Тёмный

Tecnam P2012 Is A Game Changer For Commercial Travel 

MojoGrip
Подписаться 335 тыс.
Просмотров 115 тыс.
50% 1

Buy or sell your airplane www.aeroavion.com
Tecnam P2012 Traveller www.tecnam.com/aircraft/p2012...
Today we check out Tecnam's newest line of aircraft the P2012 Traveller. Twin piston engines and this is what Tecnam is going for right now if you look at this aircraft you can see that it's not your standard single pilot airplane and naturally you will look at this thing and think okay it's for commercial and generally speaking this airplane can serve several missions and it is one you can use for commercial part 121 carrying people up and about. There are probably other similar aircraft in the same category or class or that you've seen before but I think what sets the Tecnam P2012 or aka the traveller apart is those two engines. These are piston engines and generally speaking you may have piston engines that are used for charter operations and things like that but nothing this size. usually you can have a piston that can carry maybe four to six people. This airplane will seat up to 10. Up to 10 including the pilot or co-pilot up front
Tecnam P2012 Specs.
Engine - 2 × Lycoming TEO-540C1A
Range - 1000 miles
Speed - 200 mph (170 kts)
Useful load - 3130 lbs
Price - $3 Million
Manage your aircraft with COFLYT coflyt.com/mojogrip
My Merch www.bonfire.com/store/mojogrip/

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

 

9 апр 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 221   
@My3nMy4
@My3nMy4 2 года назад
Got that Aero Commander vibe
@CarltonSmithAXAThunder
@CarltonSmithAXAThunder 2 года назад
Yh no Its an islander mixed with a 402
@jameshuggins7320
@jameshuggins7320 2 года назад
$3M is nuts. Great video!
@ernestbradley4547
@ernestbradley4547 2 года назад
Check out the BN2P Islander. I have over 5000hrs in the islander alone and all island and bush type flying. Single pilot, 9pax 1 crew. Awesome aircraft.
@fudilemedford8250
@fudilemedford8250 Год назад
i also have over 5000 in the BN2P with alot of it bush time and what i can say itz just modernized Bn
@jimmiesalazar9005
@jimmiesalazar9005 Год назад
Hey man! Thank you very much this is the first time I see you in your vlog. I always watch your videos almost everyday but I never knew that it is you. Keep making more videos man. Thank you again
@speedomars3869
@speedomars3869 2 года назад
This is the Lycoming IE2 engine which is a fuel injected, turbo and all electronic ignition and full FADEC controlled. It has been EASA certified. Tecnam is very smart to use this engine as it is dual fuel (100LL and UL 100) and generates plenty or HP. The prop control is not a combined fuel/prop control. The FADEC computers adjust fuel flow based on density altitude and other engine parameters. The prop control controls prop pitch and thus will affect engine RPM based on throttle position.
@elliottlandco2776
@elliottlandco2776 2 года назад
Thanks for the review of this beauty! Been following them, and you!
@bosshogg2081
@bosshogg2081 2 года назад
Awesome Aircraft, love the content you create I'm Columbus Ga, pursuing my private pilot license. You inspire me Big Dogg. Definitely appreciate everything you do..
@elliottlandco2776
@elliottlandco2776 2 года назад
These are gorgeous! Been following them, but thanks for the video!
@joshveerapa4368
@joshveerapa4368 2 года назад
I’m so happy I got to see your plane at Sun and fun Yesterday. Sadly I could find you but I had a great time.
@rondayvu9400
@rondayvu9400 2 года назад
Mojo...I'm really impressed with your reviews...it has helped me rekindle and returned to flying and decide whether LSA or private pilot certification...probably LSA..lots to choose from.
@UncleFester84
@UncleFester84 2 года назад
The way those main landing gear are made tells me that it has been built to be made retractable as an option in the future
@tonywilson4713
@tonywilson4713 2 года назад
I wonder if there is a low drag option for the fixed (as in wheel spats)??
