This is by far, the most extensive researched video I have ever seen on Mainland South East Asia. There are a few minor errors of course, but for the most part it is well made. Bravo from Cambodia
The Pearic in northern western Cambodia is correct though. They had their own chiefdom/kingdom before the Jayavarman II conquest. Chinese records from 600 AD talked about a Kingdom which is south of Battambang. There is another kingdom as well which is not mentioned in the map which is Sri Canasa which is in present day Ayutthaya. That kingdom is more of a buffer kingdom in Dvaravati area but based on researchers research the kingdom is Buddhist but accepted Hinduism and relied on slaves and trade and had more Khmer influence.
Thank you for writing our countries which used to exist in the past and historical names in Vietnamese language. This is the first time I've seen Vietnamese names on a foreigner ' s video .
@@Jolly_812 đó là tên quốc tế. Ngta đặt dựa trên vị trí của nó so với nước lớn nhất ở đấy tức Trung Quốc. Cũng giống như việc nhiều người gọi bán đảo Đông Dương là Indo-China vậy
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
For the people who asking why Malay Peninsula were not included in this video. My reasoning is simple, if he put the Malay Peninsula meaning he aslo need to put the rest of Maritime Southeast Asia because how the area were shaped. Which aslo meaning that it gonna take even longer research to make this video. I didnt want to argue about technicallity here because he intentionally cut it of to reduce his workload. This video had already taken so much time, just give this channel a break.
Yeah, there's a load of things also going on the seas, with Srivijaya vs Majapahit and whatnot also flexing their supremacy, and how much of info is needed to load all states in it. Only Kedah/Patani/Terengganu I think has a constant contact with the kingdom up above, and mostly with Siam kingdoms.
@@first761 Technically Kelantan exist as different smaller kingdoms and localities back then. Modern Kelantan however, is a breakaway state from Terengganu in the 19th century.
This was really great, could have been a bit more detailed for the late 20th and 21st centuries but the amazing detail in the previous centuries makes up for it.
This was such a great video, until we got to the Qing Conquest of Ming, and it's shown stupendously inaccurately! Still, I can tell a lot of work went into this. It's a masterpiece. But agh, seeing southwestern Guangdong controlled by Ming in 1661 is just aggravating. On the other hand, the Warlord Era is portrayed almost perfectly! Only that you forgot that Qinzhou was part of Guangdong before 1950, and that Sichuan and Guizhou recognised the Nanjing government in 1927.
Stop flexing on him 😂 I mean you could be right and probably are knowing your channel but still XD. He did do a great job. Can't wait to see something from you!👍
Austroasiatic and Austronesian both have the and infixes (as well as the prefix etc.). The presence of infixes of identical form and similar semantics was one of the main arguments for the Austric hypothesis. In fact, I know of Filipinos who can understand words in Khmer with these affixes if they know the root words' meaning. Such a feature seems to be indicative of a common ancestor rather than borrowing especially for the infixes which are rare in linguistics.
Just discovered this masterpiece, this is the most detailed map history about this region i have ever seen. As a vietnamese, i can see you spent a lot of effort to research about my country, the accuracy is just amazing. Nice job dude
Nice stuff! The confusing thing I found however is that according to Wyatt's "Thailand: A Short History (2nd Edition)" there are no records of Tai people in Southeast Asia until after the first millennium (or something along those lines). Also, I believed that Pegu was a vassal of Sukhothai for a few years, also according to Wyatt (and present on a few other map videos like Thames Mapping's: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-SGZqX6UVao0.html). I think Lan Na should have had its own box in the legend at least until Mangrai's death or its decline in the 16th century right prior to becoming a Burmese vassal. Also, another significant thing I found is that well into the first millennium or early second millennium, the water level around the Gulf of Thailand was higher than it is today (that might have been said in Chris Baker and Pasuk Phongpaichit's "A History of Thailand (3rd Edition)" or "A History of Ayutthaya: Siam in the Early Modern World", I don't recall). For the different language families, I think you should've color coded them somehow (in my opinion would be color-coding the text). I felt it was kind of weird that you didn't include the Burmese insurgent groups either. Great job nonetheless and didn't mind the delay due to the pain-staking detail it must have been to make this video from start to end.
Tai people did not move into Southeast Asia from China (today's Guangxi region to be exact) until the medieval times (roughly during China's Song dynasty I believe). This map here shows not just mainland Southeast Asia but also Southern China, since peoples of these two regions have deep historical connections
Insurgents groups in Myanmar is negligible, they haven’t won any battles so thus, they have no claim to any of the lands, most of them do not even station inside Myanmar, instead, they hide in Thailand, China or India
@@thunsitam7662 Did you use the word steal? The use of words seems very pathetic. In the old days, whoever lost a battle was considered a loser. Only the victors survive. The ancestors of the Khmer people lost to the Thai people and were unable to restore their independence. before being divided by the French to rule It's reasonable that your space will be left here.
As a south east asian, I really appreciate this video! I really do respect that you put so much efforts to these kinds of videos. This one have tons of details that most historical map content missed out. Keep it up man! Love your contents!
