Тёмный

The F-35 has ONLY ONE RIVAL that WON'T GIVE UP... 

Millennium 7 * HistoryTech
Подписаться 109 тыс.
Просмотров 224 тыс.
50% 1

The Dassault Rafale Fighter Jet is probably the only fighter that is selling like the F-35. In this video, I examine why it is so and what is in store for the Rafale future.
Enjoy!
The previous complete coverage:
• Rafale Jet Fighter - b...
#Rafale #Dassault #dassaultrafale
Join this channel to support it:
/ @millennium7historytech
Support me on Patreon / millennium7
One off donation with PayPal www.paypal.com/paypalme/Mille...
Join the Discord server / discord
Buy an Aircraft Model at Air Models! airmodels.net/?aff=173
----------------------------
Ask me anything!
Take part to the community Q&A clicking the link below!
forms.office.com/r/LNPQtf3Tc0
--------------------
Visit the subreddit!
/ millennium7lounge
---------------------
All images and additional video segments contained in the Thumbnails and/or B-roll segments are used in strict compliance with the appropriate permissions and licenses required from the source and in accordance with the RU-vid Partner Program, Community guidelines & RU-vid terms of service.

Опубликовано:

 

29 июл 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,3 тыс.   
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech Год назад
The Dassault Rafale Fighter Jet is probably the only fighter that is selling like the F-35. In this video, I examine why it is so and what is in store for the Rafale future. Enjoy! The previous complete coverage: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-euMhXnNiqCw.html #Rafale #Dassault #dassaultrafale Join this channel to support it: ru-vid.com/show-UCVDkfkGRzo0qcZ8AkB4TMuwjoin Support me on Patreon www.patreon.com/Millennium7 One off donation with PayPal www.paypal.com/paypalme/Millennium7star Join the Discord server discord.gg/6CuWEWuhsk Buy an Aircraft Model at Air Models! airmodels.net/?aff=173 ---------------------------- Ask me anything! Take part to the community Q&A clicking the link below! forms.office.com/r/LNPQtf3Tc0 -------------------- Visit the subreddit! www.reddit.com/r/Millennium7Lounge/ ---------------------
@joyalsajan1168
@joyalsajan1168 Год назад
Great video...
@chitaegandalalake263
@chitaegandalalake263 Год назад
. The Truth About the Useless F-35 & F-22 😜❗😁😂🤣 . Can't Turn -- Can't Climb -- Can't Run -- Like Clubbing Baby Seals😱❗ @ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-27qdB1D0s9M.html
@zvonkoprosen4096
@zvonkoprosen4096 Год назад
Americans have grounded all of the f35 yestrday,danger to pilots,any news on that?
@angeloicaro661
@angeloicaro661 Год назад
Question: if Boeing redesign the f/a-18 super hornet and make it angular just like the kf-21 when you look at it in front. Will this make the f/a-18 reduce the RCS, more maneuverable, long range and better dog fighter?
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech Год назад
@@angeloicaro661 That would be radical. I don't think it is feasible.
@pst9737
@pst9737 Год назад
As an italian aeronautical engineer, I have always loved (but also envied) the aerospace industry of our cosuins beyond the Alps. Great studies in aerodynamics and propulsion, good electronic capabilities, sufficient funds for research = great planes and top researchers. Everything made and thought inside the Country. Well done, mes amis!
@giuseppeguerrieri4946
@giuseppeguerrieri4946 Год назад
If only we wanted in Italy, we would be at the same level, we have companies, there is not enough political will, the chase of the future will only be with European collaborations
@arthurbousquet6838
@arthurbousquet6838 Год назад
It's a shame Italy doesn't have a big aerial industry, you were the leaders before WW2. Greetings from accross the Alps ;)
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech Год назад
I second that. UE and NATO are much more fragile than it seems, and there are deep rifts among the members. In this environment, it is almost imperative to have at least some autonomy regarding defence. Italy's historic vocation is to be friends with everyone, trade with everyone, but be able to deter any military threat, Like Sweden used to be.
@pst9737
@pst9737 Год назад
I myself work for an italian aersopace Company, and I agree, we have the manpower to build a strong aerospace industrial complex. We lack of two main aspects: political will and money to invest in research and the build up of structures. The wrong political approach to aerospace sector we have in Italy is clear for example for what happened with F35 and the Piaggio drone. Luckily, we have been able to at least implement the Cameri site for F35, which is a spring of know-how and it gives a relevant return to our aerospace industry.
@pst9737
@pst9737 Год назад
@@Millennium7HistoryTech I agree. P.s. I'm looking for a good book regarding the aerodynamics of fighters. I remeber that you show something similar in an old video, but I cannot find it anymore. Have you got some books to suggest? I have focused a lot on fluid dybamics and aerodynamics, but I've never found a complete guide to Military fighters applications.
@demarchithierry2691
@demarchithierry2691 4 месяца назад
Marcel Dassault said : "A plane only flies well if it is beautiful." Mirage, then Rafale, just confirm that.
@NostraDahut
@NostraDahut 4 месяца назад
He said that statement, because as a jew he was bullied by a lot of concurrences before ww2, and the concurrences were producing a LOT of ugly french planes. By selling this statement he was showing that his factory was capable of more than the concurrences, producing efficiently AND producing gorgeously
@SupGaillac
@SupGaillac 4 месяца назад
@@NostraDahut Well, I've always heard is other circumstances (and many times) that a good design is a beautiful design. Reason being that a good design usually also "feels" right. But, mind that the contraposition is wrong in general. A beautiful design doesn't mean it's good.
@gabrielcalda7033
@gabrielcalda7033 4 месяца назад
What about about russian planes? They are the most beautiful fighters, but they aren't as good against western jets. Dont get me wrong, a fighter is a fighter, it is still built to kill and it can, but Im just saying they are pretty subpar
@tucoramirez988
@tucoramirez988 4 месяца назад
Absolutely not what he said. Dassault said: "A beautiful plane is a plane who fly well". Not the same sense.
@GholaTleilaxu
@GholaTleilaxu 3 месяца назад
That is how you loose the wars with the Russians.
@grock7971
@grock7971 11 месяцев назад
I am happy when my country (Indonesia) chose Rafale. Hope in the future Indomesia will add more Rafale or more France product.
@nihilusedit1447
@nihilusedit1447 4 месяца назад
As a French, I'm happy that my country makes buisness with Indonesia, great people !
@HaterDeFrance
@HaterDeFrance 4 месяца назад
From France, Thank you !
@Dangermonkey1000
@Dangermonkey1000 4 месяца назад
Muslim radical indonesia
@TheCryptoOptimist
@TheCryptoOptimist 3 месяца назад
Hope Indonesia don't sell it to China.
@clives344
@clives344 Год назад
Being A Brit now living in France it Galls me watching this video about the Rafale, especially as an Aerospace Engineer who has worked on EFA in the past. But your analysis is brilliant. Well done to the French for removing themselves from ITAR. The French have played their hand well in the export market.
@frankmiller95
@frankmiller95 Год назад
Are you sure on the spelling on that? lsn't it Gaul?
@antoinebaldur2941
@antoinebaldur2941 Год назад
ITAR is a U.S. weapon in the economic war. In 2013, European companies Airbus and Thales were competing with Lockeed Martin to deliver spy satellites to the United Arab Emirates. The European companies won the contract in 2014, but the United States then used ITAR to terminate the contract. The French government must negotiate with the U.S. government to unblock the situation. There are many similar situations, but this is not the only weapon used by the U.S. The US Department of Justice is used to force other countries to do what they want. The Alstom case in France is a very good example. The Justice Department accused this company of using bribery to win a contract (in international business, this is a normal thing). As a result, Alstom's CEO was put under pressure and one of the company's top executives, Frédéric Pierucci, was imprisoned during the affair (which lasted just over a year). The French government was forced to sell its strategic company (turbines for nuclear reactors and for the French aircraft carrier Charles De Gaulle) to General Electric. They also use their influence to discredit each other, as in Australia when the French won the submarine contract, the Australian press criticized the French submarines very harshly, public opinion became very unfavourable to the french submarines contract as well as the Australian politicians. There had been also a leak in the Australian press about the secret documentation of the French submarines (22,500 pages), which was of course a terrible thing for all users of the Scorpen submarine. Of course, we have no evidence of who did this, but it’s a terrible mistake to be naive. The European countries are under the influence of the USA which is normal, it is a consequence of the Second World War and the Cold War. So it’s impossible to win a contract if the United States wants it. The US uses other weapons, since Snowden we have evidence that the US spies on everyone, even its "allies". You now know why the French are trying to get their strategic materials out of the United States. They learned after very difficult lessons. But it is very complicated because as I said before the USA has a strong influence on the countries around the France.
@lamsior
@lamsior 6 месяцев назад
Unfortunately Brits went for the F35 :(
@LeonAust
@LeonAust 4 месяца назад
7 to 1 in recent war games with the F-35 being the victor, Buy Rafael and you buy 2nd grade.@@lamsior
@barracuda7018
@barracuda7018 4 месяца назад
​@@lamsiornonsense Brits needed Vertical take off fighter. Rafael can’t do it.
@sajoymenon
@sajoymenon Год назад
Good tempered Indian here...good to learn that Rafale is highly rated . Though quite expensive, (don't know how much Rafale versions to other countries cost) India has had a good run with its Mirage 2000s and the French are reliable suppliers; these factors definitely worked in it's favor. Thanks Millennium for an as usual detailed report.
@jeanvaljean9293
@jeanvaljean9293 Год назад
the rafale is not so expensive but you guys always take the contract/nb of planes and .... no that's not the price of the plane. Weapons are not the plane, bases are not the plane...
@sajoymenon
@sajoymenon Год назад
@@jeanvaljean9293 You are right. The aircraft standalone cost is much less. But I have come to understand that in India's case, the 36 Rafales ordered had many India Specific Enhancements (ISEs) apart from cost of source code for sensor fusion, due to which the cost of the deal was almost double the cost of the 30 Rafales ordered by Egypt. Plus SU 30 MKIs (apparently the best SU 30 versions) manufactured in India costs one-third the above price of Rafale, so here we got the impression that Rafale is expensive. The IAF always has insisted on the best in a particular version of aircraft so naturally it has to pay more.
@majalca03
@majalca03 Год назад
Nobody really gives a shit.
@lamsior
@lamsior 6 месяцев назад
Fun fact, Rafale have replaced 7 different aircrafts in the French army, that's what we call being OMNIROLE.
@GholaTleilaxu
@GholaTleilaxu 3 месяца назад
While the French Army changes from being OMNIvore to being HERBIvore.
@doogleticker5183
@doogleticker5183 3 месяца назад
« It’s a jack of all trades and master of none. » Variety has always been a better strategy.
@DC2022
@DC2022 3 месяца назад
@@doogleticker5183 in fact considering on how it does the job, it's a Jack of all trade, master of all.
@doogleticker5183
@doogleticker5183 3 месяца назад
@@DC2022 - Still waiting for the evidence, dude.
