Yeah, they're correct and they clearly know their stuff, it's just really disappointing to see someone go so deep into theory without even touching on real jazz legends like Mookie Kramer or Roy Donk.
It's fascinating to hear them talk about their profound knowledge of music theory. And quite keen ears as well! It must have taken years of training to perfect these skills.
It's really funny until you're sitting in a studio for 8 hours listening to a Berklee grad talk about their heroic melding of "Happy Birthday" and "Giant Steps".
Absolutely brilliant. Although it was hard for me to keep up with their music theory jargon, it was inspiring to see these music experts interact. I had no idea that all music was based on Farmer in the Dell. Now I know!
Very interesting observations. Thank you! I am always intrigued by these kinds of analyses. And I am a music teacher. So true. Pa papa papaaaa pa pa papa papaaaa. It is obvious. All music is redundant. All music has a common ancestor: Pa papa papaaaa pa pa papa papaaaaa // Pa pa papa papa papapapapapaaaa. Foreal. Also Philip Glass: Pa papa papaaaa papa papa papaaaa // Pa pa papa papa papa papa papaaaa. So this is why all minimalist music sounds the same.
The final 3 notes of "The Farmer and the Dell" do in fact outline the 3-2-1 descent Schenkerian ursatz. This is a piercing and meaningful insight on Tim's part.
This is honestly the conversation I hear when a couple of music theory "enthusiasts" talk about music in front of me. Glad I don't enjoy music in a "clinical" way like Mr Heidecker and Mr Werheim ovah here.....