There's so many times where it's actually more convoluted then what they say. "Spidey and His Amazing Friends" isn't going to Disney+, it's on Disney Junior on cable. The Office is going to NBC's streaming service, but Friends isn't, it's owned by Warner and is going to HBO Max.
I'm at 9 minutes in and I'm simultaneously laughing really hard and also weirdly tempted to click away because of how I annoyed I am at how realistic this is.
@@Issicra I agree, and you don't even have to watch long. I first heard of them rewatching Nerd Crew vids just a couple days ago. Took me less than a minute to realize that the RLM guys don't even really have to embellish their personas that much. Even heard a _very cool!_ there.
A few days ago on a video about Beenz, an obsolete "internet currency", I suggested if they existed today people would gain or lose them based on what they tweet, thus creating a "social credit only you can buy COD lootboxes with it" system.. Turns out these guys had that idea a day earlier and turned it into a gag already, dammit.
The new Rise of Skywalker tease is great, it's very exciting and made me more excited about the movie, it has things we've seen before of course with a new creative spin on things which im excited to see how turn out and i want that because i don't want the movie spoiled in the trailer. that's how i want a trailer to be exciting, don't give too much away and i don't know what is going to happen.. fantastic tease. and i trust JJ and the poster is amazing, the only thing wrong with it is Sidious is too much on it, he should fade away more but other than that it's great. You don't need to have any more streaming services than you need. Like 3 streaming services or whatever is all you need really idk... they are not on point its the nerd crew yeehaw pal. The Rise of Skywalker is going to be the best and most fun Star Wars movie ever i feel likr yeah
@Quentin Beck Well you cant get just 1 streaming service, every single show has its own streaming service so if you want to watch the latest episode of anything you have to pay $15 a month.
BMW is already making car features like heated seats, remote starting and [more scary] Anti-lock breaking systems subscription based. That means they will have a way to remotely turn off features of your car potentially. Subscription software is bad but we're headed to services for hardware.
@Oh Kinawa Capitalism is fine. A defacto oligarchy that assumes money is equivalent to merit and boxes out anyone who isn't in their class makes true capitalism impossible.
@@TheZigzagman > "true" capitalism Capitalism - a society run by and for the benefit of capitalists. Capitalist - someone who acquires power and wealth from the extraction and exploitation of workers, natural resources, and rentiers. Your anti-monopoly ideas are anti-capitalist, but it's a credit to their propaganda that you don't recognize it as such.
Yeah, this is not going to end well for the studios. I'm looking forward to the studios selling the streaming rights of their collections to these "10 videos for a dollar" streaming services. It will be like the Walmart DVD bargain bin. Except without the DVDs. Or the Walmart.
Disney to Star Wars is like KFC to Popeye's, like EA to BioWare, Fortune Brands Home & Security to MasterLock, J.J. Abrams to Star Trek, i could go on, but there's so much shit in those that i've had enough. Fuck companies that buy themselves out of mediocrity, fuck individuals who think they are better than the notion of legacy. FUCK Corpos who seek only to milk success and pockets, but especially fuck Disney for being a shithole.
The fact that I can't tell which of the major studios streaming services are real or satire says it all. If Warner Archives is not a real thing, it sounds like it.
Hard to tell when the line is crossed between reality and fiction in this video. It's clearly crossed at some point it's definitely a blur (and apparently getting blurrier).
@@jorcornel558Yeah no it was just CBS All Access. I checked to see if I could find a former paramount plus, and yeah no everything just says it was formerly CBS All Access.
I love how streaming started as an option to reduce piracy for the ease of access and now its full circle back to the beginning, when Piratebay and RARBG are again the solution to their gatekeeping garbage.
Some of us have a thing called MORALS. You are the reason this country is going to hell, good Christian values are being lost and replaced by millennial entitlement.
Yeah but the pirates are launching their own streaming service. Just give them your bank details and you pay just whatever money is in your bank account at the time!!!
Watching this after 2020 is hilarious: "Aren't we supposed to be in a recession soon?" "'You mean SW9 will be the last Star Wars movie to come out in theaters?" "I have nothing but free time to watch all those TV shows!"
@@hanburgundy4317 *Someone changed their opinions? On the internet? Oh, nooooooooooooooooo...* Watch their reaction video again. They said that it worked to re-establish Star Wars but the next movie needed to do something interesting with those characters. Not a bad take, actually. I see where they are coming from. TFA was a flawed, unoriginal start but that could have be built upon. It just happens that Ryan Johnson is a destructive guy that decided to piss all over the original trilogy AND the what was set-up on TFA. As a result we are left with a bad first act, a terrible second act and what I can only assume will be a nonsensical third act where no character really grows and nothing is actually paid of.
@@mrofftopic2802 Mike, at least, enjoyed it, which is just ridiculous to me. Shrug. The guy spent years trashing the prequels for every little thing imaginable and said that they ruined Star Wars and certain characters from the OT, but then TFA comes out and _actually_ ruins two of the main characters and they eat it up. I get it, I was all in for TFA before I saw it and even though I didn't enjoy the film much I expected something to come from it if different directors were going to helm each one; Abrams is a hack and I knew from LOST that none of his mysteries had payoffs but someone else could take what he did and build on it. Didn't happen, though lmao I just don't get how people could like what they did to my man Han - how anyone could hate the PT but enjoy the ST. Actual Star Wars made with love by George Lucas, the cast, and his team at ILM vs. a soulless cash-grab trilogy that does nothing but shit all over the legacy of the story and the characters therein. Sorry, it just bugs me that these guys were all in for something that pissed on our heroes so I think it's funny to remind people. Clearly, I still like their videos :P
Gusty not just nerd culture but how older media tries to pick up and mimic nerd culture, like entertainment weekly, and the shows you only see at the screens on the gas pumps that give you brain aneurisms and are hosted by 40 year old women
We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came and the prophecy didn't, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves. The roots of liberal democracy had held. Wherever else the terror had happened, we, at least, had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares. But we had forgotten that alongside Orwell's dark vision, there was another - slightly older, slightly less well known, equally chilling: Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Contrary to common belief even among the educated, Huxley and Orwell did not prophesy the same thing. Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley's vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think. What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we desire will ruin us. From "Amusing Ourselves to Death" by Neil Postman.