@alainfilho1467
@alainfilho1467 Месяц назад
​@@GholaTleilaxuil est temps de retourner à tes soldats de plomb...et de cesser de parler de choses que tu ne connais PAS...gamin 😂😂😂😂
@MD-wn4ui
@MD-wn4ui Год назад
Let us have a moment of silence to the Gripen.
@DefaultProphet
@DefaultProphet Год назад
Sorry gripenboos
@Frencho9
@Frencho9 Год назад
F-16 Block 72 killed it. Sad would rather have poorer countries like Slovakia, Romania and Bulgaria buy European than Gringo Vipers.
@the80386
@the80386 Год назад
it's largely Sweden's own doing. they have subordinated themselves to USA to such an extent that they have to follow orders against their own interests. it's a shame because they have aero (and submarine) industries with excellent history and potential. if they focused on independence from USA components and policy like France, then Gripen (and A-series AIP subs) would've become widely used equipment around the world. they could've been the 21st century equivalent of Mirage III (or the U209 for subs)
@rosomak8244
@rosomak8244 Год назад
@@the80386 If they did that the Gippen would plain and simply never have been. Sweden has not the industrial capability to cover all the necessary technologies.
@zvonkoprosen4096
@zvonkoprosen4096 Год назад
this is killing me....haha
@singular9
@singular9 Год назад
Notice how the french like to stay in the middle ground at all times no mater what is going on in the world. The way they told germany to F Off with their "green energy" and built dozens of nuclear reactors instead seemed expensive at the time, but is now considered a genius long term move to have a fully self sustainable energy grid. Then the french arms industry consistently tries to build excellent products that avoid taking any sides or cross any legal boundaries so that they can guarantee exports and funding to maintain a self sustaining military industry, which in turn maintains the engineer's competencies for generations. When the syrian refugee crisis began france opposed softening the rules on gaining a refugee status and were actively pursuing their own goals in the middle east (and Libya when all that went down). France is the low key european super power. They have the expertise to develop and deploy modern high tech weapons systems as well as defend its own interests without taking any harm in doing so.
@Tetemovies4
@Tetemovies4 Год назад
Unfortunatly we are slowly loosing that strenght to give room to a German-French couple that only exists in french heads.
@thepny_chasseur_de_tricera5361
@@Tetemovies4 french know that a bad thing 🤨 since the german are rhe only one pushing the idea there is huge Chance that dassault will work alone
@dan7564
@dan7564 Год назад
I mean, Nuclear is green energy but I get what you mean.
@Girder3
@Girder3 Год назад
Correction, the French built an extensive nuclear energy infrastructure decades before the Germans even talked about Green Energy. It was done of necessity due to their lack of usable domestic energy resources (coal, oil, natural gas) at the time. They overbuilt capacity, but that allowed them to sell excess power to their neighbors. The french building more nuclear reactors has more to do with future proofing their existing power base and replacing aging power plants.
@flo__60
@flo__60 Год назад
@@Girder3 and no our nuclear power plant need extensive maintenance reducing the disponibility this fall we had a risk of blackout in cases of cold lack of wind and solar energy, macaron made a "i get this" move saying we would go back to "nuclear supremacy" but that's forgetting all the qualified builders are now retired or dead.... we lack even maintenance crew because after Fukushima everyone wanted out of nuclear.... tl dr: let the emotion-driven environmentalist lead the country and watch the mayhem...
@msulemanf
@msulemanf Год назад
The French have to be given credit for what they achieved in an aircraft a tonne lighter than eurofighter with much less powerful engines - ie. strong air to ground, carrier compatibility, AESA radar & lower price. Looks more elegant/innovative, too - those cheek intakes and area ruling/blending are sweet.
@pew3561
@pew3561 Год назад
To eurofighter credit, it's an interceptor, not a multirole fighter. Lack of vision i guess ?
@-_El_Pollo_Loco_-
@-_El_Pollo_Loco_- Год назад
@@pew3561 no i believe it's a difference of war doctrines that are indicative of the differences and it's just that the french were proven right to go that route
@pew3561
@pew3561 Год назад
@@-_El_Pollo_Loco_- i guess they saw the signs of the price increase between generations.
@-_El_Pollo_Loco_-
@-_El_Pollo_Loco_- Год назад
@@pew3561 probably also the fact that while having a multirole fighter is more expansive per unit it's a lot less expansive than having multiple aircraft types
@LZE.
@LZE. Год назад
Area rule became redundant a long time ago with modern aerodynamics and engines. Those intakes/forward fuselage cheeks do little to reduce its RCS, hence Dassaults' continuel patching of defensive aids onto Rafale.
@H3x4r35
@H3x4r35 Год назад
A few errors and additions: - Egypt will have 54, not 66 Rafale. First contract 2015: 24 Rafale. Second one 2021: 30 more. Technically it's even 55, as they allegedly lost one aircraft in dire circumstances I won't discuss here, an aircraft that has been sneakily added to the next production lot, explaining why the total amount of exported (or almost in the case of Indonesia) Rafale is 285 and not 284. - The 36 Qatari Rafale have been fully delivered already, the latest of the 36 was transferred in april 2022. - Discussions about the Rafale in Serbia are most probably not serious right now. It has been a long time France has not sold the same major weaponry to two potential adversaries. Although serbs have Mistral shorads missiles... It looks like an attempt from Serbia to stirr up dissent between France and Croatia. Turks did the same towards the greeks very recently, openly talking about their desire to order "first generation Rafales". I highly doubt Macron would do something like this... but who knows? So buy these Rafale before someone else does! (wink wink) - the 36 indian Rafale are not entirely modified YET. While the 36 have been formally delivered very recently, only 35 are physically in India, with one aircraft, Rafale DH RB008, the first produced but the last delivered, still being tested in France, under the authority of the Indian Air Force, for the integration and future retrofit of the full list of 13 ISE (Indian Specific Enhancements). - no electronic warfare variant is needed right now, however while the Spectra bandwidth has not been enlarged (which will be the case with late F4 early F5 production lots) the ASTAC pod dedicated to ELINT/ISR is still in service under the Mirage 2000D in the french air force. So while every Rafale will technically have ELINT capabilities akin to the ASTAC pod in the future, and much more with radar-based jamming to go alongside it, it's not really the case right now. Dedicated pods could very well be developed if the need arises, alongside the enhancement of Spectra. - SCALP EG missile could not be acquired by Egypt not because it was not ITAR free. It was. However the USA placed a certain chip on the ITAR list to block this sale out of the blue to appease Israel. Egyptians were furious against the french, and it took a year to fix the problem as a replacement chip was developed and integrated in France, but the SCALP EG cruise missiles have since been delivered to Egypt, with pictures attesting their presence in the egyptian inventory. - about F4.1 and F4.2, you get it wrong. F4.1 will be the standard for retrofitted EXISTING Rafale aircrafts, which in the case of french aircrafts, have nowadays all (or almost all) been upgraded to the F3R standard (more on this later). F4.2 standard is the designation for all NEWLY PRODUCED F4 aircrafts. Again, these denominations make sense only for countries in which Rafale already operate. The UAE won't receive F4.1 or F4.2, only F4, because there won't be the need to differentiate between platforms. Their F4 will be akin to the F4.2 of course. Egypt however has received 24 F3 Rafale, that can be upgraded to F3R easily, and then to F4.1 standard. However the 30 additional aircrafts they will receive will be in F4.2 standard (newly produced F4). Therefore the distinction will make sense only for them, as well as France, Qatar, Greece, and Croatia, if these countries ever buy more Rafale or upgrade them in the future. To be specific, the only, heavily discussed among french military enthusiasts, difference between F4.1 and F4.2, would probably be the presence or the absence of side-looking arrays in the nose. However other solutions exists, like side looking tile panels incorporated in the future GaN based AESA RBE2 array for Rafale's radar, which may render the whole endeavour, and distinction, ludicrous. However there are zero viable information about this right now, it's a well kept secret, so don't take my informed amateur word for granted. - about the MADL terminal on Rafale, this is a misinterpretation. What is happening is the ESSOR (European Secure Software-defined Radio) datalink, which is a multiplatform european datalink successor to MIDS, that is already distributed to more "subscribers" than MADL, will be integrated on the Rafale along the link 16, meaning each Rafale will receive and act as a server node hosting multiple directional datalinks in the future. This led a USN official to recently demand "more connectivity between his F-35C and the Rafale M of the french navy" but that's only wishful thinking as of now. It is VERY hard to imagine LM opening MADL to a non-US aircraft. However, the F-35 will probably have access to ESSOR, as many of the participants to ESSOR are also F-35 clients (Germany, Italy, Finland, Poland, Spain, France, Sweden). This would solve the riddle. - The spectra suite F4 upgrade will probably (no certainly) revolve around enlarging its operating bandwidth. Few details have been released. There has been speculation that the RF detection frequencies it covers may have increased, possibly detecting RF threats in the Millimetre Wave (MMW) band There have been rumors about it operating from 0.3ghz to 300ghz. Now about indian ISE because people get these very wrong and don't understand what F3/F3R/F4/F4.1/F4.2 stand for: - These ISE include a whole lot of modifications, making it a standard close to the future F4. Mainly a low band jammer at the top front of the tail, side-looking arrays on the side of the nose behind small bays only present on indian Rafale right now, another downward/rearward T/R Spectra antenna just under the engines exhausts, and a new IR optic for the Front Sector Optronics. There is also a new APU with a cold start high altitude capability. - So other indian Rafale are still in F3 standard, or something akin to the F3R standard. "R" meaning "Roadmap", which is a french only standard incorporating a small unimportant physical reinforcement setting the airframe lifespan from 7500 hours to 9000 hours before refit. - That's why it makes no sense to call export Rafale F3R (yet), as F3R is the homogeneisation standard of a fleet of aircrafts that have been delivered in F1 (9 Rafale M of the navy which were then refitted in F3), F2, F2.1, F2.2, F3.1/.2/.3/.4 and F3O4T. F3R is therefore not a specifically set standard, since newly produced latest Rafale already include this modernization. - The F3R configuration is basically a consolidation of F3O4T (traitement des obsolescences, 4eme tranche) improvements and rationalizations (disappearance of the IR ball replaced with a near-IR TV captor), and concerns aircrafts delivered in previous standard, which does not concerns a single export customer since all export Rafale were delivered in F3 configuration, to a standard close to F3.4/F3O4T. - Among the tactically important modifications achieved over time, computing power. Quick story: the Rafale first started its life in the 90's and to keep up with Moore's law, has a fully optic fiber data bus connected to MDPUs centered around a plug&play upscalable Power PC architecture and CPU. The first one was roughly akin to a Pentium 1 133mhz, then went forward with something akin to a Pentium 2 333mhz, then to something akin to a Pentium 3 733 mhz CPU, then went dualcore with a 1.2 ghz cpu for the F3 standard. Then quad core with the F3.4 standard. This was made possible by the plug&play design of the whole Rafale system. Next standard (F3R as there is no F3.5 standard for obvious reasons) includes even more cores and faster clockspeed but it has been very difficult to find any information about this anymore, although it has been revealed Cuda cores may have been playing a role in these MDPUs for a long time. There are 4 bays for MDPUs in the Rafale, currently, there's still only 2 occupied by computers. That's all I can think about now. I wholeheartedly admit the french side does not communicate enough which makes people misunderstand many things about the Rafale. Keep up the good work.
