Supreme Court LEAKS a CRITICAL RULING at the Last Moment 

no one has the right to tell a woman a fetus has more value than her life. vote blue.

Doctors will still be scared and the question is how close to death will these poor women have to endure before they get treatment???

The fact that we need a law to prevent a woman’s death is disgusting! We should not need laws to allow us to save live!

That's bullshit!!! leave our women's rights alone .

What a clown show. Zero credibility with this court.

Someone needs to pass referendums (where available) that any judge or politician issuing laws or judgement outside of the consensus of medical professionals, forfeits their protections and can be personally sued for any harm or death due to their unfounded opinions.

I know some 12 year olds who have more sense than the Roberts Supreme Court.

Until a SCOTUS judge has been pregnant, they have no right to pass any opinion of judgement on any related issues

In America, the Supreme Court is stopping women from aborting fetuses. They don't feel, they haven't got hearts, they're brainless. Yet somehow, the Supreme Court is still in charge. - British comedian Jimmy Carr, on _Late Night with Jimmy Fallon,_ June 2024

They have closed hospitals and Drs. along with other necessary staff who cared for women have left the state of Idaho. This is the worst tragedy of all the women seeking care during pre and post care while pregnant! Roe vs. Wade should never have been interfered with!

Females are suffering and some are dying because doctors are legally unable to help her if she's pregnant and spontaneously aborting the pregnancy unsuccessfully. I wish Alito, Thomas and Roberts were one of these women. 😖

Justice Jackson is a treasure.

Shocking the world watch’s in disgust !! Thank you for all your content Harry , your valuable work is appreciated

I would be dead today if this BS was happening 20 years ago. VOTE BIDEN 💙🇺🇸💙🇺🇸💙

Women we all need to vote blue, these laws have removed our rights! We now have to choose what state to live in depending on what kind of medical care we can get ! This is absolute BS!, thanks to Trump and his maggats!! Vote blue 💙💙💙

I find it really hard to believe that once again this was leaked accidentally

Thanks Harry ❤ 💙💙💙

harry, i love listening to you. your legal knowledge is inspiring.

Why do we care what SCOTUS opines on issues unrelated to the Constitution?

My cynical opinion is that the leak was deliberate and designed to help Trump in the debate so he can now say that overturning Roe was not the disaster Democrats claim because he, the SC, and the Republican Party are still "reasonable" on abortion and womens' rights.

Leonard Leo's Vacationing Vagabonds strike again. 'Come back when you have standing. We'll spell it out for you. Here's how: ...'

Thanks Harry!

I dont believe that this "leak" is accidental. Its accident once after that its intentional, likely a preview to calm the public and draw attention from all of SCOTUS controversies

Medicare is for people over 65. Do women over 65 require abortion care?

What has happened to the Trump Immunity ruling? Justices just gonna go on holiday now???

What about all the women who were harmed during the period the stay was dissolved? If SCOTUS is admitting they never should have taken the case, then at the very least they are responsible for that harm and owe those women a HUGE apology. The removal and then reinstatement of the stay wasn't just some quirky legal mishap, of academic interest only. Real lives were affected.

Thank you Harry 💙💙💙

Thank you Harry.

Harry thank you⚖️🗳️💙🇺🇸

Does this mean Roberts is losing control as Chief Justice? Is Thomas trying to move in power? Scary!

A Supreme Pizza is a pizza with too many toppings.

This is just a delay tactic, probably to benefit Trump in the election. After they grabbed the case before it had been finalized by the 9th Circuit appellate court (which they refused to do, initially in the Jack Smith Jan 6 case) some of the justices then realized that they were be issuing a ruling this term, before the election, and it would not be politically popular because it would uphold the Idaho statute which will force more at risk, pregnant women to be airlifted from Idaho to other states. So they said "oops", we made a mistake by improvidently and prematurely granting review in the Supreme Court--best to send it back down to the district and appellate courts to let it play out through the normal process. With the idea that then once concluded and conveniently after the election, they will take it up again, or a case with similar facts, and rule on it without it politically blowing up in the faces of Republicans just before the election. Note that four of the justices wanted to resolve the case here and now: three of the conservatives (Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch), and one of the liberals (Jackson, who would have ruled the Idaho law was preempted by federal medicare). But three of the conservatives, Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett, thought it best they kick this can down the road and let the game fully play out as it should have from the beginning, thus not handing Trump and Republicans a political disaster right now. The two other liberals (Sotomayor and Kagan) went along with kicking it down the road, maybe because it provides some relief for women in Idaho right now, and maybe in hopes they can talk Barrett and the Chief Justice or Kavanaugh to agree with them when it comes up again.

I thought he said “status quo Andy” and I lost it

💙💙💙

This Supreme Court is way out of bounds! I'm ashamed of them! They have nothing to do with The People!