I think we owe it all to Kathleen. George knew what he was doing when he planted the seed of having her in charge when he sold Lucasfilm to those white slavers
It was nice satire, though it is true that DIsney has an endgame of wanting to be a part of a person's life from cradle to grave. That kind of influence could mold generations, and is pretty scary to think about. Very cool, very cool. *claps*
@@ernestsacco8552 I was thinking more like Channel 23 from Max Headroom. Because we all know Disney would do blipverts if the technology was available. The 10% of people's heads exploding would be seen as acceptable.
@@theCha. Social Security. You cannot bank, get a job, get an ID, or get healthcare without it. Oh noooooooo but that's something my grandpa said was okay!
Be sure not to remember that Disney was the company that pushed for copyright to be extended borderline indefinitely to prevent Mickey Mouse from becoming public domain. Hallowed be their name.
4 years in the future… the majority of streaming services are bleeding money cause surprise, surprise… customers aren’t actually going to sign up for everything. And Disney killed Star Wars and Marvel. This aged like fine wine.
@@92Raider-art yeah some smoothbrain on Twitter a while back tweeted out the image of Jay saying that and said that anyone that uses said image hates minorities and women being in movies
Christopher Larsson Yes. People will complain that you shouldn’t criticize *[product here]* and should just accept what’s given to you. Then someone will reply with Jay’s photo and quote and the person will go insane.
That's what happens when you spend your entire adult life purposely refusing to develop just to invest what should be your personality... into plastic widgets and digital whimsies. You get a ravenous, toxic subset of people willing to hurt and blame others because their Thing™ got made fun of. A sad group, but I pity them not. They have made their bed, and if any upcoming real-world disruption or catastrophe were to befall them, they'll have to lie in it. Best-case scenario, they realize the eternal pursuit of the material is a fool's errand and take it down a notch, maybe sell some of their Funkos and buy a shirt that doesn't have nerd shit on it. Worst-case, they die useless. Win-win for humanity either way.
I find it sad that for approximately 50% of the announcements, i genuinely could not tell if they were trolling me or not. I noticed on April Fools Day 2014 people joked about Disney buying Hasbro.... Now it's speculation!
the best thing about streaming services is if you sign up for a free month, then forget about it, they'll still keep charging you even if your account is inactive for 2 years. they know that one day, i'll check my bank statement and be so relieved that i still have access to all of their incredible content!
@@mursuka80 so we get double entertainment. 1) Watch stuff for free. 2) Watch Disney and others lose their shit over this. I can't tell what will be more entertaining.
This. Why pay for 1273563+ streaming services with shows that'll get removed once the license is not reactivated or move to another NEW streaming service or just exist for that one show you'll only watch then fuck off. Why pay for internet streaming service when a pirated one can be watched offline? Heck many of the quality of these exclusive shows vary from good to YAWN.
Boy, remember when everyone said they were "cutting the cord" because cable TV was way too expensive and inconvenient for modern entertainment consumers who use Internet services to get their music, games and movies? *ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha*
@Steve Gracy if you only watch RU-vid, you are unfortunately the lowest common denominator, and a culprit in the crime of content. You don't see it, but it's true. I'm not saying that the streaming service model is right, BUT paying say 3 good content providers 30 total a month is more competitive than paying 1 cable company $60 or more without the ability to walk away from a 1 or 2 year contract. Moreover, free content is AWESOME until you want ongoing, consistent content that has continuity week to week. Free RU-vid is great but you're not getting high quality content on ad supported revenue. This is the crux of the problem. When one company can buy up all the content, they can afford to charge the best price to provide the most entertainment. But eventually they just get to choose what you watch, because their power us derived from the money we initially choose to pay. Free content sux, and paid content is great for short periods of time. It's a much more complex problem than just saying "yay youtube"
that’s because that shits from the Bible lmao, saying how ur gonna get marks on ur (left?) hand I believe in order to be able to make purchases is in the book of revelations. and if you don’t comply you go to hell! booya 😎
“It seems that every movie is a remake of something that was better when it was first released in a foreign language, as a 1960s TV show, or even as a comic book. Now you’ve got theme park rides as the source material of movies. The only things left are breakfast cereal mascots. In our lifetime, we will see Johnny Depp playing Captain Crunch.” -Alan Moore, writer of Watchmen, and also a wizard
What was that quote from Stan Lee again? About how he grew up reading Superman and went to create Spiderman, but people now read Spiderman and go on to write Spiderman
@@RockoEstalon We're pretty much at the point where the people who make the decisions in all these companies are corporate suits who don't care about the content they sell, just that they sell it en masse. If they employ anyone who has any talent beyond doing what they're told, those people are still obstructed from doing anything good by the structure they work under. Disney is just a mass producer of family friendly generic programming and movies with no goal beyond sucking parent's money out their wallets. They'll never make anything remotely artistic again.
