The Religion of Jesus the Jew 

I've waited all my life for this.

Loving the videos like this, Dr. Tabor - so focused and digestible, on topic, and fascinating. Wonderful job, as always.

Most likely, the very last thing Jesus of Nazareth would have wanted to be remembered as would be: "God". "Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone." Doesn't sound like he's speaking of himself.

Paul is responsible for disconnecting from Judaism and the Roman emperor Constantine took Christianity to another new level which was never intended by Jesus.

Dr. Tabor's book "The Jesus Dynasty" is a must read for those searching for the historical versus the theological Jesus. Warning, if your faith is tied to the Jesus myth constructed by European Christianity then you may wish to pass on this book but if you are in search of historical and archaeological evidence interpreted and presented in a scholarly but readable fashion about Jesus prophet and jew then this book will be both fascinating and illuminating.

I so enjoyed this video, James. Thank you so much.

You understand Jesus very well. Thank You James Tabor, The wise Saint.

wow, brilliantly written. like an improved apostilles' creed.

Thank you Dr. Tabor

A friend and I are devouring your videos.

I always wondered what Christianity would look like if you just used the synoptic gospels.

Ethnicity, culture, "nationality" back then and today matter. The young and foolish today do not understand this. They are naive.

Mathew 23 :13-31. Leonardo da Vinci said " The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions " Plato shared with us wisdom he learnt from Egypt, wisdom that was a death sentence in Greece, Rome ( Christianity) .. Pythagoras, Socrates and later Hypatia of Alexandria. Plato in his dialogue " The Republic " tells the allegory of " The Cave " Plato starts by telling us of prisoners being held in a sort of underground den, let us examine this den via the geometry of Bernhard Riemann and Felix Klein.. Klein bottle..3rd and 4th dimensions. Plato tells us that the prisoners are bound up unable to move their heads, let us examine this bondage via the psychology of Erich Fromm.. socialisation of consciousness..aware-unaware. Plato tells us that the prisoners mistake shadows for substance, let us examine this mistake via the philosophy of Thales and Kant..synthetic a priori..not thing in itself. Plato tells us that one of the prisoners is released, let us examine this release via the instructions given by T.Lobsang Rampa..stilling the mind- seek first the Kingdom of God..conscious astral travel- leaving the cave/body. John 8: 32. Plato tells us that the prisoners will reject this release, let us examine this rejection via the psychological effects of Stockholm syndrome..Mathew 7: 21-23.. Plato quotes Homer " Better to be a poor man, and have a poor master, and endure anything, than to think and live after their manner " Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds. Mathew 7: 1-12.

This is an excellent summary

16:23 those demographic numbers are illuminating, thanks

Finally the truth about Jesus & Judaism. He followed the Old Testament. Christianity ignored his Jewishishness & altered his beliefs from Israel & changed it according to a new scripture he knew nothing of.

Thank you again. A good reference piece.

It would be interesting if you could do a video on Samaritan beliefs, and the beliefs in general of 1st temple Yahwehism when all the tribes helped build the temple. Too bad the Jews from babylon didn't let the Samaritans help build the 2nd temple. I think Samaritans show how belief in Yahweh was never limited to the tribe if Judea and is universal

He taught and read in the Temple as well.

Ya know, I respect Dr Tabor's expertise, but wonder how much stock he'd put on "Jesus came from the line of David," as actual History? I understand if that's the way Jesus (or the interpreter of His life) felt, but it really seems a LONG way from the actual time of King David to be verifiable in ANY way...that's My take.

I think he spent more time in Sepphoris growing up than most people think.

Jesus was never a flesh person. That which is born of the flesh is flesh that which is born of Spirit is spirit Now the birth of Jesus was in this wise, When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. Which means Virgins don't have babies... The child of promise us born in you, which you must crucify(the flesh desires) so it is no longer you that lives but Christ in you. Be less Christian and be more Christ

Can you imagine how the world would look like today if the Romans had not invaded Judea (labeled Israel today). The name Palestine is derived from the name Palaestina a name given to Judea by the Romans to avoid the return of the Jewish kingdom.

Thank you for this video

And Muhammad was a traveling salesman, that married a rich princess..

It's interesting that neither Josephus nor the Essenes wrote what Jesus looked like.

The religion of Jesus is the same religion of Abraham. Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian. Abraham was someone who submitted to the will of his Creator which is definition of a muslim.

0:45 I always think that Galilean skull reconstruction looks like Fred Flintstone.

