He did sue him for his injuries. You can't be sued for saving someone's live but you can be sued for causing other damage in the process. This is the society we live in. After seeing all the victims with neck injuries it makes me think they were faking just for gaining money.
Smithkakarot Its hard to be a hero, when the people you risk your neck for do stuff like this from time to time...or if your in Gotham, its 24/7. seriously, the people on the train sued him after he saved them from what would have no doubt been death by train crash...would you have preferred he didn't try and save you at all?
OVinceThePrince I'm not a law student, so obviously you're far more educated on this subject than I am, but I agree. How the hell could that ever hold up in a court of law? It's insane. First of all, the majority of people who attempt suicide and are saved by someone else end up being glad that their attempt was thwarted and are grateful to the person who saved them. Second, if this man tried to kill himself by jumping off a building, you can bet your ass that the second the paramedics got ahold of him he would be subject to a 72-hour involuntary hold in a psychiatric hospital. And judging by prevailing societal attitudes towards mental illness in the 1950s, (when this prologue is set), his family would probably have had him permanently institutionalized. I'm not saying that would be the right thing to do; only that it would've been the most likely course of action at the time. He wouldn't be suing anybody. Third, if he wanted to kill himself so badly and was allowed out of the hospital, why didn't he just try it again in a less public way? I guess this scene is meant to be a commentary on American bureaucracy and over-emotionalism. I'm only 16 and a sophmore in high school so a lot of my info is probably wrong lol. It's strange, but I find the legal and sociopolitical ramifications of this scene fascinating. What are your thoughts? Thank you 👍
I'm no expert on the law but if that asshole were to walk into a law practice no lawyer in his right mind would do it. Also if there was a lawyer crazy enough to take it to court the judge would probably throw out the suit and tell the schmuck to get help.
I had the same opinion, until 1 massive detail came up in an online page. HOnestly, this BLEW MY MIND, because somebody at PIXAR really did their homework = Date & time. Newspaper. When Bob read the newspaper and found Gazorbeam was missing, a date is printed on the front page=May 16th 1962. The events around the Omnidriod occur in 1962, and Bob had been married to Helen/Elastagirl for 15 years by then. 1962 - 15 years = 1947! I might be wrong, but in a general search over USA law, the 1st draft of the "Good Samaritan Act" was not passed into legal statutes until 1970; even by the events of the film, Mr. Incredible wouldn't have any ground to appeal the ruling with a non-existent law. Even more="Sovereign Immunity" and another statute called the "Federal Tort Claims Act" match up with the Mr. Incredible Lawsuit. "Sovereign Immunity" made it illegal for anyone connected with a government institution to be sued for actions they conducted; only cases of discrimination or inactivity were any grounds for lawsuits to stand on. This lasted until 1946, when the "Federal Tort Claims Act" removed this immunity and made government-associated people accountable in Federal/Superior Courts. In a nut-shell, "Supers" were registered with and protected by the Government in the film. Prior to their marriage, heroes like Elastagirl and Mr. Incredible could only be sued over inaction/inactivity, and were immune from prosecution for anything like collateral damage. Mr. Incredible in the film was sued in 1947, 1 year after real-world immunity for similar actions was revoked, and the flood gates opened for anyone tied with the American government to be sued. Crazy but whomever was on the writing-board for this film really did their homework.
@@geoffreyedgson7875 I love that you went through all the research that could back up the plaintiff’s claim and indeed this is a good basis to go on. However, the defence of Mr Incredible should have an easy time debunking the argument: - Either he doesn’t save the man and he gets sued for inaction. Rightfully so, because his job genuinely consists of saving people - He does save the man, as he did. With all due respect, Mr Incredible can’t know wether the man really wanted to kill himself or not. After all the man can change his mind after he jumped. He’s not in that man’s head. Therefor, he fulfilled his task by saving the man. Yet he still gets sued, on the basis that he should be accountable for his actions. My question is, could he have done any better given the circumstances? Circumstances being that the man himself apparently chose to jump off a building. Mr Incredible saved him, literally limiting the damage to that man, but not all. But let’s not forget who was responsible for the circumstances in the first place; the plaintiff himself. He CHOSE to jump off that building. Something Mr Incredible could not do anything about. Therefor, according to the plaintiff’s own argumentation, he (the plaintiff) should be held accountable for the irreversible actions he undertook, leading to his damages, that Mr Incredible couldn’t stop from occurring. Frankly Mr Incredible should sue the plaintiff for bringing a case before the judge that is as scandalous and out of order as this one. The plaintiff tried to weasel out of his own part of responsibility in this ordeal and the court most likely won’t let it stand
Five days later another suit was filed by the victims of el train accident. ''Hey! I saved your lives!'' ''You didn't save our lives, you ruined our deaths!''
