You know, i liked that Superman movie, it had inherited the "classic" superman looks and feel from the old movies, but with a more modern twist on itand it was not a bad movie by far.
I thought, as lackluster as a Superman story as it was, that it had a lot of not only great but amazing qualities. It’s severely underrated, and is really half of a “Son of Superman” story. I loved it all.
@@frankmay3341 it’s not just the vfx, they lacked the vision to portray real physics. Remember Superman picking up a falling helicopter by its skid, or laying on the tracks to act as the rail that’s missing. These are hilariously wrong. They could have made a very fast flight scene, even a shockwave.
@@mrb2349 Superman isn't Homelander. His powers can't be described by the laws of physics. Think of the date with Lois. She was flying with him by just holding her fingers. Superman was projecting his telekinesis (or gravitation field, whatever explanation in the modern interpretation) to let her fly and not be affected by drag/wind/gravity.
I love the visuals and Superman moments in Returns. They're very good. All the action and flight sequences are just awesome. The score really helps too
Two things I really liked about this movie. 1. They finally showed Superman breaking the sound barrier. 2. They showed how strong Superman really is by holding that half of Luthor's yhat full of water with one hand.
Lmao! How does it not make sense to you, that this movie, has better cgi, than Supergirl? This movie had a budget on 204 million dollars, while Supergirl has about 1 million per episode, which is around 20 million for an entire season. So if this movie's cgi was worse than Supergirl's, then it would make no fucking sense
Now, this is a hard decision that we see Superman makes. Saving the people of metropolis vs saving his girl. He has to consciously make a decision. MoS on the other hand, force Superman to kill Zod. Superman didn’t make a decision like a man. He was ‘forced’ to like he was a child.