@islamrefaat8877
@islamrefaat8877 Год назад
you are absolutely right about the Egyptian Rafales and the SCALP EG missiles. Egypt did lost one Rafale and also did receive SCALP EG missiles
@abdullahasif8963
@abdullahasif8963 Год назад
ok Israeli secret service member
@H3x4r35
@H3x4r35 Год назад
​@Roger Really? There is one Rafale that has been ordered by an undisclosed *export* customer in 2021pushing the total result up to *285* and not *284 exported* Rafale. However this aircraft was not accounted for in Dassault's delivery schedule in 2021 when they announced their results in january 2022. The french spokeperson for the ministry of defense Hervé Grandjean confirmed this in january 2022 when answering this specific question from mister Michel Cabirol, journalist at La Tribune. Watch from 20:34: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NvLczycuIZg.html for any non-French speakers reading this here is a translation: _"- Hello Mr. Grandjean, Michel Cabirol, I had a question about the export results of the Rafale. Dassault Aviation declared in early january in its press release it had _*_sold 37 Rafales for export._*_ I noticed there were _*_30 Rafales for Egypt and 6 for Greece, but I can't see where does that last exported Rafale exported, the 37th, came from._*_ Maybe you got an idea about it, I don't. Well, I do, but it's all guesswork."_ _"- I don't know, we will investigate, we will have to ask Dassault the question too. Is it not the plane that was lost by the Egyptian armed forces, and for which they had decided on a supplement? In which case it would not be 30 for Egypt but 31? This is what I believe but it has to be verified."_ _"- That's what I think but Dassault doesn't want to answer."_ _"- Okay, we'll look into it with the DGA, and as for Mr. Tanguy we'll give you an answer by tomorrow Mr. Cabirol. Thank you very much. But once again, these are Dassault's accounts, not the Ministry of the Army's export balance sheets, so there it is. We will tell you what we can tell you with the information we have."_ There were also solid insider informations about the *_alleged_* crash but I said I would not discuss the circumstances here. This event could nevertheless have been an important factor in adding an Automatic Ground Collision Avoidance System (AGCAS) for the F3R standard, an option which had originally been postponed to F4, the classical F3 GCAS being deemed sufficient. Lastly, please refrain from telling me I'm spreading fake news. I can actually source my information, thank you very much.
@kodkodkatedra4660
@kodkodkatedra4660 Год назад
OMG your comment deserve to be the most informative comment ever I appreciate your dedicating much time to write it thanks a lot
@H3x4r35
@H3x4r35 Год назад
@@kodkodkatedra4660 Thanks. You're welcome.
@KapilKumar-kg2un
@KapilKumar-kg2un Год назад
I'm happy India made the right decision.Thanks for information
@louisixlefourbe8075
@louisixlefourbe8075 Год назад
A little anecdote about the Rafale: the engineers had trouble designing the nose of the aircraft. So Marcel Dassault, the president and founder of Dassault Aviation, locked himself up in his office for three days and drew the nose by hand. The craziest thing is that the engineers hardly needed to correct Marcel Dassault's drawings, they were so precise and perfect!
@louisixlefourbe8075
@louisixlefourbe8075 Год назад
@@sneescampers before that, he put paper wings on the biro with the help of the cap and threw it and said "I FU*KING KNEW IT" From this moment Rafale is called the Biro Death, ready to write lines of destruction and death upon ur army
@Pouncer9000
@Pouncer9000 Год назад
It really boggles the mind to think Marcel Dassault (then Marcel Bloch) started his aero engineer career designing a propeller .. during world war one!
@AntonioGarcia-zr9uc
@AntonioGarcia-zr9uc Год назад
He is a wonderful guy. Apparently, he drank 3 liters of his own piss to survive in such circumstances... and he loved every drop of it 🤙🏻hard-core stuff guys 🫡 that's what you have to do if you want to make it like a boss
@rthelionheart
@rthelionheart 11 месяцев назад
All along with a bottle of fine cognac to keep him going.
@honumoorea873
@honumoorea873 5 месяцев назад
Lol... People will never change, they need those useless imaginated anecdote
@rakim7484
@rakim7484 4 месяца назад
very important to say : most of the countries that bought F35 didnt do it because it was better or cheaper, they bought it because US treatened to not sell them nuclear missile launch platform if they didnt buy F35 :) This fighter jet was sell out because countries had no choice. technically, F35 should be better but is full of bugs and the maintenance cost is astonishing.
@lecygnenoir4313
@lecygnenoir4313 Год назад
Technical aspects aside, rapidly changing politics have had a lot to do with the Rafale's sudden success. You touch upon it in the video, but the Rafale comes with lot less strings attached than the F35 and a lot less political pressure than Russian aircrafts. France's image as an independent ally of the US, rather than a vassal, has historically always helped its weapon sales. The Trump era, with one of the two main american parties going back to isolationnism (to say it kindly) has also left a significant stain over the perception of US reliability to enforce the international rule of law. You can see the effect in the Rafale's client list. One very frequent common point for clients of the Rafale is that they're countries who have uneasy neighbour that they're worried the US might either favour over them (in the case of India and Pakistan, Greece and Croatia with Turkey, multiple arab countries with Israel) or refuse to confront directly (in the case of Indonesia and China).
@tonysu8860
@tonysu8860 Год назад
Still, it's likely a compromise and inferior choice to buy a fleet of Rafale if there was no trust issues with the US and could obtain F-15 or F-16. I don't blame Turkey and Pakistan for trying hard to buy the F-16 before the Rafale. Pakistan has enjoyed a solid and reliable maintenance contract to support its 30 year old F-16 fleet despite its up and down relationship diplomatically with the US (particularly after the Osama bin Ladin raid). When you're facing an adversary that's shooting at you, you want every edge possible and economics and any other reason for settling for second best is forgotten.
@jackdonith
@jackdonith Год назад
@@tonysu8860 Greece in addition to Rafales upgrades its F-16s to Viper (block 70). And it has also ordered F-35. But it makes sense for a coutnry that sees US politics usually (though not today) favor Turkey to split the market in two different providers. The Greek Rafale, just like previously the Mirage offers a plane that the potential enemy doesn't have and thus does not not. besides the Rafale comes with abilities the F-16v simply does not have. Scalp and Meteor missiles are the cherry on top.
@vorrdegard2176
@vorrdegard2176 Год назад
@@tonysu8860 Rafael is not inferior to f -15 /16 fighters if it was why any country would buy it
@carlosandleon
@carlosandleon Год назад
US as a whole is going isolationist. Doesn't matter which party
@TelManothHexperax
@TelManothHexperax Год назад
internet and people who love plane never understand it, but country never buy plane because it's the best one, they buy planes for politic aspect . why buy F35 ? because you need to buy USA for being ally to the USA . when you are agasint USA politic, you buy China or Russia . when you try to be ... in between , you buy french . i really think 70 or 80 % of the decision to buy rafale or f35 is politic ... look at switzerland f35 for them are the worse plane ever . they need it for air surveillance on their country alone ( a montagne country ) so their choice should be a plane fast, low maintenance ... rafale or F18 .. f35 is purely politic choice to please biden .
@iglooone7165
@iglooone7165 Год назад
Last thing, this beast is appreciate by his discreetion, not the rcs or radar’s one, but because of its low consommation of kérosène. With after-burner he drink less than a typhoon in dry trust, that means less tankers are needed in support for the same mission. Dassault had think at all. Awesome job he did.
@cheveuxjaunes2782
@cheveuxjaunes2782 Год назад
France has launched the ITAR free certification which guarantees the absence of all American dialing the eurodrone will have this certification
@pandaDotDragon
@pandaDotDragon Год назад
All the Rafale have always been upgraded to the last standard (F1 then F2 then F3) and it's a big difference with the Eurofighter (T1s...). It will be the case also with the F4 however there is a little detail. The full F4 standard needs structural adjustments hence only newly produced Rafale will be compatible: it's the standard F4.2. For the previous ones there is a sub standard, the F4.1.
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech Год назад
Thanks for pointing out.
@goodputin4324
@goodputin4324 Год назад
@@Millennium7HistoryTech you should cover the Boramae next
@pandaDotDragon
@pandaDotDragon Год назад
@Roger F4.1 and F4.2.... However the need to do a structural change is known since a long time so all the lastly produced are able to move to the F4.2, i.e it.s not only for those produced once the F4 is rolled out.
@totolescargo
@totolescargo Год назад
Glad to see a channel of such quality recognizing the Rafale for what it really is. The rampant french bashing makes people underestimate the work of Dassault. I wonder if Serbia will also get on the Rafale's hype train ?
@tomislavcukac9677
@tomislavcukac9677 Год назад
If France sell Serbia Rafale it will lost technology like America’s F-117A that was shot down in 1999 and later transfered to China.
@totolescargo
@totolescargo Год назад
@@tomislavcukac9677 Why ? France sold Rafales to Egypt, the UAEs and other countries, and yet it didn't happen. What would change with Serbia ?
@tomislavcukac9677
@tomislavcukac9677 Год назад
@@totolescargo Serbia is planing to destroy Kosovo and break up Bosnia and make Great Serbia.
@the80386
@the80386 Год назад
"rampant french bashing?" - where? by who? France is regarded quite highly for their STEM subject research and production (not to mention their culture, designs, tourism and food)
@totolescargo
@totolescargo Год назад
@@the80386 Well you musn't have been on the Internet for too long then
@Jugement
@Jugement 4 месяца назад
10:20 Rafale does this by flying extremely close to the ground. Like ~30-50m. Pilots of the Armée de l'Air always train at that altitude for penetration. In fact almost all electrical lines in France are layered with lights and sensors for that single reason !
@bertrandviolette9008
@bertrandviolette9008 Год назад
Don’t forget that the Rafale has been designed from the beginning as a "plug and play" system. That helps the easy evolution of the Rafale.
@direwolf7491
@direwolf7491 Год назад
Hope IAF finally clears the 114 Rafale F4 deal. We need them most right now.
@sbrhtdm
@sbrhtdm Год назад
20 years more
@youbdu2981
@youbdu2981 Год назад
@@sbrhtdm yes they like to lose pilot in them 60 th mig 21 .. But they gonna lose some time from shorty politics talk
@the80386
@the80386 Год назад
they're going to crash them and taint the reputation of the equipment
@tonysu8860
@tonysu8860 Год назад
If you're talking about the Indian Air Force, historically India won't buy more than the 5 it has now. They will probably be inspected and reverse engineered in an effort to make their indigenous fighter better (but won't succeed at that in the end, either).
@direwolf7491
@direwolf7491 Год назад
@@tonysu8860 What are you smoking??? It seems GoooOOooD😅😅 India has 36 Rafales not 5. Did you even watch the video??? And India doesn't reverse engineer, they do joint ventures and all of them are highly successful.
@tigwhite883
@tigwhite883 Год назад
France can't be France, without it's greatness. Charles De Gaulle.
