The Most Controversial Archaeological Discovery - The Lost Tomb Of Jesus - Archaeology Documentary 

The jesus tomb unmasked by dr. craig Go watch that..

Jesus rose after 3 Days he defeated Satan and death.Then he spent 40 days with his 12 as they watched him Ascend

@@georgeferry280 Jesus spirit ascended didn't need his bones. he was issued a new body in heaven.

@@badlilstangi checked. This video is spreading false info and gets audience convinced the Tomb belons Jesus's fam. This video is a trap

Cesare Jesus Borgia KJV 1507

A great follow-up video to this: "The Jesus Tomb...UNMASKED!" by Expedition Bible

​@conversative .

He thrives on ignorance, I hope he thanks you for obliging!

A great follow-up video to this: "The Jesus Tomb...UNMASKED!" by Expedition Bible

If jesus and Mary magdalene has a son name judah. Then who is Sarah in france that also said its thier daughter. Do they have 2 children?

Right I’m shocked no one’s is talking about this like it’s the “jesus son of Joseph”. The whole family found with one of the tombs having a missing corpse… Everything just shock’s me like I had a very hard time believing it was real lmao

The Shroud is now accepted as the burial cloth of Jesus, documenting a supernatural event that proves his resurrection. There were no bones left behind. Not to mention the matching Sudarium (the head covering). Him having children was never mentioned, nor a wife.

@Jesus Is Lord 9

@@ginastockwell101 cheezus is lard

Concur in full, phenomenal documentary

@@johnfritz7222 SUCKER: “a person who believes everything they are told and is therefore easy to deceive” - Cambridge Dictionary

Expensive!

@Richard Dames Fanatics may not care, but this story is complete BS. “In 2002, a box of ancient bones was discovered and archaeologists claimed that it held the remains of Jesus' brother. The "discovery" sparked an international scandal - and was later proven to be completely fabricated.” - The 'Unholy Business' Of Biblical Forgeries, NPR, 2008. Dr. William G. Dever, Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona, on the forged James Ossuary: "I've known about these ossuaries for many years and so have many other archaeologists, and none of us thought it was much of a story, because these are rather common Jewish names from that period. It's a publicity stunt, and it will make these guys very rich, and it will upset millions of innocent people because they don't know enough to separate fact from fiction." "'Lost Tomb of Jesus' Claim Called a Stunt". The Washington Post, 2007. Dr. Paul J. Hopper, professor at Carnegie Mellon University: “The so-called James Ossuary, which caused a brief flutter of interest a few years ago with the claim that the ossuary (a funeral repository of bones) contained an inscription linking it to a James, the supposed brother of Jesus, was quickly disposed of by experts.” A Narrative Anomoly in Josephus

@@mythbuster1483 The simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going. Proverbs 14:15 This verse proves the Buybull is true; lol; j/k!

DNA testing didn't really take off until the 90's

I especially find it interesting that they can ditch the bones in the cemetery considering all the ancient laws regarding tombs and burial. Do we even know for sure the Jesus's ossuary had bones in it? We have burial funerals today without a body.

Yes, and they could have easily IDed crucifixion marks.

Could very well have buried his burial strips and face cloth.

The only thing it would prove is that Jews of today are not related to ancient Hebrew Israelites.

@James Barlow really, what? Are you serious?

@James Barlow He is not!! What’s your proof? I’ve seen him on other specials and he’s right up there! Just have to come on and put a nail in it! Go find somewhere where people give a damn!

I was in the REAL tomb of Jesus ...He was not there !

@@A-Grammie-On-the-ROCK That’s Not funny AT ALL! If you had any decency you wouldn’t joke like that! I expect crazy from the left so you must belong in his cult! 💩 head!

Sarcasm, people…😒

You lie, don't fool yourself into thinking you are something you are not . No follower would dare disgrace him with a pagan name such as the pagan Christianosis does . Jews hate Christians! They defile our heritage they defile our Elohim

You are absolutely right I cry too when I watch Disneyland fairy tale movies and read there books. Dear Heavenly Mickey Mouse we praise you and are faithful followers Amen 🙏

Nu b

@@holysmokes3723 😂 sooooo goooood!

Don't believe that our Lord's bones were put in some box! Jesus was taken by God and he took all of him! Check out the new evidence on the Shroud of Turin and see how it proves that he was resurrected! When he left the cave he was whole and didn't leave his bones!!!

There's very little history that as biblical proof including that of Jesus. Using the Bible to prove the Bible is like using the Harry Potter books to prove the Wizarding world is real.

@@Cynnas my comment was about proving this tomb to be the tomb of Jesus’s family would only support the Bible… tell me again how that’s using the Bible to prove the Bible? This documentary is about archaeological evidence… 😊

You forget according to the gospels Thomas placed his finger's into and felt the wounds in his hands and side. That being said if Jesus was a spirit and not flesh Thomas wouldn't have been able to touch or feel the wounds of Jesus.

@@wawoodsman7198 you would have to assume God is unable to make his spirit into solid matter for that to be relevant. I assume he can do anything . More then likely he did this to help them believe he was the same person they watched die. Does not mean he was in the same body. Good observation though!

AMEN! (Tiotheberk). You are true Berean! Nothing like Biblical Truth!

If you believe this video from Liberal Hollywood...You would like my alien from mars...that I have in a freezer.

Religious is based off religion. You can believe in something and not be religious.