To understand the relevance of Jesus let's just study Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy. Without ignoring passages, altering punctuation, rearranging scripture, relying on obscure extra-biblical apostates, or imaginary calendar keeping, a plain reading of Dan 9:25, 26 shows that from Artaxerxes I decree to Ezra to take all the volunteers he wanted and return with them to Judah and Jerusalem, and further giving Ezra authority over the region and substantial funds, wasn't just a fact finding trip - it was to restore Jerusalem. From which event, simple addition of 69 weeks of years yields the baptism ("anointing") of Jesus Christ in A.D. 26, all consistent with history and His age, length of ministry and crucifixion ("cutting off") in A.D. 30, the only year in which the gospel accounts of Passion Week can be harmonized and reconciled with calendars. Daniel 9:25, 26 is in fact fulfilled Messianic prophecy is clearly fulfilled in Jesus. You will now say it's coincidence. Just like it's coincidence he was born in Bethlehem. Was pierced, smitten, entered Jerusalem on a donkey, bones not broken etc. All that coincidence? Even the great prophecy in Daniel? Really?

After decades of trying to convert mainly Protestants from "Christianity" to the true teachings and practices of Jesus, I also have come to the foundational realization that Jesus was not a "Christian" but a Jew. and too many Christian doctrines, such as "Original Sin" and an eternal hell, for example, were not exactly what Jesus would have advocated as a Jew. Of course, this needs fleshing out and more research.

I absolutely love speculating what kinda Jew Jesus was tend to side with Robert Eisenman's view which was he seemed to be on the more militant side, so I'm guessing Zealot. He hasn't convinced me the Qumran material is Jameseon, but that he and his brother are alot more strict Jews than Paul and the only thing that survived after the Pax Romana was what was allowed by Rome. That's my take and thank you Dr Tabor for keeping the debate going!

yes, a Day Job in Sepphorus as a stone-mason makes a lot of sense for Jesus' years before 30 y.o.

Exactly, Moses and the other Prophet's books were supposedly preserved by miraculous intervention, to ensure the truth remains even after the corruption of humanity. Yet there is no Jesus Book??? The new testament claims it is, but in reality it is a gathered selection of others writting, not the word for word writtings of Jesus at all!

Who ever Jesus was has been totally corrupted by the church and the writing of Paul. Can we truly believe any gospel when we know they were written way after the life of Jesus anonymously. I wonder could Jesus have been literate as he dame from a poor family. The notion he was God is really not in the bible if he did believe that he would have been killed along time before he was by his peers, not by Pontius Pilate.

Modern day Christian churches ignore the fact Jesus was a Jew, born, lived and died a Jew. If we want to be like Jesus we need to give it bit of thought.

Jesus rejected certain "rabbinic" interpretations? the rabbinic tradition was a response to the Roman's destruction of the Temple, a generation after Jesus' Crucifixion, so there were no "rabbinic" interpretations for Jesus to reject or accept.

Jesus did not 'move beyond it' - as if to abandon it - that would be error. He was trying to show that the Lord does ALL THINGS (Isaiah 45: 7), and that all were as such 'bound by their actions' to the law, and elevated the requirements of it to a spiritual level, whereby the fruits of a persons actions (what comes out of a man) defiled him. The law cannot be enforced by the letter, as you would have to break it in order to fulfill it. This is what Jesus wrote in the sand... Exodus 21:12 or (but less likely) Leviticus 24:17 The 'scales' that fell from Saul's eyes, were the scales of rights to judge. Evil has a purpose - it's the most enjoyable way to learn what NOT to do. I have THE 'theodicy' sir... and I welcome you to discuss it with me. The world 'needs' it. And it is time. Musante... mus 'A' nte Musa (Moses) Etna (Mountain of Fire) Anytime will do. Shalom.

Seems like so few “Christians” actually understand who Jesus was at all. Thus the religious legalists and literalists and tradition bound claim righteousness to this day while becoming everything Jesus defied and despised. It’s that simple really. Legalists never change.

So since I'm heaven champion. An I defeated the devil an his crew. I wield Jesus healing power. All old aches and pains will be washed away.

Why do religious people/scholars and the like still continue to refer to Jesus/Iēsos by this name when we now know his Hebrew name is Yeshua??? He should be called by the name he used in his time period and the name everyone called him by should he not????

Unbelievable though it might seem, there is an alternate view. "Jesus the Phoenician" by Karim El Koussa. What did Jesus mean when he said, "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." What did he mean when he said to the Jews, "Whither I go, ye cannot come." Or John 8:44? The history of Jesus is like the history of the Israelites ... complex.

