The Japanese Tank Meme 

Just another one, a BIG ONE !!!!! (Yes... I'm French 😂) IT'S NOT AND IT'S NEVER BEEN FT-17 !!! Just FT ! Thanks ! 😁

Potential History damn from reviewing anime to making meme videos good start

How do you comment on a video that was uploaded 30 minutes ago, 13 hours ago?

Make Meme tank 3 My tank suggestion is The TOG II

OMg that intro killed meee :D

Sooooo, the Japanese armored divisions were useless still, seeing as everyone they were fighting in ww2, had tanks, and far better ones

@@LibertyPrimed The Chinese had tanks that were both small in number and over decade old. And they were the enemy the Japanese were fighting with the longest, so no they weren't better, and for much the of the Second Sino-Japanese war, China essentially had no tanks.

Let me elaborate Smol Japanese tank = funny joke Big allied/other axis tanks = not so small, but still funny in their own ways, im just sayin, the earliest tanks ever by any country, is like paper mache and cardboard on treads with a pellet gun turret and a dirt bike engine

Exactly, the Japanese tanks did awful against modern designs like the sherman, matilda and valentine, but against small minor nations that only have infantry or only small amounts of tanks, not such a stupid decision

@@LibertyPrimed The Chinese in Manchuria didn’t have tanks nor did the Chinese government or the government of the Philippines. Pretty much no one they were fighting at first had tanks besides the British, who were giving their tanks to the European theatre. There’s a lot of fighting in the 30’s that’s not technically WWII but for all intents in purposes it is.

to be honest i had no idea what he said, but still i commend him on the effort.

@Libertatem Veritas and certainly he failed 🤦

@Libertatem Veritasi dont think so

More polite to mispronounce a highway than a persons name, just shut up

@Charles Lee Ray A good bit of romanzations for Japanese are thankfully pronounced exactly as you would think given their spelling. But not all of them.

The British were also outnumbered and half a world away from their homeland. Any amount of armor they had would've been destroyed by bombers escorted by Zero's

Actually, the Brits had superior numbers in infantry, but they were poorly trained, but they still outnumbered Japan

@@paulfrancistorres7144 On top of that, even poorly trained infantry can do a decent job when fighting from defensive positions.

Despite literally being outnumbered everywhere else. Little naval support, little air support, little armored support, even AT guns weren’t that abundant, though, still they were common. Take into account the fact that they were , in many situations, fighting the best of the best, the Imperial Guard, they were boned from the start. Then add into the fact that Australia had thrown many of its forces into Africa, and Britain was the industrial center for its equipment, there was no way they could’ve stood up to the very local power of Japan.

@@Crosshair84 in old time, yes. In ww2 time, defensive structure without support is just inviting artillery and bombs

Britain: FiSh AnD ChIps

Soviet: T H I C C US: Sherman spam

Finnish: Hippity hoppity your tonk is now my property

US: *T H I C C B O I*

America: Floatie-woatie lvt uwu

Panther is stronger but not beeter(my opinion

mobile pliot war wings so better gun and armor?

Nguyễn Hải Dương Your right but it will most likely won’t go one on one. It will either be Panther ambushes the Sherman for most of the time and in some battles, Sherman ambushes Panther. But you’re still right about Panther able to beat Shermans in one on one engagements

@Nguyễn Hải Dương Once the original problems of the panther were fixed this happened after kursk where many Panthers broke down before seeing combat the panther was no more unreliable then a t34 or sherman the problem was with the process of repairing which as anyone who knows anything about ww2 knows the germans were the worst when it came to military production and repair of broken vehicles the panther did not magiclly fucking break for no reason or because it was designed horrible it was a good tank with around the same reliability as any other medium tank of the time.

Looks like you started an argument about the Sherman and panther

lee yi xian *almost* (as in there is only one Italian tank as of yet)

Anyone wanna play World of tanks with me ? :c

THEN MEN OF WAR ASSAULT SQUAD 2

Japan wins. Why? Because when Italy changes sides, there will be no enemy.