Wow that's... stupid. Really? The fact, and it is a fact that hundreds of people were put to death for their testimony that they saw Jesus alive, that Jesus raised himself from the dead is the centerpiece of the Christian faith. This documentary is notning but a lie.

@@a.d.marshall2748 Brother... how about speaking the truth in love... not calling people RACA? The disciples did not recognize Jesus after his resurrection because Jesus appeared in the form of different people. For example, Mary Magdalene mistook him for a gardener (John 20:11-18), he appeared to two disciples on the road to Emmaus as a fellow traveler (Luke 24:13-21), and as a stranger on the shore of the Sea of Galilee to the disciples (John 21:1-13). In each of these cases, the disciples who saw the resurrected Jesus did not recognize him by his physical features, but by what he said and did. Jesus also appeared as himself after his resurrection. Jesus appeared to Thomas with his wounds from the cross to prove to Thomas by sight that he was resurrected (John 20:26-29). Jesus looked like himself as well when he appeared to the disciples before his ascension (Luke 24:36-51). The disciples were able to touch him so that it proved to them that he was not a ghost or some type of vision. The disciples learned two important lessons from these appearances after Jesus’ resurrection. First, by seeing Jesus again, the disciples knew he had actually been resurrected. Second, by seeing Jesus take different forms or materialize as different people (just as the angels had done in the Old Testament), they knew he was no longer the man Jesus, but now Jesus had changed into a spirit being. Other scriptures show that Jesus is no longer an earthly man. The scriptures say that “Now the Lord is that spirit” (2 Corinthians 3:17) and refer to Jesus as “a quickening spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45). After his resurrection, Jesus also demonstrated the ability to appear within a locked room among the believers (John 20:26-29) and disappear right in front of them (Luke 24:31). This further demonstrated that Jesus was no longer an Earthly man but now with his resurrection changed into a spirit being.

@@Freeman_Actual Don't call me your brother. You deny the bodily resurrection. You are no brother of mine. I'm no brother of snakes.

@@Freeman_Actual The person responding to you on this thread is exemplary of the issues which are hindering further investigations and discoveries. Some people can’t handle the truth, some are afraid of it and some have a very superficial experience of faith. This guy just reads the Bible and that’s it. He has no interest in further development and solidification of his faith. So, if the “literal” is ever challenged, people like him tend to become lost and afraid, which manifests as anger and hostility to anyone who threatens his so called faith. Sad, but that’s the world we live in.

Yeshua is God. Body + Soul +Spirit. You can't take away the body.

I have nothing against the Jews first off. They ARE God's chosen, but they sure wouldn't want proof of Jesus to come out. Nothings changed in 2000 years.

@@vanadians3819 Fanatics may not care, but this story is complete BS. “In 2002, a box of ancient bones was discovered and archaeologists claimed that it held the remains of Jesus' brother. The "discovery" sparked an international scandal - and was later proven to be completely fabricated.” - The 'Unholy Business' Of Biblical Forgeries, NPR, 2008. Dr. William G. Dever, Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona, on the forged James Ossuary: "I've known about these ossuaries for many years and so have many other archaeologists, and none of us thought it was much of a story, because these are rather common Jewish names from that period. It's a publicity stunt, and it will make these guys very rich, and it will upset millions of innocent people because they don't know enough to separate fact from fiction." "'Lost Tomb of Jesus' Claim Called a Stunt". The Washington Post, 2007. Dr. Paul J. Hopper, professor at Carnegie Mellon University: “The so-called James Ossuary, which caused a brief flutter of interest a few years ago with the claim that the ossuary (a funeral repository of bones) contained an inscription linking it to a James, the supposed brother of Jesus, was quickly disposed of by experts.” A Narrative Anomoly in Josephus

@@mythbuster1483 So you just gave no proof this story is BS. You need to change your name.

@@colecole3352 If it says so in a book with a talking snake, talking donkey, 900-year-old men, virgin birth and zombies, written by anonymous, biased members of a death cult, then it MUST be a reliable source?!! SUCKER: “a person who believes everything they are told and is therefore easy to deceive” - Cambridge Dictionary

@@colecole3352 Liars can claim anything, and fools can believe anything on faith, but “The burden of proof regarding the truthfulness of a claim lies with the one who makes the claim; if this burden is not met, then the claim is unfounded.” So let me know when you find some evidence to support absurd claims about an *INVISIBLE MAGIC SKY GENIE* , or that he impregnated Jesus’ mother 2,000 years ago, or that Jesus was a *VIRGIN-BORN DEMIGOD WITH SUPERPOWERS* and that his *ROTTING CORPSE MAGICALLY RETURNED FROM THE DEAD* before levitating bodily into outer space, or evidence for the talking snake, talking donkey, 900-year-old men, etc. LOL!

they actually proved that Jesus' body was removed from the original tomb and, after several months or perhaps a year or so, his remnants were placed in a bone box. that means, after several months or perhaps a year, his bones were still in the tomb.

Completely false though

@@wichitadisciple9874 according to you? you dont even have a real name or a picture, lol, you as fake as can be

My faith is strengthened. The fact that this style of burial was so short of time. Did God want them to be found? I'm listening open mind.

My speculation, to see if there's any DNA matches to current day? If, they would have Mary Magdalen(apologies for spelling!) DNA? That wouldn't prove a Relation to Jesus? But. If Theories are correct? That Jesus had a child with Mary? Anyone in current time, who has taken a DNA Test, could be traced back to Mary. They would be Assuming, that the Father of Mary's Child was Jesus My guess anyway.