@DeltaAssaultGaming
@DeltaAssaultGaming Год назад
Not so great in 1940…
@emouclier
@emouclier 4 месяца назад
@@DeltaAssaultGamingwe learn from history
@alexc7669
@alexc7669 4 месяца назад
​@@DeltaAssaultGaming french history didn't start in 1940
@user-tt4sh2yy6r
@user-tt4sh2yy6r 4 месяца назад
"Persistent bad temper of Indian and Pakistani viewers" 🤣 I am an Indian myself and can't help agreeing. Unfortunately my fellow Indians have the nature of imagining that "patriotism makes up for facts" and that is the biggest hurdle to the military and technological progress of my nation. Thanks for posting such an informative video.
@obamnaprismus
@obamnaprismus 4 месяца назад
glad to see the Rafale getting the respect it deserves. It is an excellent fighter, not because it's multirole, but because it's *omni*role. It does its job perfectly well and shows the French military is actually highly competent, I consider France to be Europe's major military and nuclear power, the only other European nation I hold to a similar standard would be the UK to a lesser extent. I say to a lesser extent because unlike France, the UK relies on external aids, what I mean is they don't build their F-35s. Many people love saying the Rafale is inferior to the F-35 because it's not a stealth fighter, but it's not intended to be, and the fact that this fighter can literally replace many other specialized aircraft thanks to its functions makes it be a major tactical advantage, as modularity is very important, and spare parts will be far easier to supply. Though this video has a couple inaccuracies, they're just nitpicks and none I picked out were on a technological level. I'd say it's very spot-on. From a very (perhaps way too) passionate French defender of the Rafale, great video
@aryanyadav3690
@aryanyadav3690 Год назад
Yeah the French weapons like Meteor, Mica & Scalp are some of the big reasons 🔥
@thierrymilan2039
@thierrymilan2039 Год назад
Not only happily.
@thetopsecretpentagonsclass6350
France don't make meteor! Rest of the weapons are too inferior to US weapons even you can check their performance in real combat.
@thierrymilan2039
@thierrymilan2039 Год назад
@@thetopsecretpentagonsclass6350 It seems you don't know nothing at air missiles. Meteor is half french (electronic) and all variants of Mica are worldly know to be some of the most successful to hit their target.
@jeanvaljean9293
@jeanvaljean9293 Год назад
@@thetopsecretpentagonsclass6350 France makes parts of the meteor thank you. Please elaborate on the superiority of US weapons...
@thetopsecretpentagonsclass6350
@@jeanvaljean9293 which weapon? Name it i will tell you its superiority!.
@GGJunHyo
@GGJunHyo Год назад
"Binkov did this already, sir" is the best opening line that could have been made for this video, im glad you did.
@BR-kv5kj
@BR-kv5kj 4 месяца назад
Thank you for your perfect presentation and your huge knowledge. Another reason for customers to choose the Rafale is his high survavibility all along his career through numerous campaigns (Afghanistan, Syria, Tchad, Libya, Mali, etc.) None was KIA. (a french aéronavale officer, 30 years of service)
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech 4 месяца назад
Are you a retired aéronavale officer? If yes, I may have a few questions for you (if they can be answered, of course). Would you contact me at Millennium7star@outlook.com, if you are interested?
@ELMS
@ELMS Год назад
Where else can anyone go on RU-vid to get this kind of comprehensive briefing? Nowhere. Your channel is unique. Thank you!
@arthurbousquet6838
@arthurbousquet6838 Год назад
Lazerpig ?
@Statueshop297
@Statueshop297 Год назад
Exactly. Normally it’s some computer voice reading stats from Wikipedia with pics of the wrong items in background. Saw thumbnail for video title: US airforce dramatic aerial refuelling. Thumbnail picture: an Indian IL78 with 2 hoses and 2 mirage 2000 following🙈
@kalui96
@kalui96 Год назад
@@Statueshop297 oh goddd those channels are so awful. they use the most tantelizing clickbait and realistic thumbnails too. then you boot the video, and the same 1 of 5 royalty free music starts playing, and a robot voice says hElLo GuyS
@vinaybati4606
@vinaybati4606 Год назад
In a multipolar world, agile weapon systems and replaceable flexible parts will be key selling point for any weapons to other country.
@gandigooglegandigoogle7202
@gandigooglegandigoogle7202 Год назад
The Rafale eat ten F35 every morning for breakfat ! the F35 has no chance against the Rafale, the F35 suffers from serious deficiencies which are still not resolved...it's a flying anvil! the F35 and the F22 raptor keep getting punished at every redflag exercise, the Rafale is by far the very best !
@Hypersonic-es6vh
@Hypersonic-es6vh 4 месяца назад
The Snecma M88 engine used in the Dassault Rafale is considered to be one of the most advanced fighter jet engines in the world, and it is highly regarded for its performance. Compared to other contemporary fighter jet engines, the M88 has several features that make it stand out. For example, the M88 has a thrust-to-weight ratio of 7:1, which means that it can produce more thrust relative to its weight than most other fighter jet engines. This gives the Rafale exceptional acceleration and climb performance, as well as the ability to carry a heavier payload while still maintaining high performance. In addition, the M88 has a digital control system that provides precise control over the engine's performance. This allows the engine to operate efficiently in a wide range of conditions, from low-altitude high-speed flight to high-altitude supersonic flight. Another key feature of the M88 is its low infrared signature, which makes it more difficult for heat-seeking missiles to detect and track the aircraft. This is achieved through the use of advanced materials and design features that reduce the engine's heat emissions. Overall, the Snecma M88 engine is considered to be one of the most advanced and capable fighter jet engines in the world, and it has played a key role in the success of the Dassault Rafale as a multirole fighter aircraft. Correction is the best fighter jet in the world, It is also ITAR free. The F 35 which the US air force has declared it as a failure recently. Read the link. www.extremetech.com/defense/320295-the-us-air-force-quietly-admits-the-f-35-is-a-failure
@sorryociffer
@sorryociffer Год назад
Two seat Rafale is a beautiful plane…
@alexanbreizh6337
@alexanbreizh6337 Год назад
I did notice that the Eurofighter is not mention among the Rafale potential competitors. 😁
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech Год назад
Strange, I wonder why...
@JGL841
@JGL841 Год назад
Every published (or leaked) evaluation I've seen of Eurofighter vs Rafale has the Rafale getting a superior score in every category. It could be that later variants of the Eurofigther will surpass the Rafale. The Eurofighter always scores fairly close to the Rafale in some categories but overall the Rafale seems better. Politics also plays a huge role in who gets picked...just ask the South Koreans, the Malaysians, the Swiss and the Finns. 🙄
@walrustrent2001
@walrustrent2001 6 месяцев назад
Overall cost is the answer, because on paper the specs are pretty close. But a Typhon is 117m€ a piece. A Rafale, 83 m€ (those figures may be old) As the air command on any country, would you buy 14 Rafale or 10 Typhoon ? And the reason for that ? France did the Rafale by itself, so it had to think hard to get the most of its bucks. On the other hand, the Typhoon is an example of committee innovation.
@patlelion
@patlelion 4 месяца назад
Rafale is far superior than Eurofighter! End of
@michaeldenesyk3195
@michaeldenesyk3195 Год назад
As usual, an excellent video and content. I think that Rafale is fantastic! I can't wait to see what the super rafale will bring to the table
@Fortheweak13
@Fortheweak13 4 месяца назад
Dassault stated they are fully ready developp Rafale successor alone if the SCAF was to fail. Has they have done when eurofighter typhoon project "failed"
@lorpot
@lorpot 4 месяца назад
Dassault reluctance to cooperate with anyone is a problem even for the French government.
@Fortheweak13
@Fortheweak13 4 месяца назад
@@lorpot You have to understand the challenges, we are speaking about classified and well protected technologies, no company is eager to share them with its direct concurrent (airbus).
@lorpot
@lorpot 4 месяца назад
​@@Fortheweak13 You are right, especially for a private company. But as EU goes, and after the alarming Trumpism, reliance on US manufacturers should end at middle/long term (even if Orange Comb don't understand it could be a death warrant for some US aircraft industry). For this purpose, we need dragons able to compete with GD, McDonnel, Northrop and likes. Regarding this, Dassault has the bad habit to live on French domestic market and taxpayer pockets, ending in many overcosts. Their engineers and managers are also said to be quite arrogant towards other Europeans makers, also not a good point. Because, apart their excellence exigences, Dassault has a big team spirit at all levels. The founder, even if frankly right-leaning, was saved by Communists while in concentration camp (rumor says people died to keep him alive for France sake once liberated) and so always treated well the company workers and unions returned him accordingly. Never a strike. So it is even more difficult to them to cooperate.
@lorpot
@lorpot 4 месяца назад
@@_Gachette_ It was not about tech but project management. Dassault wanted to be the only boos.
@veerendrapratapsingh8719
@veerendrapratapsingh8719 Год назад
Rafale has greatest future compared to the other European contemporaries....
@varun2250
@varun2250 Год назад
Not if Tempest takes flight, now the Japanese are also in the project.
@zvonkoprosen4096
@zvonkoprosen4096 Год назад
there is no competition in europe
@marcg1686
@marcg1686 Год назад
@@varun2250 Tempest, if actually built, will be eye wateringly expensive. The numbers built will be small.
@mill2712
@mill2712 Год назад
@@marcg1686 I would definitely agree with you there. The British, Italian, and Swedish Tempest being a 6th generation craft with all it's technology will be extremely costly. I also believe it will be very technologically advanced. So much so, I have a feeling that the only countries that will use it will be the ones that worked on it and it won't be exported.
@Humbulla93
@Humbulla93 Год назад
@@zvonkoprosen4096 saab gripen cheaper than rafale incredibly rugged and is so small it can land on highways
@dstavs
@dstavs Год назад
I really enjoy watching your highly informative videos as much as I enjoy watching your subscriber numbers go up! People are figuring it out.
@clio2rsminicup
@clio2rsminicup 3 месяца назад
A commercial success despite the blockages of the geopolitical power of its US "ally" which once again proves the quality of French fighter planes and the Rafale.
@castlekingside76
@castlekingside76 Год назад
It's a beautiful jet. The Grippen and Typhoon have a similar body style. For a 4.5 Jet, it's pretty hard to beat. Price wise is great value.
@stitch77100
@stitch77100 Год назад
Define a gen5 jet aircraft, and we may be able to discuss why the Rafale is only considered a 4.5 (or a 4++) by the American (biaised) designation... Given the actual proven capabilities of the F-35, the Rafale seems more mature and better designed than the US Marvel weapon (Wunderwaffen, ring a bell to anyone ?) And should actually be the 5th gen standard (only if you listen to engineers and specialists and not to marketing XD choose your side)
@artiefakt4402
@artiefakt4402 Год назад
​@@stitch77100 French doctrine with the Rafale... is fly low to conduct SEAD missions thanks to efficient jamming and a great ground tracking that allows them to fly at very low altitude and very high speed. However, as shown in Ukraine, flying low might become hazardous if there are lots of MANPADS on the ground. Wether people like it or not... VLO aircrafts such as the F-35 might come handy in that kind of high intensity conflict ... but I'm curious to know more about those "actual proven capabilities of the F-35"
@stitch77100
@stitch77100 Год назад
@@artiefakt4402 Well, for your information, the F-35 is as much (even a bit more in fact) threatened by MANPADS than any other aircraft, given that they target IR sources and that the F-35 motor is powerful (single engine fighter) So no, VLO aircraft are not less endangered by MANPADS than other aircraft : VLO is against EM radars, not IR seekers. (Unless I'm missing something in your comment)
@artiefakt4402
@artiefakt4402 Год назад
@@stitch77100 For your information... MANPADS aren't effective if you do not have to fly low... so, the IR source doesn't matter as the F-35 would be out of range anyway. VLO aircrafts (combined with efficient jamming systems) would allow them to operate at a higher altitude, despite other anti-air defence systems.
