Multi-domain, multi-spectrum, networked and optimized for physical and cognitive performance. We're working with agencies and partners across the Army and Department of Defense to ensure the Soldier of the future is on the cutting edge.
-US Army partnered with Microsoft to develop a HUD for soldiers -They partnered with Lockheed Martin to develop the Onyx exoskeleton -Theres talks of the US Army getting a new standard issue firearm We getting there bois
@@eldon9735 not really mechanics wise its pretty much a souped up G36 a weapon that is still used by the bundeswher for 30 years. We have had the m16 since the 60s. If anything they should have adopted the XM8 because its a very simple design compared to the literal clockwork guns that are currently on bid rn remember keep it simple stupid
@@DreadPirateRoberts121 The Krauts are phasing out the G36 as we speak, and the XM8 had a bunch of heat related issues due to the extensive polymer use that were as of trials, unresolved. The optic kind of sucked, and the mounting system was also probably going to go the way of the dodo if the military actually wanted to adopt it. It was modular as fuck and a really nice, slick little rifle but it had too many issues for them to undergo the collossal undertaking and logistical clusterfuck that would've been replacing the m16. Now I'm certain with some tender love and field trials, those issues could've been remediated down the line, but the powers that be decided it wasn't good enough to warrant uprooting our tried and true platform that would only end up getting better with time. Even if we had adopted the XM8, I have a feeling we probably would still be in the market for a new rifle at this point in time due to the fact that pretty much all of our weapons systems are currently considered legacy systems.
It's actually kind of scary to think about that because those exosuits can be automated so they could still technically be still running even after the wearer is long dead.
Yeah it’s not like Vietnam defeated far technologically superior foes already Seriously could you imagine being the “best” military in the world and getting wrecked by rice farmers with sharp sticks
@@nothingnothing9157 also the Vietnam war the americans got wrecked by rice farmers with unreliable soviet weapons and if I remember correctly some of them still used bow and arrows
So nobody makes the mistake...no, this isn't the "soldier" of the future; it's the *spec ops soldier* of the future. I do imagine the exo-suit portion specifically would be used for logistics, though...lot of heavy lifting that'd be real easy to do with those things. Artillery, in particular, would use it. In fact, I wonder if they'd even increase the calibers of arty beyond 155mm so arty-men could load the things in without the need of a crane or automated system...
@@brandonreyes2417a regular soldier doesn't require too much information on the situation, if anything it's a distraction from staying alive, wwz makes a great example in the battle of yonkers, soldiers need to focus on what's in front of them, the big picture information is officer territory and should remain as such. Having a minimap connected to a drone will only distract and confuse you, in fact the whole mask itself is just one massive confusing mess that WILL inevitably reduce performance, it's worth it if it's armored, otherwise don't bother.
They were eventually able to equip everyone with assault rifles. I'm sure it will be Spec Ops first, but then later on when production tech gets better, it will be included for every soldier.
Actually it's the other way around. First this technology isn't new, only newly declassified. When DARPA for example has a super secret advanced new toy, they leak it into the entertainment industry, movie, TV, Video games and music videos. If anybody tries to blow the whistle on it, they'll be accused of being a poser. And conveniently, 3 or 4, decades later it becomes public.
We laugh and critique but at the end of the day, we will eventually have soldiers with some serious tech on their side. It’s not anywhere near ready yet. But it will come.
The infantry element of warfare has been overtaken long ago with vehicles, aircraft and artillery. Infantry engagements now produce less than 1 twentieth of enemy casualties while PGMs and advanced fire control systems are now far superior to a man and his rifle in terms of precision and firepower. The only areas where infantry make sense now are in urban warfare and as guerillas. Both environments demand infantrymen that are extremely fit and agile, only lightly equipped (less than 20 kilograms for a 48 hour fighting load) and stealthy. Weighing down troops with all aspect armour, giving them 7.62 NATO or equivalent muzzle energy rifles, giving them exoskeletons and datalinks and a thousand gadgets does not improve upon the fact that in recent, infantry intensive operations such as Afghanistan and Iraq, Coalition troops were overburdened with over 50kg of kit, too slow to close with the enemy and overdependant upon fast air. If anything, exoskeletons will only make commanders more free to overburden troops even more, while all that gadgetry will not be conducive to stealth or agility. Cue the stories of worn out knees, compressed vertebrae and neck and hip injuries. If there is going to be a Third World War that does not end in nuclear escalation, the Cold War equipment and mindset of NATO armies is still as relevant and as effective. The infantryman is to close with and destroy opponents within 300 meters, or at least pin them long enough for fire support. Similarly they must be stealthy enough and quick enough to get close enough to engage, and get away from incoming enemy artillery and heavy weapons. Weighing them down with enough kit to rival their body weight is not going to be conducive to either. And there is no amount of armour you can slap on a soldier to protect against 152mm artillery shells or a volley of grenades from an AGS-30, or thermobaric warheads. But efficacy and doctrine that doesn't justify billion dollar boondoggles and wasteful budgets and procurement programs seems to be light on the ground.