Nobody plays japanese or italian in war thunder you dungus

Firefly and M4A376mm: i am tiger

@@blackopscw7913 Both weren't that armored, now if you talking about the M4A3E2 with the 76mm Cannon well they were basically tigers or even better than a tiger

@@royalcinnamon yes i was thanks for clarifying

@@royalcinnamon Not that armored but still better armored than most German tanks (except Tiger and Panthers of course)

@@blackopscw7913 in that aspect, i guess Hellcats and M36s are Jagdtigers then.

Yamato and Musashi: *REEEEE!*

Gotta steal that steel Ok that wasn’t even good I’ll leave now

Shinano: "You girls live longer than me?"

And their glorious navy is crushed at the end of the war xd

@@baskapat5239 So was the Army. And the Navy at least used modern tactics

If I ever wage war, I'm either going to go through woods or setup defences around the woods.

It's really just quite unsporting of them. I mean we made these large and clearly defensible encampments for them to run headlong into. And here they are just walking around our immovable fortresses. That's just bloody not fair, if I say so myself, and I do!

Thank god there were no large forests between Libya and Alexandria, else Italy may actually have managed something in Africa.

@@KitsuneRogue Who do they bloody think they are? War is supposed to be about honor, chivalry, and discipline. There are rules to adhere to.

*_ardennes_*

And unlike those other historians, he has memes!

“Sir, the 17 pounder won’t fit!” “Put it in sideways!” “Sir, the radio won’t fit!” “Cut a hole in the back and stick it out the back!” “Sir, the engine isn’t strong enough!” “Take five car engines and put them together!”

Yeah he’s the only History channel im subscribed to. Other ones I’ve watched are just too vanilla and barely graze the surface of the topic at hand.

Potatoe the Hun simple history is also ok

@@connorwilson2014 Yeah, sure thing dude

The thing is those flying bois wouldnt have stood a chance against their own anti-aircraft guns. American naval anti-aircraft fire was so dense and layered that it was basically a shield. This is why the japanese turned to Kamikaze tactics, because they were going to die attempting a bombing run anyway, may as well go all-in.

@Magne M tell that to the Brits

@@tradfave9474 And damn did it prove effective. _For a time, at least._

Honestly it made sense, they were an Island-Based Empire, so it was rather logic to favor the naval branch over the others.

@@MrDibara the Kamikazes indeed were effective, they just came too late in the war.

Hahaha

Europe: “Taking fire from that CUTE little Panzer! Fucking adorable like a puppy, KILL IT!” Pacific: “why is that tractor staring at us funny? Someone shoot it with a bazooka”

@@looinrims Ah, the glory that is CoH2 voice lines. Alternatively: "Put a fucking 8cm rocket up their ass!"

The Looinrims yeah i bet a 75 mm potato launcher could pen a tiger panther or panzer iv they had to flank some pz ivs

How can you read this Theres no picture bigfoot can you repeat that in English

Where’d your pfp come from?

Patrician taste

I have crippling depression

Afaik Chi-ha kai with the 47mm using upgraded shells could destroy a Sherman with a frontal hit at "100 yards" or something (use meters ffs).

imgur.com/x9yJ9YI Yes you alright! The Chi-Ha using Tokko Kou APHE shell can penetrate 114mm of armor at close range. Enough to even pen the Tiger 1 frontally.

Funny thing is that the little kid (China) somehow took steroids from the drug dealer (Russia) and he's almost as powerful as the bully.

But, as with M-4s vs. Panther and Tiger I tanks, the problem is getting "close enough" without "getting blown away.";)

M4s vs Panthers and Tigers is like a high schooler vs. College kids, Pz.V and Pz.VI vs Soviet late war heavies is like college kids vs grown ass adults

Ho=artillery ....seems about right,ights ho's,ATTACK!

*there's a note where the Ho tanks should be* "Emperor said it's our turn with the steel. Fuck you, The Imperial Japanese Navy."