No, I don't think they were intersted in suicide. The bridge was blown up unintentionally, and they'd all be unwilling goners if Mr. Incredible hadn't slowed the train down. But on account of a few broken bones, they lacked gratitude
In this case he'd be protected by Good Samaritan laws. If you, for example, drag someone out of a burning car but hurt them in the process you're legally protected.
I just realized at :09 he moves his neck to turn his head; not his body. Ive tweaked my neck before and have tried as hard as possible not to move it; theres no way if he really broke it, he would move it. Clever animators; clever.
RR3ason Music I never noticed that actually, if it was actually a deliberate animation on the animators end, that just adds ANOTHER whole layer to these events. God I FUCKING love this movie so much.
bluetec123 I’m inclined to agree that it was deliberate based on the fact that they didn’t need to show that clip. It wasn’t him saying or doing anything other than standing there so a still picture would’ve sufficed. To show a short shot like that appears to be completely on purpose. I wouldn’t put it past Brad Bird.
+Lemons19902010 Just goes to show how stupid people are today. Mindlessly following whoever has the loudest voice and fearing what they don't understand. And shunning something when they get sick of it, even when that something was a good thing and complaining when their view of something is challenged. All it takes is one spark of unhappiness to upset everyone/
+Lemons19902010 If superheroes were real, they would not give a damn about being sued. It's not like anyone is going to stop someone like Mr Incredible.
"Debt" is a noun, so the only way to say that in a way that makes sense is "you ruined my attempt to escape my debts". Plus, debt isn't something that you ruin, debt ruins you.
For anyone interested to know, the pictures of the victims of the train and Mr. Incredible are the original storyboards, due to fear of the film going over budget, Brad Bird decided that those animations were not really essential, but was forced to keep them in.
+cesarmanuel51 I was thinking that was an attempt to show not being able to take pictures/videos in court- there's often sketchers drawing in the scene instead
+uncensorer Really? I thought it was intentional. IRL, we only see drawings of what's happening in court. Wow, I say this was a really smart move to control budget without compromising quality.
"Hey come on. We're superheroes. What can happen?" Does this answer your question, bob? And honestly, if that man really wanted to die, he would have tried to commit suicide again, not sue mr. Incredible
It wasn't just that, superheros cause super-villains, and their clashes destroy infrastructure as well as harm lives. No super-villains appeared untill Syndrome so it worked pretty well.
Darwin Roberson But Syndrome appeared when the supers were still in hiding. The public had no idea, and if Syndrome hadn't been stopped, the people of the city would've thought that he was a superhero, which was his intention. The Underminer, that came during the last minute of the movie, showed up because the Incredibles Frozone, and remaining live heros, came out of hiding after defeating Syndrome because the public wanted them back.
5Mariner That doesn't apply to when *this* happened?! WHY ARE THEY ATTACKING SUPERHEROS FOR SAVING PEOPLE FROM KILLING THEMSELVES!? IT'S THEIR *FUCKING JOB*!!!
I don't think the government made them. It's not clear where the super heroes come from though I suppose it's genetic. The government just keeps tabs on them. Honestly if Mr. Incredible still wanted to fight crime he should have become a police officer.
Pelcogo I think villains just hid from the public eye, being more discreet and not blowing up Banks, think about it. If there was a large influx of Crime after the supers left, I guarantee you civilians would want heroes back. So in the end it does help villains, at least in the long run.
