This is radically different than what I have been taught in High School. The history I was taught there is mere bias american republican anti Christian and anti Monarchist view of history.
@@user-sm7og6fi3j ...The Catholics who were murdered were not murdered because they wouldn't renounce Christ. the ones who were murdered were the ones who agreed with the banishment of the Jesuit;s, the very reason for the French Revolution to begin with. In 1773 the Pope of Rome had to reluctantly banish the Jesuit's or face a world wide Catholic Revolution. In 1814, after Napoleon had marched through Europe placing his Masonic and Jesuit puppets on the thrones of Europe, the Pope reinstated the order of Jesus {Jesuit's} in the reformation act.
King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette are two of my favorite royalty from history. They have been wronged by the revolutionaries and that wrong has been perpetuated throughout the past 200+ years. As an aside, I homeschool my children and have refused to use certain history texts/publishers because they repeat the lie that Marie Antoinette said, "Let them eat cake". I'm still amazed that they can even print that and consider it a good history text.
This demonstrates (sadly) how well the propaganda machine works! Even in antiquity, propaganda was used to foment revolutions. BTW, thank you for your efforts. We like your work!
Ironically, the French hated Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI because the king was very loyal to his wife unlike his great great great grandfather who had many mistresses.
Queen Marie Antoinette's last words speak volumes about her character. When Marie Antoinette accidentally stepped on her Executioners foot. She whispered to the man: “Pardon me, sir, I didn't mean to.” Those were her last words. They are as revealing as King Louis XXVI's last words. "Gentlemen, I am innocent of everything of which I am accused. I wish that my blood may be able to cement the happiness of the French."
@@goldenvrpca7962 headed by the Rothchilds their was a book or a document to be exact that was intercepted by German authorities and they sent out a warning to the king of France that this organisation wants to topple all monarchies of Europe and Russia
In her trial the revolutionaries essentially convicted her on what might be considered tabloid reporting. Even worse her children were abused in their prisons, her son died, and her daughter survived but ended up childless and traumatized. There was no excuse for any of that.
Actually MA did say : « let them eat brioche » (egg loaf). She like all French royals of that time was believed to possess the same miraculous power of curing diseases and wounds through hand laying and contrary to others she did believe in that kind of faith healing and practiced it. The poor walked long pilgrimages through France in the hope to be cured of boils or of other nasty skin diseases through her hand laying. After having been hand laid she used to give those poor people loaves for their return trip. One time the castle’s baker had forgotten to bake bread for them. She said « Don’t worry, let them go with the egg loaves we have in surplus ». Alas Benjamin Franklin who lived in Paris and was her arch-enemy by jealousy wrote a series of articles reporting the same piece of news in the better known false and disparaging way to the anglophone press of both continents which he influenced heavily.
She bowed to the people... She listened to them... but the people listened to the slander of the aristocracy, the oppressors of the same people... Vive le Roi!
Only a fool bows to the unthinking plebs. Sadly she and her husband got what they called for. A monarch must know when to be kind and when to be strict.
It is true that the immoral philosophes of the queen's day slandered her in pornographic novels which were probably printed in the Dutch Republic. Margaret C. Jacob has done a lot of research in this area and is well-known for her work.
You are only half right about Marie Antoinette not saying 'Let them eat cake'. Those exact words she did not say; but she did have a discussion about this topic. I learned about this back in the late 1960s at University. My French History professor pointed out that she was having a discussion with one of her husband's Ministers (can't remember his name. Much too long ago). He told her that the people were starving. She asked the Minister "Have they no cake to eat?" This may sound like a heartless thing to say but she was trying to find out something important about the economic state of France. It was French law at the time that bakers could not throw out their leftover pastries at the end of the day. They had to distribute the unsold excess among the poor for free. The point was, if the bakers could not afford to bake some surplus (which would be distributed to the poor) then the economic situation in France was far worse than the government imagined. So, yes, Marie Antoinette did talk about about the poor eating cake. She just didn't say the phrase for which she is castigated. According to my French History Professor, the "Let them eat cake" story was the result of her trial. A servant who acted as a witness against the Queen and who claimed to be present at the time of the conversation between the Queen and the King's Minister reported she said this phrase in order to create hatred towards the Queen.
