The "Tank" That proved me wrong - AMX-10RC - War Thunder 

Prove it

Its à bad thing it didnt have stab like in réal life

@@owenhbitch7716 Redeffect made a video detailing the vehicle where you can see it rocking at times from the turret stopping.

@@black_wolf1664 It never had one.

@@_Admin_01. u sûre ?

That would be a French premium that I actually would love to see

Close, but not quite. AMX-10RC never mounted the TML ‘Mid’ turret found on the CV90105. They only ever mounted TML ‘Early’ (which vaguely resembled the Leclerc) and TML ‘Late’ which outwardly resembled the ‘Mid’ turret, but had an added Savan 15 roof sight which stab’d the gun. The version mounted to RC also had a bit of extra mantlet armor as the mantlet sight was no longer used, and it just looks badass. I’d take either or both RC and Vextra TML Late. Can’t wait!

@@LeGrandSarrazin well the TML 105 on the CV90105 was the late model.

@@fireshadow7598 Except it wasn't lol, the reason why the CV was replaced was because the turret it used was the early one, wich wasn't stabilised, so Gaijin avoided an M60A1 Ariete situation by replacing it by another model

@@arthurbousquet6838 execpt the cv90105 had the TML late, the reason they removed it was that the cv90 never had the late model.

It's technically a recon tank. French doctrine is to combine fast armored vehicles with jeeps(now the VBL) as a form of scouting. The gun on the AMX-10 is not meant to be a main battle cannon either since it's primary function is to scout

Its to slow to utilizes it.

The btr does the exact same thing, what do you mean "it's only used on that vehicle." Don't make such strange lies.

Thx for doing god's work 😉

People still don't know how stabilizers work I guess. The Leclerc and Abrams for example use a stabilized sight connected to the inputs of the main cannon which calculates the movement needed to adjust the cannon to keep it level. A directly stabilized cannon isnt done anymore since it doesn't provide as great of an effect as the stabilized camera.

@@l.bakker7563 When we see demonstrations with a glass of beer at the end of a cannon... That means the whole thing is stabilized, right?

​@@benoitbvg2888 That's not what he meant, and the gun still have some degree of vibration, which get worse as barrel length increase. The beer one is demonstrating liquid will not spill out, not the glass will not fall off. The beer has some adhesive to it iirc. Japanese tried it with wine glass and no adhesive and things doesn't end well for them. Anyway. Shorten and have many detail left out. Back during the early days of stabilizer, the gyro is connected directly to the gun. We figure out pretty quickly it is pretty much pointless if the gun is the only thing that is stabilized. So, the next step is mechanically linked the stabilized gun to the sight. So the sight is now stabilized. Problem solved! Then we figure out this is bad news again. Why? Because gun is heavy, there is the weight of barrel and breech to move around. Your gyro can only do so much, especially if you do want a relatively cheap and robust gyro. So, maybe instead we stabilized the sight, much lighter. and instead link the gun to the sight, would that make things better? Yes. Long story short, it is much easier to stabilized the sight, then link the gun to the sight via data/electronic signals/etc. But it has to be a non mechanical linkage to have the full potential. This is also where the myth came from. France is the first to put such this new sight stabilizer with gun that is not mechanical linked to the gun in the market. Basically, on most modern platform. The gun is free to move about. When the sight found their mark, the gun will use various build in data link and sensor to align itself to the position the sight told it to go to. When it get to the correct position, weapon goes hot, and stick goes boom. So, there exist a small "lag" between pressing the trigger and metal flying, but modern non mechanical linkage has very low delay, practically none. I think T10 for example use sight stabilizer but the gun has some form of mechanical linkage. Result is the gun will always have a relatively huge "lag" relative to the sight. And there is of course back up system that linked the gyro directly to the gun in an event the primary sight goes out of commission. But then you are back to using basically ww2 sherman stabilizer. Of course it is more precise and working parameter is not as small, but without fcs, tracking, and various sensor making adjustment, engaging target when moving is practically impossible.

@@jintsuubest9331 Thanks for the explanations. Let's just hope one day Gaijin finds a way to implement stabilized sight, even with the cannon "lag".

Sammmeeee

Not a revisit, it's a first xP

​@@JustinPlaysTV i would like if they would add version of amx10rc with stabilzer at 9.3 for example as SQUADRON vehicle good/bad idea?

They don't bring anything new, tho, I would prefer gaijin to add vehicle between 9.0 and 11.3

or the amx 13 105

Or the EBRC Jaguar without AKERONs

No upgrade kit ever granted a stabiliser just addon armor, a jammer type APS and maybe new thermal/ammo, the TML105 prototype does however have a stabilized turret

Game dev here. Derendering is most likely caused by net code/desync combined with occlusion culling. Anti cheat? Doubt since most online cheats use grabbing info either from memory or snaching packets as their arrive. Client still need to receive where all entities in game are as server sees it. Just making some clinets not receive say info about half of the players in a match and then start to receive it. Cant even imagine the headache, loop holes and problems to even implement it. Occlusion culling on the other hand is designed to improve performance by hiding objects that are behind other objects (since the name). Combine server issues with it and ta dah! Disapearing tanks.

​​​@@kryperdev diference is that gajgin had an internal leak of code and ect and that allowed cheaters to. Make cheats that are undetectable and so the DERENDERING IS in game IMPLEMENTED TO sort of fix the cheaters according to devs of wt because they don t know how to fix it otherwise because war thunder has spaghety code wich is really complicated

Ya know, I thought I forgot something...

Uhh.. lucky guess..

Bug, Gaijin is aware and work on it

It's a bug

@@elbrayan23xd47 Yh ik, it’s just so annoying considering it’s the main round for the country I’m using

@@No1harris_98 it's the same for the t80 bvm top round and all the 105 mm apds and apfs for germany

@@elbrayan23xd47 Yh it just kinda annoying atm especially that I’m grinding the br that uses the round,

@@elbrayan23xd47 it’s such a dumb bug aswell 😂

Laser rangefinder does it automatically for you

Personnally it’s by far one of my most loved ones: for real this Ytber is bad at playing the AMX10RC, it’s really special to use but once you know how to use it it’s incredib’e

@@alta6055 he isn't bad at playing it, he played it as it was intended and it's still very lacklustre at best, there's a reason a lot of people hate this vehicle so are all these players also bad?

@@raizencore just bad at playing with this one particularly that’s what I said lol

@@alta6055 ok, and I just told you he played it correctly.

who does it get hate from? people who played it, or people who look at paper stats? I personally always had a great time in this vehicle, and still drive it from time to time. I guess being a french main kinda gets you used to no stab.

The AMX....

@@JustinPlaysTV Ohh, yes they are

T32? You high?

@@MageOtter27 Of course I know they don't send American T32 tanks to Ukraine, but he said it in such a way it sounded like it. It was an open goal and I took the chans. 😁

Ehm...since the nvds were introduced?

@@Sh-epard I know I thought it only had noght vision no thermals

Well, trying new things is how we make progress as a species. Sometimes it doesn't work, and sometimes it's great, but it's always interesting.

@@adrien5834 Ukraine will be glad to hear that :D I think that sending them Stryker MGS would be better, than this thing.

@@machiator2511 Arguable. I think this is more mobile and much simpler to maintain.

​@@machiator2511 What this thing? lol you know absolutely nothing about the capabilities of the amx 10 RC to say such bullshit 🤦you better shut up..

but against the Ukrainians.

​@@Niko_rj🤡