Please one day make videos on F.W De Klerk and the Apartheid Presidents of South Africa. And one day Ian Smith of Rhodesia. I really enjoy this channel
The arms deal involves quite a number of prominent ANC figures including 2 ex-presidents and so I dont see them pressing on this one because they would also need to be jailed.
I am not sure why people are ignoring the fact that there are two commissions of enquiry that were formed for the arms deal. Both of them produced inconclusive reports, yet Zuma is charged.
MOZAMBIQUE and TANZANIA with the help of Julius Nyerere provided training grounds for liberation movements in the continent supporting Ugandans John Okello (liberated blacks in Zanzibar from Arab rule) and Yoweri Museveni . Rwandans Paul Kagame and Fred Rwigema , Zimbabweans Robert Mugabe and Joshua Nkomo . South Africans Thabo Mbeki , Albert Luthuli and Oliver Tambo . By 1965 ANC (African National Congress Party of South Africa)had established guerilla training camps in MOROGORO TANGANYIKA .
MK and Zuma will change this country because Msholozi hear the people all the time if they crying about something going wrong that's why we need MK as a government to rule this country nobody can stop that we want MK party
He was a president before. What are you talking about? He will never ever change this country. You wish eventually South African people are going to cry. Some of them they will remember ANC. Let me tell you that the coalition is not good at all.
Oh the guy who stole millions from his countrymen and Wants to forcibly take land from White farmers and give it to tribal leaders who support him(under the guise of "equal redistribution"). If South Africans want to fall deeper into failure, who am I to stop them lmao.
Ramaphopsa ( ANC) should have privately met with Zuma after becoming president and worked out a deal with him that included immunity from prosecution, and a possible "golden handshake, knowing that Zuma was a powerful force among the Zulus.. Corruption is endemic in South African politics, hence making Zuma a "sacrifical ram" was always a very, bad idea.
Gwaza Mkhonto gwazaa.... Le party ifike kwezwakala i ANC ya lose i majority njengamanje kuyafana nokuthi lelizwe alina Hulumeni i respect MK and Msholozi
Jacob zuma needs to retire and give room to the young folks. He had a chance to chsnge what he’s claiming he would change and didn’t. I don’t understand why South Africans are stuck on him
Great 👍 Mr Zuma, now you know the will of God, fear him and follow his way, he will always with you he will never leave you alone Congratulations 👏🎉 to you
Although majority of the people who voted for MK are Zulu, there was also a large number of non Zulu people who voted, the reason MK became so popular is because black south Africans have become disolutioned with our choices, ANC has done so much damage that we're tired of. The DA (second largest party) leans towards white minority rule and EFF, although very popular initially, lost a lot of votes due to policies it wanted to implement such as opening our borders to all Africans, which most South Africans are extremely against, thats why MK became such a force, they offered an alternative. Also, although Zuma was probably the most corrupt president we've ever had, his presidency did create more black millionaires than any other president I personally didn't vote for MK but based on conversations with friends, family and views of our media, these are a few of the reasons mk got so many votes, even none Zulu votes
@@VictorShongwe-eh3sc the first ANC president was John Dube And I don't think anyone cares about who was running the ANC in 1910 Its most notable people such Nelson Mandela, Thabo Mbeki, Oliver thambo, Chris Hani etc are all Xhosa
South Africa continues to suffer from excessive government control of the economy, and the MK and EFF parties both want even more. This will be a disaster for South Africa if the ANC and DA don't work together to move the country towards a free market economy and decrease racial tensions.