Dudes! Lol! Jesus, s , body is not there! Jesus, rose from the dead!Jesus, sits at the right side of God, s thrown !

@@josephlwallssr6166 if you're a biblical literalist, where do you think Jesus' body spent the time between the crucifixion and his arising? A tomb.

@@Kevin_Fiol he didn’t lay there for a year. He was in the tomb 3 days and three nights.

@@Kevin_Fiol Desended, into hell to inform Satan, he lost! Lol! Read the Bible! Better, yet, listen to a few lectures, of Dr.Michael Heisner!

A great follow-up video to this: "The Jesus Tomb...UNMASKED!" by Expedition Bible

Exactly!!!

Nomogop Nomogop - Are you talking about the incredible wealth and power of the Roman Catholic Church? Not sure what you are saying. Health and Peace, Paul

Churches are anti-Mashyah. Attempting to deny and/or replace the written witness and agreement

Money is not the goal.

That would make sense if Israel's government was made up of Jew's but it's not. The governing body of Israel are Muslims.

Check out the Ron Wyatt documentary

Oh really ? Well there is a lot of false unprovable info on here....you need to check out the other videos that speak of the real tomb of jesus ...I was in it ...and He was not there !

Oh yeah you got that right! We're watching!

It is widely believed by scholars that the Jesus in Talpiot (if this is indeed his name) is not Jesus of Nazareth, but a person with the same name, since he appears to have a son named Judas (buried next to him) and the tomb shows signs of belonging to a wealthy Judean family, while Jesus of Nazareth came from a low-class Galilean family.

Nothing shivers down the spine 😂, this is just a tomb which has similar names with lots of ifs and buts without solid proof. I believe dead sea scrolls would have sent a shivers down the spine for you.

It was that popular. Jesus, Joseph, Mary, Judah we’re all incredibly popular names. All in the top 12, and 75% of the population shared similar names. There’s a video by the channel Expedition Bible that goes into the other aspects of this film. It also has some of the original people who were a part of the dig.

He was never an archeologist. He’s a journalist by profession (and a forger) The tomb of Jesus wasn’t accepted as genuine by the majority of scholars.

@@Castellano97 lol stay mad, your jesus is a fraud.

He most assuredly is an archaeologist. I’ve seen his television programs and documentaries like The Naked Archaeologist in which he plays himself. He’s sorta the nouveau Carl Sagan of archaeology for our times.

@@Castellano97 I trust science over scholars.

If you were Christian, it would bother you. You're not, so, I get it. Your religion was created by Simon Magus, not Jesus. And Magus was rather less credible and less strict in his methodologies which were passed on to the rest of Universalism over time. Yes, you can do your homework. Universalism was founded by the man cursed by the Apostles with the Anathema in the book of acts. He arrived in Rome ca 42 ad - roughly the time they said for 1700 years Simon Peter had Arrived; but, all the historical data denies Peter being in Rome and proves quite otherwise. Magus, however, was there. He discussed, wrote about and established what he called a 'catholic' (universal) religion. One that combined the belief systems of all religions into one. That's what he was teaching when first encountered, btw, a mishmash of Judaism and pagan beliefs. He was renowned in Rome as a Magician and held the title Petr (priest of the mysteries). He was so well known that the Caesar had a statue erected to him and had him venerated along with the gods of Rome. This is all history. Much of what Catholics call dogma derives directly from the pen of Magus. Indulgences - which had part in causing the reformation - was directly authored by Magus. Interestingly, to understand Christianity is to understand that the Holy Spirit is God. Magus attempted to buy the Holy spirit from the Apostles and this is why he was anathematized. He wanted the magic he saw in his own carnal mind and wanted it. But it boils down to trying to buy God. Not an office. And it's thusly interesting that the founder of the 'catholic' religion, Magus, didn't see it as buying God.. thus the Catholic view of the crime called 'simony' is a crime of attempting to buy an office. It's wrong on the second count as well - in Christianity and 'office' is nothing in and of itself. Message is paramount - which is Why Paul quite rightly stated that if he were to teach anything other than his beginning message, he should be counted as anathema. His office granted literally nothing. And, of course, DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT. Go do your historical research on Simon Magus. Well documented. It's just that Catholics - his late followers - are always the last to find out the truth.

@@havoc092 Hmm, last I recall, “protestantism” aka, what you call “Christian” LOL; began with a guy named Martin Luther, who after criticizing the corruption of the Church, turned around and used the local nobility to force his Protestantism on all the peasantry around. See, here’s the thing - you have not been awarded any mandate or declared an arbiter of what Christian faith and belief is or should be. Once you have something intelligent and mildly interesting to say, please let me know. LOL