@twisterzman
@twisterzman Год назад
No retracts are planned
@DasMoose9001
@DasMoose9001 Год назад
Just watched your video on the P92, and saw this airframe on their website, had to look at it, glad I could count on your articulate nature again on THIS aircraft. Easy Flying and keep the blue side up, Friend
@donzimmerman5829
@donzimmerman5829 2 года назад
Always look forward to your reports from Sun N Fun. They are outstanding.
@MichaelCarterShow
@MichaelCarterShow 2 года назад
I 1st heard of the Technam from brotha Russ Can Fly's channel this past yr. Very interestin. Keep the plane reviews coming. Nice hat #salute my gud brotha!!!!!
@rotaryperfection
@rotaryperfection 2 года назад
Wow by looking at the lower engine duck, the intercooler efficiency should be off the charts with that nice low pressure zone on the bottom.
@barnard-baca
@barnard-baca 2 года назад
Nice to see your videos again! Saludos desde MMGL
@phillipmaasdorp9491
@phillipmaasdorp9491 Год назад
This is very comprehensive explanation of a very game changing aircraft.
@sheldonmurray4016
@sheldonmurray4016 2 года назад
Love is airplane!!!!!! I will get this for my family if I could.
@domwick720
@domwick720 2 года назад
Thanks for another great review and demystifying modern day flight. What is your belief on the origins of flight? Should I join group for these answers?
@willienelsongonzalez4609
@willienelsongonzalez4609 2 года назад
Damn! That thing looks sleek!
@richardherrmann1954
@richardherrmann1954 Год назад
This will work just right for me and family and work .
@pilotguy1141
@pilotguy1141 2 года назад
Beautiful aircraft would love to fly it
@MrJsteed2009
@MrJsteed2009 2 месяца назад
Very nice!
@Skiridr22
@Skiridr22 2 года назад
Great review 👍🏾👍🏾
@murdoch9106
@murdoch9106 2 года назад
This thing looks awesome! Hope its a success!
@stonehorn4641
@stonehorn4641 2 года назад
It won't be. It's a solution without a problem. There is no situation where this is superior to more closely classed turbines and turboprops, most specifically the Vision, the Hondajet, and and the Phenom 100, just off the top of my head. They are a bit more expensive, but have better hourly costs.
@The_Flying_Mechanic
@The_Flying_Mechanic 2 года назад
Such a versatile bird!
@busheerr
@busheerr 2 года назад
Nice work
@stuartsimek9393
@stuartsimek9393 2 года назад
Nice job Mike!
@baomao7243
@baomao7243 2 года назад
I really like this plane. They’ve done a great job - single pilot, a clean design, and keeping it spacious inside (the big windows help). But the max speed just keeps me eying low end turbines, esp. at that price. But i still find it gorgeous.
@americanswan
@americanswan 2 года назад
Exactly
@lardal1502
@lardal1502 2 года назад
turbine would use more fuel and require bigger tanks. More fuel means less passengers and lower income for commercial operators.
@baomao7243
@baomao7243 2 года назад
@@lardal1502 I think it depends on the application. As a mission I tend to think about taking non-paying passengers/friends somewhere within low hundreds to a few thousand miles max, maybe 4-12 people plus baggage. So “decent speed/range given that weight.” My mission doesn’t really require it to be hyper competitive commercially but if I was doing cargo for hire that might be a different story.
@randallkelley3600
@randallkelley3600 2 года назад
I agree. I read a test article on this plane. Apparently maximum cruise is 84% power and burns over 60 gph total. 50 gph total nets you about 170kts or so. Very much in the same range as a turbine Kodiak for example. That said, I am sure Cape Air knows their operations to the most excruciating detail and stayed with pistons and avgas for good reason.
@Default78334
@Default78334 2 года назад
@@randallkelley3600 Higher maintenance costs given the short hop, high frequency service that Cape Air would subject these to. A number of them are going to be doing the 30 mile HYA-ACK run 10-14 times a day each way. That's a lot of cycles to put on a turboprop engine.
