Hey guys good to see you again, before the code ever breaks just wanna say even though we’ve never met. I’m glad we share this have a good life y’all <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="24">0:24</a>
When he flashes the code on screen at <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="48">0:48</a>, you can see where it says “id:” it shows the id to never gonna give you up.
I'm convinced that someone at RU-vid is a fan of Tom Scott and has been constantly lobbying to keep the API up to date so that this doesn't stop working years later.
I'd imagine the views presented by the RU-vid API are what are also used to show end users. All of the view fudging and aggregation will happen in the background before it's presented anywhere.
Doge Guy grow up mate, there’s 132k comments and I read about 3 but if you think I’m sad enough to scroll through and copy another comment then fine but I can assure you you’re wrong. Jealousy at its finest.
I wrote some code for a company that no longer exists "Bankers Trust". Many years later I came across a small pocket of people I used to work with at BT and found that the remnants have been bought sold traded for around 13 years. At that moment I got introduced as the "Guy who wrote the zzz system". I was mostly shocked that they still had it running. It was written in vb4 using DCOM and MTS in the lat 90's. AFAIK it's still going.
It depends, you can give them the title if you give it before it updates. And does it matter? No. You can search “This video has views - Tom Scott”. Or send the link
It baffles me how seemingly no one seems to understand what Scott meant by saying that. The title is simply identical to the youtube's own viewcount, which doesn't keep track of views in real time, only every minute or so. Which means it isn't accurate, and therefore neither is the title.
It seems to me that his quote refers to the actual numbers. There is a common delay on the video so counter is about right but can not be always accurate.
I see 56,662,598 in title. 56,662,956 in description That is scarily accurate, especially since I have seen this video 17 times and it was right on the money the other 16. That program is really good.
