Where is Old Novgorod dialect? It was characterized by a number of differences from Old East Slavic (Old Russian), and in some respects from all other Slavic languages. For example, it lacks effects of the second and third palatalization of velars. Old Church Slavonic: цѣлъ /cělŭ/ Old East Slavic: цѣлъ /cělŭ/ Old Novgorodian: кѣле /kæle/ Proto-Balto-Slavic: *kailas
You can add region of romania to this because in ancient times dacian and thracian spoke a language of our balto-slav family. Romanian is just a latinised version thracian. If you don’t want to include them in the maps of recent times ok, but atleast in the ancient part thracia and dacia should be added
not bad but I gotta say that I think balto slavs, and proto iranians were the main eastern part of the corded ware culture , that came straight from the yamnaya northward around 3000bce see if I'm wrong, I might be
The beginning was good but later on for some reason all the territory of nowadays Belarus is being shown as slavic. Why? From where? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Cm8NjiikeUg.html
Some examples to show the same origin of the balto-slavic and indo-iranian languages : English Lithuanian-Latvian Sanskrit Serbo-Croat who kas ka кој when kada kadā kad other anas anya ini bird paukštis pakṣin ptica four keturi catur četiri meat mėsa māṃsá maso eye akis ákṣi oko liver jaknos yákṛt jetra to eat ėsti átti jesti to live gyventi jī́vati živeti moon menulis mā́sa mesec smoke dūmai dhūmá dim fire ugnis agní ogenj
Wikipedia, centum and satem languages: "It is no longer thought that the Proto-Indo-European language split first into centum and satem branches from which all the centum and all the satem languages, respectively, would have derived. Such a division is made particularly unlikely by the discovery that while the satem group lies generally to the east and the centum group to the west, the most eastward of the known IE language branches, Tocharian, is centum".[2]
@@atbing2425 , that extract from wikipedia is false and dates back to 2010. Because tocharian is centum doesn't change anything. The satem centum split happened. Tocharian was separated from its brothers latin germanic celtic and went to the east, while the others went to the west, for unknown reasons. You want more proves ? Let's take the genetics. The Y haplogroup of balto-slavic and indo-iranian peoples are mostly R1A. It's another very strong proof. It has changed the way we see things in many topics like linguistics. " R1a originated ca. 22,000 to 25,000 years ago." So it means the centum satem split took place more than 25.000 years ago.
1:02 I dont think using the word "Romanians" there is good, since nowadays Romanians are a combination of dacians,romans and slavs. Instead of romanians you could've used "daco-romans" or proto-Romanians!
I don't believe the Balto-Slavic joint origin. Baltic languages are more similar to German, Finnish and Swedish languages than to Slavic. It is based on totally wrong and stupid theory, that Slavs came to Europe in 6th century from today's Belarus, which is not true. But I believe that Slavic language was the closest one to Proto-indoeuropean language, and it is origin of all European languages. So Slavic language was the first European language!! I provide you with Examples (that are real today's words): (I am using Slovak language as it has the most originally Slavic words.) Slovak: more (more-mare-mar-mer) Italian: mare Latin: mare French: mer German: meer Lithuanian: jura Latvian: jura --- Slovak: meno (meno-nome-name) Italian: nome Latin: nomine English: name French: nom German: name Lithuanian: vardas Latvian: nosaukums --- Slovak: rieka English: river French: riviere Lithuanian: upe Latvian: upe --- Slovak: voda English: water [votr] German: wasser Lithuanian: Latvian: udens As you can see, even English is closer to Slavic words than Baltic languages. There are many new researches going on that proves true that is not popular for old scientist believers that are holding old theories. 😀😀😀
yes, but many basic words are similar in Baltic and Slavic and not similar in German. In first position Latvian/ Lithuanian, second Russian: pirma - pierviy ( first) gyvena - jivet ( to live) visus - vse ( everybody, everything) nezinau - ne znayu ( don't know) galvojau - golova ( think, head) zemes - zemlya ( ground) pavirsiaus - poverhnost ( surface ) miestu - mesto ( a place) bega - beg ( to run ) ziema - zima ( winter)
@@mordegardglezgorv2216 Russian is not Slavic language. Today's Russian is the result of influence from Slavic dialect spoken in Greece, in which the Christianity was spread in Bulgaria and Russia.
@@marians7364 lol what? Old Russian (Old East Slavonic) and Church Slavonic (from Bulgaria) were extremely different languages. For Example, in Novgorod (north-west Russia) it was the dialect of Old Russian and we can find it in many birch bark manuscripts. Very few documents were written in Old Church Slavonic. OCS was used only in religious books, most of people didn't know this language. Modern Russian is the result of evolution of Old East Slavic with sporadiс inclusions of Church. For Example, I can read ancient texts in Old East Slavonic without translation as Russian speaker
@@atbing2425 Macedonia is a geographical area, not a nationallity. In Macedonia live a lot of different nationalities there is no "macedonian: nationally and we will not change our common sense because a part of the bulgarian nation decided to stay apart from their motherland
@@atbing2425 language has written documents not army and navy. "Macedonian language" is introduced in 1945. That's a terminus postquem! Why don't they face the truth for a chance? They only exist because of modern politics, they have nothing to say but lies and propaganda against every neighbor!
@@Pimpikalns The very name of Ukraine - "In the country" - there is no need to determine - in the country of whom? Like this with other Slavic countries. In Europe - the second such case is only in Germany - "Deutsche"- "Nation/people" - and there is no need to explain the people to whom? How to do it Danes, Swedes, Angles and Saxons.
@@WoldUA насчет прародины соглашусь, но твое толкование Украины просто бредовое. Начать хотя бы с того, что это слово не фиксируется ни в одном источнике ранее 16 века