@burliesanford1863
@burliesanford1863 Год назад
That is a great looking aircraft . Doesn't look like a lot for 3 million though in my opinion.
@shaunmorgan2202
@shaunmorgan2202 2 года назад
I always like your vids, like the hat too
@robertcooper6289
@robertcooper6289 2 года назад
Good job Mike
@f270
@f270 7 месяцев назад
I just looked up this plane up on flight radar 24 and it's currently in the air in Alaska! Anchorage to Keni 25 min flights. Looks like they make these round trips all day.
@johnkries8189
@johnkries8189 2 года назад
Now that's a great plane
@Chris_at_Home
@Chris_at_Home 2 года назад
Piston engine airplanes are common where I live. I have flown on scheduled flights in Navahos and Cherokee 6s.
@iammrvain
@iammrvain Год назад
Kenai Aviation in Kenai Alaska bought this specific aircraft. I have flown in it as a passenger it does not like my 6 foot three frame and will be training in it as a pilot the front is a little bigger. Thank you for a good review. I’ll let you know what I think. Thus far it has been a great aircraft.
@OshowAfrica
@OshowAfrica 2 года назад
Amazing
@blakethegreatone2058
@blakethegreatone2058 2 года назад
I like the usmc boonie cover.
@patrickmurray8304
@patrickmurray8304 2 года назад
this is very similar to the norman-britten islander from England. 9 passengers in a stol design and piston engines. the islander originally had,( and still uses), the lycoming 540 but now has many versions with turbines
@wootle
@wootle Год назад
The strangest version is the Trilslander , what a trippy looking thing, Its like its trying to be an MD11.
@lardal1502
@lardal1502 2 года назад
One important spec with these short hop planes is take-off and landing distance. These planes come into their own when they are used on shorter back country strips.
@julianbrelsford
@julianbrelsford 2 года назад
This airplane reminds me of a twin otter
@stonehorn4641
@stonehorn4641 2 года назад
This has the same, or even longer, takeoff and landing distance as other comparable aircraft in its weight class. It's really not an impressive plane when you look at the competition.
@TexanUSMC8089
@TexanUSMC8089 Год назад
@@julianbrelsford Like a mini Otter that costs a lot less.
@alexwonner7469
@alexwonner7469 2 года назад
I think it will be popular between small islands... Sure Tecnam will add some floats soon...
@michaelcoghlan9124
@michaelcoghlan9124 2 года назад
Yes thank you nice piece of equipment, an there should be a good market for it. An should lend itself, in the future, to a fairly easy conversion to electric powered. Good luck to them.
@okhera1
@okhera1 2 года назад
Very Nice Bro! Get Good People/Pilots!
@notydady4105
@notydady4105 2 года назад
Love it,can you do a video of Eflyer 800 too?
@chibuikembah9937
@chibuikembah9937 Год назад
Will the lycoming use just avgas or will it be able to use other fuel types such as jetA1 or petrol?
@renatoigmed
@renatoigmed 2 года назад
with this price and performance range, it will be difficult to compete with the Cessna 208 Caravan, which has been consolidated in the market for over 40 years, carries more passengers and more cargo capacity with just one engine (which reduces maintenance costs) and also you can find used units in excellent condition for half the price.
@marviwilson1853
@marviwilson1853 4 месяца назад
Cape Air would disagree. The plane was designed really for them.
@Dogdocphil
@Dogdocphil 2 года назад
I could certainly be wrong but I think the Prop levers have nothing to do with fuel management. I thought the fadec would set the best fuel flow given the throttle position.
@Captndarty
@Captndarty 2 года назад
Oval windows and a service ceiling of 19,000 feet is it slightly pressurize?
@markemiller1234
@markemiller1234 7 месяцев назад
Mike, looks like a versatal plane. Would be a great plane for a large family. Can a bathroom be installed in the back? Love your videos. Mark in SC
@manzanoalcivarful
@manzanoalcivarful 2 года назад
So do you happen to know if they have a cockpit poster to practice the flows? If so, how can I acquire one?
