The Sherman Tank has an UGLY Canadian Cousin! 

Yes sir !

Loving the content odd, keep up the great entertainment;) 👍

They showed the Skink in the devblog, cannot wait for you to ruin someones day with that.

Can u play the russian yet Bl ? Si weird as fk

😆

Same with m6a1 and the sides of tigers

@@Miles26545 oh god don't even get me started with tigers

@@chickenpurple6704 can't forget how panthers somehow suck shells into the volumetric fuckery going on with their skirt armour and side armour

It’s the panthers mantlet that truly scares the crap out of me, I have never seen such volumetric/black magic hell.

@@alphaplayzz1381 and really just any tank with tracks

"I'm sorry! For what?" "For killing you!" "Bro I am dead"

@@Geniusinventor IM SORRY!!

@@edisonschlenker7294 "Nooo I am sorry!"

Pyrrha Nikos---Queen of Canada 😂

Attack the D point!!!

Skink is based on the Grizzly 1 (Licence Built M4) just wanted to clarify

I believe the story was different, at the time Britain had lost most of its tanks in dunkirk and couldn’t spare any for the colonies. So canada acquired a license to produce the m3 chassis so that they could produce their own tank and not take from Britain, the m3 chassis was then developed into the m4a5 ram tank

@@bruhmomentcertifier And its coming to the game soon, which is exciting for us Canadians

@@bruhmomentcertifier damn beat me to the punch lol

not just training. it was used as a flame thrower and commander, just not used to fight other tanks. still a cool tank though

Yea but the skink will be placed in british tech tree instead

@@Unknown_bnuy where it should be honestly, along with the 4 other canadian vehicles in the british tree

@@kiryu5499 ya no lmao

@@andymyung1132 it’s why all Canadian tanks have solid shot rounds as well… thanks Britain.

@@savagewolf5918 yeah yeah lol, it makes perfect sense as it’s British and uses British shit, it’s the grizzly chassis, and it’s a common wealth nation plus the uk has other lend lease vehicles like Stuart’s Sherman, m10, and modifications like the firefly so it makes a lot of sense to go to uk

Good for grinding the USA line?

@@gabrielneves6602 up till like 4.0 sure

@@themilkman8554 thx man, I play Chinese but want to grind USA air And ground, any suggestion of plane to buy with it? CAS if possible

@@gabrielneves6602 Most definitly, you might only get to rank III till is research starts dropping off but it does very well.

Is it 1510? The wiki says it's 1150. Not sure if you mixed 2 of those numbers or not, but I can't actually check in-game as I already have it.

My record is 12 but it was m6a1 in a full downtier where it was at the right br of 4.7

@@Miles26545 yeah I've had great success with it when it was at 4.7 as well.

I got 10 kills with m4a3 105mm in one spawn it’s a really good tank

@@Miles26545 M6A1 was really good against germany and some other smaller tech trees. I once went through a game with no damage minus a few mg hits to tracks and got double ace with this machine. I usually angle this tank 20-30 degrees while driving, and making sudden sharp turns when I hear the enemy fire. it is really hard to hit the small angled plate on the sides if you drive randomly and the center front plate is just volumetric hell for enemies. I bounced a lot of shells using this method. Just bind the 37 to a fourth mouse button or some key on the keyboard if you don't use gaming mouse. I really like baiting enemies out of hiding with a intentional misfire of the 37, and if it's light, a fake miss with the main gun. Even russian is no problem for the 76mm, actually the 37 could shoot under the breach of t-34s and deal with almost all german tank's' mantlets or even the hull at point blank. and it has triple heavy MG for dealing with annoying trucks and AA One fun story, once a Sdkfz was peppering me with it's gun and knocked out my commander and loader so I was actually unable to shoot it. It was trying to outrun my turret, (because it thought my gun was loaded) by running in circles around me. When it reached my front, I just pressed spacebar and two .50s destroyed it better than the main guns did.

@@Miles26545 mine was 16 with m4a1 on its br. i got called a hacker because of it.

Reverse is from the POV of the driver, not the gunner.