It was the revolutionaries after the queens execution that said “let them eat cake” shouting it, cheering and celebrating down streets of town, that quote was them mocking the king and queen, she never said that. It was used as revolutionary historian propaganda.
Very insightful! I appreciate this info! I homeschool and I want to teach the French Revolution correctly and I want my children to understand the “Marxist” ideologies behind it. I am learning right now though!
If they were doing that in the late 1700's, why in Modern Times aren't we requiring by law that restraunts give their excess food to the poor, instead of trashing it at the end of the day.
The buzzing you mentioned in Part I is most likely caused by a non-isolated ground. In other words; use only one ground wire for everything that's connected to your setup. Running two ore more ground wires frequently causes a 60 cycle hum............Great page, by the way! I'm here by way of your website.
Mad Monarchist I too rather have a queen like Marie Antoinette who would let me eat cake than have a first lady like Comrade Michelle Obama Nutritionist Of International Esteem who would not let me eat cake
Eu também admiro a Rainha Maria Antonieta. Foi uma mulher muito injustiçada, vítima de calúnias, humilhações e muito sofrimento que ela enfrentou com grande Dignidade e coragem. Quem a amar, pode me pedir amizade pelo facebook.
Reminds me of page hundred or something, in Nesta Helen Webster "The French revolution A study in Democracy", when the criminal agitators lied about one town's noble man they massacred, a good and gentle man that had done everything in his power to feed the poor and care for the people in that French town, they said he had said "If they don't have bread, let them eat hay!"...It was just another wicked lie of course, just as their evil lies about the French King and the Queen.
@@williamedwards2512 That's awesome to hear! She was indeed a great author , very knowledgeable as well. I think her books are important reads for those who urge to know history and thus also understand the present time.My favourite book by Nesta Helen Webster is "World revolution the plot against civilization", couldn't put that one down. I hope you will enjoy it too, if you haven't already read it.
@@shaiaheyes2c41 I've got the two volumes now, Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette before the Revolution, and During the Revolution. God willing I'm getting the others you've mentioned within the next few months. I wish I could have met that Marvelous Woman, what I've already covered in the books I can say she certainly knows her subject.
@@williamedwards2512 Yes, me too. You know it's funny, men like Winston Churchill read, appriciated and refered to her work, yet today one is fast to be called a "conspiracy theorist" (of course, as in the nonsensical, double think, double speak marxist slur kind of way) for doing the same. It's almost a miracle for people to stumble over her work these days, that's how much it's been hidden.
@@shaiaheyes2c41 If it wasn't for the Mad Monarchist and you, I wouldn't have had any idea about her. Another author I've found here is Reynald Secher and his book The Vendee Genocide it must be very good, but no reprints, some of his paperbacks are going for over $ 200.00 dollars which only makes me want his books more. I can do Ramon noodles for a couple of months.
Very Well Done ! Good presentation ! Good indignation in your tone ! Thank you so much for letting us know the truth. I did hear only a little before - so I was not too sure so I wanted to get down to the bottom of this. ..God bless this gentleman TOP HISTORIAN in the Name Of The Lord Jesus Christ, God Almighty . As you have spoken for a good, godly king's vindication, may the Lord Jesus Christ always bless, keep, provide and guard you and your descendants AND FAMILY for ever. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ overabundantly bless you and make you great. What a brave man to tell us the truth. How did you get all this information ?
Rikard A Most people still take it for granted what the enemies of the Royal family said about Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette was true-which I can't prevent that. But I can't agree with them.