@dam4274
@dam4274 2 года назад
On the sidebar here, there is Paul Lucas flying on a Traveller!
@AviationJeremy
@AviationJeremy 2 года назад
So, are we calling this a mini Dash 8, or modernized Commander?
@julianbrelsford
@julianbrelsford 2 года назад
In appearance it definitely has some things in common with the Twin Otter and its larger derivatives, the Dash 7 and later the Dash 8.
@derekwarren1862
@derekwarren1862 Год назад
Would make Great Sense for a little place here in the UK By the name of Alderney EGJA and the surrounding Islands
@Antares2
@Antares2 2 года назад
I saw Tecnam is developing an electric engine version together with Rolls Royce for norwegian regional airline Widerøe. I really wonder if they can make it work.
@richardstonyisland9719
@richardstonyisland9719 2 года назад
propellers that close to the door seem a lil scary if u had to bail out
@JacobTJ1
@JacobTJ1 2 года назад
Perfect candidate for the new smaller GA turboprop enines
@foramericam1097
@foramericam1097 2 года назад
For 3mill it better be turbo prop!!
@renatoigmed
@renatoigmed 2 года назад
used Cessna 208 Caravan for the half price
@louissanderson719
@louissanderson719 Год назад
@@renatoigmed would pick the 208. Although, this aircraft does look sweet
@robjohnson8522
@robjohnson8522 Год назад
1/2 a mil for the panel! :(
@jacobbesele8713
@jacobbesele8713 7 месяцев назад
my Man.I didn't see the complete video about these plane.is it not felt the landing gears?
@markushandlemeyer6717
@markushandlemeyer6717 2 года назад
As a career long salesman of business jets, turboprops and pistons, I have always respected Tecnam albeit as a bit of a 2nd tier manufacturer of private aircraft. And I always liked the P2012 also. But I always assumed that the aircraft had a price point of about $1.5-2M. When I heard you say that it is $3M, my jaw dropped. Who would buy this aircraft when a new Cessna Grand Caravan EX costs about $500k less while carrying up to 12 pax with more payload, more range and way better product support in a global service center network with a proliferation of Caravans around the world. Are you SURE about this? If its true, it would be really good to hear from people who have paid $3m for theirs and why they didn't choose a Grand Caravan EX. Thanks & keep up your mojo !
@wncav8er
@wncav8er 2 года назад
Markus, I thought much of the same at first glance. I then researched the origins of the aircraft and its intended mission. Cape Air a small part 121 Airline based in the US is the largest customer of the 2012 and the catalyst for many of the design features. They are trying to replace their fleet of (around 80) Cessna 402C. Cape air flies mainly short flights out of smaller airports feeding larger ones, Island hopping and Point to point flight between tourist destinations. They approached Cessna about a new aircraft, but they weren't really interested. From talking to a Cape Air pilot, they wanted to keep 2 engines (Redundancy) and the low fuel burn (especially at lower altitudes) provided by the 402s Piston engines The 2012 is equipped with the latest FADEC controlled Lycoming engine. They also simplified many systems in order to keep maintenance and cost to minimum: Fixed gear, Simple flight controls, TKS Icing vs Boots, etc. Im sure Cape Air did not pay 3 million per aircraft, and to other small commercial operators the twin engine, low fuel burn, and simple systems might outweigh the price, range and payload factors. I have some time flying a caravan and it would be hard for me to buy a 2012 over that, but depending on ones mission I could see an argument. Cheers
@markushandlemeyer6717
@markushandlemeyer6717 2 года назад
@@wncav8er thanks a lot for this input. Yes - I have followed Cape Air for a while and aware. If they mandated a twin - that's all that's needed. Its a big price to pay but so long as they paid a lot less than the $3m unit price, it would make sense if support is sufficient. I'll go check out the DOCs between the 3 models...especially fuel flow. I just remembered that the US limits the Grand Caravan to 9 pax so my argument about more pax is moot. I live overseas and the limit is 12 pax here for a grand caravan... cheers to you !
