Tamron 17-28 F2.8 VS Sony Zeiss 16-35 F4 LENS COMPARISON

Подписаться 612 тыс.

Просмотров 178 тыс.

50% 1

Tamron 17-28 F2.8 VS Sony Zeiss 16-35 F4 LENS COMPARISON!
In this video i compare the Tamron 17-28 F2.8 and Sony Zeiss 16-35 F4 to each other and share my opinion on the lenses.
BUY THE TAMRON 17-28: geni.us/cYO3X
BUY THE ZEISS 16-35: geni.us/vWfOFs
Hope you'll enjoy!
MY ESSENTIALS
TUBEBUDDY: geni.us/gettubebuddy
THE CALL OUTS I USE: geni.us/mhud3
FCPX PLUGINS I USE: geni.us/h4aEC5
MY LUTS: www.plindgren.com/store/
COLOR FINALE: geni.us/colorfinale2
CINEMA GRADE: geni.us/cinemagrade
BEST SFX LIBRARY: geni.us/awesomesfx
2 MONTHS OF FREE MUSIC: geni.us/bestmusic
JOIN ME ON INSTAGRAM: / peterlindgren1
MY LUTS: www.plindgren.com/store/
MAIN GEAR
LENS: geni.us/tRFqz
CAMERA: geni.us/IJ2C
DRONE: geni.us/mavicair-2
GIMBAL: geni.us/s9Tgw0
MICROPHONE: geni.us/mD85
B ROLL KING: geni.us/2GRZ1S
CAMERA BAG: geni.us/gKAmH
DESK GEAR
MY MONITOR: geni.us/ultrawidemonitor
IPAD: geni.us/2020ipadpro
APPLE PEN: geni.us/applepen
IPAD STAND: geni.us/satechiipadstand
MACBOOK STAND: geni.us/macbookstand
NAS STORAGE: geni.us/nasstorage
APUTURE 120DII: geni.us/6uMAiD
NANLITE FORZA 300: geni.us/eAFRz
NANLITE FORZA 60: geni.us/UpObvM
GODOX SL150: geni.us/03Bs5pe
GODOX SL60: geni.us/cwRy
BIG SOFTBOX: geni.us/3pUIba2
SMALL SOFTBOX: geni.us/roSyD
MONITOR: geni.us/h8oTrI
SYNOLOGY STATION: geni.us/N3c1h
NAS DRIVES: geni.us/GYHy6fo
WD MY CLOUD: geni.us/6Kvfcm
COMPUTER MOUSE: geni.us/H6mFYJO
PORTABLE SSD: geni.us/s9TSTe8
AMBIENT LIGHTS: geni.us/TDZiCG
AMBIENT DESK LIGHT: geni.us/tTS8Aw
OTHER GEAR I USE
MY HIGH RESOLUTION CAMERA: geni.us/IB6TQc
MY TELE ZOOM: geni.us/58MXzg
BOKEH MASTER: geni.us/VKdxB
MY MOST VERSATILE LENS: geni.us/0vAf
MY FAVORITE ND FILTERS: geni.us/a6KXKD
SD CARDS I USE: geni.us/8zYq
BRIGHT LIGHT: geni.us/okebHAV
BENDING TRIPOD: geni.us/odBmo
BEST VIDEO TRIPOD EVER: geni.us/qKPA
MY CAMERA BAG: geni.us/G8lGpb
www.plindgren.com
LINKS USED IN THE DESCRIPTION MAY OR MAY NOT BE AFFILIATE LINKS
By using the affiliate links i earn a small fee of your purchase, it does not cost you anything extra to use them. They help me to be able to create more videos for you. Thank you for the support!

Кино

Опубликовано:

9 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 408

@GKid1 4 года назад

Great video. Helped with my selection for my RU-vid channel. Thank you

@fl4tbxr 4 года назад

which one did you go with?

@GKid1 4 года назад

Chris Hermo Sony Zeiss for the native-ness

@canillocanillo3371 4 года назад

G-Kid The Tamron is native to the Sony. Did you miss that part?

