The politically incorrect truth about the French Revolution, focusing on the revolution itself which the facts show was not necessary, not productive and not good for the common people.
The french revolution was one of the most terrible things ever happend. The hole area of the Vendee, filled with catholics was slaughtered. The first Genozid. The guilliotine was not fast enough so they drowned mothers, children, whole families in leaking boats in the rivers. Of course they never tell you THIS in history- lessons at school... RIP martyrs of the Vendee. Always light up a candle and pray for all the victims of the cruel bloody french revolution on the french "nationalday"!
it's funny how often you hear the Inquisition talked about as an example of how horrible the Catholic Church is and the French revolution touted as a great victory of Republicanism but there is this quote floating around out there "..The French Revolution caused more deaths in one month in the name of atheism than the Inquisition in the name of God did during the Middle Ages and in all Europe ..." Pierre Chaunu
The inquisition was about the Jewish community harbouring their own members using usery to rip off the people so queen at the time demanded that the leader of that community bring her all the lands and wealth acquired through usery once that happen she had them banished to Morocco who ended up killing the Jews
@@Tboy439 the French revolution and reign of terror killed roughly 20,000 people in a matter of three years. The Spanish inquisition (which is generally what people think of) found at most 2,000 people guilty of their respective crimes over 350 years. The thing most people do not understand is that "an inquisition" was not an institution, but a system of ecclesiastic courts through which crimes were tried. The state would prosecute or release people based on what evidence was found.
Very good, however the truth is that the Inquisition has been as misrepresented as the French Revolution. The Protestants won the propaganda war bc they had the printing presses, plus they were much wealthier. Foxes' Book of Martyrs is a good example - it inspired real hatred of Catholics as seen in the sufferings of the Irish at the hands of the English
Liberty and equality are mutually exclusive, so they were wrong from the beginning, and fraternity may be achieved only by the spiritualisation of race.
@@goldenvrpca7962 Liberty and equality means,i rob you, you rob me(It's a quote from Canto dei Sanfedesti,the anthem of the Sanfedestis,a neapolitioan counter-revolutionary movement during "French" revolutionary wars)
Leftists often say the exact opposite of what they mean. Sometimes I wonder if they are just projecting themselves. For example when they scream “racism” at someone what they really mean is that they hate race that God created and the nations He created, they wish to destroy God’s creation by mixing everyone into a meaningless consumeristic materialistic grey raceless goo. This is because spiritually they are children of the devil, who was a liar from the beginning.
Was unfair for a 10 year old boy who was believed to be next in line for the throne to end up being neglected, starved and abused in prison and ended up dying. We know Louis XVII's parents were never tyrants and never deserved the horror. I agree possibly with Louis Charles still being young-he possibly shouldn't have ruled or possibly they had to wait until he was a little older, but he shouldn't have gotten the mistreatment that he had-he could've lived his life-which he never did- in a foreign country.
I have a feeling that the revolution was a poor decision. From the information I have gathered, I do not believe that Louis XVI was the worst French king. No proof that he was the most corrupt or the most power drunk. The question is who really planned the French revolution? Who wanted to benefit from the power change? Who did benefit from the power change? Which foregin countries financed the revolution? The crime committed by the revolutionaries was worse that those committed by the monarchy in my opinion. I wish someone can provide information as to who were the real beneficiaries of the French revolution.
@@Tboy439 that's an Ice cold take. Rome? The Pope at the time; Pius VI said of the French revolution "In fact, after having abolished the monarchy, the best of all governments, [the French Revolution] had transferred all the public power to the people - the people... ever easy to deceive and to lead into every excess" The Church lost all of her institutional power in the nation of France. Under the Ancien Regime the Church was the First Estate. It was more powerful than the monarchy; why would it have subverted itself? Holy cow to think someone could be so mentally deficient, and historically illiterate.
@@Tboy439 it was the Freemasons, the libertarian Protestants, Ben Franklin, people like Voltaire and DeSade, and middling nobles who wanted more power.
5:56- 5:57 "You couldn't even trust your own neighbors." Sadly that's how half of the United States of America feels like- if you and your neighbors were on different sides.
A lot people say about this kind of history is gonna repeat itself. Not just in the same place like France/Europe. But it will also happen in the U.S. as well.
Comme toujours: Danton, Robespierre and Marat were NOT the Washingtion, Jefferson and Adams of their heritage. How sad that all of these wicked things happened under the cover of liberty, equality and fraternity, which, of course, were never delivered to anyone.
I hate to be the one to break the news to you, but Washington, Jefferson and Adams were just as much responsible for the French Revolution as Danton and Robespierre. Also, Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, James Monroe and James Madison, and probably John Quincy Adams.