I think the archers gun is mounted backwards in the tank

@@crazysnow1236 it is

The US medium tank program very much preferred iterative designs, since they allowed parts interchangeability between models, and a faster production time. The M2 Medium's running gear was preserved for the M3, nearly identical tracks and suspension, and similar dimensions. The M3 recognized that a 37mm gun was insufficient for a modern medium tank expected to fight a wide variety of targets from entrenched infantry to enemy armor. However, US manufacturers had yet to design and produce a gun mount robust enough to survive the recoil of the new 75mm general purpose guns, so the M3 had to compromise; keep the shiny new 75, but stick it in the hull, with a much sturdier mount that only allowed limited angles of fire. But a tank needs a turret, so they made a new cast turret, and fit the old M2's main armament inside, which in the eyes of the Bureau of Ordinance, meant it was better than the M2 in every way. But then they realized they failed to meet the machine gun quota, so they added a coaxial MG, another two hull MG's by the driver, and finally, deciding that wasn't enough, they put another turret _on top of the main turret_ and added yet another MG so the commander wouldn't be too bored. With that sorted, they put the M3 in production, using many components from the old M2. When the Sherman was finally ready(the two were developed at the same time, but the M3 was intentionally designed as a stop-gap), they were able to once again recycle components from the M3's, and get them out in record numbers in record time because the factories basically got to practice building tanks with these components.

I thought that it looks like a big m22 lol

How is it "weird" that the Sherman would have a similar hull to its predecessor? Is it weird that the Panzer IV is similar to the Panzer III?

@@whatdothlife4660 i can see what you mean. However, the Panzer IV felt like a natural progression from the Panzer III, compared to the glow up that the Sherman had over the Lee's "Frankenstein" dual guns.

Awesome!

I hate players like you, haha.

Until it gets blasted back to Canada by a Breda 501

@@agravemisunderstanding9668 3 mgs go brrrr lol

@@agravemisunderstanding9668 oh god I hate Breda with a passion.

If I remember correctly the ram was a British design, that was made in Canada, that was used by American's and never was fully put into production.

You're supposed to hit them in the transmission housing, right? Only like 2 inches of cast armor there, versus the upper hull's 3.5 inch, plus sloping.

@@magisterrleth3129 the drivers hatch is pretty weak

@@mlgnoscopeblazeit7708 for real? I always aim for the drivers when I play the t34 and 75% of the time, the shell shatters, is there a ghost armour plate there or am I hitting volumetric

@@Darkcloud3200 that's strange I'm not sure, I was just messing with the penetration analysis and the drivers hatch was a weak spot

@@mlgnoscopeblazeit7708 hahahaha dude no worries I'm just gna blame volumetric sometimes it saves u, sometimes it cucks u

As a Canadian I love it. It looks like it was made of maple syrup that settled and froze and then started melting a little and then froze forever creating a beautifully indestructible single piece of armour. Truly makes me embrace Canada. Sorry for the comment, and the unfair tank, eh.

I mean they did see some action as troop carriers ;(

Oh yea it’s a fun tank but I doubt it was your first premuim don’t you ussaly get a premuim plane when you get into the game but It was my first purchased premuim.

@@crazysnow1236 Bro... "one of", not literally my first.

Just don’t play it too much or else we will have it’s br bumped up again until it gets absolutely creamed into a new upper br. A So I played the t126 a lot and I think I was a helping cause . of its br update to 3.0

The t126 was so fun in its lower 2.7 br because it could bounce shells non stop I hade a game where I was surrounded with a tank to my front and a starter tank at my rear and it took them about 2 min to kill me.

I also remember getting an he shells from the Sherman 105 on my side and just drove off because it didn’t. Really affect me and was just an annoyance.

Also has HEAT-FS and APDS if I'm not mistaken. I should give it a try.

I started using key board and mouse with a monitor with my series S, much better experiance, and alot easier to aim.

Oh yea pz 4 are a bit hard to deal with

He also has a really satisfying voice.

Shhhhhh

I encountered an m4 Sherman and struggled to pen its turret cheeks although I was at range but I did manage to take out its breach

I think it’s mainly to how the armor is designed and the fact that it’s also cast

@@crazysnow1236 I agree. The cast armour and its shape probably explain why it can tank shots that would pen the M3 Lee.