@@aldridkg No no.. you'll need to do better than that. Protestantism was a protest movement that left Universalism.. nothing to do with Christianity apart from their stated goal to reform to get closer to Christianity. Seems to have largely failed. They married philosophy. Christianity existed right alongside of universalism. It's just that the Universalists attempted to murder anyone who didn't bow to them and then denounce them as heretics while making up pious tales of conquest .. which in this day and age with all the info available has been set back a far piece. I didn't criticize the corruption of 'the church' either. Universalism isn't 'the church'. And it never has been is what I stated without caviat. I said it because it's a provable fact. What's more, I spent years studying to find out what all the Universalists should have known if they'd done any research at all before adopting. The information has always been there. And while I'm smart, I'm not unique in pointing it out. And as a matter of fact, as a Christian I have something you don't - a priesthood. That does give me the authority and right to speak. You don't have any.. do you. I mean, if you're a universalist (which one assumes at this point) then you will have to admit you have zero authority to speak on behalf of your religion. So why are you? Why are you engaging me when you have no authority offered. If I put a direct question of faith to you .. you can't do anything but give me what they give you to say.. which I can probably quote verbatim to you in the first place and save you the time. I'm stating what anyone willing to do the legwork can find out rather directly for themselves because there is a historical record concerning Simon Petr Magus.. and that was purposed. Everything your relligious group says of Simon the Apostle was true of Magus, not the Apostle - his arrival in Rome. His founding of a religion - namely universalism: the combining of all religions into one. He developed, founded and led his religion from Rome. He was honored by Caesar, not Peter the Apostle but Magus. Magus is the one the statue was erected to. Magus is the one venerated (worshipped) by Rome. Peter the Apostle they wanted nothing to do with. And it wasn't Peter the Apostle that Paul sparred with in Rome.. Paul directly faced down verbally and in print the very dogmatic pronunciations of your founder Magus. Universalism (Latin: Catholicism) Has never been Christian.. ever. Christians, Jews and pagans alike were forced into it at the point of a sword. That is the history. So I'm not your opponent. History is. And History, too, has the authority to speak. Where's yours?

@@aldridkg Finally, and ultimately.. if you want to be a Universalist.. knock yourself out. If you intended to be a Christian instead, go do your homework and, again, knock yourself out. Your soul is your boat to row into eternity. If you want to do it informed or blind - utterly your choice. But the historical record is quite clear on who was and wasn't in Rome. It's clear on the role and life of Magus. It's clear about a lot more things to do about Universalism that you've probably never given a second look before simply adopting what Universalists told you. Your choice; but, Blind acceptance less useful than leaving your fate to the flip of a coin. Both are reckless. I remember being taught how Constantine was a 'Christian' emperor.. utter nonsense.. and how he defended the church by destroying the aryans and the donatists.. not true either.. he exiled Arius and actually preferred the arians - attempting to talk the part of early leaders that bothered to show at Nicea into changing scripture to make Arianism non-heretical. The Donatists, whome early Universalists beseached the emperor to murder, were merely chased out of Roman territory and outlived the Roman empire with a perfectly proper and orthodox statment of Christian faith. When they turn up non heretics with orthodox Christian testimony.. that is a problem for Universalism - not donatists. Their crime was pointing out the heresy of some in the Christian church of having turned in their texts to the emperor and then pay tithes to the Roman gods. For that, the universalists wanted them murdered. And thankfully, that failed. All a matter of history.. it just takes wanting to know and doing the research.. and not all that difficult to do.

@@havoc092 My initial post made it quite clear that my faith is not dependent on a literal interpretation of the Bible or any writings for that matter. Hence, I’m not certain how you extrapolate my statement to mean blind acceptance or flip of a coin... As for the rest of your diatribe, it sounds like something right of blog from a conspiracy site. Clearly, nothing meriting any serious engagement. To reiterate, please let me know when you have something intelligent to say.

C. j. vvv M

well of course you want to believe in the supernatural fairy tales...no doubt it would upset you jesus had a wife and a son and his tomb found showing he wasn't resurrected etc.....

@@davidgarner3552 Your comment is so ignorant and full of ad hominem assumptions. You seem angry. Lest your comment betray your heart.

@@davidgarner3552 it would totally ruin everything they believed in, lol

@@ThereIsNoneButHim But it does not, for the Lord YAHSHUA [JESUS] resurrected on the third day, Amen. HalleluYAH! Well, what do you expect from blasphemers and liars (Talmud Judaism) but to invent and slander, for even ISAIAH 53, PSALMS 22 etc. they forbid millions of Israelis to read and understand, so accept JESUS as indeed the Messiah, Amen. Oh how easy it is to INVENT/produce ALL OF THIS, JUST LIKE in Universal Studios, Amen. LUKE 8.17 etc. Peace/Shalom

Simcha in Hebrew means joy!

@@qkcmnt1242 Or 'liar'.

Fanatics may not care, but this story is complete BS. “In 2002, a box of ancient bones was discovered and archaeologists claimed that it held the remains of Jesus' brother. The "discovery" sparked an international scandal - and was later proven to be completely fabricated.” - The 'Unholy Business' Of Biblical Forgeries, NPR, 2008. Dr. William G. Dever, Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona, on the forged James Ossuary: "I've known about these ossuaries for many years and so have many other archaeologists, and none of us thought it was much of a story, because these are rather common Jewish names from that period. It's a publicity stunt, and it will make these guys very rich, and it will upset millions of innocent people because they don't know enough to separate fact from fiction." "'Lost Tomb of Jesus' Claim Called a Stunt". The Washington Post, 2007.Dr. Paul J. Hopper, professor at Carnegie Mellon University: “The so-called James Ossuary, which caused a brief flutter of interest a few years ago with the claim that the ossuary (a funeral repository of bones) contained an inscription linking it to a James, the supposed brother of Jesus, was quickly disposed of by experts.” A Narrative Anomoly in Josephus

Should watch the Ron Wyatt documentary

@@CanucksFanBoi "Ron Wyatt is either very psychologically ill or one of the greatest liars I have ever come across." Institute for Biblical & Scientific Studies

@@CanucksFanBoi Answers In Genesis, a Christian website, says "Ron Wyatt has claimed, among other things, to have discovered the following: The Ark of the Covenant...Noah’s house, and the graves of Mr and Mrs Noah, together with millions worth of her jewelry (allegedly then stolen from Wyatt)...An actual sample of Christ’s blood, with chromosomes allegedly still visible under the microscope, showing that there was no human father. Placed in growth medium, the cells began dividing, says Ron." LOL!