In defense of Mr. Incredible stopping the L train, what else was he supposed to do? If he didn't stop the train then those people would end up worse or dead. stopping the train by himself was literally the only thing he could do.
*Mr Incredible:* HEY! I saved your life! *Oliver Sansweet:* You didn't save my life - you ruined my DEATH! *Mr Incredible:* Listen you little piece of - *Lawyer:* My client has no further comment at this time. Real sneaky, Brad Bird. Real sneaky. Honestly, guys, listen _very_ carefully to that part again. And if you still doubt me, I can lead you to the actual script.
It's like the Weirdmageddon episodes of Gravity Falls: *Grunkle Stan* (drops barrel) Hot Belgian waffles! Oh, wait, I'm alone. I can swear! Son of a- *Dipper* (turns knob on camera again) That's him alright.
Thus does Pixar take a jab at how lawsuit happy this country has become. Sued for preventing suicide? Sued for saving people's lives on the train? Honestly if I was the judge, I'd be telling those people to be grateful they ain't dead!
My guess is he was sued by causing the bridge to blow up by unintentionally causing a kid to try become his sidekick. To them: "If you hadn't influenced an inexperienced kid to try become your sidekick, we wouldn't have suffered injury"
A major problem with people these days. One small spark of unhappiness will ignite a series of never ending complaints. Just goes to show that majority vote does not always lead to good things. Because humans will mindlessly follow whoever has the loudest voice.
Ikr? People overbloat issues in a maniacal way nowadays. Rampant "Antifa" protests and others alike trying to paint an unrealistic world of a group they hate, all the while ignoring how people really are. It's idiocy. People can debate about things, but when it gets to the point where people start saying 'Beat up fascists!' or 'Kill Group X and Y!' then it's just uncalled for and ridiculous.
Too true. Far too true. It's idiocy at its finest when it comes to making complaints or following stupid people for the dumbest reasons imaginable (attention, self-entitlement, feeling important, etc.)
I remember watching this movie as a kid and loving it. Looking at this scene years later (I'm 21 now) I can appreciate just how brilliant the storytelling is. It makes you understand what Bob feels as he's forced to leave his life of being a hero to being trapped in a cubicle with a horrible boss just because his power makes some people "uncomfortable." I think it's time to re-watch this movie.
I remember watching this movie as a kid and loving it . Looking at this scene years later ( l'm 21 now l can appreciate just how brilliant the storytelling is . It to leave his life of being a hero to being trapped in a
You would think the suicidal guy case would be thrown out on the grounds of insanity. What sane person would say "You didn't save my life, you ruined my death?"
Exactly! When I was younger, I didn't understand what was going on in this part. Now that I'm older, it pisses me off that Bob got sued for saving that guy's ungrateful ass.
He probably just fake it for the money in this case, I think he planned this for any hero to save him in his area, the hero has no idea what's he/she getting into and boom he hit a greater jack pot, but who knows anyways.
There is a libertarian argument that says that mr incredible interrupted the victims freedom to end his life.if they can find a good lawyer and a libertarian judge I think the victim can win
This sequence proved how incredible and ahead of its time it was/is. I watched this in theater when I was 11 year old and was floored by this scene and Kronos unveiled the most.
True, and in more ways than even the 5th or 6th look. I found a couple details which honestly BLEW MY MIND. Newspaper. When Bob read the newspaper and found Gazorbeam was missing, a date is printed on the front page=May 16th 1962. The events around the Omnidriod occur in 1962, and Bob had been married to Helen/Elastagirl for 15 years by then. 1962 - 15 years = 1947! In the USA, even the 1st draft of the "Good Samaritan Act" was not passed into legal statutes until 1970; even by the events of the film, Mr. Incredible wouldn't have any ground to appeal the ruling with a non-existent law. Even more="Sovereign Immunity" and another statute called the "Federal Tort Claims Act" match up with the Mr. Incredible Lawsuit. "Sovereign Immunity" made it illegal for anyone connected with a government institution to be sued for actions conducted; only cases of discrimination or inactivity were any grounds for lawsuits to be made. This lasted until 1946, when the "Federal Tort Claims Act" removed this immunity and made government-associated people accountable in Federal/Superior Courts. In a nut-shell, "Supers" were registered with and protected by the Government in the film. Prior to their marriage, heroes like Elastagirl and Mr. Incredible could only be sued over inaction/inactivity, and were immune from prosecution for anything like collateral damage. Mr. Incredible in the film was sued in 1947, 1 year after real-world immunity for similar actions was revoked, and the flood gates opened for anyone tied with the American government to be sued. Crazy but whomever was on the writing-board for this film really did their homework.
