I just realized that as time went on, Nero’s arm got more and more blue until it looked like it did in dmc5 before it got ripped off. It was fully red with the blue glowy bits, then the top part of it started to turn blue, then we have the dmc5 version
I'd always interpreted it as Nero growing and changing into a more mature state, physically and mentally. Cause we see the brothers' DT change when young based on the Devil arm being used. But by 4 and 5, it's mostly set in place as one design for Dante. So for Nero, 5 is basically the most matured iteration of the Devil Bringer, seeing how it's still his arm and he can manifest it at will to complement the new Breakers.
I’m packing all my stuff for my leave to the military it feels so surreal but watching this video is like looking at my sensei looking at my childhood as things get wrapped up for the new chapter to start
DmC:Devil May Cry was my first exposure to the series, and I quite liked it. I feel the hate towards it is just cause it pokes fun of the original series but by itself it's a pretty good game and the definitive edition just makes it better
Im just gonna throw this out there. Saw someone say this and now its my official headcanon. Dante being broody in 2 is because hes depressed over the events of 1 with Vergil being a husk that he was forced to kill. Idk for some reason I really really love that theory
Well this was a great time sink. I was very happy to go back to the lore of the series and you may have a point with V. I mean the fact that he has Vergil's humanity and that he was a nice dude, it could mean that Vergil may have some shred of kindness deep inside. That said thank GOD we never got a sequel to the reboot because being reminded of that 'dialogue' easily made my brain die and the sequel would be even worse. Overall, this was a great compilation of the videos you have done and a soild job Donte!
Ya know I always thought DMC Dante was cool I was introduced to that version of Dante and first fell in love with these games. Then I went and played other every single game.
this game was so good and i know some of you are gonna be surprised but dmc reboot was actually my first dmc game and you know what am happy it was my first because it introduced me to the whole series
The Original DMC is always top tier but the new version is decent (key word decent)… Many certain elements were missing but the gameplay was still cool… I don’t like how they changed Dante from eating pizza to smoking like that was his thing foreal… But ehh what do I know haha… Now I wanna play DMC now haha
@@TheBlackMastadonte word… Like I understand what they were tryna do… But they could’ve kept the same blueprint when it came to his character specifically at least that’s how I feel about it
By no means was DMC: Devil May Cry a good game, but it wasn't a bad game either.... it was just certainly a game that existed that didn't live up to what the fans wanted .... however I still do want a DMC2, because I enjoyed the story of it, and want to see the end
I'm surprised there's no authority government in this game series that wants to kill off all demons including Dante the government's solution to getting rid of the problem would be a giant ass nuke!
I feel like arguably DMC remake could have been an origin story before DMC 3. Since he looks way longer and eventually his hair grows white and is still young trying to figure shit out. Vergil and Dante see each other again later on after their first fight and the story goes on. I feel like that would make more sense side quest wise
Not gonna lie, I enjoyed DMC. But in no way should had been named or connected to Devil May Cry. Definitely would have been better received if it was its own thing. May have even gotten a sequel.
"The Full Story" except it skips over important story elements like DMC2 in its entirety and how it relates to the rest of the series, or what happens in the show.
As stated last year, can you cover *Touhou Project* for Honest Gaming History in the future starting with it protagonist and poster girl *Reimu Hakurei?*
You just told the same story multiple times. . . With the most minor changes for each character you could’ve chimed in one in thru one telling of the timeline. Idk the full story but still feel like the Dante, Virgil and Nero story was all the same as you told it. Why?
