@@anugrah1921 Yea, but if you're going to be doing a video rating emblems, maybe you could so a little research to know why they chose that design instead of just saying "ew" and moving on.
Both Mexico 68 and Rio 2016 emblems resemble the ones used for the world cup (Mexico 70 and Brazil 2014). P.S. are you planning to rank World Cup emblems too?)
I'm obsessed with olympic iconography My favorites are Rome 1960, Moscow 1980, Sydney 2000, Salt Lake 2002, Athens 2004, Torino 2006, Beijing 2022, and LA 2028 My least favorites are Montreal 1976, Lake Placid 1980, and Albertsville 1992
With so many of these it seems like the text and the rings are an afterthought. All my favorite ones actually try and integrate everything in a nice way (Mexico, Montreal, Tokyo, Sydney). I also love LA 1984, the text brings it down but the stars and stripes represent the country well and it looks like it should be on an ad for running shoes. I think the Winter Olympics ones are overall better and you should make a video on them
I was watching this and it was so well made I didn't even realize how small of a channel you were It felt so high quality Keep it up I really enjoyed it :)
The Stripes going up the 1980 logo and meeting the star at the top are also reminiscent of the silhouettes of Moscow's "Seven Sisters", which are a series of 7 relatively similar Stalinist skyscrapers around Moscow
Each of the numbers in the 2012 london emblem represents the shape of a continent. The 2= europe. 0= asia, 1=africa, 2=north and south america. And the dot in the middle=australia. So its not completely random
The 2012 logo is inspired by the 80s pop culture in the UK, the era was energetic, youthful and bright, and that’s what the Olympics also have in common, I got that from a design website and the Olympic Committee should have a better explanation
I agree with many of your takes but I would make some changes based on personal preferences. Firstly: The logos of 32 and 36 are F for me. 32 is just a mix of boring sybolism and bad design. The german eagle of 36 is throning above the olympic symbols (suggesting germany is above all) and therefore contradicts the spirit of the games => bad olympic logo. The rest are purely personal taste: I'm not a huge fan of mexico 68, B-tier, melburne is ab bit unnecessary complex, montreal is to boring, both C-Tier, Paris 24 has nice symbolism but just isn't that intresting to me, A tier, London 48 deserves more love imo, only Logo where you instantly recognise the city and just a nice motiv, should be a little bit simpler for a logo, B-tier. Lastly La 28: Just make a logo and commit to it or let it be, D-tier
If the distance between the sun and the rings were not that close in Tokyo 64, I can see it being in B tier but S? no shot. Moscow 80 really is the best though.
S tiers are all L except Tokyo 64, drop Moscow to A, Mexico to B at best and the other ones can have a chat with Rome in F. Bump LA and Munchen to A as well.