These movie appear to be for children, but the content is written for adults to be also entertained. (Kinda like Monsters University) So these sort of movies weren’t ahead of their time, you’ve just matured enough to understand it.
He probably eventually just became dillusioned and frustrated with the whole thing; working in a corrupt court system just as Bob was working in a corrupt insurance bureaucracy.
So, the people on the train, Mr Incredible saved them all, but because they broke some bones and sustained a few injuries, they blame him and hate him? What would you rather be? Hurt or dead? Pain is often a good thing, it lets you know you're still alive.
Not to mention Bomb Voyage was the one who planted the bomb on Buddy's cape, leading Mr. Incredible to try and get it off him, only for it to fall on the train tracks. The way I see it their anger should be directed at Bomb Voyage rather Mr. Incredible.
@@Polychi1998 I mean it's obvious all these people sued to get some settlements like that guy who tried to jump off the building was obviously looking for attention
I don’t think Doctor Strange would count though since he wasn’t an Avenger just yet, but he did have to face Health Insurance in the first half of the movie when his hands were all messed up which resulted in him not doing the one job he loved doing the most which was neurosurgery. He also lashed out at his lover, Christine, and that made her marry another man in the sequel. In short, he never had to deal with superhero lawsuits when Civil War was going on.
"Mr Incredible's court losses opened the floodgates for dozens of superhero lawsuits the world over" Who do we have to thank for that? Buddy, for one of the court losses was the El train accident, which was caused by him by meddling in Mr Incredible's affair Ironically, Buddy killed the superheroes twice
"In spite of everything you've done for them, eventually they will hate you." - Spider-Man. (2002). "You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." - The Dark Knight. (2008). "That's how it starts, sir. The fever, the rage, the feeling of powerlessness that turns good men cruel." - Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. (2016). "The world owes the Avengers an unplayable debt. You have fought for us, protected us, risked our lives. But while a great many people see you as heroes, there are some who would prefer the word vigilantes." - Captain America: Civil War. (2016) To honour among the glory days of superhero media.
Yea I think if super heros were rela they wouldn't bother saving the world anymore people would just keep suing them to make money and shit. They would probably just let the villans kill everyone people are so ungrateful in real life. In the superhero cartoons and stuff the people enjoy the hero,s wish people did for real.
@@aaronnantz5554 Some people are no better than the villains they are protected from. And they think superheroes are gods who can make their troubles go away.
Cost the city millions. Maybe but he saved a lot of lives. Since when is money worth more than human lives? Suing the guy who saved you. It's like that story of the women who was saved but because she was bruised during the saving the saver is being sued. The jumper would of also caused a lot of emotional damage to the people below viewing a guy go splat on the ground.
George Zero that lawsuit about spilling a hot coffee on their lap and it burned them was pretty stupid, especially since they could have just placed it on a table or the time someone drank a entire coffee in one go and had burns, it's coffee, it's supposed to be hot!
@Anonymous Mystery For context however that person was a grandmother sitting at the back of the car the grandmother then recieved 3rd degree burns she admitted it was her fault but the media painted her as if she was in the wrong for filing against McDonald's when spilling a cup of coffee shouldnt make insane tragic damage like setting your lower half on fire for a mistake especially at her age.
these people were stupid to expel the supers like this. for me, I would say, "all right, get rid of all the supers, but when a villian comes to take over the world, don't come knocking on their doors.
They would honestly want the villians to come in and destroy shit people dont care about their own species like the joker said people just want to watch the world burn. They will do all they can to get rid of the hero,s just to let the world die people hate other people expecially these days. They dont like good no matter what it is this is why i agree more with the villains these days cause people are just ungrateful assholes.
