Symposium | Beyond Ukraine: Debating the Future of War

HCSS | The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies

Подписаться 1,3 тыс.

Просмотров 3,9 тыс.

50% 1

What does the Future of War look like? What lessons can be learned from the current War in Ukraine?
On May 14, Leiden University’s Institute of Security and Global Affairs (ISGA), the War Studies Research Centre (WSRC) of the Netherlands Defence Academy (NLDA), the Royal Netherlands Association for War Studies (KVBK) and the Hague Centre for Strategic Studies (HCSS) organised the symposium “Beyond Ukraine: Debating the Future of War”.
This event acts as the official book launch of Beyond Ukraine: Debating the Future of War, edited by Tim Sweijs (HCSS Director of Research and a senior research fellow at the War Studies Research Centre of the Netherlands Defence Academy.) and Jeffrey H. Michaels (IEN Senior Fellow in American Foreign Policy and International Security at the Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals).
Offering the first comprehensive update and revision of ideas surrounding the future of warfare since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine by Russia, the book includes analyses from renowned international experts from the War Studies field.
Onze website: hcss.nl/
Twitter: / hcssnl
Facebook: / hcssnl
LinkedIn: / the-hague-centre-for-s...

Опубликовано:

20 май 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 26

@felipefrutoramirezsj5342 Месяц назад

Military strength does not prevent future wars. This symposium of war freaks is going nowhere as long as all it proposes is military escalation. / It should focus more on how to build peace by promoting social justice and common prosperity for all nations, and advancing a multipolar and multicultural world. Build mutual understanding between peoples, avoid military blocks and exporting ideologies. / The "west" needs to discuss with the "rest" of the world and not presume it knows the solution to the problem of wars. / The "west" needs to accept the fact that the expansion of NATO provoked Russia to invade Ukraine. It scuttled various attempts to forge peace agreements with Russia (e.g., Minsk Agreement, etc.). It must also recognize the role of its military-industrial complex in instigating military conflicts for profit. Without such honest-to-goodness reflection on its culpability, the west is deluded... it is imprisoned by it own psyche. .

@qake2021 Месяц назад

😁😁😁😁😁✌️

@efghggdxlmfn33 Месяц назад

BRICS - the future

@luminyam6145 Месяц назад

That was good, thank you. I understand each person had to take a short time, it could have gone on for another hour or two and I would have been enthralled.

@555usher Месяц назад

And what did you take out from this?

@luminyam6145 Месяц назад

@@555usher I just like to hear all these different ideas. It all gives me things to think about.

@paularnold1930 Месяц назад

The outcome will be determined by the RF

@PerriBelcourt Месяц назад

Best ground defense in the world's is Russia and China and America and Europe Union can't stop a weather ballooon and Russia flags is a Christian Nation and Russia flags flying in Berlin Germany after the war and 😢😮Ukraine people with Hitler regeme against Russia and people with history know this

@PerriBelcourt Месяц назад

@dimitrioskantakouzinos8590 Месяц назад

HCSS: Your Dutch tax dollars at work.

@amunra5330 Месяц назад

Praying for Russia 🙏🏻

@niklasnorberg5071 Месяц назад

Studying war in UK😂 given the analysing capability we have sqen from them we should not be so hopefull, or is was we se mostly psyops?

@rsjmail Месяц назад

Can’t hear Europeans meandering along and saying nothing. What a surprise

@mhenkelmann11 Месяц назад

Complete disappointment with these Dutch experts on the origins of the war and underestimation of Russian capabilities and psyche. Russia never wanted to conquered Ukraine. An escalation of restraint on the part of the West is really not true.

@yttean98 Месяц назад

This supposed to be an intelligent discussion, they did not start discussing this first: war starts with behaviours of human beings influenced by its surroundings including their supposed " enemies" discuss this first and the rest are TOOLS of war.

@hazelwray4184 Месяц назад

eh?

@yttean98 Месяц назад

@@hazelwray4184 if you cannot understand what I wrote I cannot help you eh?

@kayt9627 Месяц назад

@@yttean98 we cant understand cause its a runon sentence

@The_O.G_Cyber_bully_24Hr_Ban Месяц назад

@@hazelwray4184 Wars happen for a reason that the reason for stating them is usually hidden (behaviours of human beings) lies. Ten Commandments of War Propaganda We do not want war. The opposite party alone is guilty of war. The enemy is the face of the devil. We defend a noble cause, not our own interest. The enemy systematically commits cruelties; our mishaps are involuntary. The enemy uses forbidden weapons. We suffer small losses, those of the enemy are enormous. Artists and intellectuals back our cause. Our cause is sacred. All who doubt our propaganda, are traitors. In August 1914, when an almost unanimous German parliament voted yes to war, it was presented to the German public as a defensive Schutzkrieg against conniving enemies. The perception presented to the public during the first few years of fighting, was of a Germany fighting a defensive war for survival, not a scheme for imperial aggrandizement. But in reality, already in September 1914, in the first few weeks of the war, a secret plan for an extensive redrawing of Europe’s borders was prepared for the ""Septemberprogramm"" sound familiar? it should do a countries hedge ummm onny is going down the shhhhhter