Hey where’s Kenny *burning wreckage* Oh my god the bastards

Rest of the world -No Hoes, Only Bros Japan during WW2- I need them Hos, enough with bros

North Korea: hold my bombs

Yeah thats why the US bombed two mostly by civilians populated cities :/

But yeah haha funny

@@jasperjahnke Their civilians made most of the weapon parts in their homes before sending them to factories, so that makes them military targets.

@@jasperjahnke I didn't realise there was such thing as military populated cities

xXRedLineXx Because *AMERICAN OCCUPATION!!!*

@@boyketer3585 *When Americans send more technology support to Japan than their own country, resulting in one having a great economy and infastructure, while their own crumbles.* >Why the fuck not? Sounds like a *GREAT* idea!

@@redline1916 Because Japan is near China. And the Japanese communist were getting really powerful after the war.

*Japanese focused effort

xXRedLineXx I don’t know, our economy is doing quite well

No the accidental (maybe) rhyme was better

I did love it but if the umbrella had popped open with a modern Japanese flag before the "Yeah, he's done" it would have been even better.

Homer even did a Banzai charge at the end! :D

Real_Rex yep

Real_Rex 666 LIKES😱😱

Calvin_Coolage agreed

Calvin_Coolage Cuz you’re a weeb, quit making excuses.

@@z54964380 why the fuck do people have a need to call someone a weeb all the time just because they like something about Japan?

Their philosophy was blame the tank designer for Tojo's incompetence at using them.

The 93 is trying so hard with all those turrets it’s cute I call it the fat princess in wot

The Yamato went down as embarrassingly easy as the Bismarck. Possibly even more so.

@@lsswappedcessna except the Bismarck had the British deploy a handful of ships to hunt it down, and after they finally find it the Germans manage to scuttle it after a couple of hours of being constantly shelled The Yamato got fucked over by American planes without a chance, the real German embarrasment is the Tirpitz

@@lsswappedcessna Yamato literally exploded into peaces while Bismarck sunk because of holes

@@altaccaltacc7652 yeah, at least she went out with a bang. Something as boring as having the crap beat out of it until the crew got tired of having their asses kicked and scuttling it wouldn't have been fitting for the Yamato.

it's actually a really good tank

Well the ho it is almost a failed project because of its heavy weight would get stuck in the sand and mud because the Ho-Ri has a 105mm gun as well as the armor protection would work against the tank in the islands the Japanese would be defending from the Americans

This is so sad Can you make some -T-34's- *Sturmgeschütz III's?*

Ho-Ri it up

It's small It's cute It's iconic It's stronk It's fast ...and also easily taken out by Shermans. AMERICA.

didnt know until today i wanted a hago gf

Isaiah Sherrill f u with u shity pun 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Racket Rider It’s not even that fast

you just described a renault ft17

Racket Rider Loli tank

I'd prefer metal gear if you ask me.

You want a war is that what you want asshole

What a prediction for 2020

They already build Gundam and can move

@@askamikaze3936 Metal Gear? It can't be...

Italian tanks are arguably worse, but since they mostly surrender before fighting hard... You don't see them in action often.

@Vlad Melis en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_campaign_(World_War_II) look for yourself, after September 26, 1943.

@@LibeliumDragonfly ask that to the 132nd armored division ariete

@@LibeliumDragonfly if they see an Italian tank from the ariete. They lose morale and always surrender to the Italians.Well Guess what happened

@@LibeliumDragonfly fake news believer

Murican immigrant

@@panzerkampfwagenvausf.g9469 irish-japanese man called tommy o'hara

Tomio Hara

@@panzerkampfwagenvausf.g9469 *A wave of T-34/85s swarm the Panther*

Lmao thats a good one

Preach it i fucking love these videos

That and his outro music is a fucking banger.

*_laughs in Hellcat_*

@Victor Tran the p47's engine isn't fat it's. T h i c c

@Victor Tran I said the wrong plane

NothingXemnas you make no sense

Andrew Michaelson so 50 cal was piercing this thing?