@@CanucksFanBoi Will do. Thanks for the suggestion.

Frankly, it feels like an anti-climax to me... Why didn't they just follow the thing to the end...? They tested Jesus's and Mariamne's DNA. Why NOT Judah's also...? Just imagine... The possible implications & indications that a +ve result from the Judah's test would bring to Christians all over the world.... It would be heady..!!

Something weird about that... I'm sure they could have returned weeks, months later after getting paperwork and approval. The reason they gave was they didn't want kids to fall in... That's not an excuse as that problem could have been averted a thousand different ways. I wonder if they ever even translated the inscriptions that were on the wall down there... I may have to do some searching elsewhere to see if they ever did return.

The real reason that they covered the tomb up was due to the fact that real research would have exposed the truth. the truth that this was a total fabrication. The truth is contained in the inspired Word of God. Jesus rose from the dead and ascended up into heaven. He did not continue to live an earthly life! Just say He did; why is there no further record of His life from that moment on? Did he simply vanish into obscurity and was never heard of again. No, if he had remained and lived on earth, He would have continued about His Fathers business and continued to proclaim the Gospel. He would have continued teaching, He would have performed many more miracles. And God's Word would have been a lie, but God cannot lie, He cannot lie, He is incapable of lying. Therefore the Word of God is truth, which means that this documentary and so many like it are all complete fabrications. Whoever believes mere man over God Almighty, is a fool and almost certainly a non-believer. I fear for your never dying souls from that which is to come; the judgement!

When people throw up huge roadblocks over something that should be explored, it means you're on to something. Think of the money and organizations that would crumble if this were all true. I think many people would stop at nothing to hush this up.

Sounds like a bullshit documentary to me.

I agree with you about that. My first thought about this was his resurrection.

It was not the next day, but I agree with your point. He has risen and is alive

Funny... I was all intrigued just watching the beginning of this and excitedly told my husband about it... his first words were... "So, there was no resurrection?" LOL... I felt dumb.

@@Lisa-ec9qb Maybe not.

@@MGreen-vz6yb *Quote:* _"Maybe not."_ Maybe so :) *John 11:25-26 (NKJV)* _25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. 26 And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?”_

Right, they discovered it in 1981.

That is the 100 dollar question . Why would they be so willing, if their story wasn't true. People don't think that deep sometimes.

Why do martyrs in other religions willingly die? Does that also make their mythology true? They’re willing, so it must be true, yes?

The disciples did not recognize Jesus after his resurrection because Jesus appeared in the form of different people. For example, Mary Magdalene mistook him for a gardener (John 20:11-18), he appeared to two disciples on the road to Emmaus as a fellow traveler (Luke 24:13-21), and as a stranger on the shore of the Sea of Galilee to the disciples (John 21:1-13). In each of these cases, the disciples who saw the resurrected Jesus did not recognize him by his physical features, but by what he said and did. Jesus also appeared as himself after his resurrection. Jesus appeared to Thomas with his wounds from the cross to prove to Thomas by sight that he was resurrected (John 20:26-29). Jesus looked like himself as well when he appeared to the disciples before his ascension (Luke 24:36-51). The disciples were able to touch him so that it proved to them that he was not a ghost or some type of vision. The disciples learned two important lessons from these appearances after Jesus’ resurrection. First, by seeing Jesus again, the disciples knew he had actually been resurrected. Second, by seeing Jesus take different forms or materialize as different people (just as the angels had done in the Old Testament), they knew he was no longer the man Jesus, but now Jesus had changed into a spirit being. Other scriptures show that Jesus is no longer an earthly man. The scriptures say that “Now the Lord is that spirit” (2 Corinthians 3:17) and refer to Jesus as “a quickening spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45). After his resurrection, Jesus also demonstrated the ability to appear within a locked room among the believers (John 20:26-29) and disappear right in front of them (Luke 24:31). This further demonstrated that Jesus was no longer an Earthly man but now with his resurrection changed into his resurrected body, a spirit being just as we will when he comes. 1 Corinthians 15:53 clearly tells Christians with an ear to hear we will put off our old bodies for new ones. Verse 50 give context...Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood (our bodies) cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption (dead bodies) inherit incorruption. 51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall ALL BE CHANGED, 52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible (New Bodies), and we shall be changed. 53 For this corruptible must put on (be changed to) incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. 54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. 55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? SELAH my friend!~ Selah!

I have read that the only sentence mentioning Jesus in Flavius Josephus was faked/added later.

@@rolandvonmalmborg1905 kindly provide the book please or your source. thanks

I am curious if there were any bone fragments in the son of Jesus’ ossuary that could’ve been also tested and then compared to the mitochondrial dna samples that were already on file for Mary Magdalene and Jesus.

@@ShamSham-xu6vm the have no DNA for Jesus🤔 You did read the Bible??? According to the churches narrative Jesus took his body to heaven clothes and all. I heard heaven has the best washing machines in the universe. Bath and body works also have diff Different fragrances that they don't have on Earth. But I think the devil took 1/3 of them. 😝🤣😅 But hes the only person in heaven with his body so, I guess that's one of the Benefits of being Jesus Christ With the Hebrew name Joshua.