In what ways can Justices sanction each other? Looks like a Supreme Brawl is breaking out.

Love your work!

All these people who want to tell a woman what to do with her body, should be required to give 50% of their money to pay for the birth and then provide for the child for life. If they do not want to do that then they should shut up! The woman should not have to pay a dime for the birth or childcare for life. YOU want to force birth then you take care of the child!

Thanks Harry.

Thx Harry 🌿

💙

Vote Blue 🌊

hey harry

Kickback bribes ate legal. I have a letter notice pasted on a box RETURNED, I sent Pelosi/AOC in 2021, selling shopping bags handmade, my own label sewn inside inside with my letters to them. The rejection assumed it was a gift--NOT ALLOWED TO ACCEPT--at 70 I was just trying to save myself from foreclosure an small 1,020sq.ft house in Tampa. I did ultimately get help enough to pay it off. (scary for me). They were honest.

Color me suspicious

I suspect these leaks warn the plaintiff to ready an application for a stay from another court, for yet another reason.

Idaho, Idaho, Idaho. One can not get far enough away from Idaho.

Thanks Harry ❤ Next time will be worse.

Mistakenly? I call BS on this!

augures meaning : to foretell especially from omens. 2. : to give promise of : presage. This bad news augurs disaster for all of us. intransitive verb.

Is it me or is this Court a mess?

Wait. Did this happen again or is this the one from last week? If its the one from last week, why we still talking about it.

(Roberts deliberately allowed this to see who the inside leaker is).

Idaho and Louisiana together are the Christianized Iraq of the USA

Not good enough.

Women's lives (which include health) are at risk. And it's not merely regarding abortion. All reproductive health is involved, as -are issues of things like divorce (where they want to take away "no-fault" divorce which is essential for women in abusive marriages.) These are not "slippery-slope" problems (since the "slippery-slope" arguments are fallacies) but what we've seen happen repeatedly in other countries when they start trying to control reproductive medicine. And we also have Project 2025 and statements from people like Judge Thomas who has said we should revisit issues such as Oberfell, Griswold, and Lawrence to know what they have planned for the future of our country.

How Emily Litella of SCOTUS

Thank you it sounds like they wanted to back door and women have no rights

improvident • \im-PRAH-vuh-dunt\ • adjective. : not provident : not foreseeing and providing for the future. Examples: Judy's bankruptcy is the result of several years of improvident borrowing with little thought as to how she would ever manage to repay her debts.

Between the Supreme Court rulings and Maga propaganda I'm done Harry

💯💙💯🌈🌈🌈

Scotus Project 2025 Scorecard this month: FOR: Repealing bump stock ban ; granting kick backs for officials; EMTALA federal law kicked back to states for emergency pregnancy healthcare; Block EPA “good neighbor” law; SEC fraud cases allowed outside SEC so rich fraudsters can win = 5. AGAINST: Fed can urge social media to remove misinformation = 1. (Note: upholding federal law, dismissing a frivolous case not counted; it’s the basic job of Scotus.)

GREEN SCREEN

What doesn't make logical sense to me is allowing for abortion in the case of rape or incest as kind of an "of course" attitude, while not allowing for abortion in other things such as how far along the pregnancy is etc. If the Right is saying that abortion is killing an innocent child, how that child was conceived should have nothing to do with it. It really ruins the whole argument of abortion being wrong because it's murder. Murder is murder, no matter who you murder. Saying it's okay to abort a child born of rape or incest, but not okay otherwise, is actually pretty judgemental of the mother. It implies that if the mother chose to have sex, you can't kill that baby; but if the mother didn't chose to have sex, you can kill that baby. It's shame based, not logic based.

*_comment for the algorithm gods_*

They should have released the immunity decisioon bedore the debate.. maybe it is bad news for Trump and that's why they didn't.

Producing documents does count only destroying or altering existing documents. Learn the law . Only my Opinion: Immunity vote 7-2 in favor of Trump :IMO Full 100% immunity for every Act while president: only Congress has oversight not DOJ. - TRUMP 2024🇺🇸 The greatest president the USA has ever seen : Vote Trump 2024: Save us from radical lawfare and the left agenda.

Picture is still crooked.

After Harry explains something I usually feel like I understand it less.

While the Idaho restriction to "life of the woman" is nuts, Harry's stuttering around for an example of _"these incredible, ghoulish horror stories"_ only to settle on the possibility of infertility seems like he failed to present a convincing case _against_ the Idaho law. 🤔

Only God or “one’s highest power” can know where and when one will die. A friend’s mom, diagnosed with ovarian cancer was given less than a one percent chance of survival…..50 years have passed; she is alive, celebrating holidays and family milestones…❤❤❤

Has anyone seen the great Fanny Willis lately? I thought she was going to “get Trump” in GA! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Those judges are pathetic

💙💙💙