@dusty_burkhalter 3 года назад

The Tamron 17-28 paired with the A7C is an amazing combo for me so far. I considered the 16-35 f4, but used the savings to pick up the Peak Design Travel Tripod instead. I already have the 24-105 f4 G lens so the 17-28 f2.8 pairs nicely with it, and I really appreciate the lighter weight of the Tamron.

@Ahmaddashti 4 года назад

Loving your content man! Super GREAT QUALITY and very helpful info. Keep up the good work

@GatewoodBrown 4 года назад

Great review! I've been trying to figure out whether to snag this lens up for underwater work.

@Successfueledintent 4 года назад

Great review! Really helped me a lot. Keep up the amazing work.

@MrSUKH 4 года назад

This is it. The title. This is the video I needed to watch. Because previously i wanted to buy 16-35 f4 but now as I heard about Tamron 17-28, I wanna buy this. I haven’t watched this video but that’s what I came for, to see the difference and all. You were amazed by the number of people subscribed to you, this is the reason. Because you are coming up with things which people want to watch, you create quality content with good sense of humour. This is why I subscribed you recently. Good day dude. Thanks for this all

@paulallardes3728 4 года назад

This should be good, been waiting for this Peter, cheers!

@DavidOastler 4 года назад

Congratulations on 40,000 subscribers Peter great work

@PeterLindgren1 4 года назад

Thanks David! Been going insanely fast!

@DVZM. 4 года назад

Wait what he gained 210k subscribers within half a year?

@efimtravels 4 года назад

Thanks, good video. I got Tamron few weeks ago and really feel limited by focal diaposon if 17-28 as you mentioned. Now use mainly for photo and it gives very good picture. Paired it with Tamron 28-75 and this set gives good coverage, but for both lences 28 boarder feels limiting when zooming in the street. Despite of it, like Tamron for performance and outstanding ratio price/quality. Availability of these two Tamron lences was tipping point to buy 7aiii because original lenses were too expencive for just hobby, but Tamron provided good option. Going to extend lences park with few manual lences both on wider and longer lengths for non critical to speed aplications and than will feel better equiped.

@tombuck Год назад

Browsing lenses and found this video. Quite the throwback!

@BartekBojarYT 4 года назад

Hello Peter! What is your best solution to shoots from above? :)

@PeterLindgren1 4 года назад

Just using a tripod!

@papsny 4 года назад

Great video! If i may add, the filter size for the tamron is the same with the 17-28 and 28-75 which helps save you on filter cost and less stuff to carry

@TIBISCOBIOLABAND 4 года назад

Hi Peter, I like your your contents and what you do. I am wondering if you recorded the OSS test on the same camera brand. It seams to me that the Zeiss wich has image stabilization shakes more than Tameron without OSS. Regards,

@sumitkhare6500 4 года назад

I prefer solid build quality of Sony as I purchase lens for years of use and F2.8 Vs F4 is not a much difference for a UWA lens for me .16 to 35mm is a better zoom range for composition from 28 to 35mm without changing lens.

@samcorcoran7965 4 года назад

Bro let’s talk about the elephant in the room! Where is New Zealand on your world map??

@bennnnft 4 года назад

Middle earth doesn't appear in modern world maps

@robertcatellier1604 4 года назад

Ha! Good eye.

@aandm7772 4 года назад

you must be a photographer..

@bjornaustmarorsson2066 3 года назад

Also no Iceland

@QualityAntics 3 года назад

YOOOO TRUTH, put us on the map boiiiii

@MollyFitzBrown 3 года назад

Have you compared the Tamron17-28 to the Sony 20mm f1.8? Any thoughts?

@RoosterRicks 3 года назад

Had the tamron first but swapped it with the zeiss, the 16-35mm focal length was the deciding factor for me. The 28mm limit for the tamron was a bit lacking for me to be called versatile. It's all about preferences really, both lenses are great, you just have to know what you need more in terms of the shoots you do.

3 года назад

This was actually helpful. Thanks alot!

