Time to SELL my Rolexes, Which one to keep and why? 

My first Rolex was to celebrate surviving cancer. The last Rolex I got was to celebrate a huge promotion AND 20 years with my wife.

Personally, I’d keep the Explorer 1 and it’s not even close. It’s arguably the most perfect 3-hand dial design ever and it is more versatile than the other Rolex’s in your collection. Another reason to keep it is you’ll probably get more money for the other watches. Also, you already have the dive watch category, and 40mm+ sizes covered in your collection, so you won’t miss the Sub. The Explorer 2 has so many overlapping traits with the Sub: black dial, same hands, same indices. You can easily find a more unique GMT somewhere else.

Rolex fanboy here. You articulate great points driving your ultimate decision. Personally, I would sell all but the Explorer II. Your concern about the bezel is unfounded. It is cheap to replace at an AD. I rotate my watches every several days and I beat on my 226570 Polar hard. It’s big. I have 8.5 inch wrists and it looks great on me but I am a big guy. It has great water resistance and a very useful GMT function. Even better, it flies under the radar. I can wear it at work with nobody noticing it. Black dial even more so. I also often wear a neovintage 40mm 16570 Polar and it truly is the perfect size. Same GMT Master II movement but slides under a cuff easily. Good luck with your decision.

I purchased Explorer 1 and Submariner same year my son was born. Explorer 1 I’m wearing on the NATO strap everyday. Doing everything with this watch, traveling, cooking, hiking, playing games etc. Also asking my son to help me to put it on my wrist and buckle the strap. Some day this will be his watch with tons of memories. He will get it no matter what. Submariner will be his college fund. If we can get it through without selling the watch, it will be his after he graduates from university.

I went through a similar dilemma recently with my 116900 Air King and 124060 Submariner. The more they went up in value on the second hand market, the less and less I wore them. More a subconscious decision than anything else, but every time I went to pick one up in the morning to wear for the day, I found myself hesitating and reaching for a piece that I was less precious about. Consequently, over time the Rolex in my collection went from being watches that made me smile and feel great, to watches I potentially worried about for fear of negatively affecting their (financial) value. So I took the decision to sell, made my profit and replaced with a couple of Grand Seiko watches that I feel give me more joy, less worry and personally think are better designs, technology and overall value. But that's just my opinion. First time watching your channel and now subscribed.

I have the same Rolex models in my collection and have struggled with the same dilemma. I love all 3! In the end, I chose to keep them because once sold, it's not so easy to obtain them again and the prices will likely be exceedingly more than what you originally bought/sold them for in the first place. They all have sentimental value to me as well, so holding on to them so I can put them on when I fancy them again rather than missing them once they are gone was the right decision for me. I say keep them all and move forward. The market right now is also not in the best place for private sellers to offload a Rolex so patience is the best solution.....for now.

Most versatile…36mm. I wear one on an 8 inch wrist with no problem. Most comfortable, go anywhere watch I own

Once you sell them, that's when you miss them

You could replace all three with their Tudor counterparts: Ranger, Black Bay Pro, and the new Pelagos. It solves your issues: you can still create content, use on vacation (not too flashy), and use for actual diving and exploration.

As much as I am normally team Explorer, for your case, I would keep the Submariner. Good way to leave the brand while holding on to the icon. It is quite ubiquitous these days, but it's usually referred to the one sports watch to get in Rolex. One and done.

My advice will be to keep the explorer II. Why?: 1. GMT Function: You'll never know when you will need it but you WILL need it and it can be very helpful. 2. Timeless Design 3. Formal, yet Informal You can get alternatives for the explorer I and Sub, but the GMT? If I got the money, I'll buy GMT for functionality purpose

This is great content for anyone on the fence with buying Rolex. I wear my watches and don't see any point in owning them if you don't. They become investments and not collections. But each to their own.

I initially thought it was too small for my large wrists (7.75in). I decided to give it a try since it is such a classic design and found it to be one of my favorite watches. The size makes it extremely easy to wear. I dont have to worry about catching it on my my backpack when traveling, my seatbelt in a car or my shirt/jacket sleeve. It tends to just disappear until I need to tell the time.

You're a watch purist ❤️. A true collector. I look up to you as watch enthusiast for making these difficult decisions.

There comes a time in every man’s journey throughout horology where the normal every day “jazz” just does not do it any longer, and you need to start listening to more advanced “jazz” to scratch that same itch. Same happens with Rolex. You want one , you want one… when you are still new to horology and then when you been around for a while and gone deeper into it all, you want pieces that are more special , more unique, … like a Fp Journe, an H.Moser, an Mb&F, etc. i think it’s a natural process on this fascinating journey.

Out the 3, if I had to just keep one, it would be the Sub. The Exp 36 is too small & the Exp 2 a bit big. The Sub is perfection. I’d keep them all though, personally.

Exp 2 the keeper. Exp 1 would be gone already (too small). Sub (gone) only because it is not a GMT and I feel the Exp 2 is just more dynamic and a true long-term keeper in a collection with great contrast. Wear it, use it and make the scratches yours. I would guess it would wear long term perfectly. I am on the list for a Polar and when it comes in, I am hoping it will be the only Rolex in the WB as the YM (116622) will find its way out. I have often thought of my collection w/o Rolex and if I would be happy or not. I think I would manage with so many other brands to explore and my tastes constantly evolving I often feel like the collection is a 'road of memories' if you will. Good luck whatever you decide and great content as always.