@jpmeyer4159
@jpmeyer4159 Год назад
I think you mean Part 135, Also there were plenty of piston twins in the past that held just as many people. Cessna 402, Chieftain ect...
@michaelthomas7178
@michaelthomas7178 Год назад
Reminds me of Rockwell commander.
@billmorris2613
@billmorris2613 2 года назад
There are quite a few twin piston engine air raft capable of carrying 10 passengers plus the pilot.
@TexanUSMC8089
@TexanUSMC8089 Год назад
How many cost 3 million brand new?
@domwick720
@domwick720 2 года назад
Pardon me this is a little out of sync but what is a good plane I could put a focke and wulf assuming it is feasible mechanically. Money of course is a factor but would it be tasteful. I'm not putting a. AudRS engine into a chevy cobalt even if it would make sense to attempt
@JACB006
@JACB006 2 года назад
Great replacement for an Britten-Norman BN-2B Islander.
@philliphill3390
@philliphill3390 2 года назад
FINALLY! An aircraft designer who creates separate doors for the copilot AND the pilot AND the other passengers!! I never understood the seeming stupidity behind the small Piper's single door design even though I like Pipers!
@SuperVt100
@SuperVt100 2 года назад
The single door on a Piper as told told to me in the 70s (I was young) was for the strength of the airframe.
@niladrimukherjee2098
@niladrimukherjee2098 Год назад
Hi Mike , a request : I understand more in kiloneters and miles and noting in nautical miles and please mention the data in kilometers or miles alongwith nautical miles
@gregdankert
@gregdankert 2 года назад
I think Cape Air is getting these soon-ish
@itisWhatitis12345
@itisWhatitis12345 Год назад
damm good airplane
@rameshkumargurung674
@rameshkumargurung674 2 года назад
sir I want to watch electric commercial aircraft vedio , is it possible??? l am lover of your channel, best of luck go ahead
@rchkdd3804
@rchkdd3804 2 года назад
Dope
@chriskibbe2901
@chriskibbe2901 2 года назад
Anyone have an idea of the hourly operating cost ($3M)? Thx
@jpconnect4015
@jpconnect4015 2 месяца назад
I think they wanna bring a couple of these planes in to Hawaii for inter island travels but they look small on the inside....would be hard for the elderly to get in and out....I wish they would bring back the twin OTTER...
@paradigmlost7582
@paradigmlost7582 6 месяцев назад
I still think a version with retractable gear might appear for even higher cruise speeds.
@FlyingNDriving
@FlyingNDriving 2 года назад
That engine needs to go in the Piper m350 or even the SR22
@rafaelcarvalho6222
@rafaelcarvalho6222 Год назад
That is what I thought also.
@i.r.wayright1457
@i.r.wayright1457 2 года назад
I would like to know the real operating cost per seat mile.
@raulramos5258
@raulramos5258 2 года назад
What is the per hr cost?
@TexanUSMC8089
@TexanUSMC8089 Год назад
Way cooler than the P2006. It also costs a lot more though. LOL I would rather sacrifice a little speed to have more interior room. I like this plane. It's a SUV instead of a sports car.
@Skiridr22
@Skiridr22 2 года назад
It some how reminds me of a great white shark
@phatboizbackyardkustomz9006
@phatboizbackyardkustomz9006 2 года назад
Should have went with a diesel like Diamond and the non retractable gear is a deal killer. For the price someone can get a caravan.
@stonehorn4641
@stonehorn4641 2 года назад
I've never looked at a High Wing and thought, "oh, that's nice, I want one of those". That still holds true today.
@viperdriver82
@viperdriver82 2 года назад
That's a pretty islander
@cyrouskhavari969
@cyrouskhavari969 2 года назад
I don't believe it can compete with, planes such as Pilatus, Kodiak, Caravan. For bigginers I believe its under powered. The Italians, try to imitate the Rockwell commander 500. Except its fixed gear. Just my humble opinion.