Phil Mak oh easily

Hardly easily. The type of .50 cal we were using in WWII could penetrate 25mm of armor only at less than 100 meters distance, so the chances of actually pulling that off without getting shot up by the tank or the tank's supporting infantry is quite low. On top of that, .50 cal can penetrate the armor of M18 Hellcats but you don't hear anyone giving Hellcats shit about it.

@@Seraphil1 Don't think the Hellcat was facing very many 50 Cal. MGs...

@@Seraphil1 because they could actually shoot back

R3d Ro0k 37 i see that your a man of a culture as well

It's a bad idea if the enemy infantry can run up to them, or the enemy have trucks.

So meta

ARTILJERIJA BOSANAC SAM BEKRIJA

I don't think he's ever played hoi 4, take your dead meme and leave please Edit: WE SHOULD BUY HIM HOI4 SO HE CAN DO ARTILLERY ONLY

Some Rando Filipino ohhh another Filipino

The attack on Pearl Harbor was a surprise military strike conducted by the Imperial Japanese Navy against the United States naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, on the morning of December 7, 1941 (December 8 in Japan). The attack led to the United States' entry into World War II. The attack was intended as a preventive action in order to keep the U.S. Pacific Fleet from interfering with military actions the Empire of Japan was planning in Southeast Asia against overseas territories of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and the United States. There were simultaneous Japanese attacks on the U.S.-held Philippines and on the British Empire in Malaya, Singapore, and Hong Kong. The attack came as a profound shock to the American people and led directly to the American entry into World War II in both the Pacific and European theaters. The following day, December 8, the United States declared war on Japan. Domestic support for non-interventionism, which had been strong, disappeared. Clandestine support of Britain (e.g., the Neutrality Patrol) was replaced by active alliance. Subsequent operations by the U.S. prompted Germany and Italy to declare war on the U.S. on December 11, which was reciprocated by the U.S. the same day.

Pearl Harbor was a inside job *FDR DID 12/7*

America was prepared in Pearl Harbor. They moved their carriers away, they knew Japan is coming for them and they need reason to join into World War 2.

Some Rando Filipino 200 land based US Bombers (Including B-17) stationed all over the Pacific (and eventually China, had things gone to plan) would seem to indicate otherwise. America was going to war, they just didn't realize that they would not be the ones delivering the first strike. Joint Board Plan 355 signed by FDR months before Pearl Harbor, never forget.

Bro.....not funny XD

Chi-number one

@@AsianSaIad R.I.P Stefan Karl

Chi chi

@@breizhrudie4757 More like chi-nope

Japan wasn't a axis country.

Remember when Italian soldier fight in the jungle? Me neither.

@@MouldMadeMind japan was an axis country

@@user-yo5pz5rg4h no Japan had only the same enemy as the axis.

@@MouldMadeMind Japan is technically Axis, and that's what mostly matters in the context of the post.

Soviets: when your tanks look cool af but your navy are a bunch of row boats

And Japan's economy was smaller too

@@elykeom1 and it made sense for them to use most of the resources on the navy, since they were a island nation and a naval power

@Kyros Droztamyr please explain

@Kyros Droztamyr yeah, not only that but most soviet tankers rarely had a decent amount of shells, and some tanks lacked gunsights due to the rush in production, i would not like the crew a t-34, but i can see how they helped in defeating nazi germany

I think you Mean the Anko Special.

You mean, wasser-panzer?

That’s really awesome tbh (rather really creative)

go away muso

No

Prussian Eagle yeah he came down to Milan and filmed me and now I’m here

Toaster no

Smerlin yes

And French tanks.

@@swann3482 remember who you're talking to, he's a german commander.

Not really, the Japanese had better guns and shells

Were they bad tho? Italian tank was just not adapted to the use the german made them use

@@popopduck877 no the french emphasised on speed and mobility too bad the germans were better

*matilda gets a granade thrown right into its tracks* OH NO KING GEORGE THE 3RD SAVE ME

@@ncrveteranranger9126 Japanese officers order a retreat? And follow it up with a logical move? I'm sorry but I refuse to believe this fantasy. Make it believable Mr Ranger man.