@stitch77100
@stitch77100 Год назад
@@artiefakt4402 Oh that was the meaning of your message. Sorry I got it wrong. (I thought you meant a VLO flying low) Totally agree that a VLO would be able to fly in densely defended airspace. And high enough to avoid the threat of MANPADS. But I am not convinced that an aircraft would never be detected by AA defenses (the F-117 shot down is a proof that no system is 100% safe) And the low RCS of the F-35 is only excellent from the front angle. But the radars may be more than one, and the plane will eventually need to turn away. It will still be LO, but some angles will reflect shortly some waves. Probably hardly enough to get a firing solution though, maybe not even a noticeable detection. One mistake though on your part, the fast and low flying as part a the French doctrine is not the same as the USAF/USN one. It is used to approach the target enough to be in range of the SCALP-EG or AASM armament. The first one has a range of 500km+ (300+ miles) so there is plenty enough space to shoot and manoeuvre without being detected, and it's supposed to be VLO too. So the need for dedicated SEAD/DEAD armement is lower than the US doctrines. The last French one was the AS.37 Martel (and later the ARMAT development)
@tricosteryl
@tricosteryl Год назад
The main difference between Rafale and F35 is that the Rafale can be operated alone. Whereas the F35 is relying on heavy support for air superiority, protection, range and so on. Also Rafale is far more easier to operate and the cost of the flight hour is much lower
@hermes6910
@hermes6910 4 месяца назад
" Whereas the F35 is relying on heavy support" Just no.
@rosomak8244
@rosomak8244 Год назад
People seem to have actually forgotten that the Rafale was a split up from the Eurofighter project. The basic aerodynamical design choices are the same as can be seen. And it got finished much quicker and seems to have turned in to a far more actually practical asset.
@bertrandviolette9008
@bertrandviolette9008 Год назад
Not realy the same aerodynamical philosophy. Both are canards fighter, yes, but the Rafale canards are close canards, the air intakes are quiet different, and so on…
@jmbig
@jmbig Год назад
the canard system worked on some mirages long before the existence of the typhoon it was the typhoon that (poorly) copied dassault... not the other way around...
@anselmetheo3266
@anselmetheo3266 Год назад
The Rafale was inspired by the Super Mirage 4000 who was created long before EF typhoon
@rosomak8244
@rosomak8244 Год назад
@@bertrandviolette9008 I don't think you understand how the canard on both aircraft work. Both of them work in the same way. Boundary layer handling on the Rafale seem to be more refined that's true.
@honumoorea873
@honumoorea873 5 месяцев назад
It was not, political decision was, engeenering design wasn't.
@danieledelfino6527
@danieledelfino6527 Год назад
ahhh , love rafale! it deserve success!
@direwolf7491
@direwolf7491 Год назад
Yes it does. Amazing fighter jet.
@SukhoiGC
@SukhoiGC Год назад
Love your videos! Glad you are well, keep it up :)
@rajeev4243
@rajeev4243 3 месяца назад
Besides the 36 Rafales flown by Indian Air Force mentioned here in the video, India is buying additional 26 Rafale Marines. Also the 114 Rafales are in the final stage of contract as part of the MRFA deal of India
@jpierce2l33t
@jpierce2l33t Год назад
The Czech's just picked the f35 over the Gripen...and SAAB is butthurt about it lol. The Gripen is great too tho, not taking anything away from it. The Rafale is one of my very favorite fighters..and I think another reason it's so popular is because other countries see how the French use it themselves...VERY aggressively! They come in hot against the best air defenses in the world, blow everything the hell up, and get out before they know what hit em! They have a very 'who needs stealth?!' attitude and I think it's awesome
@Skankhunt-mv4vd
@Skankhunt-mv4vd Год назад
aren't they literally in the process of developing a full stealth aircraft?
@jpierce2l33t
@jpierce2l33t Год назад
@@Skankhunt-mv4vd yeah I'm just speaking on the Rafale...not the French attitude as a whole lol.. guess I could've worded that better 🤣. But yeah I just meant the Rafale's attitude
@didierlemoine6771
@didierlemoine6771 Год назад
@@Skankhunt-mv4vd stealth hs no future with new radar and satellites :)
@Skankhunt-mv4vd
@Skankhunt-mv4vd Год назад
@@didierlemoine6771 satelites will not be able to detect stealth planes in real time for the next few decades at the VERY LEAST. They can barely handle ICBMs and those are thousands of times brighter than jet engines (even in afterburner). In terms of radar, sure they are bound to get more powerful and they will develop better clutter algorithms, but stealth isn't really one specific technology and it will also continue to evolve and adapt to new radars and techniques. Quite short sighted to assume stealth has no future, especially since literally every major country is pursuing the technology.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
@ChucksSEADnDEAD Год назад
@@didierlemoine6771 New radar would make conventional aircraft obsolete, making stealth a bare necessity.
@Real_Claudy_Focan
@Real_Claudy_Focan Год назад
Rafale sells well in "non-aligned" countries for one simple reason : secrecy and how you're never really the "owner" of the plane for the F-35 ! US will always keep "an eye" on what you do with the aircraft and they are allowed to analyse data gathered during your flights and data gathered through sensors Dassault dont do that.
@tsangarisjohn
@tsangarisjohn Год назад
Perfectly understandable. If the French had equivalent tech they would do the same. Protecting technological assets is rational.
@tonysu8860
@tonysu8860 Год назад
Not entirely true. The non-aligned countries you describe probably try to keep their heads down and avoid confrontations with any country that's truly powerful that has Russian or American aircraft so can afford to buy something less than the best. They're probably flying against insurgents in the desert or some other adversary that doesn't have the means to buy any particularly dangerous weapons.
@thierrymilan2039
@thierrymilan2039 Год назад
@@tsangarisjohn "French don't have the tech" ? That is a joke ? Another stupid french bashing comment.
@johanmetreus1268
@johanmetreus1268 Год назад
@@tsangarisjohn it's not about protecting the technology, but using technology to leverage and extract other vital information from the clients. Basically a John Deere scheme on international scale.
@honumoorea873
@honumoorea873 5 месяцев назад
​@@tsangarisjohnThe reason is the mindset of America, they want to control everything, they are selfish little kids, not that surprising for a young country.
@msackett4858
@msackett4858 Год назад
Excellent very interesting, lots to think about and great to have an understanding of the lovely jet, Thank you !
@Merlig22
@Merlig22 Год назад
Vos vidéos sont vraiment très intéressantes. Merci à vous.
@Real_Claudy_Focan
@Real_Claudy_Focan Год назад
Rafale is a mature weapon system. Can fulfill every single task its assigned with a decent reliability and performances Airframe is also very capable to evolve onto something like "Super Rafale" if SCAF comes with delays US brag about F-35 but it's a "gen" later and logically much more "technological" and refined for "stealth" and "sensor fusion" Can't wait to see what Dassault will do with the SCAF ! Gonna be epic !
@iglooone7165
@iglooone7165 Год назад
Hello my friends, congrats for this vidéo, ur analyse is pretty good, respect for une awesome job. Just know concerning spectra, that’s a complet program notified by DGA to dassault électronique in 1980. Dassault got The lead because they were much more ahead concerning counter mesures than thales (ex thompson) since 2001, it’s no less of over 4000 update done on the system, that means approximatively an update each open day
@jkim6200
@jkim6200 4 месяца назад
I had the pleasure of seeing a Rafale more than 20 years ago at an airshow. It was quite a contrast to the then-aging design of F-15K which could only do big power loops at higher altitudes.
@dovlacro6382
@dovlacro6382 Год назад
It's look like France wouldn't sell Rafale to Serbia because of distrust to Serbian government. Formally "neutral" position of Serbia but extremely very close ties with Russia and China guarantee that Rafale will be carefully analysed by military technical intelligence of both countries. That is reason why Turkey doesn't want to sell Bayraktar TB2 to Serbia too. France is NATO country and Serbia really hate NATO.
@the80386
@the80386 Год назад
Serbia maintains ties to Russia because they remember what NATO did to them in the 90s. there was no outcry for them in the media like ukraine gets now, because the aggressors were the 'good guys'. And they're building ties with China because that's the obvious thing to do for any country (unless it's fully controlled by USA/EU). the future cannot be imagined without China because they're the 2nd most important 'pole' in the evolving 'multi-polar' world; denying that is denying reality.
@aleksaradojicic8114
@aleksaradojicic8114 Год назад
You dream to much...
@dovlacro6382
@dovlacro6382 Год назад
@@aleksaradojicic8114 Why? What isn't truth?
@aleksaradojicic8114
@aleksaradojicic8114 Год назад
@@dovlacro6382 First, Serbia doesn't have any special intelligence relations with either Russian and China, as such claiming that Serbia is some "security risk" is laughable. Second, France sold Rafales to both Egypt and India, countries which have much more closer relations with China (in case of Egypt) or Russia (in case India), as such claiming that France will not sold it to Serbia is again laughable.
@cannonfodder4376
@cannonfodder4376 Год назад
The relative lack of terms and conditions that come with French equipment like the Rafale is undoubtedly its biggest boon. It may not be 5th gen but for many the overall package combined with France's lack of attaching strings to their sales is much more attractive in this new era of uncertainty. Going to be interesting to see the Rafale evolve as the years roll by. Although sometimes I wonder wither or not taking the Rafale's guts and repackaging them into a KF-21/J-35 style 5th Gen airframe may not be a better alternative to SCAF should SCAF fall apart. A good and informative video.
@rosomak8244
@rosomak8244 Год назад
The platform is as old as the Eurofigher because they have common roots. It's basically 80-ties aerodynamics and it's getting really old.
@didierlemoine6771
@didierlemoine6771 Год назад
@@rosomak8244 still much lighter than the F35 :)
@valian8985
@valian8985 Год назад
@@rosomak8244 exept the rafale airframe is not "old".. Its as capable as most modern airframe
@thierrymilan2039
@thierrymilan2039 Год назад
@@rosomak8244 Only the aerodynamic design was quite common. Both fighter are way different one from the other.
@DecalageChope
@DecalageChope Год назад
@@rosomak8244 Except that the Rafale's aerodynamics were definitively fixed in 1991 with the first prototype (Rafale C01). Compared to the demonstrator of the 1980s (Rafale A), the shapes were modified for stealth.
@bertrandviolette9008
@bertrandviolette9008 9 месяцев назад
I love the title. Marvelous way to say all in a single sentence!
