The Vibrations Inside || Carlsen vs Keymer || Grenke Chess Classic (2024) 

Oh geez Rick

in the commentary anish said this vibration but lawrence corrected him not the vibration like niemen

Lmao

I came late to this one 😂

HAHAHAAHA

'Hans cheats only when Hans is in the US' : How is Magnus making all these fake accounts to insinuate there's an American conspiracy? I ask the above because some pointed out Hans didn't do so well in U20 classical WCC but later did well in 2023 USCC. I posted the b()ds theory that Elon Musk shared ( see p1w4Rr-ut or 1Dx9Y2Q7NY4 ). The theory says BOTH Hans & Magnus used b()ds. Magnus 1st. Then Hans. I didn't create the b()ds theory. I just posted it. But I do have my own theory... ... We know Hans didn't cheat OTB vs Magnus or anyone. But nevertheless Magnus thought (still thinks?) Hans did. So hypothetically how could Hans cheat? I mean seriously like realistic methods of course. Don't think of things where Hans bypasses security. ( Consider this 'red truth' like in Higurashi/Umineko. Cf the zm0zts meme. ) 3 things . . . . . Thing 1 Magnus is discriminatory. Consider that Hans beat Shak & Magnus, lost to Fabi & Wesley So and drew w/ everyone else. Hans, Fabi, Wesley So, Chris Bird, Rex Sinquefield are all American. Shak & Magnus are not American. (I know Magnus implicitly accused Hans right after the loss and then Fabi & Wesley So came only after but at least Shak was before Magnus, but bear with me.) I'm not anti-American. I'm not saying there was an American conspiracy. I'm saying Magnus THINKS there was. And then Magnus can't explain the way Hans cheated because doing so would expose Magnus as discriminatory. Magnus is making essentially the same accusation as what Bobby did in the 1962 candidates. But Bobby doesn't need to be afraid to be thought of as discriminatory because everyone already knew that the Soviets were pre-arranging draws (and maybe even decisive games?). The Higurashi/Umineko solution ( again cf the zm0zts meme ) is that Hans doesn't bypass security but that Hans is colluding with security! . . . . . Thing 2 Magnus is defamatory. I read on chess stackexchange that moderator Brian Towers says there's a PRACTICAL not just a MORAL reason to not accuse publicly : The arbiter can watch for FUTURE games. If you accuse publicly, then the accused, if actually guilty, might stop future cheating and then you ruin your own sting operation before it actually begins (ruined ab initio?). Hence, Magnus is either defamatory or 'not the sharpest chopstick in the drawer'. . . . . . Thing 3 Magnus is defamatory and discriminatory. Why for the love of God would Hans cheat especially knowing the whole world is watching your every move given your history? Is Hans like Leopold & Loeb? Why would Chris Bird help Hans? More info : UFUHa27kiJc zs4zpf p1w4Rr-dd zm0zts --- P.S. Wesley So on Lex Fridman xcdhgq P.P.S. Interview while imprisoned Qt0S8G_fUbE Pablo Mercado: So what is your advice to the Filipino chess players? Uncle Bobby Fischer: Filipino - My advice is to give up chess and take up Fischer Random. - 2004Oct11, 15 years before nephew Wesley So became the inaugural WFRCC in CLASSICAL time controls.

Nicee

On Lichess, playing against Stockfish level 3-4 is easy to get in these positions but not easy for me to win every time. Check it out for yourself if you’re interested.

Very reminiscent of my ongoing war against Fairy Stockfish. I use my pawns to lock up the position, seeing no way the engine can break the lock without sacrificing a full piece, but FS noodles around until it identifies some tiny crack that was imperceptible to me. Here too, I didn't see how Magnus could infiltrate without sacrificing a piece, and I was wondering why Agadmator was showing a drawn game. It reinforces that Magnus is the closest there is to an engine inside a human body.

😂😂😂😂.

Homo jokes

The Beach Boys approved this game.