They're working on bullets that alter their flight and there's scopes that make all the calculations for you and track targets. It makes a cross hair in your sights. You just line up your crosshair with the one it makes. Or at least that's how i understood it...
I know it looks ridiculous, but be honest the recruitment centers would have lines stretching all across the cities if this stuff would become reality. Plus it would be really sweet.
@@Zargex its called Six Days in Fellujah. Soldiers who were in the battle on the front lines participated in making of the game. It had great potential but unfortunately it never got released because of the families of the soldiers who lost their lives in the war said it was glorifying their deaths.
I decided that I could maybe draw inspiration from this. So I decided to write down everything. I guess there's a chance someone might find this helpful for something, so here it is. Clothing: Regionally adaptive combat ensemble Novel functional fabrics and finishes Health status monitoring Integrated data/power distribution Integrated percutaneous protection MicroClimate Vest: Active body heat/cooling regulation Increased endurance Supports broad spectrum deployment environments Exo-Skeleton: Human Augmentation Increased speed of movement Increased load capacity Reduced fatigue Soldier Communication and Mobile Data: Advanced sensors for dismounted situational awareness Information portrayal, assessment, and displays Soldier data management On-demand resupply Health status monitoring Control multiple micro UAVs/USVs Supports dismounted MUM-T operational environment Slim and lightweight 1/0 package Real-time tactical uplink Active and passive tactical status linking Human Dimension: Distributed/adaptive training and immersive simulation Neural-engineering Optimized human performance Nutritional intervention Psychological status monitoring Advanced Weapon System: Optimized sighting systems Inter/intra squad targeting hand-off capability Full auto firing modes for precision/point suppression effects Embedded processing Faster multiple target engagement Lightweight materials Integrated Protection System Integrated head/ear/eye protection Lightweight modular body armor Environmental protection Enhanced chem/bio protection system Integrated sensors Shot detection system Advanced protection capability/DE weapons Headgear: Shock/impact resistance Passive/active eyewear Threat sensors and Assisted threat recognition Audio/visual stimulus management Beyond novel materials Integrated respiratory protection Integrated day/night thermal optics Batteries and Power Systems: Power generation and conversion Energy storage Power management and distribution Energy harvesting capability Advanced power cell Wireless Power distribution
@@figo3554 really sounds good on paper, but they couldn't even get the Land Warrior System to work out. I'm all for technology in weapons but to integrate that into the survivability of a soldier is the wrong thing to do. I used to be able to drive across the country with one look at a map. Now I can't get across town without my phone or GPS. I just feel that money could be spent on other things besides some Sci-fi super soldiers.
I don't care what county decides to invade United States they will be defeated, we are different people who survived and came together when in great need , as far back as the first settlers who repelled attacks by the local inhabitants ( Indians) to helping to win world war 1 and 2 but even before that the British in the war of of Independence and the war or 1812 , I'm very proud of my country and grateful to all serviceen and women!!!! And a special appreciation for all our veterans who made the ultimate sacrifice for our country!!!!!! God bless 🙏 America!!!!!!!!!
Kidnapping? Well it saved us right? It’s obvious the S-4s will never be anything more than bullet sponges for me. They are a downgrade. Not nearly as many augmentations having to sprint and lower their weapon (Bro, Spartan-IIs and IIIs constantly sprint, the speed Madter Chief moved at in Combat evolved, to Halo 3 (Full speed.) was Master Chief Sprinting, that’s why I say Halo Infinite should give us options. If we’re a Spartan 2 make us automatically the same speed as a Sprinting S-4 without sprinting, instead turn the sprint where you lower your gun, into a armor ability like it was in Reach, since it’s more of a speed boost than actual sprint. Leave S-4s the inferior cocky kids they are now.