@@paulnamalomba194 Your can't introduce a market economy on any society. In china, in the 60s and 70s everyone was brought to level playing field, free education and health. In those year, all the human indicators improve drastically, such lifespan. Then market reforms where introduce 80s. There was no resentment. Tanzania would be country that can introduce aggressive market reforms, because they dealt with their society problems(tribalism) in their early stages after independence. An unequal society like SA is not working out. This election just reintroduce tribalism in SA: now leading down a tragic road of tribalism. "Nigeria"
If south Africans are not careful they will fall and they will fall hard then Zimbabwe will be far better than them, the way the natives killed their own fellow Africans is so sad, looting of shops and super markets will kill South Africa as a nation
Zimbabwe currency depreciated making it possible for Bob to carry the civil service from his back pocket in London, he eventually ran onto the sand bank,arrogance ego, so he got crazy and pulled the land rabbit,that was the the end.time and negative cash did the rest.
South Africa is going through what only 2 other regional countries went through - the post-liberation party era - Only Zambia and Malawi have done this.
During white British colonial rule in the continent of Africa 19th/20th century , some white South Africans(Dutch Afrikaners) were moved by the British from South Africa to Kenya(both white British Colonies) and populated the rift valley farm lands of Kenya also called white highlands . The white in Kenya were from Elite backgrounds of Irish, British , Scottish etc extraction and considered farming brute hence the movement of Dutch South Africans to Kenya . The British considered them inferior illiterate whites hence relegated to farming , hunting etc in Kenya . The white South Africans also had establishments in Kenya capital Nairobi .
Mmm I've seen this account a few times but how come one ever sees white Kenyans with Boer names Every time I've met a white person from Africa and they got surnames like Nel, Botha, Kruger, Van Der Merwe etc they are always from SA, Zim and Namibia. Never Kenyan
@@Lindelwa872 and how could a right wing party that is not associated with the white population only emerge? Like is it possible or most South Africans are left wing?
Can you do a video on Kgalema Motlanthe. He is the former South African president everyone always forgets but his rise is interesting as he was former apartheid activist, jailed on Robben Island, when released led one of the biggest unions in South Africa and rose to become sectarianism general of the ANC. He remains very much respected and stood between Mbeki and Zuma in the 2000s and was SA state president for 1 year.
During Kenya's independence struggle in the mid 20th century armed uprising by black Kenyans and increasing deaths of whites forced significant portions white Afrikaans to flee to South Africa where they reinforced segregation . During South Africa's independence struggle Daniel Moi Kenya's president , suspicious of a plot to eliminate NELSON MANDELA IN ROBEN ISLAND PRISON by white south Africans , decided to financially support Pan African Congress leader CLARENCE MAKWETU as an alternative in case MANDELA was gone.
Kenya has zero credentials when it comes to supporting liberation The countries that did are mainly Zambia and Tanzania then later Mozambique supporting Zim's independence then Zim helped Namibia and SA. Kenya played zero part
Sicela kusetshenziswane ngokuthula ma-MK amahle....for the sake of SA. Hlahlani indlela eya phambili enokuthula nokuhlakanipha. Ningavumeli amazonihlohla bathi phakani impi, kobe bafuna ni-loose i-focus. Be satisfied and move on with the good planning. Don't waste your time on focusing to respond to your haters, that will not be wisdom. We pray for peace in SA in Jesus name.
I also feel they had to wait with the documentary, seeing that more is about to unfold in the coming days. I have a strong feeling that Msholozi is going to pull more political stunts soon.