@scottbauerunderwater8144 4 года назад

I actually traded my 16-35 f4 in to get my new tamron 17-28. I am with you though, I really liked the sony/zeiss. The reason why i made the trade was because I primarily shoot still frame and I found the tamron to be sharper. Since i am shooting still frame on tripod (landscape/realestate, ect..) i found that the added sharpness of the Tamron was worth sacrificing the IS of the Sony/zeiss. Also, another advantage about the Tamron that nobody seems to mention is the nano coating on the lens along with the aperture blades that create a beautiful sunburst when shooting into the sun or bright lights. Using the Sunburst in my compositions is the main reason that compelled me to switch.

@jamesf3382 4 года назад

Scott Bauer seems like the flare resistance of Tamron is better too.

@ZisimosZizos 4 года назад

Hello Scott. Do you have sample images to show me?

@stillinthestream 4 года назад

Thanks Scott, that note about the sun stars caught my attention. I'm looking at this comparison for landscape and travel, and so I'm thinking that the added light gathering offsets the IS to some degree? I'll be using a tripod near to home, but not necessarily when traveling... so that is where I'm stuck at the moment.

@scottbauerunderwater8144 4 года назад

@@stillinthestream no worries, best of luck!

@v.v.c.videophotography5688 3 года назад

Hey! I’m looking for a vlog lens for my Sony a7C Can’t decide between Tamron 17-28 and Sony 16-35 Love the fact that the Tamron is f2.8 but.. is the OSS important for vlogging? Isn’t the IBIS enough? And then there is also the Samyang 18mm f2.8 which is tempting!

@dcdays 4 года назад

I have liked before watching. I make notes of these videos so that i can implement a few of such awesome shots (though I shoot on phone). Way inspirational.

@hannahf7984 2 года назад

I just ordered the 16-35mm f4 and I‘m excited 🥰 I mainly wanted this for architecture shots when travelling to get everything in the frame. 😊

@Nico-bc4ir 2 года назад

Great content! Just subscribed. Best regards from Stockholm!

@acesauce_media 4 года назад

Thinking bout getting the Tamron 17-28 lens for my new sony a7iii my first full frame coming from a Sony a6000

@jimlitton 2 года назад

Loved the video and comparison. After seeing the shovel in the wall , i got a sinister vibe 😁

@dffkll3058 4 года назад

Nice video. I'm curious, does that Sony A7 M3 compensate for the lack of lens OSS? Also a friendly suggestion, please mention the stuff explicitly by their names, it's hard to keep track of "this" and "that" and what lens is in what hand especially if I'm not actually looking at my screen ;)

@AivarsMeijers 4 года назад

I have 10-18mm for my APS-C (crop) Canon. For the full-frame, I would go with 16-35 because of stabilization and focal range. Speed for sure is important as well, but secondary for me because you can fix this by lighting inside and do not have such a problem outside during the day at all.

@PeterLindgren1 4 года назад

The OSS makes such a huge difference for me when i'm shooting video. It might not be noticable at the vider end but when you start to move the camera/get walking shot it really shows!

@ADof28 3 года назад

Great vid Peter. My thinking is that if f4 is unusable in a low light situation, then f2.8 won’t make much of a difference either. A fast prime would be the better bet. The extra zoom range and the IS on the Sony however are critical for run and gun video shooters.

@RogerOThornhill 2 года назад

I don't know. 2.8 has saved my bacon many a times when f4 would have been a no-go.

@toddysurcharge771 2 года назад

@@RogerOThornhill yeah one full stop of light can make a difference.

@championcreativemedia 6 месяцев назад

Paired with an a7siii for video I’m not fussed with the f4 anymore

@azvisuals 4 года назад

Awesome comparison video! You've inspired me to make my own, but comparing the 17-28 vs the 12-24. I've sold the 16-35 since owning the Tamron since my copy of the 17-28 is THAT much better. Looking forward to your next video :)

@PeterLindgren1 4 года назад

Awesome man, glad i can inspire someone!

@mikolaud3810 4 года назад

Watching all of your sony lens' comparison, love your vids even if I cant afford them.