I have heard nothing but bad things about the French Monarch, King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette! I don't understand why the Historians teach this stuff if it's not true! Personally I am really intrigued by the French Royals! I feel, actually I know, what was done to the King and Queen was extremely unfair. I think there was a lot of jealousy towards the Monarch! I am completely awestruck by the French Revolution and how it went down! Terror Robespierre was a complete lunatic. He was the true Tyrant! Not King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette! I watch lots of documentaries on it. Can you by any chance recommend a good Documentary or book that discusses the accurate facts about the Monarchy and the French Revolution? I'd appreciate it! Thank You!☺
Do you speak French by any chance? I am glad to find out that there is people who are still interested in knowing the truth about the French Revolution and King Louis XVI! I have plenty of sources on RU-vid about the subject but they are all in french unfortunately...
@Ich Bin Armilus! Yessss! Robespierre and his gang of thugs were the leftistloons of that era. They did the same thing back then ripping down statues, Crosses, Churches, changing street names.... etc they even murdered the King and Queen. It's so much like today. I agree with you that the French Revolution is the beginning of the downfall of our western culture.
@@oswaldojimenez4118 Here is the playlist! It was private, but now it's ''non répertoriée'' so you should be able to see it with this link only : ru-vid.com/group/PL0197Y56tJvOjQ1iRcjQ7bcelkGS59NqC
Good day, Do you reccomend any good book related to your videos on the french revolution. I really need to look into this, very interesting facts about the real history of the two monarchs and the situation before and during the revolution. Best regards. Pax!
Couldn’t agree more. Louis and Marie were exceptional, good and fought against the status quo to better the people. They were honorable and way ahead of their times. Their history has been ruinously caricatured by their haters. I fully expect to meet them in Heaven one day ❤
As written here 4 years ago the cake-story is fake, but when you do not want it repeated, it does not help to use the word "repeat" 11 times and the expression "let them eat cake" 6 times. Here in Holland we were not told this story, it came as a surprise to me in this video. I believe Marie Antoinette has a much better reputation here in Holland. Most of the "incorrect truth" in this video is a bit trivial, the more as we know history is always written by the conquerer(s). Apart from defending monarchy (defending which is absolutely useless in The Netherlands) you could perhaps shine your light over other politically incorrect items, like the way our western society looks at her "enemies" in Eastern Europe, the Middle East or China.
@Ich Bin Armilus! ...That's debatable. Thomas Paine was English and not even from America, so could he actually be considered a Founding Father? He is also the primary author of the Declaration of Independence, but couldn't receive credit because he was British, and credit was given to Jefferson. There is a hand print on the back of the original Declaration, and most experts believe it is that of Paine as an only way he could sign it. There is a video by James Perloff titled....Freemasonry and the American Revolution where he presents a very compelling case that it was actually Paine who authored it. P.S....All the founding fathers were traitors to America!!!! 5 of the first 6 presidents of America and other important figures like Franklin and Paine were not in America rallying troops for the American Revolution, they were in Paris planning the destruction of the French Monarchy and the subsequent Napoleonic wars. They had to leave Washington in America so he could be portrayed as the hero and Founding Father. One of his first action he and fellow Freemason did was to grant a 20 year charter to the Rothschild for the first National Bank of America, which ended any pretence that America would ever be independent. When the charter was about to run out in 1811, many in America balked at renewing it because it had become ruinous to the country. At this, Nathan Mayer Rothschild sent a message to the Americans that stated....Either the charter for the bank will be renewed, or America will find it self in a disastorous When the Americans balked, Rothschild launched the War of 1812. Although our history books tell us we won, that kicked our ass, and forced us to sign the second charter for the bank. The truth would sicken you.
A monarchy is such a flawed system but no where near as flawed as what the National Assembly put in place. That said, history really treated the monarchy unfairly during the French Revolution. Learning about it now makes me very lamentful.
This guy is a bit sketchy but he is right that she didn't say that. There's no evidence that she said it, nobody in her court ever made the claim. It is significantly more likely that the quote was created by propagandists such as Marat to rile up the people.