JEWISH ANC Seems like most people don't understand the history of the ANC which I've written in detail in this group. But I'll take it as my responsibility to teach fellow Africans about their history until they understand. The Union of South Africa was in 1910 and the ANC was formed 2 years later in 1912. What was it formed for? There was no racist opressive laws. Afrikaners were not in power. South Africa was ruled by England. So what was the purpose of the ANC? I explained in why post that from inception, the ANC was a party of Amazemtiti (exempted blacks - those blacks who were regarded by England as above blacks in general but below whites). The ANC was a party to represent Amazemtiti as there was a party to represent the English and liberal Afrikaners, that party is the DA today and there was a party representing Afrikaners. Poor blacks in general weren't represent and there was no interest to represent them. The ANC remained in this class segregational form until the emergence of Anton Lembede in the 1930s among the ANC youth ranks. Lembede together with his colleagues in the Youth League like Robert Sobukwe demanded that the ANC represent all black people. They eventually forced the ANC to adopt the pro-Africanist Program of Action in 1949. That was one year after the verkramptes took over power from the mainly English liberals. The Afrikaner verkramptes pushed hard for liberation from England on 31 May 1961. It's important to note the the Natives Land Act of 1913, one year after the formation of the ANC, was promulgated and enforced by the British. Afrikaners were not in power that time. But ANC leaders were bought houses in posh suburbs in England by the same people who promulgated and enforced the Natives Land Act of 1913 that made black people landless up to today. What does that tell you? The problem started whe the Afrikaner verkramptes wanted to expropriate English business without compensation. That's when English Jews took over the ANC to fight their cause against the Afrikaner verkramptes. Anton Lembede had to be killed for the plan to succeed. The ANC of 1912 died with Anton Lembede. A new ANC was then formed by the Jewish English. The founders of the new ANC (Jewish ANC which is in power now) are Lionel Bernstein, Bobby Hepple, Dennis Goldberg, Arthur Goldreich, Hazel Goldreich and James Kantor. Their first recruited fronts were Nelson Mandela, Walter Sisulu, Govan Mbeki, Raymond Mhlaba and Ahmed Kathrada. The Jewish ANC founders mandated Lionel Bernstein and Bunny Bunting to write the pro-West Freedom Charter which will overrule and erase the pro-Africanist Program of Action of 1949. The likes of Robert Sobukwe, Zephania Mothopeng etc left the ANC to form the PAC after realizing that this no more the ANC they hijacked from representing only Amazemtiti and made it to represent all Africans. Their Program of Action was thrown under the carpet by the Mandela's, Sisulus etc. Does it now make sense why they were bought houses in posh suburbs in England? While on the Jewish ANC, let's have a brief view on the DA. Tony Leon is Jewish, Helen Suzman was Jewish, Helen Zille is Jewish just like Jewish Soviet KGB Colonel Joe Slovo and his wife who splicited funds for the ANC from the Soviet Union. So, what surprises you when a Jewish ANC wants to form a coalition with a Jewish DA? It's birds of the same feather. The ANC merged with the National Party to form this party that is ruling as we speak and you kept on voting for it. What is wrong when they go into a coalition and finally merge with the DA? Fast forward to Now ... The Democratic Alliance (DA) is a party that has consistently shown its racist tendencies and lack of genuine agenda for the people of color in South Africa. Consequently, the idea of forming a coalition between the DA and the African National Congress (ANC) is utterly unacceptable. Since the DA assumed official governance in Cape Town, there has been a resurgence of apartheid-like practices directed at people of color. This is a situation we cannot afford to see replicated on a national level. The DA systematically undermines the accomplishments of people of color while excessively praising anything done by white individuals, even when those actions are nonsensical or counterproductive. During elections, the DA engaged in fraudulent activities, manipulating results by switching off vote-counting machines, allegedly with the assistance of CIA agents from the USA. This was facilitated by the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), an institution that was purportedly independent but has been revealed to be influenced by the DA’s funders, who also support President Cyril Ramaphosa. President Ramaphosa, influenced by these funders, has been accused of planning to sell state control to the DA. It is alleged that votes were bought through secret meetings, involving substantial sums of money. The DA’s strategy extended to attempting to bribe other top leaders of the ANC, aiming to secure power nationally and act without any checks. The South African populace has a clear understanding of the DA’s true nature, which is why they would never support the party voluntarily. The DA’s methods of inflating their support included buying votes from people in the streets and infiltrating rallies of other parties to sway individuals. Their inflated presence