Thank you, James. You have done much work. 🙏 Would you be open to other explanations (explanations that only a relative few on earth know about-perhaps an explanation by the ascended consciousness of Jesus)? When reading, you will learn how such communication was accomplished, which scientists can now explain. Please search for CHRIST’S LETTERS from CHRIST’S WAY online (including in various social media platforms). The pieces will surely fall into place. Blessings!

God is not a Jew or a Christian. God the creator has to be beyond all sectarianism.

If Jesus existed, I honestly think he would be horrified by what Paul and the Church Father's had done to his movement.

Following Jewish law Jesus fulfilled the law and opened the door of his grace and law of holy spirit Jesus did many miracles on Sabbat and explained to the leader the true spirit of Sabbath God Bless you

Even it is debated that he was a jew. First, his belive and teaching was universal and not connected to one nation. Second, in Galilea mostly not jews were living at that time. Even the word Galilea means: land of goys, means land of not jews.

Was Jesus a good carpenter though? Did he work on day rates or 'piece work'?

One of the problems with this narrative is that it was not Palestine at the time of Jesus. Also, Jesus said that He and the Father are one. If you had seen Him, you would have seen the Father. Sounds like He claimed to be God to me. Plus all the Apostles claimed that he was God, and died to prove it.

But didn’t the keys of the church get handed to Peter, the first pope?

This is shattering. I thought Jesus was a Roman Catholic. Of course geza vermes said all this in his ground breaking book of 1971." Jesus there Jew". So nothing new here. But well done to james for making scholarship available

Once thing possible, somewhere between Egypt and Saudi Arabia, between the Mediterranean and Red Seas, an analytically viable source of his dna is currently resting. Rest in Peace whoever you were.

I don't think it is right to call Jesus as a jew

Oh dear, they'll be coming for you Dr Tabor. 😂

Extremely interesting.

Jesus didn't exist, but if he did he wasn't a "Jew", they didn't exist then?

"political/religious establishment" - ??? trying to bifurcate the matter? It's simply retelling how to observe who is blessed from who has cursed themselves - according to the TEACHING of Elohim.

Did Jesus read the bible in Hebrew or Aramaic?

Isaac only when you look at what Paul is saying in his letters, it states clearly only the children of Isaac can receive the promise,.. This is why the scribes and Pharisees were persecuting them, you see the scribes and Pharisees were actually the children of Ishmael... and Paul was basically saying they were not included.. Genesis 16:12And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren. Galatians 4:28¶Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. 29But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now. 30Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. Also note.. Paul in the passages below states, just because people are the children of Abraham doesn't make them heirs to the promises, Paul goes on to say that only the children of Isaac could receive the promises which the letters a referencing... Let me also add, Paul would not write letters to people at Rome about the Affairs of a bloodline covenant, if these Gentiles at Rome were not the" bloodline of Isaac" .......(The northern house)....... Let's review. Romans 9 7Neither, because they are the bloodline of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy bloodline be called. 8That is, They which are the children of the flesh,= Ishmael ) are not the children of God: but the children of the promise=( Isaac) are counted for the bloodline. 9For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. Note, Paul in Romans 9:9 refers you to Genesis 17:21 confirming it's their bloodline Covenant which is indeed being referenced.. Genesis 17:21 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year. Now this doesn't mean you can't have salvation, but it does mean you can't have part in the promises it's referencing from the letters.. Such as being part of the body of Christ, the Eternal priesthood for example... But you can be a fellow citizen in a finished Kingdom with a finished eternal Temple which now makes intercession from the clouds of Heaven as we speak.. As the children of Isaac , the corporate body of Christ has inherited all things and now control the New Covenant as the Saints of Heaven.... Romans 4 13¶For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. Isaiah 49 8¶Thus saith the LORD, In an acceptable time have I heard thee, and in a day of salvation have I helped thee: and I will preserve thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the earth, to cause to inherit the desolate heritages.. Isaiah 54:3For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles, and make the desolate cities to be inhabited.

A bit of subject, but: "Roman occupied Plaestine?", I think you mean "Roman occupied Judea."

I have seen Jesus and the image used here (from 0:41 on) resembles him most.

He was of the Nazarite sect like John the Baptist & in earlier times, Sampson.

Thank you James

There is a difference between a Jew “JU” of the tribes of Judah, or the Hebrew, which Jesus was, is not taught by many….

Yes. Absolutely. And the New Testament records numerous times He violated the Sabbath.

i have long been wondering why the earliest so called followers of jesus/yEhoshua/yeshua are not called yeshuans/yehoshuans?!