“Every time they would get what they wanted… then they would demand more.., until they would move farther and farther to the left, farther into the radical fringe… until there was complete chaos…” Are you talking about Canada or Australia!?
The French Revolution was the First World War, and it was the first time that a country waged war because of the exportation of an idea: Liberty. The French Revolution was an immense massacre to impose Liberty. Note the uppercase. In fact, there was no liberty at all involved. Only financing for butchering. France today has a hymn written in 1792, during a disturbing disgusting obscene period. France is proud of that. France is obscene. Today as back then. When I happen to think of France, I feel like puking because I can feel the horrendous screams coming from the past into our time. I can hear the terrible echo of the suffering. Do French politicians and common people hear it? Do they? When I think about the French Butchery, I can feel my tears coming.
The countries that invaded France in 1792, when the La Marseille was written, did so not so much for the sake of restoring the Bourbon monarchy. They also had an ulterior motive of seizing territory from France. Keep in mind that the Austrians, Prussians, and British were enemies of France during the height of the Kingdom of France as they were during the invasion of 1792. Also the La Marseilles was written by a devout Catholic. So there is no need to abandon it. Especially, if you can add monarchist terms or lyrics into the song.
The intensity in your conviction and the soft hum of the recording gives this a timeless feel. Also thanks for the inspiration for this final paper I have to write tonight
Napoleon took power a few years later, he loved equality and freedom so much he thought nothing of forcing young men into the army and to die in their thousands.
This channel is very interesting. I am from Colombia. The revolution to overthrow the Spanish King was led by a class we call "creoles" they were the offspring of Spaniards born in the colonies, as such, they had less rights, which of course they did not like. They were not really interested in creating a more egalitarian society as much as they wanted to be the ones in power, their descendants still rule today as the leaders of the main political parties. More often than not, they are corrupted and do a lousy job. I have always blamed it on the fact that Colombia still works as a monarchy. But this makes me wonder. Would monarchs be more accountable to their actions due to the fact that their rule is not temporary, or is it just a matter of doing it responsibly regardless of what label we give to those in power (King, President)?
my family is from spain, southern france & spanish southern italy. Yes Creole Spaniards were not deemed the same as Spaniard, it was a scale of opportunity & it would of been difficult if you were mestizo or indigenous you would of had a good life i can assure you but you would not become King further to that most Kings were descended from Germanic Bourbons & not Iberians or Romans anyway. This still was a Christian & Commons Sense society with plenty of opportunities. However there were liberal reforms that stemmed from the french revolution that were deemed socialist and ultra liberal by the creoles, short story Spain was turning soft, weak & liberal like france. Bottom line the liberalism that come from the french revolution via france, sweden, from northern europe fucked not just all of of europe but the entire western world including the americas with centuries of socialism!
Very Well Done ! Good presentation ! Good indignation in your tone ! Thank you so much for letting us know the truth. I did hear only a little before - so I was not too sure so I wanted to get down to the bottom of this. .. God bless this gentleman TOP HISTORIAN in the Name Of The Lord Jesus Christ, God Almighty . As you have spoken for a good, godly king's vindication, may the Lord Jesus Christ always bless, keep, provide and guard you and your descendants AND FAMILY for ever. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ overabundantly bless you and make you great. What a brave man to tell us the truth. How did you get all this information ?
French revolution was most brutal and darkest event in French history, it just destroyed the legacy of France of what it used to be a defender of Christendom
love to hear the truth about history thanx for the uploads folks should think about after all theses wars and revolutions etc how are we any better off today? I say we are not I do believe or present situation is proof and self evident
Unfortunately you still have fanatics like my stepmother who think that it's so much better due to the French Revolution. She literally told me you can't make an omelet without breaking some eggs. That's how she justifies the Reign of Terror
as I said yesterday "Kings get their authority from God. Presidents get their authority from Mammon." Monarchies have existed for a long time for a good reason, because they work. It doesn't matter if they're Monarchies that just came out of the Tribal system, like early Poland, or the early Frankish Kingdom; Feudal Monarchies; or the post Feudal Monarchies.
The French revolution was not necessary. First it was not a revolt of the common people against the elites. It was a series of take-overs, most of them remote-controlled from the city of London or from Switzerland, that started with a tentative usurpation by the d'Orléans house who promised to make the regime compliant to international finance. The popular aspect of the revolution, led by Robespierre, was actually a Parisian revolt against the newly-installed republic that had abolished mostly workers' not nobles' privileges. This revolt was rapidly crushed as it lacked both the numbers and the money to give way to a dictatorship like France had never known, the directoire, which was a prelude to the installation of Napoleon.
