ubisoft had it been Naughty Dog u woulda been foaming at the mouth lmaoo

But it helps :)

$7.50 app on steam could do it but multi-billion dollar corpo giant chooses not to because Jensen needs more yachts :)

In-game setting is more convenient.

@@clem9808 Yeah but not all games or apps will have that option especially older ones and emulators. I have been using the 3rd party app on Steam called "Lossless Scaling" and it works great on the MAME emulator.

@@tcg2717 what? How does not enabling it driver wide makes them more money? Wouldn't it make more sense if it's the opposite? If there's an option for frame gen in the driver that can work with any game, that would increase people's interest in the 40-series cards. Most likely they haven't done it yet because a non-native implementation of frame gen tends to not look very good, especially with UI elements

@@ivandarmawan9372 I've tried the Steam app, and except for a few games, the UI looks just fine with FG, and their native upscaling is better than FSR, if one guy can do better, the big corp has no excuses.

Just save your money and you could definitely get one, one year ago I saved up money to build my first PC. Spent $5k on my build, I had no budget and went all out

@@WonderBread4020 Doesnt sound like you are the brightest dude... Spending 5k while next gen CPUs and GPUs are right around the corner. Your build will lose 50% value in just a few months.

Wait for 50s cards they will come in a half year

@@samirfa5300 who cares bro just let me enjoy gaming

@@ebgames5125 true, wait till they come out and get one, Imma get one and say fuck it.

Avatar was on the same engine as this and it ran very well. I'm sure the game will run and look good.

@@ajitjagdale6593 Snowdrop Engine is soooo good!

Yes, Jedi Survivor was open-zone mostly but this will actually be open world

woke bot detected

@@cesaru3619 you woke

@@dant1310 woke bot, next level console peasant

Still branching off 3.5 feature set until they come up with a 4.

Less bright light leakage from the exterior, more natural lighting from the interior. Ray reconstruction is an odd thing to show in a video. It's mostly about image clarity and the finer lighting details that get lost in video compression. Digital foundry may have better examples upon release.

On the LEFT screen; There's shimmering in the ceiling of the ship. Indicating unstable ray reflection image quality. The screen on the right has no shimmering.

minimal difference

@@machinefannatic99 now imagine a scene that's only reflective surfaces; there's been such scenes in even as recent as Jedi Survivor 2 ; and then add that shimmering effect ... which is now across most of your screen; not so nice now right? This solves that.

You'll notice better fps while playing. If you're a console or AMD guy, lol....

Have you learned nothing from other space games? You're expecting way too much.

@gungaloscrungalo8925 what like star citizen and no man's sky? Seamless space travel is very possible

@@joshuaminke6629 I was thinking more Starfield or Lego Skywalker Saga. This is Ubisoft we're talking about here. You really think they'll go that far?

@@gungaloscrungalo8925 I saw a gameplay video. Showed them taking off and getting to space with no loading screen. So who knows

@@joshuaminke6629 Star Citizen/No Man's Sky are space sims so its different, this is a SW game with a story focus first and the space flying is just tacked on to it

Passa ddu ué e instala limpo de novo, se continuar o problema volta para um driver anterior.

It's Ubisoft game, remember never pre-order.

150 for wokies

They forgot to inject it lol it's minor between them

thats just dumb Nvidia naming. DLSS 3.5 is Ray Reconstruction feature and DLSS 3.7 is the latest number for DLSS 2 upscaling. So actually this game is more advanced than Ragnarok cause this has Ray Reconstruction and will also have DLSS 3.7 upscaling

Hello

Don’t Know🫥

Wdym

cringe 💩🤡

frame rate would drop to 10 FPS with npcs

Ubisoft isn't better 😅

Thank GOODNESS it's Ubisoft instead of a greedy multibillion dollar company! 💀

@@supermario2044 Heyy aah MadadARiio0o0 I know your getting old so your not always hip with the new but you should go look at the preorder costs...

we will find out soon in a week

No you're just confused by Nvidia's dumb naming schemes. DLSS 3.5 is the Ray Reconstruction feature wheras DLSS 3.7 is the version number of DLSS 2 upscaling. Hopefully that makes sense.

@@ajitjagdale6593 lol who even comes up with these naming schemes at Nvidia?

@@lobstrosity6576 yup the naming is mega brain dead but I think once DLSS 4 launches it will unify all of this shit at once (hopefully)

Lol

Both are with RT ON. They're comparing the denoising.