@edgardbmedia Год назад

Getting the Tamron 17-28 next month. Good video

@user-fm5cs4ix9k 4 года назад

Hello from Kyiv Ukraine. Hi. I am a Sony shooter. I shoot fashion models , portraiture and build portfolios. I now have the tamron 17 to 28mm and I think this lens is just excellent. The OSS does not make a difference because my cameras all have IBIS and I do not see any difference. Even on your comparison footage side by side I did not notice a difference. For me the 17mm v 16mm and no OSS has not really effected my decision to buy. It is a good lens. I own a lot of Sony lenses and third party lenses for Sony FE. My Sony lenses. 35mm F1.8. 55mm F1.8. 85mm F1.8. 50mm Plannar f1.4. 90mm F2.8 Macro. Samyang 35mm F1.4. 45mm F1.8. 85mm F1.4. Tamron 28 to 75mm F2.8. 17 to 28mm F2.8. Cameras A9. A7 RIII A7 III. Future plans: Tamron are releasing a 70 to 180mm F2.8 FE this October so I am waiting to see before I buy the Sony version. I have heard that Samyang are working on a 135mm F1.8 so I am also waiting to see before I buy the Sony version. I buy my lenses when I visit relatives in England from this online shop E-Infinity. Always stock and best prices.

@BestmobilesInUa 4 года назад

Вот так коллекцию собрал) А я вот в раздумьях, 17-28 или 16-35. Немного смущает всего 28мм на длинном конце у тамрона, можно ли им нормально снимать на длинном хоть с намеком на боке?

@vasilykomanovsky4234 3 года назад

what could you say about 17-28 Tamron now?

@v.v.c.videophotography5688 3 года назад

@user-fm5cs4ix9k 3 года назад

@@BestmobilesInUa Да, но нужно быть близко к объекту.

@user-fm5cs4ix9k 3 года назад

@@vasilykomanovsky4234 I think the 17 to 28 is an excellent choice. I have the 28 to 75 also and now I also have the 70 to 180 which means I can go from 17 to 180 at 2.8 across the 3 lenses. I think these 3 lenses are excellent

@LivinWithGrininMcKinnon 4 года назад

just picked up the 17-28mm to pair with my 28-75mm, thanks for the review!

@GaryJahman 4 года назад

Just got the tamron and it is quite impressive! Did a first impression vid and quite like it. More testing to come!

@user-pp3wk6ce2o 4 года назад

Thank you very much! bought a tamron 3 hours ago and this is lens what i need. 2.8 - better for me. Now, waiting for 75-180 2.8. Good job!

@beisongquanwen6242 4 года назад

I am waiting the telephoto lens too. You sure it is 75- 180?

@user-pp3wk6ce2o 4 года назад

@@beisongquanwen6242 yes!

@oguzbenice7423 4 года назад

Oops, I think it will be a 70-180!

@8XHuXBgkok 4 года назад

Unlike 17-28mm and 28-75mm, both of which I love, the lack of VC will be a real problem for 70-180mm.

@TheSurianima 2 года назад

Thanks for the info!

@ShadesOfTech Год назад

In 2022 which ultrawide would you suggest for Sony a7iv? More fore videos but also a little bit for photos

@aravind.r723 4 года назад

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 nice unboxing and comparison

@aboynamedjamil 4 года назад

i recently bought the tamron and have set out to reshoot some of the same shoots ive taken with the 16-35 gm and i am absolutely blown away by the tamron. im not gonna say that it is better or as good because that isnt important. what ive found though is that i am completely satisfied with the purchase. and for the price i feel like it is everything i need.

@PeterLindgren1 4 года назад

It's definitely the lens to go for instead of the GM, and if you need/want the 2.8 aperture then there's no discussion on what lens to get!

@app4634 4 года назад

Thanks sir for this it is helpful

@ViccoVlog 4 года назад

Thanks, this video is helpful...

@MNDRCKVisuals 4 года назад

Yeah, tamron 17-28mm is my next lens I'm planning on getting.. I like how the barrel doesn't come out so it'll be easier when using a gimbal.

