The RANGERS are not a Stanley Cup team | Boomer and Gio 

that’s what yall say every year for the last 30 years lmao

I still think they have a shot.

True word's, leave them alone.

They need to be focused and hungry. It depends who you play in the first round.

well said. I always have faith in the rangers but i never felt we were in a stanley cups grasp since 2014. 10 years later i finally feel we are finally going to win it. I been saying this since November

I also think the Rangers are not winning even the Eastern Conference as they are. Miller is a liability every game. Giveaways and just getting beat way too often. He’s big and needs to be more physical and get a tougher mindset. I’d bet he’s on the trading block. Rangers win a lot of games when they get outplayed much of the game. They rarely get a dominating win.

@@TheYamahog12 I understand but in fairness during this 10 game win streak the defense and goaltending is what was winning them games. I said earlier in the season after their hot start that all they need is zibanejad and Igor to return to form and they will be a cup team. Igor has during this month looked like his old self. It's really up to the star players right now to play at the level they can to carry the team. My biggest concern as of late is the power play. Suddenly they don't look as dominant which is what you need in the postseason.

@@edd06001You’re right. The PP has been terrible lately.

You are 100% correct edd. I've been down on this team, but when you win 10 in a row and have a back to back away, I can look the other way (i.e. everything you said). What makes this idiotic take worse is that seemingly everyone in rangers fandom across X to youtube to reddit all felt the same way about Sunday's game - i.e. losing wouldn't be indicative of anything.

@@cooliotopnotch6287Idiotic take? If based only on yesterday’s game then yes. If you see how they looked from Christmas until a couple weeks ago then not so much. I’ve been a Rangers fan since about 1970 and nobody wants to see them win the Cup more than I do. Wanting to see the team get better isn’t an idiotic take. Even during this win streak I don’t think they look as good as they did the first half of the season.

Agree.....but who is the bozo?

I don’t think he’s basing this on one game.

@@TheYamahog12 Which one then? We have the equal best winning percentage with Florida. What more does it take?

Edstrom sucks period! I’m not impressed with his play at all!

Kid absolutely sucks! I haven’t seen him do anything out there!

I have a feeling it will happen

Clown

So a rookie fighting guys every night, a captain smashing people to pieces, a back-up goalie reviving his career, a team tied for most amount of comeback victories and tied for best winning percentage? Yep, that certainly sounds like no heart or passion. Nailed it alright. About as much as nailing slime to a mud hut.

According to the Athletic, now there were 3 shades of checkmark and just an X, judging compared positions to the range of comparable players off Stanley cup champion teams to each eastern conf team. X fell entirely out of range. A grey check was "passable" but below average range. A black check was slightly above average range A gold check was way above range. Now discounting colors of checks. Just going on x's and checks. The Rangers had 7 checks and 5 xs. 6 other EASTERN Conf teams had more checks and less X's. (Boston 9) (Florida 12) (Carolina 10) (Toronto 11) (Philli 8) (Pitts 11) Only 5 teams had less total checks and more x's. (Detroit 5) (Tampa 6) (Jersey 6) (Washington 1) (Islanders 5) So according to the Athletic the Rangers stack up only 7th best in THE EASTERN CONFERENCE for the Stanley Cup.. not including the WEST??? meanwhile they are top 3 or 4 team in the league in record/ wins????

Are we playing over our heads?????

He thinks he knows hockey although he really doesn’t.

Good. I love it.