in the political landscape does not reflect genuine support but rather manipulation and deceit. The DA’s policies included opening South African borders to undermine the ruling party, allowing uncontrolled immigration which stunted national growth. They exploited President Ramaphosa for their agenda, knowing they could discard him once he was no longer useful. Conversely, they attempted to coerce former President Jacob Zuma, but he steadfastly refused to betray his principles and his people. Jacob Zuma’s tenure as president saw significant advancements for South Africa. The economy thrived, with businesses flourishing, and substantial infrastructure development including courts, prisons, hospitals, police stations, universities, clinics, bridges, and roads. The successful hosting of the 2010 FIFA World Cup and the resultant infrastructure was a testament to his leadership. Under his presidency, the black middle class expanded, and free education from primary to university level became a reality for many. Despite these achievements, Zuma was targeted by the DA and its allies, who owned major businesses, media outlets, and controlled significant economic resources. They launched a smear campaign against him, fabricating charges and using state apparatus to harass him and other black businesspeople. The narrative of state capture by the Gupta family was one such manufactured controversy, ignoring the historical presence and contributions of the Gupta family to South Africa’s economy. Zuma’s vision for South Africa included joining BRICS and advocating for a BRICS bank and a nuclear plant to meet the country's growing energy needs. These initiatives were misrepresented and opposed by the DA and their business allies who felt threatened by the empowerment of black South Africans and the shift away from Western economic dependence. Under Ramaphosa’s presidency, policies that favored DA’s interests led to economic hardships. There were increased utility prices, inflated food costs, and a decline in job opportunities. Many South Africans found themselves in severe financial distress, unable to afford basic necessities or access education. Given these challenges, Jacob Zuma’s efforts to protect South African sovereignty and promote inclusive growth stand in stark contrast to the actions of the DA and Ramaphosa. To address these systemic issues and offer a viable alternative, Zuma went on to establish the UMkhonto We Sizwe Party (MK). This new party aims to rectify the injustices and foster a fair, prosperous, and self-reliant South Africa for all its citizens.
Wonder if the Zulus voted for these party because of its policies, wonder what Zuma did great for the South African economy, we thought Soutth Africans are not tribalists, but MK party proves that wrong party of the Zulus
i was just thinking about the similarity in their political stories, although i don't think Mr Zuma would like that comparison very much, i suppose you could say it's a similar political journey to Lula in Brazil as well
Zuma's coup against Mbeki in 2007 was the actual date of the demise of South Africa as a viable nation state. Mbeki was an honest man who had South Africa moving in the right direction economically altho' he made a tragic misstep in his handling of the AIDS crisis in the country. The Zuma coup initiated the thuggish corrupt pillaging of the nation's coffers which, unfortunately, remains to this day and has put the nation on the precipice of collapse. The fact that Zuma has so much popular support in South Africa, particularly amongst the poorest and most wretched of the souls in the country is the ultimate irony of his existence as a leader in the nation. Ironic because he, more than any other person on the planet, is responsible for those people's wretched condition. The parallel to Donald Trump in the US is astounding. Trump did nothing but do everything in his power to make things worse economically for his base during his tenure in office, yet the base is clamoring for more. Same with Zuma and his populist base in South Africa. Assuming Zuma somehow wrangles his way back into power and Trump wins the US election in November, the world is going to be a very different, and much worse, place for both of their bases. In both cases, everything that hasn't yet been destroyed or stolen in both countries will be by the time these two geriatic demons are finished. It is an unfortunate part of the human condition that the majority of people, not only in these two countries but around the world, are so ignorant politically that they are completely clueless that they are rabidly supporting the people who are going to destroy them.
If MK goes to coalition with ANC, investors withdraw from South Africa and MK wants everything state owned. That means they want to get all the money for themselves. In other words: welcome to Zim 2.0. If this coalition happens, RUN out of this country as fast as possible.
MK and IFP turn around KZN. Get your own new coal power station in Newcastle. Focus on fixing promises made by Anc. Be people oriented then take over 2 other provinces
Here is the big question - is it legal to accept funds from a foreign sources to start and run a Political Party in South Africa. Bearing in mind that the foreign entity may have an agenda that is against South Africa and its best interests