@mczun666 3 года назад

That's the point

@Clemi47 4 года назад

Peter, I was thinking to purchase the Tamron 17-28 for the extra "f" but your video helped me to keep my Sony Zeiss 16-35 f4. Only one thing Peter, I will never lend you one of my lenses to do a comparison.... YOU ARE DANGEROUS!! ( I've spent the entire time whilst watching your presentation waiting for you to drop one of them) Thanks again Clem

@krzysztofbobrowicz589 4 года назад

Which one would you recommend for interior photography?

@alanyuen6866 4 года назад

Great video, thanks.

@IwasKiddinggg 4 года назад

nice vid man. I own the 1635 f4 for a while now with my a73. I take it out in pouring rain all the time and it is still perfect

@russleewildlife1136 4 года назад

I bought the Tamron 17-28 and received it a few weeks ago. I love it so far

@rexlibon8908 4 года назад

Russ Was the lens that sharp?

@viveksathish 3 года назад

Great Video, i own the 28-75 and now considering the 17-28 mainly for shooting cars using the rig. Would love your thoughts on it especially the image stabilization in this case

@sebastianus_olaf 4 года назад

yes its a hug difference of sharpness, but with our eyes not client. So I'm still prefer the zeiss one for the extra zoom!

@mikebaltierra 4 года назад

thinking of getting the tamron - mostly for indoor shooting where i don't need to zoom out to 35mm

@Has0n 3 года назад

hey, what talking lenses do u use while filming this video ? I mean the one on your studio

@VLS28 4 года назад

Nive video. Both nice lenses, depends for what use want them. I didnt see any comparison at interiors shooting. Which one you will use for interior shot?

@henrydufour9688 2 года назад

Looking for which lens to put on the m2 gimbal so I think the tamron is a better choice for me with the weight difference and zoom style.

@zahryl 4 года назад

What camera and lens you use for this video? I love the color.

@AiurMedia 4 года назад

pretty much the same price, I'd go for the zeiss for the range and OSS

@ragemaster2 3 года назад

I have bought Tamrons in the past and twice I had to send it back and got a replacement and there are quality differences but once you get a quality inspected Tamron they are a joy to take pictures with. That was a couple of years ago now Sony has bought a 15% steak in Tamron and have given a few suggestions to help so I will be keeping my eye on the new 2021 lenses from Tamron.

@santoshrnojha 4 года назад

Let me comment first. I'll watch the video later because I know you would have nailed it. Thanks by the way as I said I'm gonna buy one of these lenses super soon.

@fibranijevidra 4 года назад

I like the natural feel of your videos, and Sweedish accent here and there. Thank you.

@michaelgonzalez8122 4 года назад

Amazing video, Starting to VLOG and couldn’t decide on the Tamron or the Zeiss, but with the Zeiss OSS it was a no brained since I don’t have the steady hands😪

@FirstnameLastname-pe3ky 3 года назад

It's "no brainer", not "no brained". Just FYI :)

@v.v.c.videophotography5688 3 года назад

@seken2nun 4 года назад

Definitely going with the Tamron 17-28....

@brucebohlen1149 4 года назад

I will be buying the Tamron due to its sharpness and f/2.8. Thank you for posting this video!

@Feeqsays 4 года назад

Thanks, it's answer my question

@AIishereFOR 4 года назад

THANK YOU!!!!!! best video !

@o_studio87photography89 4 года назад

Peter i have sony 6400 witch lens good for shooting video?

@Andy-sj2dv 4 года назад

Coming in a bit late, but I have just bought the Zeiss for that little bit extra, although they say that size doesn't matter, it's what you do with it !! Cheers mate from " Down Under ".

@BaksTruly 4 года назад

Ahhhh been waiting to see this Tamron Review and comparison. You hit everything! I'm really annoyed that it's not 16mm because I feel like I can notice the difference. But honestly for the weight, apurtue and sharpness it's a bargain. The OSS didn't seem like a big issue I think the camera sensor did well. Awesome review bro!🙏🏽

@JJ-vp3bd 3 года назад

would you recommend it as a travel lens for a sony a7r3?