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
Fascinating the mosaic of peoples/cultures early in history that inhabited that part of the world and how the boundaries and groups evolved, I wish to know more as I know too little of this subject, great work! 👍👍
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
if china is shown too, wouldve been nice to show northeast india as well, since some kingdoms there are also somewhat like those in mainland southeast asia
Especially since Ahom Kingdom were Thai speaking, and nagas were shown. Would have been nice to see Mizoram, Manipur, Nagalim, Tripura, Assam, etc. Also, seeing Burmese Civil War lines, like the Wa state would have been cool.
Yeah, that part of India has a shared culture with parts of Southeast Asia especially Myanmar. They have Austroasiatics and Tibeto-Burman speaking people.
@@JcDizon Not only that part. There are Many Vedic influences throughout Southeast Asia which range from Language to names of places and religious idea's as well. Even many festivals.
no offense, i still don't understand why all northeast india became part of india not myanmar, or independent states, after the british left. how did the british draw the lines back then. why some tiny parts like bhutan and, well, back then, sikkim, could be their own.
Thank you very much for this exeptionally well made video. It must have been a really big amount of work you have put into the research and production of this. I very much appriciate your work. I am so amazed by this.
Please do a video on Malay Archipelago (Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Timor-Leste) next time. Thank you so much for showcasing our beloved region ASEAN.
Hi, Dragon! I love your videos and work, so I wish that you make a video about History of Mesopotamia from Stone age to today. I know that will be the best video ever.
commenting to help the algorithm, very detailed and a lot of research is done to this video. would appreciate if you also make the Maritime South East Asia Version. keep up the Quality~!
Very good video although the map of Vietnam in some periods is not very accurate, for example central and south Vietnam under the Nguyễn dynasty is still not very accurate so please fix the errors related to the map in the next videos, thank you for making good quality videos.
Thank you admin for doing research about this . I guess that it would take a huge a mount of time to reading book, research , and editing to make this type of video. Very detailed compare to same style history map videos i've seen on RU-vid.
@@Nohatedont ah, are you his second channel? I’m asking cuz like, I’ve seen these stuff and make maps before but never on this level of detail. This is quite obscure at the very least and require professional informational access at most. Usually books and websites have some info but the history of zomia is quite difficult to track, only modern distribution. I also just wanna ask the creator as well in case I could ask him for some info I couldn’t find.
Though I am not sure if we were a Chinese, Vietnamese,etc, but really, this map has helped me a lot to understand how our ancestors have migrated. Thank you very much for the video from North East India, Mizoram. 😑😑👍. Nah, it's a pain, I really wish to know who were our ancestors. We called ourselves Zo people.
@@cynki5152 One of my friend has tested his DNA and see that he had Central Asia, Finnish, Inuit, Nepali 2%, Vietnamese and Han Chinese 87%. But the thing I want to know is Chhinlung. Chhinlung is a place where our ancestors have come from.
@@ruatapachuauruatapachuau9116 The Chinese genes are inherently heterogeneous because in the past China invaded other countries and merged them. North and South China have very different appearances. Southern China today (southern of the Yangtze River) belongs to the land of Baiyue. Most likely your ancestors came from there, then migrated gradually. The same ancestors land of Vietnamese people (as me) and Thailand
Linguistically speaking, your people is Sino-Tibetan. I've seen pictures of Sino-Tibetan peoples of Northeast India and they look very much a like to the Chinese, many of them look like Yellow River region Chinese, not even the Southern Chinese who are mixed with Hmong, Yue and other tribes.
At 1:18 shows the Austroasiatic homeland being placed in Southern China, but that has always been a fringe theory in linguistics. The main theory today is that the Austroasiatc Urheimat lies somewhere near northern India, followed by the other most probable candidate, Indochina ("Mainland Southeast Asia"), since this is where the most genetic diversity is found. The theory that Austroasiatic originated and dominated most of Southern China is largely obsolete and not supported by recent evidence. For the Baiyue whom you labelled "Austroasiatic," current linguistics point to a Kra-Dai relationship, suggesting that the Wu and Yue natives most likely spoke an ancestral language to Kra-Dai or, perhaps, a sister branch next to Kra-Dai that had become extinct. Prior to the Kra-Dai expansion in Southern China, it's believed that they may have begun as an off-branch migration from the Pre-Proto-Austronesians, where one branch went to Taiwan and the rest of Maritime Southeast Asia, forming the Austronesian language family. Here, a second branch most probably left Taiwan and (re)migrated back to Deep Southern China, forming the basis for Kra-Dai.
@@Urlocallordandsavior Look up Austroasiatic language and history by Roger Blench and The Handbook of the Austroasiatic Languages by Paul Sidwell & Mathias Jenny. The map shown in the video here is a fringe theory that contradicts what academics widely teach in universities today. I minored in linguistics at UBC, graduating in 2018.