@@bigrabii9470 then it shall be done *japanese soldiers overrun the matilda*

@@ncrveteranranger9126 Oh cool. That makes sense.....well maybe. The Japanese still wouldnt have anything able to pen it and closing in on a tank is a bad time. Lots of guns doing a shoot at you.

@@bigrabii9470 they could have thrown more grenades as well, and the matilda is gonna run out of supplies sooner or later

true

I have to wait 90 days to change my name i have to wait 90 days to change my name too

I have to wait 90 days to change my name did you commented on a different video I Remember reading one of your comment I forgot which video was it

😂😂😂

@ur mom I've seen you before! Good start.

I should say something that basically everyone found it useful or outright necessary to attach _some_ kind of armoured close support to their infantry, be it dedicated designs (eg. infantry tanks or assault guns) or just general-purpose line tanks seconded from their usual duties. One French general in the Great War quipped something to the effect that "there are two kinds of infantry; one has not gone into attack with tanks, and the other never wants to do so again without them" and that seems to have aged remarkably well. See also: IFVs and just putting halfway decent amount of gun and armour on basic bitch APCs.

​@@broadbandislife Your point makes some common sense: would an infantryman prefer to have a bit of mobile cover that can shoot and has enough armor to help it survive for a while? Or no? Of course the answer is usually, "hell yes" but the challenge is gonna be loss rates....can I field a design that takes acceptable losses in that role and is feasible to keep supplied and mobile enough to keep up with the army?

@@NPatterson4vdma You mean economics and logistics, ie. "how many of these buggers can I actually afford to field and where do I usefully employ those I do?" Also given that the overwhelming majority of WW2 armies were still fundamentally transported by ye olde Heel-Toe Express and period tracked vehicles tended to run into serious breakdown problems if they travelled far under their own power the mobility angle tends to get somewhat excessively emphasized. Plus pretty much everybody built a crop of _fast_ tanks of some sort for the maneuver role anyway. The _actual_ problem with this kind of division-of-labour approach, which I'm pretty sure was in part influenced by industrial paradigms and the fact technological immaturity forced eg. the warplanes of the period to be rather task-specialized, was industrial-logistical - duplication of effort, more complex supply chains, diminished economies of scale and so on and so on. Which is why by the end of the war Everyone & Dog, Inc. was switching or had already switched over to "universal" all-purpose designs, made more feasible by the maturing of the technologies and hard-won practical experience of the kinds of solutions that worked. (Light and heavy tanks hung around for specialist tasks for a long time but that's not important here.)

we did but it seems really weird to have this footage of nothing

Australia was worried AF about Japan invading, so it might have been gathered back in the day for sizing up the enemy

@@blahblahblahblah2837 the Brisbane line.

Well said

_'Always important to remember is how late Japan arrived to the industrial era.'_ Japan opened at the start of the second phase of the Industrial Revolution. For example, Japan didn't need to invent the steam engine (which took about 125 years of development to transform from something than could pump water out of a mine to be able to pull a heavy load over long distance on a grade reliably and at profitably, i.e. a steam locomotive). It was able to leapfrog into the Industrial Revolution. It purchased the day's state-of-the-art technological products, licensed or reversed-engineered them, began to innovate its own ideas, and entered the comparable phase. 'We make steam locomotives too.' Adding the triumphant and self-congratulatory 'And it didn't take us more than 100 years to do so' would be absurd though. Its rapid development was not unique in this regard. The Soviets did so. So have the Koreans and many others. Think about it. When you attended grammar school and learned to read and write, did you start with cuneiform, move to Greek, then Latin, and continue on with old English, middle English, and early modern English as the prerequisite to learn contemporary English? No. You leapfrogged all of that. You probably didn't see Beowulf and the Canterbury Tales in the classroom until you were age 11 or 12, and the purpose of that instruction was not 'Let's now learn old and middle English.' Japan was already an industrial power years before WWI, so seeing what battlefield innovations came from Europe, studying them, and then applying them to their own needs was not a stretch. And this wasn't the first time Japan did so. After the introduction of the matchlock by Portugal in the mid 16th century, Japan was soon manufacturing its own and making innovations. The Mongol invasions in the 13th century also taught Japan several things. Humans have a remarkable capacity to catch up. Quickly. We all don't need to start at year zero and plod along blazing a new trail.