Yes, Nesta Helen Webster's work is truly great, "The French revolution A study in Democracy", "Secret societies and subversive movements" and the excelent "World Revolution the plot against civilization", people need to read and study this.
I would love to know some reading materials/resources you used to have this knowledge so that I can better educate myself. What historical references can you suggest? Thank you.
Don't forget the potato. The revolutionists looked for many reasons, and the potato was one of them. Crops failed, because Europe was still in a little ice age. The French farmers refused to grow potato's. While in Germany potato's were grown to make up for the failed grain crop. d'Orléans supported the French revolution, probably because they wanted the throne.
I’m really enjoying these segments, but can you do something to eliminate the 60 Hz buzzing? Thank you, and stay mad. PS: I listened to some later episodes and the buzzing is gone. Good job!
***** You moron, before the 1979 Islamic Revolution Iran was a monarchy. The current theocracy has openly call itself an enemy to all monarchies. Iran was the only nation to openly object to Prince William and Princess Kate's wedding
***** The So Called Dictator was the Emperor of Iran and he took the throne in 1941 not 1953. What happened in 1953 turned the Emperor from a figurehead to a absolute monarch
You are so right about that! I have just recently learned about The Sacred Heart Mystery ( Raised Protestant) And we almost lost all the writings of St. Louis De Montfort to the French Revolution. They were found in a trunk buried in a field 130 years later. But none the less this wicked age is passing, Thank God!
You should do a video on Napoleon. He was a military leader under revolutionary government, but when he attained power via a bloodless coup he overthrew the revolutionary parties, the jacobins tried to assassinate him twice so he expelled them, and he put an end to the terror, lawlessness, in effectiveness and warmongering of the revolutionaries. Certain things he kept, as there was genuine corruption and backwardness in the monarchy, especially birth rights and the ridged social classes. Napoleon abolished these but also dialled back a lot of nonsense from the revolutionaries. Napoleon ended the revolutionary wars, and made peace. It was the British in 1803 that broke the peace on false pretexts, and began throwing cash at the misguided monarchies of Europe. Largely because the same internationalists who funded and help orchestrate the jacobins take over of France were able to influence their political allies across Europe to try and regain control of France. Napoleon essentially made another monarchy with his family that was free from Illuminati control.
I have a feeling that the revolution was a poor decision. From the information I have gathered, I do not believe that Louis XVI was the worst French king. No proof that he was the most corrupt or the most power drunk. The question is who really planned the French revolution? Who wanted to benefit from the power change? Who did benefit from the power change? Which foregin countries financed the revolution? The crime committed by the revolutionaries was worse that those committed by the monarchy in my opinion. I wish someone can provide information as to who were the real beneficiaries of the French revolution.
Only person to blame for the bloodshed was Marat becauase that is what he wanted. He was far more worse person during the French Revoultion. What happened to him was necessary.
Come on, man, I truly love what you're doing here, but give the identity of the tribe responsible for this bloodbath. The Jacobins (of Jacob) were freemasons, the Bolsheviks of the 18th century. And we all know who the Bolsheviks were (97% Jews). Freemasonry is Judaism for gentiles. In fact, Freemasonry is based on the Jewish Kabbala.
Assemblies which he disbanded at every turn, and he didn’t submit to Constitutional Monarchy until he was forced to. It turned ugly because of Robespierre and the radical faction and their paranoia
9:09 Man, one of the main ministers of the federal supreme tribunal of my country, Brasil, once had saied, "oh, i'll make Words of my the precepts from the French Revolution, Igality, Liberty and Fraternity" this was saied by the minister Luis Fux. Just by it you can see why Brazil is in this poor state of misery, because what should go to the security and health and for the general well state of being of the people, goes to pay de salary of ministers and politicians like this cynical man.
I always loved to say that a republic is nothing more than 18th century communism. (Yes, I am aware that republican governments have existed longer than that).
I guess that everyone who has spent at least 10 minutes studying the French Revolution will be aware that the revolution of 1789 was not te same thing as the terror 4 years later. I think most people will think your truth is in fact politically correct, because your comment only concerns the terror, not the achievements of the first revolution. By the way; in my comment on part II I suggested some other topics, I see now that you've done so already. I may not always comply with your views but I certainly value your way of looking at things from another side, more people should do that.
great counterrevolutionist interpretation!!! I don't agree that the revolution was unnecessary. Liberte, egalite, fraternite. The revolution was necessary to bring forth individuality and freedom. The freedom to criticize, protest, think, and live for yourself rather than being dependent on a monarchy. These places like Denmark and other who never had a revolution and you claim are not any less free, I would disagree. They can't speak their truth and must obey a monarchy. Don't be afraid of the destruction of the social order.