It would be nice if they gave a orphans and traumatized children these types of resources. In exchange they can provide community service to prove they’re debt and appreciation. “Quietly”
Would it be possible to counter this lawsuit with another? Mr. Incredible did his job by saving the bystanders of the suicide attempt. There were probably children in that crowd who would've been affected by seeing him hit the ground.
I mean if there were children in that crowd then all those parents would be at fault... they were treating it as a show. If a person wants to die, they should have that right. We have no say in being brought into existence
When this movie addresses "how would people react to superheroes in the real world" in a much shorter timespan and far better than the Batman vs Superman movie did.
He does so much only to end up with a crowd of understandably upset people. It’s crazy because Buddy is largely responsible for Mr Incredible’s retirement. Had he not foolishly tagged along with him, Bob wouldn’t have had to recklessly chase after Buddy and the bomb and therefore had to quickly stop the train in the crudest way possible.
The government and the civilians are really dumb for making super heroes illegal. All it did was raise crime up and a lot of accidents to occur, all of that resulting in more injuries and death. I’m starting to hate the super hero trope of people, government and cops treating the super heroes like crap after they just saved their selfish assess. I think the civilians, cops and government are bigger assholes then the villains the super heroes are fighting.
I find this funny as hell. The Reason you need supers is for the Super villains wtf happened to them? Did they all give up their super-identity to become normal people too? Even at the end of this movie let the monster destroy the city and have them beg for a super to come save them. If saving people get you sued and hated let them deal with their own problem.
SinOfDisaster yeah especially if an alien invasion comes, would the supers help them? Or never because the ungrateful aholes will sue anybody for money or other shit. Really i find this very stupid they have to sue a super for saving their lives.
The sad part is that stuff like this exists in real life. EMTs are not allowed to save someone committing suicide, all they can do is wait because the person can sue them. The same thing with medical professionals saving people outside of a hospital, if a doctor were to pull a woman out of a burning car and he hurts her shoulder trying to pull her out, she can sue him and get his license revoked. it's a dumb system.
And that, my friends, is someone who knows nothing about the law in the US. As I said, it depends on the state. States that allow them to be sued do so b/c, as medical professionals, they're held to a higher standard given their training. Furthermore, their oath does not require them to administer aid outside their work environment & it does not give them license to save lives by "any means necessary."
Timon: "Look, kid. Bad things happen, and you can't do anything about it. Right?" Simba: "Right." Timon: "Wrong. When the world turns its back on you, you turn your back on the world." "No matter how much nice you are to some people, they'll turn their back on you the second they get the chance." - Jeff Kinney
Mr. Incredible got sued for saving someone's life? That's beyond bullshit. He, as well as the other supers, save lives everyday (presumedly) and no one shames them for it (I hope). What about instead the guy does end up falling to his death and someone sues Mr. Incredible for not saving him, as it is his job to save people so in a way he caused that man's death, though he was probably preoccupied with another catastrophe or something to do it. It would've made for a more interesting debate.
Yeah these humans are complete and total fools for turning against the supers and becoming moronic, prejudice imbeciles who act like they hate every ounce of life saving which makes them hypocrites.
Disneyfan82 Here's a new wrinkle I discovered: Sansweet is faking his injury. Watch his movements. He moves his neck in a way that's not possible for someone with a neck injury.
Mr. Snarky and when you look closely at his facial expressions, he doesnt seem to show proper facial expressions like smiling or being genuinely angry and it seems like he is trying his best to look like he suffered from a neck injury, note the obvious narrow eyes. He also seems to look side to side suspiciously Note this part also: 0:27 that much movement will injure his neck even more, but he doesnt seem to show signs of pain
In my opinion, if the guy wanted to kill himself, he shouldn't have gone with the"jumping of a building" way to do it, because that is obviously going to attract attention of the people and the attention of a SUPER. If he didn't want to be saved, he probably should have killed himself by hanging,poison,stabbing and/or shooting himself,etc.(Just to throw out ideas.) Mr.incredible is not to blame for the guy's attempted suicide. If he really didn't want to be saved, he wouldn't have made a big deal out of it by jumping of a building for hundreds of people to see.