You open by saying Jesus “read” the scriptures in Hebrew. Isn’t it most likely that Jesus was illiterate, as were most of the population. Didn’t he speak Aramaic? I believe that you, yourself, have said that only the upper class and elites were literate, that there was no school in Nazareth.

Neither a Jew nor non-Jew can be God.

The whole problem with all this smoke and mirrors is that Jesus wasn't a Jew!

the only thing about the type of jew he was is debatable(depending on if the ad biblical texts are true that is) jesus would be more a rabbinical type figure practicing/preaching the school of Hillel.. example,, abolishing ALL commandments set before & then only following/preaching only the ten commandments or Noah’s/Adams

this presupposes that the gospels reliably record Jesus' words and actions.

As near the truth s we are ever likely to get, raw history will always trump superstitious mythology and blind faith.

Jesus read the 24 books of the Tanakh (OT39) but ALSO the 70 hidden Hebrew books. He was vehemently opposed to Pharisees and their traditions of the elders

A couple of tiny misapprehensions... (1) Most families could not remotely afford to make all of the pilgrimages to Jerusalem every year; you lose too many workdays just coming and going and leave the home village unoccupied and unprotected - depending on how far away they were and their specific means, they made as many pilgrimages to Jerusalem as possible. To do otherwise is to create the conditions for starvation. The farmers needed to tend their crops and animals, it's as simple as that. Perhaps you could get a neighbor to tend yours for a week, probably in return for tending theirs. Otherwise, in subsistence agriculture, somebody is going to starve to death. See the importance of human life, below. Now as a single, healthy, male with no family responsibilities and a trade (not a farmer) it would have been easier for Jesus to make the pilgrimage than it was for most; but the same would be true of any other single, healthy male who was not a farmer. It's not remarkable in any way. (2) There is no reason to suppose that Jesus (or most anybody els) was circumcised at the Temple. It was then, as now, done near home and often in the home. Travelling with a newborn was insanely dangerous, and even worse for the mother. Basic respect for the lives of the individuals, which is among the highest of all Jewish values, makes a trip to the Temple from any distance, absurd and very very wrong, the deepest sort of irresponsible sin. If anybody at all was circ'd in the Temple precincts, it would have been only the folks who lived there - and even then, likely performed in the living quarters. (3) Was Jesus a "card-carrier"? Nope, there's no such thing. There's no such thing as formal denominations. Sadducees and Pharisees were more like styles and bodies of opinion; they were not formal things that a person could "join" or "quit." Some individuals were strongly opinionated one way or another, but there was no "membership." Essenes were a little different, because they tended to live in isolated communities. And you're right, the largest group of Jews were "just Jews" - these "partisan" distinctions were entirely a matter of the educated elite. Even such modern distinctions as "Reform Judaism" or "Orthodox Judaism" have no formal meaning within Judaism; one can switch between then without "converting." One is born into Judaism or converts into Judaism, one is not born or converted into "Reformism" or "Orthodoxy." It's not like Catholics vs Protestants, or this-Protestant-denomination vs that one. Likewise one was never born or converted to "Pharisaism" or "Sadducism" - this makes no sense and has no meaning. One is a Jew, or one is not; and if not, one can hang out with Jews and pray with Jews provided only that one is not disrespectful. Further, although one born Gentile can convert to become a Jew, one faces no penalty in this life or the next if one doesn't.

So if Jesus can trace his lineage back to Adam, was Adam a Jew.? Who was the first Jew.?

Jesus or Yehusua???

He wore Tzit Tzit.

Amen 🙏💖 Jesus was God in human form dear God bless and forgive all sinner's who question you

The Holy Scriptures don't teach one milligram of Christianity.matt.5:17-19/Isa 8:20

The silly portrayal of Jesus starting at 0:50 is based on Joan Taylor's book, "What Did Jesus Look Like." Taylor constructed her ridiculous image of Jesus by tritely dismissing the Shroud of Turin as authentic. She bought into Dr. McCrone's "painting" theory and then opined that the images on the Shroud were the result of a medieval penitential rite. Her book is full of errors and makes no sense. Dr. Tabor is also a Shroud denier, and perhaps that is why he has posted Taylor's supposed image of Jesus throughout this video.

Might have been a Jew but he died atheist lol

When a person is spiritually worthy, only then are they blessed. A person is never blessed or shines, just because they call themselves so, that is a contradiction! Why christi-anity is it's own anti-christ! An arrogant movement that destroys people's opportunity to come closer to the True God, it instead created a fake God it calls the jesus trinity!