@@dffm7141 i know that you are making fun of the Christian's but it is obvious that he couldn't just vanish in thin air

@@frieezi of course not that's cause it's not a literal story. He might as well going looking thru the woods for the Descendants of the 3 bears. That meet up with Goldie Locks. Or maybe check the DNA of pigs to see which one built there house with brick...smh

@@dffm7141 everybody conveniently forgetting they already have the shroud left behind by the risen Jesus.. And the DNA found on that material proven to be that of Jesus.

So glad I watched that 3 part video after this documentary. Highly recommended to watch both before picking a side

Probably because the translation they claimed in this video was quickly debunked..........

When they showed the chemical analysis of the bone box patina, the narrator said, "it's a match," not the experts. It didn't look like a match to me, not any closer than the controls they had. The video creators did find some neat stuff, but they made one guess based on another.

Simcha won a libel suite for them saying his research was fake... $250k

@@scottemery4737 you must not have used different types spectroscopy before. Being a biology major having taken organic chemistry and having been the tutor for the nursing chem class at my university, the certain elemental signatures are extremely similar, given that they would not be exactly the same due to a difference of location within the tomb. Each different box will have slight differences in chemical composition, but that there was overlap for each peak is a telling sign that they did come from the same tomb.

Fanatics may not care, but this story is complete BS. “In 2002, a box of ancient bones was discovered and archaeologists claimed that it held the remains of Jesus' brother. The "discovery" sparked an international scandal - and was later proven to be completely fabricated.” - The 'Unholy Business' Of Biblical Forgeries, NPR, 2008. Dr. William G. Dever, Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona, on the forged James Ossuary: "I've known about these ossuaries for many years and so have many other archaeologists, and none of us thought it was much of a story, because these are rather common Jewish names from that period. It's a publicity stunt, and it will make these guys very rich, and it will upset millions of innocent people because they don't know enough to separate fact from fiction." "'Lost Tomb of Jesus' Claim Called a Stunt". The Washington Post, 2007.Dr. Paul J. Hopper, professor at Carnegie Mellon University: “The so-called James Ossuary, which caused a brief flutter of interest a few years ago with the claim that the ossuary (a funeral repository of bones) contained an inscription linking it to a James, the supposed brother of Jesus, was quickly disposed of by experts.” A Narrative Anomoly in Josephus

What discoveries? It's all a deception, an attempt to fool you, to lead you from the truth; that Jesus Christ rose from the dead and ascended up into heaven. This man is no scholar, he is one who serves the devil with his attempt at deception. Only a fool would believe a man, over the inspired Word of God.

It is all well documented.

I watch it all the time! Love Simcha!!

I am..... New Zealand

Sunday, December 5 ,2021

That's because the real brother of YAHUSHA was named Yakob (Jacob)

@@SopranoJessi How would you know? If it says so in a book with a talking snake, talking donkey, 900-year-old men, virgin birth and zombies, written by anonymous, biased members of a death cult, then it MUST be a reliable source?!! *SUCKER* - “a person who believes everything they are told and is therefore easy to deceive” - Cambridge Dictionary

It also describes what will happen to the unbelieving...

@@woodardlinda25 So does the Quran! I hope you don't end up in Muslim hell! "And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger - then indeed, for him is the fire of Hell; they will abide therein forever" Quran 72:23, "But the ones who disbelieved and denied Our verses - those are the companions of the Fire, abiding eternally therein; and wretched is the destination" Quran 64:10, "And for those who disbelieved in their Lord is the punishment of Hell, and wretched is the destination" Quran 67:6.

@@woodardlinda25 At least there's no harm in believing a debunked book of ancient mythology with no evidence! "Christian father shot his son dead for being gay" Daily Mail. Where would he get that crazy idea? "If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads." (Lev. 20:13). It's not like the bible contains proven lies by liars, right? "But good Christian scholars of the Bible, including the top Protestant and Catholic scholars of America, will tell you that *the Bible is full of lies* , even if they refuse to use the term." Dr. Bart Ehrman, Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina, Who Wrote the Bible and Why it Matters.

Tis best to check our vissions out with the 66 books of the written word of God.

Channel 4 is British tv

Come on Brad... we see it today, because it was on TV.

Cesare Jesus Borgia KJV 1507

Yes, we do claim Jesus rose from the dead . No longer in the tomb. I don’t claim to know the mind of God, not his sons mind either. I just believe. I do enjoy talking about Jesus , God, history, Egypt , England, kings,queens, I’d like to learn more about Buda , and masons ( not the Masons of today but masons that built things in history. ) I’m missing something there but I don’t know what. I also really need to know what the standing stones are about. Also are the “ great men” in the Bible children of angels and women? And are those children hero’s like Achilles, Goliath and Sampson? If witches and magic aren’t real then how come we aren’t supposed to suffer a witch to live? Is there a difference between the witches then and now? If they practiced herbal medicine why on earth would that piss God off that bad? Who did all the work on Petra ? Where is the book of Enoch and why’s it bad? I know I have more questions , I can’t really think of them right now.