If superheroes were actually a thing, this is exactly how it would play out. A few years of a golden age then hiding among the common people to avoid repercussions.
+chainaxe8 That's because this is an era where individuality and self promotion is valued. When a hero comes along people view them as narcissists who view the people they help as lesser beings which makes the people view themselves as lesser beings, challenging the individuality and self promotion culture.
@@godzillavkk Got nothing to do with that. It's do with the fact superheroes cause a lot of damage which cost's tax payers and Governments a large sum money, their powers are completely unchecked and they could easily turn bad at any given moment and they are pretty much entirely responsibility for the all the super villains they have to fight that never existed in the first place before they did. If you read Watchmen, Kingdom Come, Justice League: Tower of Babe, Civil War, Injustice or watch The Boys and Invincible you really begin to see just how dangerous superheroes or any one with meta-human powers really are to society and how helpless and screwed humanity would be if they turned on them.
We’re opportunistic creatures. It’s how we survived. If nothing is going for me in life and I decide I want to checkout, but am denied, and having the opportunity of gaining monetary benefits, best be sure I’ll take that
Suing a Super Hero for saving his life when he wanted to commit suicide? WTF? Why aren't people more concerned about having that man rehabilitated!? HOW did something like this come to court!?
Cody Peterson What makes you think that? Seriously... attempted suicide. That's just unacceptable. There is too much in life to just suddenly throw away.
I realise that the plot of the movie is a result of that guy suing Mr Incredible for saving him, but it really dosent make sense. I mean if that guy was upset about Mr Incredible saving him, then why cant he just try and kill himself again? Now I really don't mean to sound like I'm encouraging or approving of suicide but there are in fact easier ways to do it other than jumping off the tallest building in town, in public, particularly in world where superheros are always flying around everywhere and can easily save you Plus, I really don't see how that guy could have gotten away with suing anybody. It obviously goes without saying that this man is suicidal and therefore not in proper frame of mind, so any lawyer could easily manipulate the jury into not taking him seriously.
Well it this is a moment in time when the oppertunisitic would relish the feeding frenzy that this would cause among the public. Yes this matter is trivial and is beyond ridiculous but this at the same time proved a method for people to bring the Superhero society down. In journalism in general, there was a way of selling a political narrative and to garner attention from the masses. Look at the articles of the newspapers. Sensational journalism played a factor on this which fanned the fire of the public. There are people every day that happen to help out their fellow human beings. Yet a newspaper wants to say that an average person could do just as a much as a superhero? And how this matter spread to other heroes and being harassed intro sharing their beliefs to be used as more "gotcha" journalism. There is a moment when a superhero is putting his hand in front a photographer's camera. Also, the Lawyers would relish this moment in time because of how Heroes often act as a form of law enforcement. So some of them must have government funding for their teams and equipment. Lawsuits are a very crafty and emotionally bankrupt tool. It was just a powder keg.
+ShinobiPXO In my state we have something called a "Baker act" where people that are deemed severely mentally unstable (suicide attempts for example) can be involuntarily commited, and to the best of my knowledge most other states and countries have similar laws on the books. So it would hardly be manipulation of a jury it would be a matter of fact statement on the execution of legal statutes.
They left out a major part: what became of the supervillains after the superheroes were forced underground. My theory is that, after the Super Relocation Act, the military was dispatched to hunt down and kill all of the supervillains, and any who were in prison at the time were executed without trial. In the fifteen years between the prologue and first act, a few new supervillains popped up, but never got an opportunity to do anything before the CIA found and killed them. This caused any future would-be supervillains to either operate more like a mafia, or set up shop overseas...only to find out that superheroes were only illegal in the United States, and that Japan was still swarming with heroes; they even have entire schools dedicated to heroics, including the most prestigious of them all, UA High School. So yeah, The Incredibles is a prequel to My Hero Academia, and all of the Supers' powers are Quirks.
