They solved FNaF. Just like that. Right there. ( 

NEWSFLASH ASSHOLE I'VE BEEN [X] THIS ENTIRE GODDAMN TIME is honestly my peak favorite parts of the video and they encapsulate it so well, it really kept me going through the already amazing video

🤯

Wow By the looks of things, it looks like a certain specimen managed to solve FNaF in 2 hours 16 minutes and 32 seconds!

dude “you know who” as the vengeful spirit makes so much fucking sense im surprised we never thought of it sooner

I swear to Clearsight if this beats Depleted Tolerance in views I'm going to make a F.A.T.A.L. character out of spite at some point

World record speedrun

Solve fnaf lore any%

didn't expect a proto on my feed What was I expecting anyway? +1 like

The only thing I'm iffy on is how they placed SL after the events of fnaf 1, but otherwise, MAN they convinced me.

I'm Glenn quagmire. I'm Glenn quagmire. I'm Glenn quagmire. I'm Glenn quagm

Its not it its ussless irs not actualh solved goddamn it

It was truly a phenomenal video. Very ambitious that answers a lot of questions. But I think there are a few holes in their timeline that are worth discussing. "Golden Freddy is the SL night 4 springlock suit." Baby specifically says that the springlock suit was from HER old pizzeria. Afton robotics and Fazbear’s Entertainment are separate companies. So, although Fazbear’s Entertainment may have banned springlock suits, that doesn’t necessarily mean that Afton Robotics did. Yes, the fnaf 1 animatronics AND the funtimes can both open their faceplates, but there is zero evidence that the springlock suits can. Especially not how we see the springlock suit in sister location night 4. Not even the fnaf 1 animatronics can do that. They claim in chapter 3 of the video that during Sister Location, NOBODY is inside Golden Freddy. But later in the video, they claim that the Crying Child's soul is attached to Golden Freddy when Afton uses the suit for parts. So, what is it? Is there a soul in Golden Freddy by the time of Sister Location or not? "The Crying Child is the fifth missing child. William takes the Crying Child home from the hospital, tries to make him possess the fredbear suit, fails, and buries him in the woods." There's one little detail regarding FNaF 4 that they didn't mention. William Afton promises to put his son back together only a few seconds before the Crying Child's heart stops and he dies. This implies that Afton’s promise to “put his son back together (aka start his killing spree), if the Crying Child's death is the moment Afton snapped, must happen AFTER the crying child is already dead. The Crying Child doesn’t just lose his frontal lobe like Jeremy Fitzgerald does in the bite of 87, his entire head is crushed. I simply don’t believe he’s in a state to leave the hospital at all. According to their theory, the police blame Henry for the kidnappings because the Crying Child was one of the victims. But again, according to your theory, the Crying Child was IN A COMA AT WILLIAM’S HOUSE! How could they possibly believe that Henry was the killer if the Crying Child was literally at William’s house? The notes in FNaF 1 clearly say that the children disappeared at Freddy Fazbear's Pizza. Considering what I said in the argument just above this one, there's no possible way Afton could've tied the disappearance of the Crying Child in with the disappearances of the other four. "Henry was framed as the killer." It’s still under speculation if Henry disappeared from the story at all. Many people believe that he was the one who sealed up the saferooms to keep Afton at bay

This video was like the String Theory of FNAF

the theory was amazing!

They haven’t solved the mess of Help wanted+ yet

IKR ITS CRAZY WENT IN LIKE "okay lets see what yet another theorist thinks..." AND BY THEN END ITS LIKE "gd.. they so right, it fits so neatly! this is much more satisfying!"

I hate that the community is so hell bent in some ways that immediately mock you for thinking differently. I believe for example in Mike Bot. The way he stood up, baby saying categorically "you won't die" like she realized he wasn't human to begin with, the robotic voice at the end. There are several instances of lore not being definitive, but people had already made their mind and head canons so now it becomes extra difficult to share something... Different because they all jump and say "I can't believe anyone believes in mike Bot in 2024"

I'm currently working on a littlr debunk video going over the major statements they brought up. I liked their interpretation but there major issues with it.

Yes because Cassidy being BV and Mike being TOYSNHK is totally right /s

No, they did not.

Yea it solves their headcanon,

Turns out that when you ignore what the games, short stories, novels and Scott actually say, you can make your own story that people who don't know as much will believe

That theory is just plain heresy