True. Tanks capable of fighting the heavier western tanks were in fact developed, but as said at the end of the video, they were retained for homelands defense. Plus there certainly weren't that many of them

Torys Account The katana dates back to the 1300s, guns weren't in mass production for another 200 years, and guns started in China, so the Japanese knew what they were before the Europeans did. And the katana is a derivation of the tachi, a sword that goes back to the 900s. The katana wasn't a mythical cutting sword that could bifurcate an armour clad knight, but the katana is by far the most versatile sword in the world. It is curved enough to be used on horseback and straight enough to be used as a thrusting weapon, it was long enough to be used in a field but short enough to be used indoors. They could cut while drawing and can be wielded with 1 or 2 hands. the Europeans had hundreds of specialized swords for each of these purposes. And the Japanese came into contact with hundreds of cultures with thousands of different swords and they stuck with the katana design for 1150 years.

@Skelotor Two put your shit in 1 post ffs.

@Skelotor Two I mean it's not, it's actually harder to respond to (especially on mobile), but whatever floats your boat.

yeah but the katana had next to no ability to deal with anything in heavier armor, like at least a longsword you can fucking beat someone to death with it, hold it by the blade and use it like a mace, or half sword it, but a katana is really only good for cutting

Siegfried Gottz **pommel time**

350k anti-tank only

Lexter Nagasangan anti air only

There is no gaming channel, please stop Edit: NVM A R T Y O N L Y

Am I allowed to bring a Stug III? Technically it was designed as "close" range infantry support artillery.

B O B S E M P L E O N L Y

commissarmanul Agreed, The Churchill is underrated and under-recognised in my opinion.

@@loganjonesTTMS Every time I look at it (especially the earlier variant) I think "Brits, you know the great war ended?"

“It looks like it’s from the last war, you can’t miss it, Gunner”

Brandon Fu I know a Squire reference when I see one! Great work my good sir!

Personally I think a lot of British tanks are quite underrated for the sole reason that, compared to the Soviets and Americans, there wasn't that many made.

Legendary japanese war hero, Tommy O'hara.

TBH, that came later in the war when they started throwing kitchen sinks (and other house appliances) in vain attempt to keep Allies at bay.

@@hemidas ever seen the national defense rifles? Oh boy.

@A Bandit they don't have sights

A Bandit I’m sorry, fucking look at them

@Soren G you thought loool

with that short 57 mil no way, the chi-to however, that thing was a beast!

What you mean? The Chi-Ha Kai 47mm is extremely good what it is! It was even praised by the Americans as a excellent Anti-Tank gun. Based on the American tests, the type 1 47mm gun with a special shell can penetrate armor of 114 mm thick at close range. This thing can easily punching through a Tiger 1 heads on. imgur.com/x9yJ9YI

@@i_nameless_i-jgsdf no, I'm talking about the type 97

Omar سلوم So did i? The only Type 97 Chi-Ha with 47mm gun is the Chi-Ha Kai. The first Chi-Ha carried 57 mm howitzer! The 47mm gun Type 1 as i explained is designed for anti-tank role!