THANK YOU!👏 Finally someone who gets it! I mean I'm not just gonna put on a mask and fight crime but your right, Superheroes SHOULDN'T be banned just like that! Just like cops, firemen & Doctors they save lives
Had Mr. Incredible not stopped the El train the passengers would have died when it crashed off the elevated line and could have killed more people in the streets below, and there suing for injuries. Lol
President: It is time for their secret identity to be their ONLY identity. Time for them to join us or go away. Sounds like something Ladybug and Cat Noir would do
Although this is obviously fictional, Mr. Incredible should not have been liable to be sued. Good Samaritan laws provide legal protection for helping injured people out. They were DESIGNED to make bystanders less hesitant to help out from fear of being sued.
I would argue that the man attempted suicide in a public place, disregarding any possible injuries or deaths that would happen into the people on the ground below. Then I would argue that he also disregarded any possible mental anguish that many would have, as a result of watching his death. Then finally argue the amount of money it costs for a burial (often life insurance does not payout for sucide) then calculate the amount of money his family would lose as a result of him no longer having a paycheck until the average retirement age. Then calculate the amount of social security this mans family would also be losing out on. Being as it recommended to have one million dollars for retirement, I would say Mr. Incredible prevented this man from ruining many life's and saving the family money. Finally, I would question the legitimacy of the mans sucide attempt, being as Mr. Incredible just so happened to be there to save him and that, this man despite being suicidal, still attends court.
@@sw8330GKEEPER And if you look closely, you can see the man move his neck despite it being broken without so much as wincing in pain. His neck probably wasn't that badly injured and he's using the neckbrace to hide it. Thus, he probably wanted to get money out of medical insurance, too. Total insurance fraud.
This is why superheroes are best as vigilantes. This is why captain America was right to oppose the superhero registration act, so they don't have to deal with this. I should add though, I have always hated the idea of superhero quitting just because the law opposes them. I mean does Spider-Man quite when the bugle smears him, no, he still saves Jameson despite how much he annoys him. When batman is wanted by the law does he quit, no.
Yes or Ant Man. I know Scott Lang built Ultorn in the comics and the cartoons but I guess Marvel that it would make more sense if Tony Stark did it since he builds machines and stuff.
0:39 “X-Ray vision Peeping Tom?” not only are Supers being sued for causing damages and injuries, but some apparently like to take advantage of their powers for fun.
why would the passengers sue mr incredible for saving there lives in spiderman 2 the passengers cheered when he stopped the train but in incredibles the passengers somewhat hate mr incredible that's stupid they should have thanked him not sued him
Marvel and the Incredibles world's are completely different, where spiderman had a reason to stop the train because of Docter Octopus destroyed the lever that increases and decreases the speed of the train and there were no more tracks at the end after that his secret identity was revealed to people inside the train so they pretty much promised not tell anybody about it. In the Incredibles however. Mr. Incredible has the same reason, but instead of getting the love and giving as a hero, they get a Big Fat Middle Finger to the face and gets sued entirely, despite the fact that Mr. Incredible saved everybody in that train and yet he had a reason why he stopped the train. I soon realized its a society where heroes are treated differently which they have to follow rules in order to become a hero if you break these rules you're going to jail no matter if you are a hero that saved millions of lives, no matter if you actually saved the world. the government comes in with the power of American B.S. Its like that one quote that The Green Goblin said In Spiderman 1 "In spite of everything you've done for them, eventually they will hate you. why bother?"- The Green Goblin
Blobulous well he caused the explosion that caused them needing to be saved on the tracks pulling the explosive off buddy. Their injury was entirely his fault
how did the train people not realize the result would have been worse had Mr. I NOT done anything? Granted, he did indirectly cause the bomb to land on the track, but that is definitely more Buddy's fault than his. Heck, if Mr. I had mentioned that, perhaps bringing up the police who were so eager to catch Bomb Voyage, he might have gotten Buddy safely out of the way (dunno what the punishment would be for a kid critically distracting a Super during a crucial moment, but I don't think Buddy would be allowed to bother Mr. I afterwards if that evidence did come up.)
I watched this movie a lot as a kid. It’s weird to see how adult this movie really is. I remember my parents commenting on it one time when they watched it with me and I didn’t know what they were talking about. It’s great to be able to go back and fully “get it.”