The God of the Jews said: Isaiah 46:9-10 "Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me. Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure." And He will not change His mind: Numbers 23:19 God is not human, that He should lie, not a human being that He should change His mind. Does He speak and then not act? Does He promise and not fulfill? Where are the followers of the **renowned and powerful people at their time**? The Nazis, Stalinists, even followers of Elvis Presley? Why is the Man so hated by most of His people, the Jews,. and His early followers were hiding because of persecution, and were fed by the Romans to lions for entertainment (which should have effectively stop their growth, the spread of Christianity, followers of Jesus CHRIST), why is He still famous today and His followers are now in billions? Because God fulfilled His promise?, that **through** the offspring of Isaac, and Jacob/Israel, A JEW, will ALL NATIONS on earth be blessed, Genesis 26:4, 28:14. The God of the Jews never commanded the Jews to proselyte. But we came to know their God (the Bible contains the old testament, the Torah of the Jews) through THE JEW, Jesus Christ who commanded His followers to proclaim the gospel to the world.

He took the believer from the Temple and brought the temple to the believer

Yahweh, actuslly means Yah Ho wah He Who Is, Our Creator Whose name is Holy and to whom mortal man has no access to know!

I don't think we have evidence that Jesus had an open attitude towards Gentiles and women. Matthew says he told his disciples to avoid Samaritans and Gentiles and go "only to the lost sheep of Israel." I think that's remembering a historical Jesus who avoided Gentiles. Jesus is also said to call Gentiles "dogs" and "pigs," but I think more significant is the fact that Paul said he had to get permission from James to evangelize Gentiles. If Jesus had done that himself, why would Paul have needed to get permission. I see no evidence of Jesus being progressive towards women as well. He is rarely shown interacting with them, but when he does, they are always in a subservient role to him. The Pericope Adulterae is not authentic. He did tell men not to abandon their wives. Paul says nothing about Jesus being progressive with women even though it might have helped him to do so. Mary Magdalene, I think is a fictional character. She has no existence or interaction with Jesus before the empty tomb and the empty tomb itself is a Markan fiction. She's just a plot device. I think she may have been split off from the MOTHER of Jesus who is disparaged as "Mary the Hairdresser" in the Talmud (Tolodeth Yeshu, I think, but that might be wrong) and apparently, "Magdalene" can mean "Hairdresser." I say "disparaged" because "hairdresser" was sometimes a euphemism for "prostitute." There are scholars who think "Mary the Hairdresser" was split off into a separate character in order to create room for the new and improved "Virgin Mary." Anyway, I would be careful about reading too much "openess" into Jesus. He is not likely to have been any more progressive than James and everything we have in the Canonical Gospels is post-Pauline. I think Jesus' significance was in his opposition to, or subversion of ritual purity and animal sacrifice in favor of repentance and forgiveness, which is pretty much the same thing John the Baptist taught, but Jesus expanded it even more by deputizing people to baptize. JD Crossan characterizes this as Jesus "franchising" John the Baptist. I think Jesus was specifically targeting people who were deemed guilty of "sins against God." That phrase occurs in the Gospels where it is said that no one but God can forgive a "sin against God." But what counts as a "sin against God?" Well, apparently that was a phrase used to describe people with congenital or unexplained conditions or illnesses such as blindness, leprosy and lameness. Any sort of skin condition was called "leprosy: and that included Vitiligo or any superficial discoloration of the skin. It could also refer to psoriasis or eczema or any break in the skin. It usually did NOT refer to Hansen's disease, which seems to have been rare to non-existent in Palestine at the time of Jesus. The word translated as "leprosy" is a Greek translation of a Hebrew word which refers to a sort of general discontinuity or corruption of skin but in Hebrew it can also be applied to thinks like runs in fabric or a moldy wall. Lepers were anyone who seemed to have something wrong with their skin or who had vitiligo (which the Bible calls "white leprosy." All that is is vitiligo). People who had conditions like this were thought to have angered God somehow. They assumed God was doing that to them for a REASON and that as long as they had the condition God was still mad at them. What particular sin the person committed was unknown. It didn't matter. the fact that he was blind or lam or leprous was proof that God was angry at him. These people could not go to the Temple as long as they were seen as being in this state of impurity. They just had to pray and wait for it to cl;ear up. The Dead Sea Scrolls say the Essenes had a leper colony right where Bethany is at the foot of the Mount of Olives. This was a place the Essenes set up to keep the unclean away from the other pilgrims while they waited for God to heal them. Apparently, at some point. Jesus just started telling these people they were forgiven and could go to the Temple. When asked where he got the authority to declare this he said. "the son of man has the power to forgive." I think that was the most central teaching of Jesus and the most understood and it's misunderstood in the same way that all other teachings of Jesus are misunderstood. The phrase "son of man" is just how you say "people" in Aramaic. "Bar Enash or Bar'nash" is the ordinary Aramaic word for "human being." It was not a special title for one person. Jesus was not saying "I PERSONALLY have authority to forgive," he was saying "PEOPLE have the authority to forgive each OTHER" for this alleged "sins against God." Mark misunderstood "son of man" as the angelic figure described in Daniel and as a personal designation for Jesus but I don't think Jesus ever intended it that way.