"at close range". Very rarely would you get the chance to engage a Tiger 1 at close range in Europe or Russia. The advanced optics and the KwK 88 meant that the Germans could engage targets at up to 2 kilometers away. Short range engagements with Tiger 1's only ever happened towards the very end of the war in Europe when urban combat was the norm. And even then it was rare, as the majority of Tiger 1s were shipped to the Eastern front. You would never get to "close range" to begin with. Not to mention that the Tiger 1 used face hardened armour, rather than regular RHA. Even in a point blank scenario the 47 mil wouldn't stand a chance against a Tiger, at least from the front. You can't just look at penetration values and assume that it would go through, you have to take into account armor type, realistic engagement distances, angles, ammo type, muzzle velocities etc.

Wow, thanks for sharing. That is very interesting. Any hints so I can find and read that article? I've long noticed the exceptional IJA-IJN rivalry and how badly it crippled the Japanese war effort, but I didn't know the roots of the rivalry went that far back. And I certainly didn't know it was Japanese Hatfield-McCoy tier insanity.

Nah, they are extremely over confident and picked on the wrong country...AMERICA!!!

@@trevorconnatser6161 This kind of comment makes us look arrogant. Could you tone it down? We don't have to smere our victory in everyone's faces

@@Myreactionwhen_80085 Nah, I'm just about the most patriotic person you will EVER meet. Also, I feel that not many people are able to realize how much our country has accomplished in just a few hundred years. Not many people are patriotic enough these days and only focus on th hard times that this great nation has had.

@@trevorconnatser6161 No I know very well how much our nation has accomplished and I'm all for having a sense of patriotism but it gets to point to where it's just insulting. All being outwardly patriotic does is let people know YOU feel that way and further cement our already arrogant reputation.

@@Myreactionwhen_80085 Glad I could help

Nick Mettler and a New Zealand tank

And the Japanese at least had a good reason to not bother with tanks much (naval warh

What you mean the ones that had switch sides in them or the Frist reverse gear , oh sorry that was frogs

I would rather be in a endless wave of t34 tanks in ww2

@4shacks1house Based on doesn't mean they were as good, and you do know the Vickers 7 ton design was very outdated by this point, da?

sir, this is the youtube comments section. your facts and sentence structure have no place here.

ever heard of dootha dootha anti tank only challenge

Anti air only

*A R T I L L E R Y O N L Y*

only hoi4 niqqas will understand

*GNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!*

@@thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 don't spam

@@peanut6008 It's not spam if it's relevant to the joke.

May someone explain what the refrence is i am a uncultured sugar free soda water

Youre talking about King Ghidorah. The right head (dragon 2 in dominance/power but dragon 1 in the way read), is the very aggressive, focused one. Dragon 2 (opposite of dragon 1, 2nd resd but strongest and most dominant) is the leader of the all. Both 1&2 (or 2&1) are very powerful but then it comes to 3 (3 in all ways), he is very goofy, easily distracted. While every trait may not apply to the tanks exactly, but generally, they apply to them in the sense that the first 2 are formidable while the other, or the last one is somewhat of a joke.

Go comit restore family honor

RAVIOLI RAVIOLI PLEASE DON'T LEWD THE TANK LOLI.

Te-Ke is even cuter.

Seppuku is always an Option

A true men of culture

*AMOG US* sUs

Ja meinen auch :D schade das es in deutschland nicht solche museen gibt bis auf stahl auf der heide sad

But since what "auf wiedersehen" actually means is "till I see you again", to you sir, I say... nevermind actually. Auf wiedersehen!

Can you get me a -Tiger I- *Sturmgeschütz III?*

Wo ist das? Und ist das recht gut, oder gibt es da nur 5 komische Renault Panzer und sonst nix?

@Apache Beard Sorry these are out of production at the moment. But we have the Leopard II as an special offer at the moment. You can switch the motor out in about 15 minutes (maybe a bit more).

*NOT HONORABU*

The_Mad_Bear 1096 A tank?

Rice Krispie

@@m.kozlov8461 yiss

A design working as intended

Lol lol lol lol lol lol

Wait?

hi

Is Lithuania a country?

You should make a video on the history of Lithuania.

why should he?i am lithuanian who knows a bit of history and i know that Lithuanian history isnt that intresting comparade to history of some other things

@@karolistamulionis713 Latvia?