⁠@@lobstrosity6576ah ok , wasn’t sure what they meant by ray construction … Nvidia release literally new feature every week and is hard to keep up 😂

@@wakingfromslumber9555 Lol true 😂😂 and their naming schemes are very confusing

Avatar was amazingly optimised and this is using the same engine so it should be good as well. As for buying it, I would recommend using Ubisoft+ on launch so you can play the whole game for like £18 with all the bonus content and then if you really like it then buy it on a deep sale a year or more after its release.

Cause maybe there wasn't a video of DLSS off?

It's ray reconstruction for ray tracing maybe play the video at 4k I can definitely see the difference on my s24 ultra lol

I watched this video on an RTX 4090 and didn’t see any difference either

​@@user-pk9fc1il4yI also have a 4090 with a QD OLED ultrawide monitor y'all are really blind 💀

because the woke mind virus is strong

mostly nosltagia of what star wars was before the new trilogy.

@@latinocreamking9125 REMEMBER THEY KILLED ALL STAR WARS CHARACTERS!

Fck off I pre-order already

the shots they chose are pretty bad here but Ray Reconstruction always looks better in motion and gives better fps so its a no brainer to switch it on

I think you might need glasses mate.

They haven't done that since Watch Dog's 2 lmao

I think it will. I'm just afraid of the gameplay being bad. It has my interest peaked but I really hope I don't wake up on launch day to everyone trashing it.

its going to be trash like all Ubisoft games, remember dont preorder

@@Jack-eg8wg I'm not preordering. And not all I soft games are bad. You just like to look at the bad ones.

​@@Space-_-Benderwe all want to know what your PlayStation/achievement account? And see if if you actually play Ubisoft games

No you're just confused by Nvidia's dumb naming schemes. DLSS 3.5 is the Ray Reconstruction feature wheras DLSS 3.7 is the version number of DLSS 2 upscaling. Hopefully that makes sense.

@@ajitjagdale6593 Thanks.

Someone wanna tell him?

Theres a huge difference lol

You'll notice the fps difference while playing.

Suspiciously the increase in fps in not shown in the video. But, my comment was referring to the image quality comparison shown in the video.

@somastic69 Well, genius, the entire point of frame generation is you don't have to sacrifice high framerates for better visuals. You can't see frame generation in a 60fps youtube video. It's something you feel while playing.

I mean, the difference isn't huge but it's pretty obvious in some of the scenes, in particular the ones with reflective surfaces. You might need glasses.

Ray Tracing technology is truly a breakthrough in the visual quality of games, but if what was shown in the trailer is the best the developers could do, then it means they simply didn't deliver.

@@climenty It's the best they can do right now. It's only going to get better. Consoles are primarily holding graphics back though.

The most noticeable difference is the shot starting at 0:27. You won't see it if you pause the video; there's a shimmering effect on the "ceiling" of the ship inside that box. That shimmering is gone on the side with Ray Reconstruction on. It's not a great video as they don't really explain what they're showing off.

Só vi RT fazer diferença mesmo em 2 jogos até hoje kkkkk.

In fps while playing it will be.

@@BryceCzirr-jz7ju There can be a big difference with RTX Denoising, yes. My point was more that this video pretty much fails at showing it..

@@Case_ That's the entire purpose of frame generation. To not sacrifice high frames for better visuals. You can have your cake and eat it too. You can't see frame generation in a 60fps youtube video. It's something you feel.

@@BryceCzirr-jz7ju First, this video is about ray reconstruction, not frame generation, and second, it's rather unfortunate to talk about "not sacrificing high frame rate" and frame generation being "something you feel" when frame generation gives you more frames only visually as an "illusion" and otherwise feels exactly like the low framerate it is generating the frames from, or rather it even adds a bit of latency to it.

bro are you blind? this is clearly running at a smooth 60fps in the video so maybe your pc is making it look choppy

@@ajitjagdale6593 You didn't get it, sure it looks ok (like it runs @60 fps on some scenes) BUT we see main character walking, we haven't actually see intense frame paced scenes (ground or space battles with many stuff to be rendered), I just wish that traversal stuttering / loading assets as you run will not be present on this game engine as it was before with previous titles. I am a fan too, don't get me wrong, I do want the game to be great.

@@spanian77 this runs on the same engine as avatar and it’s developed by the same team and that game ran extremely well with no issues at all so we have nothing to worry about tbh

@@ajitjagdale6593 Thnx for informing, well then it should be a great experience.

PC footage

​@@BryceCzirr-jz7juno shit

It’s better that than actual real life physics using air jets lol