@tonywilson4713
@tonywilson4713 2 года назад
Good point. It seems like its a lot of money for a plane that can't go that fast. But then it might being aimed at the short hop tourist markets in places like Africa, Asia and the Pacific, where a less technical plane might be a damn sight easier to operate, maintain, get pilots for, etc.
@a.b.6233
@a.b.6233 2 года назад
It was designed and engineered according to Cape Air's requirements and specifications for the US market. I heard that a turboprop version is under study for the rest of the world where avgas is difficult or impossible to find. The Pilatus, Kodiak and Caravan are designed with a different target in mind and are single engines, the P2012 is meant to replace the Cessna 402 at Cape Air.
@pistonburner6448
@pistonburner6448 2 года назад
Did I read correctly that the Tecnam's fuel burn is over .3kg/km while the Piaggio P180 Avanti Evo burns .22kg/km (flying at 318kn...). And comparing Pilatus PC-12 it consumes 250 l/h compared to Tecnam's 117 l/h. But since the Pilatus is cruising at 265 kn (and Piaggio's number includes takeoff, climbs etc. for the flight) compared to Tecnam's 170 kn, their consumption is actually not that horribly far off? The Tecnam doesn't really save in other than capital costs, and I guess despite needing overhauls more often, it's probably still somewhat cheaper in maintenance than a pressurised business turboprop like the Piaggio and Pilatus? Or do the longer TBOs of the Piaggio and Pilatus even it out? No doubt the Tecnam is far, far simpler. Of course on shorter routes the Tecnam won't use as much fuel climbing up to high altitude, but is there that much of a difference, since the Piaggio climbs to FL250 in 10 min? So is it true that with the Tecnam costs won't be wildly cheaper for many types of operations compared to far better performing and more comfortable turboprops, the main advantage is easier raising the much lower capital / lower lease payments?
@ankurrsoni8648
@ankurrsoni8648 2 года назад
Looking very similar to Do-228
@milojenikolovski7522
@milojenikolovski7522 2 года назад
Regards from Serbia Mojo, nice video.
@punyaslokmohapatra7631
@punyaslokmohapatra7631 2 года назад
👍
@mohammeddambatta7563
@mohammeddambatta7563 2 года назад
Hay Mike great video. Do you think this aircraft will do well in Nigeria? Peace out.
@Yman83464z
@Yman83464z 2 года назад
Smaller airport to airport [Airfield] runs - yes. But nowadays with the risk of small arms fire, RPGs etc: you need a good ceiling. You would also need good weather mostly to operate it. With 9 pax, it would have to be a "premium" service commercially: Kaduna to Abuja return, Kano to Abuja return etc. Abuja to Makurdi or Otukpo... Lagos to Ibadan, or Lagos Ilorin etc... With the range of the aircraft: it can do much longer flights even Lagos to Abuja - but it would NOT be a comfortable prospect. Long [2+ hours], turbulent etc...
@josephc.9520
@josephc.9520 2 года назад
@@Yman83464z I thought you were joking about the RPGs took a hot second to realize your seriousness
@Yman83464z
@Yman83464z 2 года назад
@@josephc.9520 Parts of Nigeria are under some "bandit"/ Terrorist pressure: these are gangs of terrorists, some of who are linked to Boko Haram, and other extremist groups - as well as gangs of cattle rustlers and many gangs who have gone into kidnapping. They are quite heavily armed: a lot of small arms and RPG from looted warehouses in Libya have trickled down to Nigeria now...
@treysouder9176
@treysouder9176 Год назад
Have those same goodrs. Electric
@pilatusdistribution3141
@pilatusdistribution3141 2 года назад
The smaller twin P2006 has retractable gears.....Strange that Tecnam went for the fixed gears design on this new heavier twin.... With retractable gears the P2012 would probably cruise well above 180 kt at 80% power and the gears up configuration would also help to maintain a better single engine positive rate. As for the power plants , for example , a pair of light weight Rolls- Royce M-250 / 420 shp would boost the performance numbers and operators could stay away from the problematic AVGAS supply at remote airports.... These light weight turbines have a reasonable fuel consumption and comes with a better safety track record vs engine failure than their pistons cousins.... Yes the amount of fuel required on board for the same range is greater but turbines are way lighter for the same horsepower output than the piston engines. At last a beautiful design from Italy that could benefit from a a gear up jet fuel smell upgrade...