@darkcassoulet1041
@darkcassoulet1041 4 месяца назад
Im a Rafale mechanic :)) And i just wanted to point out thats the F4.1 is already in the Air Force for testing at Mont de Marsan's CEAM,
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech 4 месяца назад
The videos in the mash-up are a couple of years old now...
@darkcassoulet1041
@darkcassoulet1041 4 месяца назад
@@Millennium7HistoryTech yeah ik man
@hunterh1175
@hunterh1175 4 месяца назад
Anyone else getting déjà vu about the SCAF program? It looks exactly like the Eurofighter program. It was supposed to be a joint European thing, but every country wanted a slightly different aircraft and that made the final product kind of bad for everyone, so France went and made the perfect plane for themselves (Rafale) while the others finished the program with the Typhoon, which is basically a Rafale but slightly worse at everything. Fight me on that
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech 4 месяца назад
I would say that the Rafale is more mature, as a combat system. In terms of pure performances the Eurofighter is kinematically superior. I am a supporter of national solutions, so no wonder I like the Rafale.
@hunterh1175
@hunterh1175 4 месяца назад
@@Millennium7HistoryTech I wish European nations could get along more… I do think French aerospace engineering is the best in Europe, and that we would all benefit if the EU just paid us to design a European aircraft ourselves, but of course that’s not possible. Everyone wants to do their part and have their say, and to be honest that’s completely understandable. I don’t think we’re rich enough to make a 5th gen fighter on our own like we did the Rafale, and I don’t think the EU is mature enough to make a good fighter in reasonable time. But anything would be better than being dependent on the US with the F35
@Idahoguy10157
@Idahoguy10157 Год назад
Rafale, Typhoon, Gripen, in the future Tempest. All this not counting F-35. Or Russian jets. French engineering has always been impressive. What’s more impressive is marketing French military equipment!
@asper1952
@asper1952 Год назад
The lights are amazing, the image is very smooth, did you change something, it's really positive !
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech Год назад
Thanks, Lumix S5 filmed in vlog and colourized with Da Vinci Resolve
@asper1952
@asper1952 Год назад
@@Millennium7HistoryTech looks like a real improvement ;)
@Rousseau4469
@Rousseau4469 4 месяца назад
Rafale has in it's roster way more missions and operational hours than the F-35 in Mali Syria Iraq Afghanistan and finally in Libya where only took 4 of them to destroy all infrastructure of Al Wattiya airbase ( anti-aircraft Hawk missiles Turkish Jammer Coral ΤΒ2 Drones stationed radars of the base Sam missiles various armored vehicles). After that operation Greece ordered its first Rafales and a number of countries followed it's example.
@new-wave2941
@new-wave2941 Год назад
You are a legend, thank you for making such good videos, greetings from Serbia 🇷🇸, we will probably order 14, but they are overbooked, they have a lot of orders, so only god knows when we will receive those 14 planes 😂
@randmht9976
@randmht9976 Год назад
Great video as always
@nv3796
@nv3796 Год назад
Great content! Using too much Autis reminds me of the movie 'Her' :P
@petermcgarrymusicandflying
@petermcgarrymusicandflying Год назад
Well deserved. French success story.
@francoscicolone9534
@francoscicolone9534 Год назад
Great video. I envy the french's models and their aproach to their technology in projects, not wanting to lose ground. But what were the diferences between airbus and dassault?
@cheveuxjaunes2782
@cheveuxjaunes2782 Год назад
Not the same company and not the same philosophe Airbus is an european company qui touche un peut pres a tous ce sui vole Dassault is a French company and not European (this is why in the FCAS dassault represents france and airbus spain and germany) they specialize in fighter aircraft with a private jet branch dassault has a philosophy according to which they concentrate all their competence on this to push it to its maximum.
@didierlemoine6771
@didierlemoine6771 Год назад
Eurofither is Airbus, Rafale is Dassaukt :)
@gringologie9302
@gringologie9302 Год назад
On other term. Germany is trying to remake an air and space industry alone. From Ariane space program to actual state of Airbus consortium ; the direction is confirm. back at its fondation, Airbus was more french than anyother participant. Today, headquarters had been transfered at Frankfort for Airbus defense branch. They are pushing to go further, pretending that they can totally lead an European project by themself in defense (like any private company will do to obtain a market), forgetting all the prob that are inside a project like Eurofighter for the exemple. In term of defense, from an independant state point if view, EF isn't acceptable. Airbus private interest are totally backed by German states, as they gain ground on air and space tech. While France is sharing tech. That's a different story. A chance that Dassault isnt lead by french politicians demand. If it was, France wouldn't have any independent air defense company. Our europeist leaders are totally disconnect from reality of our world.
@cheveuxjaunes2782
@cheveuxjaunes2782 Год назад
@@didierlemoine6771 it is more than Airbus In typhoone leonardo a top italian company it also here
@didierlemoine6771
@didierlemoine6771 Год назад
@@cheveuxjaunes2782 yes Airbus seems to hv a majority in thé Eurofighter ;)
@dariusdareme
@dariusdareme 4 месяца назад
Thanks for letting me know of the Joint European Fighter Program for a 6th generation plane. Didn't know of that.
@SpartanLeonidas1821
@SpartanLeonidas1821 4 месяца назад
Rafale is an Amazing Aircraft! 🇫🇷💙🦅
@amardeep5821
@amardeep5821 Год назад
Can you please put out a video which analyzes Rafael's capabiities vis Chinese Air Defense systems and also how does it compare in terms of performance + capabilities against PLAAF and PLAAN inventory.
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech Год назад
So you can go to a forum and discuss how powerful is IAF?
@amardeep5821
@amardeep5821 Год назад
@@Millennium7HistoryTech Nope. We paid a very hefty price for 36 Rafales. Wanted to know whether it was worth it? Or would it have been better to go for F/A-18 Block 3 Super Hornet.
@frankunderbush
@frankunderbush Год назад
Coming from the perspective of a Canadian, it's been very disappointing to see the current administration choosing the F-35 over the Rafale. After flirting with Lockheed for a decade, having the original F-35 purchase plans axed, only to come back to the F-35 after this latest round of evaluation/competition. For a country like Canada, realistically the main uses of such aircraft would be for counter terrorism and peacekeeping operations against much inferior enemies. It is a complete waste of money to buy and maintain a fleet of F-35s. In contrast, a fleet of relatively "cheaper", more flexible, easier and cheaper to maintain 4/4.5 gen fighters would do just about all the F-35 can do minus the radar profile aspect. Anyway, great video as always, looking forward to the next topic!
@tonysu8860
@tonysu8860 Год назад
The problem for Canada is that it can be considered a "border country" adjoining Russia so Russia is a likely adversary which would have to be overcome if a conflict arises. So far Rafales are being sold mainly to countries that don't expect to have to overcome Russian fighter technology and for many not even Chinese. If a country doesn't have to face Russian aircraft and systems, then something less than an F-35 can be considered, even 4th Gen like the Rafale.
@EEEEEEE354
@EEEEEEE354 Год назад
The Rafale is not signficantly cheaper than the F-35 in any way.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
@ChucksSEADnDEAD Год назад
If you want counter-terrorism and peacekeeping, get cheap used F-16s and fly them until the wheels fall off. Nothing "cheap" about using 4.5 gen in peacekeeping or counterterrorism.
@EEEEEEE354
@EEEEEEE354 Год назад
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD the Rafale is straight up more expensive than an F-35A per unit, and it's cost per flight hour is virtually equivalent. The only reason anyone buys Rafale is ITAR. F-16s are the real deal
@Mystical922
@Mystical922 Год назад
Canada is part of NATO you may be called to combat the F-35 is the best export aircraft in the world the only reason the F-35 isn’t bought is America has strings attached to prevent classified aspects leaking to our enemies
@nimaiiikun
@nimaiiikun 7 месяцев назад
I love it when John Goodman narrates military news
@zvonkoprosen4096
@zvonkoprosen4096 Год назад
Great chanel for detail info on new technologie
@bernardedwards8461
@bernardedwards8461 Год назад
Poor old RAF! It used to be third most powerful airforce in the world, but now it is one of the weakest, though you wouldn't think so to hear Boris Johnson talk! Our Army and Navy are in no better state, but few Brits know this. They think we have strong armed forces.
@clives344
@clives344 Год назад
Many in the UK 🇬🇧 armed forces would agree with you.
@thierrymilan2039
@thierrymilan2039 Год назад
Being French, I completly agree with you. The question to me is how a country sized like France can apply in his defense budget almost the same military choices like the USA do ? Questions about industrial lobbies ?
@bernardedwards8461
@bernardedwards8461 Год назад
@@thierrymilan2039 Militarily, France is a lot stronger than UK, but nowhere near as strong as USA. Britain cannot be as stromg as America, but if our defence was in competent hands we should be able to match France. The most sinister aspect of this is that what I have told you has been hidden from the British people, so at least 90% of them believe we are a major military power. It's a wonder we are allowed to keep our permanent seat on the UN Security Council. Macron rightly described Boris as a clown, totally incompetent.
@thierrymilan2039
@thierrymilan2039 Год назад
@@bernardedwards8461 First, my purpose wasn't to compare UK and France, as each nation has been at competition for 1000 years, just an odd habit. Second when it goes on nukes power, saying one is better than another is just unuseful as only one nuke head on a country Capital city or another major point would be dramatically ending the story of every one. I wouldnt say something bad about Brits because I do appreciate you (I was talking with a former British Army unit commander no less than last sunday in France). But each nation think more or less what their own government, lobbies and medias feed them with.
@bernardedwards8461
@bernardedwards8461 Год назад
@@thierrymilan2039 Silly man! Nukes dont count, because we cant use them. They are for deterrence and prestige, not actual use.
@Jess_star123
@Jess_star123 Год назад
As usual, a great video. However, I question the comment that the Rafale's performances "smokes the F-35 in every area". I assume what is meant is the basic air frame performances. As this is a very complicated issue, I wonder what is actually meant by that. Granted, in very simplified terms, the Rafale has the advantage in lower wing loading and slightly higher thrust-to-weight in afterburner. I MIL power, however, they are about the same. But the F-35 has the advantage with a much larger angle of attack capability and can perform post-stall maneuvering, which the Rafale can not. Neither can any other currently operational fighter which does not employ thrust vectoring. It also has a drag and maneuvering advantage with internal weapons. F-35 can pull 9 Gs with 5700 pounds internally - which currently no other operational fighter can match - and , for instance, with comparably much less roll-rate and asymmetrical restrictions. Perhaps except for the J-20 and SU-57, if one would describe the latter as operational. And the F-35 has a significantly larger, relative internal fuel capacity (fuel fraction) which translates into more range and performance advantages in certain parts of the mission and flight profile. So while I agree that the Rafael most likely has several performance and maneuvering advantages over the F-35, it would depend on the configuration and mission. I think there is also no doubt that the F-35 has advantages in some areas.