'Hans cheats only when Hans is in the US' : How is Magnus making all these fake accounts to insinuate there's an American conspiracy? I ask the above because some pointed out Hans didn't do so well in U20 classical WCC but later did well in 2023 USCC. I posted the b()ds theory that Elon Musk shared ( see p1w4Rr-ut or 1Dx9Y2Q7NY4 ). The theory says BOTH Hans & Magnus used b()ds. Magnus 1st. Then Hans. I didn't create the b()ds theory. I just posted it. But I do have my own theory... ... We know Hans didn't cheat OTB vs Magnus or anyone. But nevertheless Magnus thought (still thinks?) Hans did. So hypothetically how could Hans cheat? I mean seriously like realistic methods of course. Don't think of things where Hans bypasses security. ( Consider this 'red truth' like in Higurashi/Umineko. Cf the zm0zts meme. ) 3 things . . . . . Thing 1 Magnus is discriminatory. Consider that Hans beat Shak & Magnus, lost to Fabi & Wesley So and drew w/ everyone else. Hans, Fabi, Wesley So, Chris Bird, Rex Sinquefield are all American. Shak & Magnus are not American. (I know Magnus implicitly accused Hans right after the loss and then Fabi & Wesley So came only after but at least Shak was before Magnus, but bear with me.) I'm not anti-American. I'm not saying there was an American conspiracy. I'm saying Magnus THINKS there was. And then Magnus can't explain the way Hans cheated because doing so would expose Magnus as discriminatory. Magnus is making essentially the same accusation as what Bobby did in the 1962 candidates. But Bobby doesn't need to be afraid to be thought of as discriminatory because everyone already knew that the Soviets were pre-arranging draws (and maybe even decisive games?). The Higurashi/Umineko solution ( again cf the zm0zts meme ) is that Hans doesn't bypass security but that Hans is colluding with security! . . . . . Thing 2 Magnus is defamatory. I read on chess stackexchange that moderator Brian Towers says there's a PRACTICAL not just a MORAL reason to not accuse publicly : The arbiter can watch for FUTURE games. If you accuse publicly, then the accused, if actually guilty, might stop future cheating and then you ruin your own sting operation before it actually begins (ruined ab initio?). Hence, Magnus is either defamatory or 'not the sharpest chopstick in the drawer'. . . . . . Thing 3 Magnus is defamatory and discriminatory. Why for the love of God would Hans cheat especially knowing the whole world is watching your every move given your history? Is Hans like Leopold & Loeb? Why would Chris Bird help Hans? More info : UFUHa27kiJc zs4zpf p1w4Rr-dd zm0zts --- P.S. Wesley So on Lex Fridman xcdhgq P.P.S. Interview while imprisoned Qt0S8G_fUbE Pablo Mercado: So what is your advice to the Filipino chess players? Uncle Bobby Fischer: Filipino - My advice is to give up chess and take up Fischer Random. - 2004Oct11, 15 years before nephew Wesley So became the inaugural WFRCC in CLASSICAL time controls.

True! This actually looked like a typical Magnus game, after quite a long time.

2018 magnus prime vibe here

Magnus has won 6 EVENTS in a row… what do you mean?

Pawn to f6 Keymer had 20 seconds left Magnus with 5 minutes left

fr

*interesting

In commemoration of hans!!!

'Hans cheats only when Hans is in the US' : How is Magnus making all these fake accounts to insinuate there's an American conspiracy? I ask the above because some pointed out Hans didn't do so well in U20 classical WCC but later did well in 2023 USCC. I posted the b()ds theory that Elon Musk shared ( see p1w4Rr-ut or 1Dx9Y2Q7NY4 ). The theory says BOTH Hans & Magnus used b()ds. Magnus 1st. Then Hans. I didn't create the b()ds theory. I just posted it. But I do have my own theory... ... We know Hans didn't cheat OTB vs Magnus or anyone. But nevertheless Magnus thought (still thinks?) Hans did. So hypothetically how could Hans cheat? I mean seriously like realistic methods of course. Don't think of things where Hans bypasses security. ( Consider this 'red truth' like in Higurashi/Umineko. Cf the zm0zts meme. ) 3 things . . . . . Thing 1 Magnus is discriminatory. Consider that Hans beat Shak & Magnus, lost to Fabi & Wesley So and drew w/ everyone else. Hans, Fabi, Wesley So, Chris Bird, Rex Sinquefield are all American. Shak & Magnus are not American. (I know Magnus implicitly accused Hans right after the loss and then Fabi & Wesley So came only after but at least Shak was before Magnus, but bear with me.) I'm not anti-American. I'm not saying there was an American conspiracy. I'm saying Magnus THINKS there was. And then Magnus can't explain the way Hans cheated because doing so would expose Magnus as discriminatory. Magnus is making essentially the same accusation as what Bobby did in the 1962 candidates. But Bobby doesn't need to be afraid to be thought of as discriminatory because everyone already knew that the Soviets were pre-arranging draws (and maybe even decisive games?). The Higurashi/Umineko solution ( again cf the zm0zts meme ) is that Hans doesn't bypass security but that Hans is colluding with security! . . . . . Thing 2 Magnus is defamatory. I read on chess stackexchange that moderator Brian Towers says there's a PRACTICAL not just a MORAL reason to not accuse publicly : The arbiter can watch for FUTURE games. If you accuse publicly, then the accused, if actually guilty, might stop future cheating and then you ruin your own sting operation before it actually begins (ruined ab initio?). Hence, Magnus is either defamatory or 'not the sharpest chopstick in the drawer'. . . . . . Thing 3 Magnus is defamatory and discriminatory. Why for the love of God would Hans cheat especially knowing the whole world is watching your every move given your history? Is Hans like Leopold & Loeb? Why would Chris Bird help Hans? More info : UFUHa27kiJc zs4zpf p1w4Rr-dd zm0zts --- P.S. Wesley So on Lex Fridman xcdhgq P.P.S. Interview while imprisoned Qt0S8G_fUbE Pablo Mercado: So what is your advice to the Filipino chess players? Uncle Bobby Fischer: Filipino - My advice is to give up chess and take up Fischer Random. - 2004Oct11, 15 years before nephew Wesley So became the inaugural WFRCC in CLASSICAL time controls.

?? What backlash? Wokism in chess too?

agar

@@curious_banda he tweeted an amusing ss from his comment section, apparently somebody does not like the word “material” being used in that context.😅

@@theyaoster autocorrect 😪

bruh,magnus wanted to e pawn get capture

Well it doesn't matter what Magnus wanted. It was a much better line to consider than moving the bishop to a dead square.

It had already been established that nothing was going to happen along the a8 h1 diagonal by that point. So why move your bishop to that diagonal and waste a tempo.