The F-Pace SVR is Jaguar's Answer to the X3M - One Take 

fuck yea!

It's the all season tires make it seem faster as they break loose easily

It's a 176mph car, 0-60 in around 4 seconds. And it grips in the bends like crazy.

I’ll second that, took my breath away.

Seriously!

i feel sorry for you car guys in europe, your continent is run by commies

@@drunkpolack7612 lol at least we can buy and import pretty much any car, try and go get yourself an exige in the US. "emission regulations" my ass...

@@drunkpolack7612 nahhhhhh we get the best stuff here, can you get rs 6 avant?

@@drunkpolack7612 Said no one ever

more like Hellish

Definitely

Ian Townsend owners have timed 60 in 3.7 to 3.9 sec

Stephen Isaac That is quick for a car this size.

So do I. The only thing it’s lacking is the air suspension for some off road clearance.

The Velar AutoBiography SV is beautiful tho, I’d take it over this

Any issues with electrical systems, or unanticipated break downs? I want one...however a bit nervous about jags history..

Just in case (laughs), “you never know”.

Jaguar has a 5 year 60k warranty. No one in the luxury segment has that to my knowledge. I think in that warranty they take care of all fluid replacements.

That is so true 🤣 I love my Jaguars and Land Rovers but never without warranty. My front camera broke after 6 days and the car even turned up with the door (and door trim) out of alignment. I still love it though, Ultra blue in the sun looks fantastic!!

mansees yeah, my moms F pace has free maintence... haven’t paid a dime

Stop it. Look at the data behind the rankings. The data spread behind JD Power is so small to be pretty close to inconsequential...modern cars from today's manufacturers are incredibly reliable, period. And in some cases the causes for negative feedback are often cultural, not mechanical. For example, some responders get aggravated by small cup holders or small AC buttons, but that data is still recorder as a hit in surveys. One of the reasons JD doesn't offer raw data as readily as it once did is likely because the data spread is so tight, tight enough to just about make the exercise meaningless. Buy what you want, and if you need more info, take the time to look at the data, not just summary lists.

Hell yea

Gta v baller

I have to agree. I like the Stelvio, too, but the Jaguar takes the cake. And with the s/c V8 it will stomp a lot of other vehicles. Like our host, I was impressed at how comfortable it is and how well it handles crappy American roads.

It’s an SUV

Honestly this thinf has way more character bur sadly not as reliable :^/ shame jag got fuck for so many years by ford and whatnot. They always made cool lookin cars that always sounded great.

lexus gsf? v8 NA rwd sedan... and i doubt amg and m or even alpina for that matter will ever stop putting v8s into their upper class offerings.

@@leviathan5207It's only a matter of time before they don't either. The displacements have gotten much smaller over the years. Amg is down to a 4.5 bmw are using 4.0 liters. Ford gt has a V6 now.

Yes, me!

Was there a PFS show I missed??

@@dalefredriks2085 yesterday.... (Sunday)

@King of sting They have said however, that they'll stockpile as many as they can and continue to put them in low volume performance models until they're gone.

Isn't this just the old 5L ford block with a SC on it? JLR used them for years in the early 2000s...

@@j.d.m2103 No it's not buddy. The AJV8 started out as a 4.0 back in 97 I think, then a significantly improved 4.2 around 2001 or 2002. The current Gen III version arrived in 2008, they're all designed in- house by Jaguar, but are built in a Ford factory to save on costs.

@@v88dicky32 good to know, thanks.

@@j.d.m2103 You're welcome 👍

Yeah I almost regret taking the heated windshield option. I can't unsee it.

Never! Still saving my pennies for one. I heard that and the giulia are extremely unreliable: (

Ryan Dougherty not Honda quality but still more reliable than Jaguar...

They are dropping in price! Pick one up for 60k🤑😎

Wolf Man i live in china, here the cheapest is over 150k$

postponed the loan

I've got your answer..... No.....it's still a Jag. Lol.

Billy Leung I have a 2017 f pace R-sport 45k miles and everything is fine no problems.

Anything will last if you take care of if.

Tis true. I work for Jaguar.

I genuinely think it may have been missing some plastic cover or something?

He said front-engine cars, not front-wheel-drive.

my mom has an F-Type V6S Coupe

Yep the f pace is more in line with that. The e pace is closer to the x2/x3

Velar has supercharged 6 making 380 hp w a 5.1 sec 0-60 X5M twin turbo v8 making 570 horses without. 4.0 0-60 Two completely different leagues.