@goldenboy5693
@goldenboy5693 Год назад
The thing is, you are talking about what the F35 should be able to do... In reality all we know about F35s (outside of lockhead martin propaganda) is that they still have a couple hundred of issues, governements buying them are not really happy and isreal is apparently doing good with them in actual combat (not as good as they expected tho, but still it apparently does the job). The F35 is like the iphone of fighter jets, it's good but expensive, and is most usefull for showing off, all we know about finish F35s is a video of 2 F35 flying near rusia 1 week after they bought them and thats it... Meanwhile indian Rafale dropped bombs on pakistan a couple of month after entering service. It should be equal to the rafale (as you said), locked martin always says it's better, but we never get any proof (since indonesia and brazil we don't have any unclassified competition data, and rafale won both of those anyway) and because we have no proof of the F35 capabilities this dude considered the Rafale to be better is everyway (it's like saying a bodybuilder is better at lifting weight than a gorilla, it's kinda true since we never saw a gorilla lift weight competitively...) whitch i totally agree with. Maybe next week, there is an actual combat mission planned with F35, but if i see that the mission results are classified, i will laugh really hard
@Jess_star123
@Jess_star123 Год назад
@@goldenboy5693 "The thing is, you are talking about what the F35 should be able to do." Actually, I am talking about the F-35's basic performances, which are facts and well documented.
@thierrymilan2039
@thierrymilan2039 Год назад
@@Jess_star123 I don't know you but I must admit you're a very pleasant guy. Really, I was laughing so loud when you pretended Iron F35 was superior in range. Please continue like this, you should be consulted for health concerns.
@Jess_star123
@Jess_star123 Год назад
@@thierrymilan2039 I note that you didn't provide any sources to contradict my statement. The F-35's range capabilities are well documented, and the following interview with a couple of USAF and USMC F-22, F/A-18 and F-15C pilots point this out in real scenarios. For instance, the pilot states that the F-35 has substantially more range and persistence than an F-15C with two drop tanks (I highly recommend to watch the whole interview for a better understanding of the F-35's capabilities): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QTgDTC8_PM0.html
@Albertkallal
@Albertkallal Год назад
>and slightly higher thrust-to-weight in afterburner. No, the Rafale has a lower power to weight rating. you can't just go google the T/W rating, since each figher is rated WITH VAST VAST different payloads - beyond silly to do that. Here is the thrust to weight rating for F35, Rafale, F16, and Gripen. Higher = better. Fuel payload Rafale F35 F16 Gripen 0 1.4137 1.3984 1.4784 1.2617 700 1.3737 1.3672 1.4284 1.2130 2500 1.2806 1.2932 1.3141 1.1035 3500 1.2341 1.2555 1.2581 1.0508 3750 1.2230 1.2464 1.2449 1.0384 5000 1.1704 1.2028 1.1826 0.9805 6000 1.1314 1.1701 1.1371 0.9387 7000 1.0950 1.1391 1.0950 0.9003 7500 1.0777 1.1242 1.0751 0.8822 9125 1.0249 1.0784 1.0151 0.8283 10362 0.9880 1.0459 0.9737 0.7914 12000 0.9431 1.0058 0.9239 0.7474 13500 0.9055 0.9718 0.8825 0.7111 15000 0.8707 0.9399 0.8447 0.6782 18250 0.8038 0.8776 0.7729 0.6165 20900 0.7564 0.8325 0.7228 0.5739 so, we see that: The F16 has to burn fuel down to a low 3,500 lbs to match the F35 thrust to weight. The duel engine Rafale fairs even worse, down to a bone dry 700lbs to match the F35. And the power lower powered Gripen - even starting at 0 payload it matches none of the above. The Gripen with JUST a payload of 5,000 lbs now weighs MORE then total engine thrust !!! (can't fly straight up). And with only 10,000 lbs payload? The Rafale now also weighs MORE then total engine power can can't fly straight up. F35 can, and can do so with 11,000 or even 12,000 lbs payload. And this T/W advantage holds in favor of the F35 as you increase payloads. Given that the F35 is a duel tail section fighter, and ALSO has a better T/W rating then a Rafale, then even in dogfighting, the F35 going to fair better. But, no, the only real elephant in the room in regards to the Rafale? It has a rather low power to weight rating - and it worse then the F35.
@none941
@none941 Год назад
That face you make at Otis. He isn't far from SCRAP, is he? LOL! 🤣
@kathrynck
@kathrynck Год назад
Rafale, Grippen, and SU-35S (emphasis on the S) are my 3 favorites, for non-US gen 4.5 fighter aircraft.
@bafattvahetere
@bafattvahetere Год назад
Gripen.
@kathrynck
@kathrynck Год назад
@@bafattvahetere On a per-dollar (or euro) basis, yeah, the Gripen does stand out. Particularly on upkeep expense. It's amazing how many boxes it checks at it's cost point.
@Lol-rx7sx
@Lol-rx7sx 4 месяца назад
Le gripen n'est pas totalement Suédois, son moteur et 40% de ses composants sont américains...
@Statueshop297
@Statueshop297 Год назад
I saw on a forum that Italy has increased its contribution to tempest program. Obviously it’s a forum so could be nonsense but they had planned spending was €50m a year for next few years but it’s up at €1 billion a year! I will go and check source etc Edit. It looks like at Farnborough show Italy up its funding over 15 years from $2billion to 3.8 billion
@Millennium7HistoryTech
@Millennium7HistoryTech Год назад
I have to check. I didn't see the news.
@marc9080
@marc9080 Год назад
le programme tempest est déjà mort né à cause du Brexit et la guerre en Ukraine le fait est qu'il est mort définitivement faute d'argent et de capacité technologique comme l'Euro fighter mais sans les allemands ni Saab qui vient de retirer ses billes, le Japon? juste du marketing anglais à 1 cent il verra jamais le jour, avec 95% d'argent du privé c'est faisable! mais des années après le Scaf! l'histoire se répète toujours comme la mode! dernière nouvelle d'Italie, je cite, le projet tempest n'est pour l'heure plus une priorité pour l'état Italien et l'entreprise privée Leonardo! politique oblige.
@user-ny3gy6in3o
@user-ny3gy6in3o Год назад
Greece has already 6 rafale in service
@bastadimasta
@bastadimasta Год назад
...and a debt for the next 60 years to pay for them and keep them operational.
@user-ny3gy6in3o
@user-ny3gy6in3o Год назад
@@bastadimasta whatever is necessary to defend our land from hostile pirate states ... I don't think our economy is something that should bother you mehmet .
@bastadimasta
@bastadimasta Год назад
@@user-ny3gy6in3o why are you so aggressive and rude?
@zvonkoprosen4096
@zvonkoprosen4096 Год назад
are you guys happy with rafale? problems?
@vask3863
@vask3863 Год назад
@@zvonkoprosen4096 From the very few information that we get, is the pilots are very satisfied with the Rafale. No problems at all, since Hellenic Airforce is flying French planes for over 50 years.
@michaelmazowiecki9195
@michaelmazowiecki9195 4 месяца назад
Given the possibility of the US pulling out of Nato, dependence on US technology is a security risk
@lolilollolilol7773
@lolilollolilol7773 3 месяца назад
Buying F35 planes means you sign military allegiance to the USA. I cannot guarantee it's true (and knowing the US politics, it is most likely true), but I've read that the F35 requires an electronic key that is sent to you on a daily basis to operate. So if Washington wants, they can simply block this transfer and your shiny F35 planes are as good as a pile of bricks. After all, they did exactly that to Egypt when they tried to buy bombs that contained american electronics. That's the kind of "strings attachment" that you deal with when you buy american planes and that's one of the big reasons why many countries prefer the Rafales to the F35.
@RaySqw785
@RaySqw785 3 месяца назад
Rafale has a marginally lower in T/W ratio 0.01 than a Eurofighter, but it eat 2t less fuel per hour, and 4t in AB per hour, making it the most effective military engine of his range in the world, never forget its the birds staying longer in the sky that wins battles, range weight and weapons load are everything
@warcrimeenjoyer219
@warcrimeenjoyer219 Год назад
When you buy American weapons it’s more of a lease than ownership
@dasarhijau
@dasarhijau Год назад
And when you buy from the French they would tell your enemies what is the advantages and disadvantages of ur weapons and the way to easily counter them. What, u don't believe? Ask the Argentinians.. Hahaha
@scramjet7466
@scramjet7466 Год назад
Not just weapons even consumer tech like apple, Tesla, farming equipment etc. It's all planned obsolescence
@askingstuff
@askingstuff Год назад
Well… that’s basically nonsense. We never requested the weapons back.
@redwithblackstripes
@redwithblackstripes Год назад
@@askingstuff No but you blocked spare parts and maintenance in the past to countries looking to buy Russian equipment and even the UK is concerned with anti tempering mechanism in its F-35's, you can't exactly pretend the United States operates in a free market...
@Aaron-wq3jz
@Aaron-wq3jz Год назад
@@redwithblackstripes ofc since US is essentially the leader of the western world. They make sure they won’t have a repeat of Iran where they might have an adversary that flies the f35 for the next 40 years
@nicocarperiviere570
@nicocarperiviere570 Год назад
Magnifique avions 100% français vive la france 🇨🇵
@amardeep5821
@amardeep5821 Год назад
The talk about Super Rafael has parallel with the talk about the proposed Mirage 4000 fighters. If one believes some comments in certain forums then it almost happened but was dropped becauae of the cost and limitations of the air frame.
@dennisleighton2812
@dennisleighton2812 5 месяцев назад
Thanks for an interesting and informative video on one of my favourite planes! The fact that Rafale has carrier capability of course give it huge traction (to certain potential customers only, of course), sets it above some competitors. It is also true that Rafale is attractive to foreign Air Forces as described in the video. Basically only countries having aircraft carriers would be interested in this attribute, and it's irrelevant to all the rest. However, to label it the only rival to not give up may be going one little step too far. I would have enjoyed some discussion about the other two European contenders as well, viz, JAS 39 Gripen and of course Eurofighter Typhoon. Could we hope for another video along those lines, especially as you seem to elevate Rafale above them by some margin. I would like to know more about why you think this. Thanks again, and hi to Otis!
@yxgygv7883
@yxgygv7883 4 месяца назад
They're not as capable, and aren't updated like the Rafale is. That's why Germany AND the UK are buying F-35. It is also cheaper to operate than the Typhoon or F35. Also, the political side : They (Gripen and Typhoon) are dependant on the US approuval, and even Germany itself is currently blocking a sell to Turkey. Buying the Rafale is a way to avoid the American hold, with a plane nearly as advanced as the American jets
@doogleticker5183
@doogleticker5183 3 месяца назад
And just how many countries have CATOBAR systems and are potential customers of Rafales due to their carrier capability?
@yxgygv7883
@yxgygv7883 3 месяца назад
@@doogleticker5183 It can also take off from a conventional ramp
@Gar99
@Gar99 Год назад
F35 is an amphibious fighter jet capable of underwater manoeuvres
@tricosteryl
@tricosteryl Год назад
you've just killed me 😂
@Gar99
@Gar99 Год назад
@@tricosteryl it always ends up under the sea
@berrol
@berrol 6 месяцев назад
yes, the F35 can do submarines too
@didierlemoine6771
@didierlemoine6771 Год назад
France is the only one independant country in Europ :)
@superfastjellyfish78
@superfastjellyfish78 7 месяцев назад
Not as it used to be... France has to free itself from Europe to free itself from the US. Europe is a US puppet
@smeralda4431
@smeralda4431 3 месяца назад
.. i have been to a number of airshows. All i can say about the Rafale: i have not seen another fighterjet (including F-35, Eurofighter, etc.) with such incredibly dynamic flight performance ..