@@夜行者-s2x They used to live in India, then migrated to Southeast Asia and migrated back to East Asia. And were pushed back to Southeast Asia by the Han people.
great video but the French had never conquored Đà Nẳng. the reason why France Invaded Cochinchina was because they failed to capture Đà Nẳng. just a minor detail but still hope you notice my respond.
@@first761 Culturally and historically, it's more in line with maritime Southeast Asia (it was controlled by two empires based in Indonesia after all). Same thing with Vietnam (culturally very Sinitic-influenced but its location makes it in SE Asia). Southeast Asia's a large and diverse region, you have to split it accordingly somehow (ideally a mix of shared cultures/histories/location).
Haha, I checked out his presentation on Austroasiatic migrations from earlier this year and tried to represent his research in this video. Hopefully it turned out ok 🙏🏻
@@TheDragonHistorian archaeogenetics confirmed that Austroasiatic O1b1 had already migrated to Southeast Asia mainland, part of marine and the Philippines 9,200 years ago. The Hoabinhians also contained Austroasiatic Halogroups. Around the Dong Son period, the Red River Delta burial remains were mixed between Austroasiatic and Kra-Dai/Austronesian O1a1 , might be the legendary King An Duong and the Ouyue tribes who partly integrated themselves with local Austroasiatic elites. Archaeogenetics >>> linguistic
I find that the place of origin of Austroasiatic peoples was changed to Pearl river basin(that could be related to Baiyue...?) instead of Yangtze river possibly due to previous comments by Dr. Sidwell😅
How long did it take you to complete this project? What software did you use to create the dynamic map? 감사합니다 (I lived in Korea for 8 years in Jeollabuk do, noticed some different dialects in Jeolla vs Gyeonggi )
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
Also, '... While no conclusive study to determine whether Funan's ethnolinguistic components were Austronesian or Austroasiatic, there is dispute among scholars. According to the majority of Vietnamese academics, for example, Mac Duong, stipulates that "Funan's core population certainly were the Austronesians, not Khmer;" ...' Etc.
From wiki "The key drivers of the Indianisation of Southeast Asia were the Austronesian[4][5] and Indian maritime trade especially the Spice trade and the Maritime Silk Road, the emissaries of Ashoka, and the Buddhist missions of Emperor Ashoka the Great."
Siam, the old name of Thailand, was used officially from 1856, during the reign of King Mongkut, Rama IV of the Rattanakosin era, to 1939, when the country's name was changed to Thailand for the first time in the post-revolutionary era under the leadership of nationalist Prime Minister Luang Pibulsonggram, who was also the war-time prime minister. After the end of World War II in 1945, the country's name in English and other foreign languages reverted back to Siam until 1949 when Pibul, who was back in power after staging a military coup, renamed the country again to Thailand, the present name of the country.
Damn I'm so proud of myself that I managed to predict most of the major events before they happened. I've never thought of myself as being very good at SEA history, and I'm obviously much better at the history of other regions, but it's still really nice.
Muang Sua was founded by the Mon people as well as That Phanom on the west Bank of the Mekong just north of Savannakhet, Sri Gotapura near Nakhom Phanom and Chantaburi near Vientiane.
NO, china forever be a vietnam enemy because when they rule vietnam they were try to assimilation vietnamese to chinese so we need to independent to keep our culture and vietnamese land, vietnamese rule, not chinese
how did you can said china and vietnam are brother??? it’s different from culture to nation and chinese forced vietnamese to leave their culture how did vietnam and china is a brother??
@@vietnamese_guy What culture does Vietnam have? In BC. The greatest poet in classical China was Qu Yuan from the Yangtze River Basin. Can you tell me if there are people like Qu Yuan in Vietnam?
ขอบคุณจากประเทศไทย นี้เป็นวิดิโอที่ดีที่สุด งานวิจัยด้าน DNA คนไทยส่วนใหญ่มี DNA -Mons นี้คือสิ่งที่ถูกต้องที่สุดแต่เคยดูมา ตรงกับหลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์
Vietnam is a Southeast Asian country, but it feels similar to the history of Northeast Asia in that it achieved centralization quickly, is a Confucian culture, and has constantly fought with China.
Alexander Woodside: Vietnam only became quite "Confucianized" during the reign of Gia Long and Minh Menh during the first half of 19th century, by enforcement of East Asian Sinic elitist traditions over Vietnamese peasantry, whom Southeast Asian naturally. Result: 500 rebellions
Doesn't surprise me that Northern Vietnam where Hà noi now sits, developed early civilizationally. It's flat, low-level, humid, and warm and therefore very fertile. Easy to get a large population going.
This is extremely cool. However I'd like to know what source you use for the expansion of the Tai peoples into the region. From what I understand the Mon controlled city states all along the Mekong and Khorat Plateau until conquest by the Khmer Empire. I don't think that the Tai arrived until rather later, 900s or so. This seems to put them in Khorat very early. Regardless fantastic work.
The whole SEA area is one of the areas on Earth that I know little about! I know more about Africa and the Pacific Islands than I know about SEA. Thank you so much for making this video!