@thisismagacountry1318
@thisismagacountry1318 2 года назад
Probably wanted to appeal to the missionaries who need simplicity and lower operating costs. A larger market to sell more planes to.
@durksteel
@durksteel 7 месяцев назад
Cape Air asked for fixed gear on this machine.
@ukoutdoors3022
@ukoutdoors3022 Год назад
For 3 million I'd expect the carpet not to have wrinkles in it.
@av8tor261
@av8tor261 2 года назад
It's pretty. How much, turn key?
@stormworks4882
@stormworks4882 2 года назад
3milly
@av8tor261
@av8tor261 2 года назад
@@stormworks4882 Yikes! I'll stick with a Twin Otter.
@chrisdutoit2641
@chrisdutoit2641 Год назад
In my opinion Tecnam, though beautifully designed, is ridiculously over-priced and underpowered. You get the consumption of a Cessna 182 with the performance of a 172 and at a price more than both those. Ten out of ten for beauty of design though.
@user-ct1nv1yb7n
@user-ct1nv1yb7n 10 месяцев назад
คุณต้องคิดถึงความเป็นจริงมีร้านค้าอยู่เป็น 10 ล้านคุณเข้าไปซื้อกันอยู่ร้านเดียวกิน 9 ร้านเขาขายของไม่ได้เลยมันไม่ผิดกฎกติกาแต่เป็นการรักษาน้ำใจสังคมส่วนรวมคนกลุ่มใหญ่แล้วก็มีปัญหาอีกมากมายขอพักไว้ก่อน 5-6 เดือนขอยืนยันไม่ได้ห้าม
@kazansky22
@kazansky22 Год назад
Tbh with pressurization it'll be pretty niche, and for the fuel you're burning and amount your carrying it's just too slow. Better options were built in the 60s-70s-80s.
@gkindern
@gkindern 2 года назад
CapeAir says the fuel consumption so far is worse than promised
@twisterzman
@twisterzman Год назад
It is. And slower than our 402s. And can't carry as much. It does have nice avionics..🙄
@minkusmcminkus7598
@minkusmcminkus7598 2 года назад
A short bus for the sky
@miran77
@miran77 2 года назад
How much it cost
@jeffreyd2477
@jeffreyd2477 8 месяцев назад
It was Designed for Cape Air to replace the fleet.
@usorodanielusoro8688
@usorodanielusoro8688 2 года назад
Awesome price. That's about the price of Vision Jet!!!
@tomboard1
@tomboard1 2 года назад
Except it's a million more than the Vision Jet. Completely different missions.
@usorodanielusoro8688
@usorodanielusoro8688 2 года назад
@@tomboard1 The G2 variant of Vision Jet was $2.85 million in the second quarter of 2021.
@1987whitez
@1987whitez 2 года назад
The rotor is really close to the open pilot and coed pilot door damn. Nice plane over all
Далее
88. Обзор самолета Tecnam P2006T
24:14
Просмотров 50 тыс.
Just try to use a cool gadget 😍
00:33
Просмотров 50 млн
#47 Demo Flight in the Tecnam P2012 Traveller Twin
22:31
Tecnam P2006T - the lightest twin-engine
17:13
Просмотров 214 тыс.
Inside The $3 Million Tecnam P2012 STOL
8:17
Просмотров 17 тыс.
Inside The $3 Million Tecnam P2012
8:25
Просмотров 15 тыс.
Top 5 Cheapest Turboprops | Price & Specs
10:42
Просмотров 476 тыс.
Inside The $700,000 Tecnam P2006T
9:47
Просмотров 18 тыс.
$2.75 Million Tecnam P2012 STOL | Twin Piston Aircraft
8:57
Как вам такой Матиз?
0:15
Просмотров 1,4 млн