@WinGate Mose I understand your knee jerk reaction but we are called to be Bereans and to study to show ourselves approved. The disciples did not recognize Jesus after his resurrection because Jesus appeared in the form of different people. For example, Mary Magdalene mistook him for a gardener (John 20:11-18), he appeared to two disciples on the road to Emmaus as a fellow traveler (Luke 24:13-21), and as a stranger on the shore of the Sea of Galilee to the disciples (John 21:1-13). In each of these cases, the disciples who saw the resurrected Jesus did not recognize him by his physical features, but by what he said and did. Jesus also appeared as himself after his resurrection. Jesus appeared to Thomas with his wounds from the cross to prove to Thomas by sight that he was resurrected (John 20:26-29). Jesus looked like himself as well when he appeared to the disciples before his ascension (Luke 24:36-51). The disciples were able to touch him so that it proved to them that he was not a ghost or some type of vision. The disciples learned two important lessons from these appearances after Jesus’ resurrection. First, by seeing Jesus again, the disciples knew he had actually been resurrected. Second, by seeing Jesus take different forms or materialize as different people (just as the angels had done in the Old Testament), they knew he was no longer the man Jesus, but now Jesus had changed into a spirit being. Other scriptures show that Jesus is no longer an earthly man. The scriptures say that “Now the Lord is that spirit” (2 Corinthians 3:17) and refer to Jesus as “a quickening spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45). After his resurrection, Jesus also demonstrated the ability to appear within a locked room among the believers (John 20:26-29) and disappear right in front of them (Luke 24:31). This further demonstrated that Jesus was no longer an Earthly man but now with his resurrection changed into his resurrected body, a spirit being just as we will when he comes. 1 Corinthians 15:53 clearly tells Christians with an ear to hear we will put off our old bodies for new ones. Verse 50 give context...Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood (our bodies) cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption (dead bodies) inherit incorruption. 51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall ALL BE CHANGED, 52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible (New Bodies), and we shall be changed. 53 For this corruptible must put on (be changed to) incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. 54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. 55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? SELAH my friend!~ Selah!

Was It Not A Common Custom Of This Time Period That The Widow Was To Marry A Brother If No Children Were Born Of The Previous Marriage?? Even As I Was Writing My Question I Had A STRONG SENSE OF BEING IN THE WRONG FOR THINKING….. I DON’T THINK THAT JESUS WAS EVER MARRIED!!!!! HE WAS SENT HERE BY GOD HIS FATHER TO BE CRUCIFIED FOR ALL SINS, TO DEFEAT satan BY DEFEATING Death(Which IS ONE OF The devil’s names) & JESUS CHRIST WAS RISEN FROM THE TOMB ON THE THIRD DAY!!!!!!! I LOVE YOU GOD & JESUS CHRIST ETERNALLY!!!!!!!

And the documentary was trying so hard to reinstate that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene. Duh

Fast forward to 24:20 to get a synopsis of everything they put before it. In essence "hogwash".

That was not the family tomb. The Bible talks about the other tomb. God can do anything. He could cause the guards to sleep, move the stone, remove the body and put it wherever he liked in the blink of an eye.

@@HearturMind I'm waiting he will appear and everyone will accept and follow the same cause without disputes and war. He can do it I'm sure, at least once more!

I thought that same thing. Also, why not see if there is DNA in the ossuary of Judah son of Jesus and compare it to Jesus’ and Mary’s DNA?

Wasn’t Mary Magdalene his wife? And on a note I have never thought of. Can you imagine doing the nasty with the Son Of God? Let that sit on your brain and fry for a bit.

@ roo Lenoir ya i cant imagine god or yashua doing anything sexual but i have read odd comments about people wanting to be there eturnal sex slave and other odd things when i read that for first time all i could think is who thinks this way we r supposed to look at god as our heavenly father so why would anyone think anything sexual.... idk just seams very odd to me

@@korn5308 So I said Son of God, I had never thought about that before I said that in my post. ☝️I guess I never thought about Jesus being married and all that goes with it until the very moment I wrote that. Now try to stay with me here. I’m raised Southern Baptist, we don’t like to talk about sex much. ( well my family didn’t) and I was not taught much about Jesus when he was a kid, or as a young adult. So I never even thought about him being a person , I only knew him as more than a human. But he was human. I said what I thought. Up until I read your comment I hadn’t thought about it again. I have never heard of anyone wanting to be God’s sex slave. That’s weird. Yea, me thinking” I wonder if Jesus and Mary ( Magdalene ) ever made a baby” is mild compared to what you said. So if you were aiming to make me feel , dirty minded, you failed miserably. If you would like to talk more I’ll be happy to respond.☺️ Have a good day.

Historians never like to challenge new history. They come up with every kind of theory that fits with their belief but not for any new theory/fact. Remember, the history was actually written until 400 years after Jesus' death. By that time it was oral history and we all (should) know a story can be changed by just one word. So, put your thinking caps on .....

The disciples did not recognize Jesus after his resurrection because Jesus appeared in the form of different people. For example, Mary Magdalene mistook him for a gardener (John 20:11-18), he appeared to two disciples on the road to Emmaus as a fellow traveler (Luke 24:13-21), and as a stranger on the shore of the Sea of Galilee to the disciples (John 21:1-13). In each of these cases, the disciples who saw the resurrected Jesus did not recognize him by his physical features, but by what he said and did. Jesus also appeared as himself after his resurrection. Jesus appeared to Thomas with his wounds from the cross to prove to Thomas by sight that he was resurrected (John 20:26-29). Jesus looked like himself as well when he appeared to the disciples before his ascension (Luke 24:36-51). The disciples were able to touch him so that it proved to them that he was not a ghost or some type of vision. The disciples learned two important lessons from these appearances after Jesus’ resurrection. First, by seeing Jesus again, the disciples knew he had actually been resurrected. Second, by seeing Jesus take different forms or materialize as different people (just as the angels had done in the Old Testament), they knew he was no longer the man Jesus, but now Jesus had changed into a spirit being. Other scriptures show that Jesus is no longer an earthly man. The scriptures say that “Now the Lord is that spirit” (2 Corinthians 3:17) and refer to Jesus as “a quickening spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45). After his resurrection, Jesus also demonstrated the ability to appear within a locked room among the believers (John 20:26-29) and disappear right in front of them (Luke 24:31). This further demonstrated that Jesus was no longer an Earthly man but now with his resurrection changed into his resurrected body, a spirit being just as we will when he comes. 1 Corinthians 15:53 clearly tells Christians with an ear to hear we will put off our old bodies for new ones. Verse 50 give context...Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood (our bodies) cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption (dead bodies) inherit incorruption. 51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall ALL BE CHANGED, 52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible (New Bodies), and we shall be changed. 53 For this corruptible must put on (be changed to) incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. 54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. 55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? SELAH my friend!~ Selah!