very interesting video. but i would disgree with the idea that the pharisees were a small elitist group. josephus says a few times that the multitude of the jews followed the pharisees josephus says: [288] However, this prosperous state of affairs moved the Jews to envy Hyrcanus; but they that were the worst disposed to him were the Pharisees, 1 who were one of the sects of the Jews, as we have informed you already. These have so great a power over the multitude, that when they say any thing against the king, or against the high priest, they are presently believed. (15) On account of these doctrines, they (Pharisees) are very influential among the body of the people, and whatever they do about divine worship, prayers, and sacrifices, they perform them according to their direction. In this way, the inhabitants of the cities gave great tribute to the Pharisees by conducting themselves virtuously, both in their way of life and their discourses as well.

You know nothing of the truth to shed light on anything, Jesus is not even a Jewish name if that tells you anything.

⁠No. Isaiah prophesied “There shall come a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a NAZARENE shall grow out of his roots. Matthew 2:23 “And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, HE SHALL BE CALLED A NAZARENE.” Jesus was a Nazarene… a Galilean. “And the multitude said, Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee. “ Matthew 21:11 The word “Jew” did not exist. The letter “J” was not invented until about 1524. When Jesus taught about the Rapture, He used the ancient Galilean wedding to foreshadow the biblical rapture. His disciples, other than Judas, were Galileans.

But no true devoted person will ever claim.themselves jew( chosen) the reality would just become obvious from the glow of light coming from them! This is also confirmed by the traditions jews still blindly follow without knowing their true significance! Which christi-anity went on to copy claiming itself those that glow!

Herod or Borgia icons are funny and the (renaissance) art

For sure, Jesus was not European as you believe.He was and still is a black man. And if you want to tell the truth, first, you must identify how man was ,and still is Black Jew and not European.

Thank you

Its’s straight from the Jesus Dynasty book.

the Messiah has said, "O Children of Israel, worship Allah, my rabb (lord) and your rabb." (Al-Quran 5: 72) Indeed, your rabb (Lord) is Allah, who created the heavens and earth ... (Al-Quran translation 7: 54)

Mr. Tabor you would have thought being so educated in the text you would have understood it's all referring to their bloodline Covenant... When you inspected the text it becomes very clear Paul is actually only targeting the children of Isaac.. And you know it's about the bloodline Covenant because he specifically States if you are not born from Sarah and Isaac you could not even have pardoned the promise..... These facts exclude religion completely, as well as Judaism which is not based on the bloodline Covenant but rather a wall added to the bloodline Covenant poor conditions in living in that land... Romans 9 7Neither, because they are the bloodline of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy bloodline be called. 8That is, They which are the children of the flesh,= Ishmael ) are not the children of God: but the children of the promise=( Isaac) are counted for the bloodline. 9For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. Genesis 17:21 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year

Jesus, (Issis) as a buddhist, lived in India for 29 years. Then returned to Jerusalem to teach. He was crucified, but did not die. He was resucitated and nursed back to health by mary magdalene. Then he returned to Kashmir India and lived as a buddhist until 80yrs of age. He is buried in Srinigar. The tomb Rozabal.

The whole notion of Christianity is based on the need for a sacrificial savior..... No such idea is in the Torah. This begs the question, what sort of perverted god would need such a method for forgiveness of sin. = A pagan god. The God of the Hebrew Bible revealed to the Israelites and Prophets that His main objective in all His revelations was ethical behavior.

christianity is "judaism light" mixed in w greco-roman paganism, later turned against its creators who reminded them idolatry was bad.

Stand properly people.

Christians are the followers of Jesus the Christ. We already know that Jesus is a Jew. (John 4:22) Plain and simple