@chillafghan9703 3 года назад

@@JJ-vp3bd yes sure why not

@Pavel__Shin 4 года назад

thanks for the honest comparison. Not just selling the Tamron to us.

@RichardBauer_ 2 года назад

Video still relevant in 2021! Thanks Peter. Getting my 16-35 F4 this week. Second hand for cheaper than the Tamron :)

@olegpukhlyak8052 4 года назад

great video as always! thinking of GH5 or Fuji XT 3 with 18-55 F.2.8, cant decide lol

@johnforsyth9249 4 года назад

planning on the 16-35 f4 for real estate and landscape shots

@MrJuanduenas 4 года назад

Buying the Tamron. I already have the sony 24mm 1.8. I am just looking for more options for indoor real estate photography I don't really need image stabilization. Great video.

@slimsimtv 3 года назад

thank you Peter...because of this video I will buy the Sony Zeiss lens, I need it mostly for video so there we go...thanks m8!

@The22Century 3 года назад

Very nice video comparison! I'm gonna go for Tamron. OSS doens't matter that much as people think. For professional purposes like real estate, cars photo/video Sony would be a wiser choice. And for filming purposes (not a Vlog style) where depth of field matters, f2.8 helps. I think both lenses are great it's just a matter of preference - what you need it for)

@josefojma1580 3 года назад

I have the 16 - 35 mm it’s a great lens for outdoor shootings but for studio / video I’ll will love to have the aperture that the Tamron has.

@chuck90504 4 года назад

There are a bunch of internal zooming lenses like the Tamron, it's a good thing.

@yKamilo 3 года назад

How to change for shutter prior in film mode ?

@RzaNaziri 4 года назад

my new favorate RU-vid ca mera gear guy!

@sjmedia_official 2 года назад

Which lens should I get as a first time Sony user for near all purpose, no vlogging, many people recommend Tammy 28-200. but its not wide enough for me or Sonny 24-105, but I heard it does not render well and I am looking for superior image quality. Was thinking 17-28 +new Sigma 105mm Macro Art for macros and portraits, what would you recommend?

@MrFredericks. 4 года назад

Great video. I'm going to buy the Sony A7III and get the Tamron, mainly because i'll be doing more landscape shots on a tripod.

@umang9565 4 года назад

Peter, first of all, thanks for sharing the info👍. How is auto focus comparison specially for video ? Which one performs better ? Thanks in advance

@PeterLindgren1 4 года назад

You're welcome! I think that the Zeiss is the better one when it comes to video, it's dead on almost all the time.

@umang9565 4 года назад

Thanks

@stefanvandermerwe3968 4 года назад

Hi Peter, great video! Would be cool to see how the sigma 14-24 2.8 e mount stacks up against the tamron 17-28. 👍🏻

@tomslittlecorner 4 года назад

i agree on that:)

@dalvysjorge9233 4 года назад

I would like to see that review too!

@bartekbielinski5324 3 года назад

To hell with lenses - what's the badass shovel on the wall?!

@denismalizani 4 года назад

The Sony 16-35mm is the first full frame lens I've ever bought along with an A7III. Only bought a few hours ago but already know it was the right decision.

@ashwin2101 Год назад

Ive been thinking of buying THIS for my a7iii, at what price did you buy it for and do you think its worth it for the price you got it for? Please share your thoughts.

@afrank3029 4 года назад

28 - 75 and 16 - 35 combo is my choice ! =)

@mynameisneb 3 года назад

Where'd you get that world map light???

@johannbeckham 4 года назад

i dont see the difference in terms of OSS when using A7RIII or A7III. Would love to see it in your future video.

@garyfortner 4 года назад

Crushed it! Great review. Honest, but still a great display of the strengths/weaknesses and how to use either lens. And you ended with a personal preference...how rare! Haha, keep up the awesome work.

@azizoid 4 года назад

THank you for the video. I often listen to a video on the go. so if you constantly use this/this sometimes it is not clear what are you talking about. can you pls use names more? sony/Tamron for example

@zenza7120 4 года назад

Does OSS even make a difference on cameras with IBIS? I do shoot video with my 16-35 on a7iii.