True however according to the gospels Jesus allowed Thomas to touch and feel his wounds to know it was him. Or had he ascended before approaching his other disciples?

Jesus appeared to them in a glorified body. The spirit is more real than what we call real. He still bears the scares and wounds of the cross, even in His glorified body.

@@wawoodsman7198 reading it in the Greek, a better rendering of “ do not touch” would be “ do not clutch”. Jesus had things to do after the resurrection. With Thomas, the Greek can be rendered touch. Two different Greek words are used - one for clutch and one for touch. Cameron is always trying to make Christianity look like a fraud. He is such a tool.

@@Freeman_Actual very good point. I think we only know in part. We all are going to be surprised by things we were taught as in tradition, not truth. ✌🏼

Yes so what's your point???

@@assassinworks5538 you're in my prayers. Jesus loves you. I pray that you find the peace that only he can give, and comes through salvation. Much love :)

@@karfomachet7265 Read your bible.

@@ronsalles2627 why would I waste my time on that garbage ? And don't call that vile book ' your ' as if I would be connected to that trash

more like the devill is a lie/myth - before the Jews fell under the Zoroastrian Persian empire satan was an ally of god and when the Persians took over Judah satan becomes an exact copy of the Zoroastrian anti god airiman .Know the history of the myths u base your life on .

Nobody mentioned finding the sandal, the gourd, or the holy hand grenade, but I know they did. I saw them. Sir Not Appearing In This Film ran off with them, down the garden path when that lady from IAA showed up.

The bones of Bigus Dickus would be a great discovery.

Maybe King Arthur is in one of those boxes.

He's a very naughty boy

If it were Christ's grave there would be no bones as he rose three days after being entombed

@@diychad7268 Yes, he could’ve risen in spirit. I mean you’re reading from a book that was authored by what is believed to be 4 different writers, written hundreds of years after the Crucifixion and which was edited and re-edited for hundreds of years after. Not to mention had books removed from it all together. The measure of one’s faith should be spiritual and not textual.

It has always concerned me that from the start the roman catholicfaith seem to put more accent on the mother of Jesus, not the man himself on which the faith of christian people is based. Why when he is the son of God first and formost. The other thing that is strage is that there is son of Joseph on just one box but not on any of the others?

@@johnlaccohee-joslin4477 I’m not really sure what you mean. What exactly are you basing that on?

@@diychad7268 I have always believed that Jesus and his resurrection story was not able to be written as it really was a spiritual awakening for Jesus and his immediate followers. Jesus was more evolved than they were and they could not understand what was actually occuring as Jesus ascended his body. Only Jesus understood what it was to be the son of God. His followers were not in that state of conscuousness and could not write about it accurately. I thought this was an amazing documentary. James Cameron did an excellent job.

Are these graves unnamed? Like mass graves? They don't keep a record on these things? Was this Jezus crucified? The bones were the only answer...

You have to comprehend the intense almost biscuits pressure put on archaeologists by Orthodox Jews not to disturb graves, or have no time to do a cataloguing or good job. Native Americans are falling into this same trap emotionally when heritage could be appreciated by those few folks who study their ancestors and could bring their humanity out. Rigid written beliefs leave no room for heart, thought, science, or caring.

I agree.

Yes but aren’t we talking about Jesus!

Questioning is no foul. It's the raw assertion without doing science that bothers me. Giant waste of time. Though the story they attempt to craft without evidence does tell you about who it is crafting the story and betrays problems with the story in how they crafted it. Reaching unsupported nonsense. But they have a reason to push it. The drive is on to get rid of sectarianism. And none of these programs get made without money and an okie dokie from the right people.. not in the filming of it - in the airing of it. You can film whatever you want but distribution if people don't want it seen is nearly impossible. Just ask Mel Gibson.

just a hoax trying to prove Jesus is nothing but a man , this is not scientific , where are the texts of the historians that wrote about Jesus for comparison ? touching bones without protection to prevent contamination , why Aramean insciptions not Hebrew ? if followers of Jesus were considered enemies why declare themselves through their burial ? the only scientific done here is the trial to collect DNA based on names by directly considering that this is it we found the Jesus and his family without any consideration of what i just typed , where are other tombs that had the Christian symbol upside down v comparing to Hebrew and Jewish tombs entrences , are Jewish and Hebrew ossuaries scibed in Aramean or Hebrew ? where are the comparisons . Got to be either fanatic or symple minded to consider any truth in this other than desperate to prove Jesus is just a man and finally in their own Jewish History why and what was written why they crusified Jesus for comparison what the Christian churches claim