Oh I didn’t know they made an SVR Velar. While I’m not sure it’s out today I learned something new today. Thanks. : )

Mclarens answer to every thing is 3.8 V8

They have a new Turbo Inline Six coming.

you gotta admit though, it's a pretty good answer.

@@TheSmokingTire that's not the answer though lml

Russell turbos are so much fun though. They make nice wooshy noises.

@@ReviewedByAndy yes on modified japanese cars but on normal efficient german cars all they do is mute the sound of the engine and give lag

It's terribly slow and laggy, worse than almost any other brands infotainment. This is coming from a jaguar Land Rover product specialist

It's about 1,000 lbs lighter than the Trackhawk I drove last year at Road Atlanta, but down 200 lbs, for roughly the same money. If you're on big open freeways all the time, go with the Jeep. If you're on windy roads, the Jag is more agile (get the right tires!)

XE Project 8. Pretty bad ass car. Just smashed the Ring record for saloons.

@@mariusnenuIt's a cool car but I meant an M3, C63 competitor and not a limited edition 200kUSD car

I see your point. That would be awesome ,99% of the work is done anyway, all it needs doing is to dial back the project 8 and voila

Button up your cardigan Clifford. Also have a cup of concrete and harden the fuck up.

Dillon Optics! Longtime sponsor. Go to our website, and click on the "partners" tab, and if you use that link to buy a pair I'll send you a free TST T-shirt!

Charlie Denbigh 2001 Jaguar is Ford. 2019 Jaguar is Tata.

Farris TheLaggy When Ford owned jaguar, they built and designed them. Which made them somewhat reliable-ish. Also, Jaguars and Land Rovers use Tata electronics, so they’re not just responsible for the money.

Farris TheLaggy I never said that Tata makes JLR. They make their electronics, which makes them shite

Farris TheLaggy am I wrong?

Farris TheLaggy they are owned by Tata and they use Tata electronics. Saying that JLR isn’t Tata is like saying that Ferrari isn’t Fiat Chrysler.

Jaguar has more of a trustworthy, proven manufacturing tenure. Hard to predict the long term reliability of an Alfa

@@MrAnnihilator22 that's true , but probably not by much, they both have warranties though , so as long as alfa doesnt completely disappear within 4 years lol. Which is unlikely now that they're owned by fiat

Heard you mention it later in the video, LOVE those roads!!

I'm curious too, I've run Firestone Firehawk A/S (V-Rated) and BF Goodrich Comp 2 A/S (Z-Rated) on my Chrysler 200 (V-6, factory 18's, went from 225/50TR 18 to 235/50R18 as well) and I rarely had noise with the BFG's, but do get some from the 'Stones if I'm pushing them. That said, the F-Pace is weighs more than our cars at 4395lbs vs 3600lbs for my 200 and maybe up to 3255lbs for your 3. That weight alone could make a difference, let alone what kind of A/S tires, especially factory tires vs tire store replacements, which may be made as much for a new car price point as they are for anything else.

@@GreenJeep1998 My MZ 3 would be 2800 curb so roughly 3000lbs loaded. And remember that tires have a weight rating. not just a size.

Rolf Bjorn That is some of what I was trying to get at, though be it poorly.... I included the width since I went wider for lateral grip as well as under acceleration and braking (the O.E.M. rubber should have not been on the V6 cars) and therefore added grip may have helped with the noise abatement. Funny thing about the Firestones I'm running now though, when I researched them, I found that owners of sub 4000lbs cars like us really liked those tires (I like them, work great for me), while guys with the bigger, heavier cars (like the Chrysler LX cars) hated them with a passion. I think that they just may not work as well on heaver cars like they do lighter ones.

@@GreenJeep1998 What I meant is that every tire has a load rating. For example, I have 93 XL on my Mazda 3, which is frankly overkill. That means that each tire can take 1433 lbs, which means they could technically be put on a 4000 lbs vehicle and there would be 1700 lbs of extra capacity left. If someone puts an all season tire type that is not a HP or UHP type of tire, with a lower load rating and a very high profile, squealing and other performance issues can be expected. And this is an SUV/Crossover type vehicle.

This had Pirelli Scorpion Zeros on it. I would not recommend them for performance driving, and obviously neither would Jag's PR people.

The front tire squeal is louder than the already loud exhaust.....lol. Needs those summer tires YA