@v.v.c.videophotography5688 3 года назад

Wondering the same!!! Hey! I’m looking for a vlog lens for my Sony a7C Can’t decide between Tamron 17-28 and Sony 16-35 Love the fact that the Tamron is f2.8 but.. is the OSS important for vlogging? Isn’t the IBIS enough? And then there is also the Samyang 18mm f2.8 which is tempting!

@zenza7120 3 года назад

@@v.v.c.videophotography5688 not sure if it was on this video, but i did not swap my 16-35 because it is interestingly more stabilized than 17-28. However a7c may reducr that difference via a softwaree like Catalyst. No experience about it though. For me fl range matters more.

@ikemadethis894 4 года назад

Great video at the right time. I bought the 16-35 f4 on eBay for a low price. I've been wondering if I should sell it to get the Tamron. I think I'll keep the f4. Thanks man!

@kenmicallefjazzvinylaudiop6455 4 года назад

Another helpful video. Buying the Tamron

@foxhouse_tips 4 года назад

It's hard decision. Sometimes i need a wide angle lens, so 16-35 or 17-28 but lighter. For estable shoots the f/2.8 aperture doesn't matter, cause i need about f/5.6 or darker aperture to show all in focus. But for weddings it might be a big deal

@Jigsaw407 4 года назад

Which lens did you use to shoot yourself in this review? The 28-75? Looks good!

@ThePhilharmonicStudios 3 года назад

Does this work on crop sensor Sony bod ?

@stephengalaso9841 3 года назад

the Zeiss is for me. the much wider range makes the lens way more useful. as much as I like the larger aperture, I gotta say the 16-35mm has a waaaay more practical range. It's worth $1000 to me (refurbished on amazon or eBay).

@ponderingnugget 4 года назад

Have both and keeping both. They're both good for different applications. Can't go wrong with either one if you are trying to pick between them.

@THELIFEOFCB 3 года назад

Which do you like better

@ponderingnugget 3 года назад

@@THELIFEOFCB I like the 17-28 for astro, or any time I want to carry less weight. The image quality is a little better on the 17-28 in terms of edge to edge sharpness, auto focus is about the same on both. I like the 16-35 better for landscapes because of the greater zoom range. I end up changing lenses too often when I use the 17-28 for landscapes, and I don't like doing that with my Sony cameras because the sensor gets dusty so easily. What kind of shooting do you do?

@THELIFEOFCB 3 года назад

@@ponderingnugget more less vlogging

@ponderingnugget 3 года назад

@@THELIFEOFCB You might like the 17-28 better for weight and the wider 2.8 aperture.

@JonasHolmqvistSweden 3 года назад

Awesome Peter! :)

@davidziggiattifilms5999 4 года назад

what is the best sony gmaster 16-35 2.8 or tamron 17-28 2.8 ??

@michaeljimenez9345 4 года назад

I'm torn between the two! I have a kit zoom and 50mm 1.8 on an a7iii. The 16-35mm focal length and the oss sound sooo good but the image quality of the 17-28 and the faster aperture really makes me question which way is the correct option! I like to vlog and shoot street photography and environmental portraits too. Someone help lol!

@Server16116 2 года назад

Go with 17-28. Everyone says that anything above 30mm on the 16-35 does not look nearly as sharp. Between 16mm vs f/2.8, I think f/2.8 would be more useful. That's my opinion anyways.

@nelsonngu 3 года назад

I have 16-35 f4 in my bag all the time. I do more video over photos. I like the solid build of the Zeiss, put on a rubber ring to prevent the paint scratch. Have 24GM f1.4 in my bag at all time for photos purposes with creamy bokeh. So I am happy with my purchase and I would not trade in for Tamrom as 16mm really makes a HUGE different in photos/videos.

@matthoffman6962 4 года назад

All I really want to know is if the tamron can handle group wedding shots without distortion and if it can be a good landscape lens. If yes to both I’m sold.