It’s the same stuff as it would be in 1940, old men manipulating the youths emotions and morals, by depicting wars as a game or adventure but in reality it’s a horrific experience that shouldn’t have happened, sorry for venting.
The US army: Damnnn. We ain't getting enough recruits. Guess we better make an advert for tech we will never have in the near future! That's sure to make them join!
They actually already have a prototype for something extremely similar to this but it currently needs a giant battery or hydraulic system thing. Once they get rid of the heavy battery and hydraulics I’m assuming the elite troops will get it and ya
WeBe Flexin well if the battery dies and leaks acid all over you while you’re stuck in a suit of power armor you’re fucked, and immobile. Many shots can be survived, especially with armor, and even more so with the armor they would supposedly be able to pack on to this suit since it can handle more weight.
What I wanna know is, how often will there be DLC available, and will there be a special edition of this suit if we preorder right now? Unit Supply is gonna have a field day with this!
Orbital drop shock Troopers were deployed in New Mombasa to help fight the covenant. The covenant found a vital object that would help them. This object was in New Mombasa. I haven’t played Halo in a while, so my lore has got behind and I’ve forgotten what they were looking for.
Damn they should give him a technically advanced water bottle, my man runs a lot and I bet he be thirsty af Edit: omg thanks for the likes, i would like to thank my mom, my dad, my brother, my dead hamster, my mom and my mom
Who would win an IS-2 heavy tank capable of blasting nearly anything in its way, mounting a DShK and DT guns or one infantry man (whom ambushed the tank) firing a dirt cheap panzerfaust into the IS-2's engine?
@@motiv8_750 Yeah but Battlefield always has better graphics than COD and they give the players a giant battlefield to freely play on. But I do wish COD will make a new game about *The Battle Of Marawi* in the Philippines. Wouldn't it be cool for a new Modern Warfare series about different wars from different countries?
@username Can you tell me why Battlefield has a lower 3D graphics than Call Of Duty? Cause as far as the games go,Battlefield is always a few steps ahead of Call Of Duty.
Battlefield has always been my cup of coffee, better looking, bigger maps, more realistic feel all-round! Yet this.. this looks like 'COD infinite super warrior black hole awesomeness future Legend cool Lit GG laser beam' trailer 🤣
Shut yo ass up and enjoy living while there are people dying for u. And you better hope that you dont run out of those types of people, because when you do, you're going to be the one doing the dying.
@@baklavacore4062 U don't understand, THAT it's the problem. There are people dying out there and we can't do shit other than die ourselves, you just explained my comment.
@@Gaterstoo Yes i agree. Unless it has superior armor and is for special forces than it will be a waste of money. One of those suits probably costs 100k
Oh shit my bad. You know how many vets commit suicide everyday? What about spending that money on preparing them for, and how to cope with PTSD during basic training instead of waiting until after it happens to teach them. It's not like the military hasn't been gathering data on it since the first World War. But fuck it your right, spend it on a suit so they can come home and die. Guess your right.
Facts! 1. Life cycle cost of 1 US Soldier is about 3 million IF you do not disable him. Then it goes up! 2. Cost to deploy 1 US soldier for 1 yr 550k. 3. Yeah the armor will be high. But the added: flexibility, survivability, mobility, and fire power. Means you can drop from a 13 to 1 supporter to killer ratio maybe 9 or 10 to 1 with a smaller lighter force. I lnow it looks like A Halo game, but it is really smart future force planning.
Trick question. Nuclear weaponry would destroy everything and potentially result in mutually assured destruction. Which is why no-one uses them. So soldiers of the future would win, hands down.
The soldier in the future must not only have better armor suit and better guns but also have better treatment to mental illness like anxiety and ptsd when they are in the militry.That is what i hope it becomes in the future.
These super soldier programs are so advanced. White gold infused, holographic heads up display, suit can stop a 223/5.56 bullet, brace a broken limb, give nutrients, wear for 7 days straight without eating, jump up to 50 feet, and run 38 mph..