@biswajitbordoloi8092
@biswajitbordoloi8092 Год назад
Indian airforce inducted 36 RAFALE Indian Navy in process of acquiring 26 rafale -m Indian airforce has High probability of acquiring 114 RAFALE in MRFA .
@lcoudeur
@lcoudeur Год назад
Do you need a CAESAR to teach Otis a lesson about French kit ;)
@Fasmidio
@Fasmidio Год назад
The Rafale is likely the best multirole fighter at the moment with the best price/performance ratio. However, I don't think it's a competitor to the F-35. F-35 is quite a lot better as I see it, but it has a more specialised role and needs deep pockets F-35 also must be maintained in another country except the countries that got the facilities. Plus, there's a fat chance the export version of the F-35 is as good as the US version, and an even fatter chance countries have an F-22 alternative to dominate the skies and access to the weapons US has. In short, F-35 is great for countries like UK, Israel, Japan, but the rest are better off with Rafale. Now if you already have Rafale or F-15 or Eurofighter, F-35 is also good. I also consider F-15 better, but it has the same negatives as the F-35 + lacks stealth and is not 5th gen.
@Albertkallal
@Albertkallal Год назад
>as I see it, but it has a more specialized role and needs deep pockets No, the F35 is less cost to buy then a Rafale, and in fact less then most 4th gen fighers. Typhoon/Eurofigher: 115 million Rafale: 94 million F15: 88 million (with IRST pod, and air to ground systems - 120 million). Gripen: JAS 39 E/F: 85 million F33: 77.8 million - and that's with full laszer to ground pod, and IRST system. So, how is the F35 higher cost? And the F35 has a better power to weight rating then a F16, or even a duel engine Rafale. And the flight cost per hour? Less then a F18, Less then a F15, and less then typhoon or Rafale. So, from a cost point of view? You need deeper pockets to buy a Rafale or F15 - and they both cost more per hour to run and maintain.
@lolilollolilol7773
@lolilollolilol7773 3 месяца назад
@@Albertkallal LMAO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Albertkallal
@Albertkallal 3 месяца назад
​@lolilollolilol7773 Not an argument, you have to try and make one.
@ricosiou5121
@ricosiou5121 3 месяца назад
May be F35 will be better but for now he s not mature enough and rafale is at his prime
@Albertkallal
@Albertkallal 3 месяца назад
@@ricosiou5121 Well, it not clear what you mean by "maturity" of the platform? I mean, compared to 10 years ago? Well, a bunch of engine issues were fixed, and the price of the engine now has dropped a whopping half in price. So, a bunch of updates and fixes to the engine has occurred. Same goes for the stealth coating issues at high speed. All F35's since lot 8 have a new high temperature ceramic coating applied to those program areas, and are now fixed and thus no damage to stealth at high speeds. Same goes for the helmet system. They used to cost $400,000 each, and now cost $250,000 each. And the bright LED problem at night been fixed, and the gen II/III helmets are now much lighter. And they upgraded the DAS camera system, again higher resolution, and much lower cost. And same goes for how they apply the stealth coatings - much improved. So, per unit cost has dropped from 200 million per copy to now 80 million per copy. And this year, they are rolling out a new central computer system - a whopping 25x the processing and memory of the previous gen computers. So, in terms of upgrades, fixes and maturity, the F35 seen vast improvements in the last 10 years. Perhaps your reference to maturity was in regards to combat experience? But then again, a fail to see any valid narrative in that area. I mean, we are now aware of the famous top gun school. What they trained for in war games worked in the real world. And same goes for the Falklands war. About 1 year before that war, British pilots took on some USA F15's in Germany and beat them, and lo and behold, the same tactics used in the Falklands war also worked. (in other words, a slow sub sonic fleet of 28 Harriers was able to fight against a fleet of Mach 2.0 able fighters with rather ease). And same goes of Israel - they played war games on how to defeat SAM sites with their F16's, and in the 1982 Lebanon invasion, what they did in war games worked in the real world. And same goes for the Gulf war -- once again, what they did and trained for in war games translated into real world results. So based on 50+ years of how fighters performed in war games and training exercises? Well, history shows that translated into real world results. And right now, F35s are racking up unprecedented kill rates in war games, and thus no reason I can see why those results will not translate into real world results, since that's what occurred in the past 50 years of war games. So, I see no real "valid" arguments or narratives that the F35 is "somehow" lacking "maturity" here translates into any real valid arguments against the F35. If anything, the F35 seen more fixes and upgrades then even what most 4th gen fighters have seen or experienced. So, while the F35 has received boatloads of bad press, most if not all of the F35's teething issues have been fixed, and thus the F35 has turned out with some years to mature into a rather amazing and viable platform.
@samaipata4756
@samaipata4756 Год назад
Your analysis are great, however I miss one very significant number which is man hours maintenance required per hour flown?
@franklinlewis6059
@franklinlewis6059 Год назад
Nice sidekick 😆
@TechZF
@TechZF Год назад
Thanks for the video, Could you sometime, make a Gripen vs Rafale video? From exports and capabilities point of view? Thanks in advance.
@price803
@price803 Год назад
Little update for Serbia. Serbia is interested for total 24 of multirol aircrafts for replacment for J-22 Eagle and MiG 29. Since replacment of J-22 is more urgent, first J-22 will be replaced by 12 new multirol aircraft (read new Rafal F4) and after that the plan is to buy additional 12 for replacmet MiG 29, so that will be 24 aircraft in total.
@swordsman1137
@swordsman1137 Год назад
No Mig-35? Not satisfied by Russian product?
@thelovacluka
@thelovacluka Год назад
Were there any talks in Serbia purchasing SUs?
@zvonkoprosen4096
@zvonkoprosen4096 Год назад
serbia is geting chinese plains
@price803
@price803 Год назад
@@swordsman1137 The Serbian Airforce was never the fan of it or 29 that we currently have. The Rafal is wet dream for all ex Yugoslav air forces (Serbian especially) due to never completed project of YU Supersonic, which was single engine Rafal planned to be built in Yugoslavia. ​ @Luka Mesaric I guess yes, but like I said, air force was more a fan of Rafale. Beside two mentioned, there were also talks for EF2000 since late 2000's and sort of talks with US for F-16
@entropy_of_principles
@entropy_of_principles Год назад
as like is going on with supporting poutine 's war, Serbs not going to see nothing, not UE invitation, nor the West fighter. how it could be ? as you and all of yours support a criminal regime, you and hunGayry
@trikk9964
@trikk9964 Год назад
... loved the opener... :)
@Continuouz93
@Continuouz93 Год назад
I love your videos, sir. 🤠🦅
@zetareticulan321
@zetareticulan321 Год назад
If the Rafael sells any better the US would be like, "that's a national security threat!"
@XxAverageJoexX
@XxAverageJoexX Год назад
Why? The F35 would kill the Rafale in most circumstances.
@XxAverageJoexX
@XxAverageJoexX Год назад
@@CaptainDangeax 🤣
@johndoe-cd9vt
@johndoe-cd9vt Год назад
@@XxAverageJoexX HAHAHHAH nice joke, this crapF35 can't even turn properly...
@freakymachan2301
@freakymachan2301 Год назад
@@johndoe-cd9vt lol what the rafale is a crap overpriced shit and they cant even properly sell that shit
@adrien5834
@adrien5834 Год назад
@@CaptainDangeax I don't know why you feel the need to be so aggressive, the OP made a joke...
@sukocoimam4519
@sukocoimam4519 Год назад
Indonesia switch to Rafale caused by SU35 blocked by US, and when Indonesia want F35 or F15++ US not approve it, And offer F16 or F18. Eurofighter are to old, no upgrade and expensive
@swordsman1137
@swordsman1137 Год назад
Typhoon will get upgrade soon. They in progress of producing new radar for upgrading Typhoon.
@Statueshop297
@Statueshop297 Год назад
Typhoon not upgraded? Have you heard of tranche 1 to 4. All the blocks in those tranches? Project centurion? Multiple AESA radars available. Thrust vectoring engines tested? Remember if your not sure you don’t have to post rubbish. You can just say in my opinion rafale is better than typhoon.
@Statueshop297
@Statueshop297 Год назад
Price wise euro fighter typhoon and rafale are similar. When you get the interesting bits of contracts like spares, weapons, manuals, simulators and so on the typhoon is fairly priced with rafale. If you think different please show sources for us all to see
@sukocoimam4519
@sukocoimam4519 Год назад
In this case Indonesian offered for 2nd Eurofighter from Spain or Italy .. new batch Eurofighter not available soon and or to much US tech inside that blocked to foreign costumer. In my opion US blocked high tech to Indonesian because Singapore and Australia (Indonesian neighbour) are more royale costumer to US. Just like near Israel costumer will not have more tech than Israel ..
@amp5275
@amp5275 Год назад
I think the US congress approved the sale of F15 EX (probably in response to the then impending sale of the rafales). Its just that Indonesia is not in active talks to buy them yet
@turndroid234
@turndroid234 4 месяца назад
As an American, i choose the Rafale over the flawed , super expensive F35. The history of the F35 is a sad one. From the very start, experts agreed it would be cheaper to cancel the existing program because its riddled with all sorts of problems and start from scratch. But the Bush administration insisted to continue the project no matter the cost because a lot of investors would lose their investments. So in short, the F35 was built with investors in mind, not the people who will use it to protect liberty.
@vasiliyt8600
@vasiliyt8600 Год назад
There are also plans for Greece to buy additional 24 (at least) Rafale in the future. HAF will have in the 2030s at least 48 Rafale, 40 F-35 Block4, 83 F-16 Block72, 38 F-16 Block50++ Advance.
@douginorlando6260
@douginorlando6260 Год назад
The F35 has one saving grace … if an F35 and F15 are both detected, then the F15 will be the higher priority target.
Далее
F-22 Raptor: The Apex Predator 😈
36:56
Просмотров 48 тыс.
SITUATION IN FAST FOOD
00:19
Просмотров 2,1 млн
надувательство чистой воды
00:28
The Dassault Rafale: The Plane that Beat the F-16
18:50
The F-35 Block 4 is Pure Science Fiction!
50:24
Просмотров 367 тыс.
Le F-35 : un mystère ! #jumpseat
1:30:54
Просмотров 205 тыс.
Why so Few Su-57s ... and Other Stories.
14:19
Просмотров 54 тыс.
Rafale: India's Cutting Edge | NDTV EXCLUSIVE
40:04
Просмотров 328 тыс.
NATO Air Forces are Doomed
19:47
Просмотров 77 тыс.
The MYTH Of The "F-35"
11:20
Просмотров 511 тыс.
Why the NGAD is more like the F-111 than you think
12:46