No watches can replace them. I feel though that the sub has more competition than the explorer models. Great vid and interesting considerations 😃

Sell them all! I sold off a lovely collection this year and have found so much freedom from the perspective of a brand new chapter in life. I let go of a sub date 116610LN, a datejust 41 wimbledon, and a rootbeer rolesor GMT, plus some beautiful JLC’s and omegas. I slimmed down my collection to just 3 excellent watches, and I’ve found so much enjoyment from rediscovering them and putting my money into other exciting aspects of life with zero regrets. I’m looking forward to hearing what you decide to do with your collection. Great video!

Well, we have to differentiate between new Rolex models and vintage ones. Those can absolutely have meaning to you and are not necessarily for showing off.

I would keep the Explorer 1, but would have second thoughts if the Exp2 had a polar dial. The modern Sub with the maxi case and ceramic dial is way too sceptic.

I'd keep them all... No question about that!

I would keep the Explorer 1, no doubt. But thats just me. At least the Sub is a no-date (which I strongly prefer). Nice content, Like!

i think rolex should be flashy and you wearing them on accession not daily and not on vacation unless your vacation is 5 star hotel etc, if its daily it should be descreet like explorer everybody knows its a rolex quality but you know what you spend money wise

to compare Timex and Bulova with Longines is very brave, considering that after the M40 or the Accutron neither brand did anything worth remembering. The explorer is a fantastic watch, if one could just buy it at a list price. Good video!

I would keep the explorer one. I have to admit I don’t have the issues people normally have with Rolex. I’ve learned to love the watches for their value as horological pieces - superb materials. accuracy and simplicity, so for me it’s not a matter of hype. My only issue is that I refuse to pay above the retail price, so I’m in peace. I have my explorer as an everyday watch.

It's pretty clear the size of the Explorer I doesn't do it for you, however objectively tempting it may be. The Explorer II is a looker but it's on the "polar" opposite of size and finally, the Sub is the icon you seem to feel an allure towards, from both a value and a timelessness angle. For me, a daily wearer of an OP 36LN, a Speedy and a G-Shock, the Explorer I would stay to maybe replace the OP if I didn't have it. The 41 OP Silver Dial sat in a box for half a year until I eventually sold it. It's 36 all the way for my 7in wrist, certainly a personal preference. And instead of the polar dial Explorer II I told my AD I wanted, I changed my mind and would rather put that money into a 321 Ed White Speedy. Good exercise and I thank you for sharing it.

The Submariner seems to be the most versatile of them, and the proportions are the best. It is the one model that has matured over the years like the 911. At the same time it’s not extremely special apart from the secondary market prices. As a beater you could go for the BB58. That’s one you wouldn’t have to be too worried about scratches or being too flashy

Those are the three watches I want in my 3 watch collection except Explorer II polar (too many black dials). If I had all 3 and needed to keep only 1, the Sub would be the one. Thanks for the video!!

I sold two Rolex and saved money to buy a Vacheron Constantine Overseas with blue dial.... I don't miss the Rolex's..

I am curious to know which one would you keep and why, But also If you had the entire amount available (aprox $30.000) what watches would you buy? Please let me know in the comments, thanks :)

Btw the Explorer 36mm really measures at 36mm. The size is not on the case. It’s on the bezel that goes over slightly on the edge… Use a digital caliper and measure from 2-7 o’clock.

Sold all my watches and got an explorer 40 as a one watch collection. Feels good to be financially out of the watch hobby.

Sell them all, buy a 40mm explorer 2 polar and a BB58, pocket the cash! Or, get a Grand Seiko GMT and wear it everywhere. Each one has issues like you list, and you don't absolutely love any of them. This isn't a popular opinion, but I've never really liked the Sub. Just as you said, it's too sober for a diver, I don't connect to it. Personally I do genuinely like the 39mm explorer or 40mm polar dial explorer 2, but there are so many alternatives I would move both. Maybe look at the railmaster 1957 trilogy as an alt for the explorer 1. The only rolex I actually want is a panda Daytona, but so does everyone else!!

Great channel

After watching the video I see what you mean regarding the explorer and explorer 2. I'd sell both and keep the sub. It's one of the all time greats and it looks great on your wrist.

Heck. Just cash out if there’s no connection anymore. They will just sit unwound. I type this with my Exp1 36 on my wrist. 🙋🏻‍♂️🍷

I have the same seamaster on rubber and a sub date, both 2022 models. I found that I wear 80 % of the time the Omega, dont know why. Omega is a bit more comfortable and for everyday work/sport use, rolex comes when iam free and around with friends and family. I like them both, and will keep them both.

All Rolex watches get better with age but if I would have to choose one, I would pick the Submariner.

I always like your take. If Only more ppl thought this way! Iam suprised I haven't come across none of your videos with you reviewing a Sinn. Especially with you being in the army in the past. And you seem like you're at the point I am with Rolex. I purchased 3 Sinns in a couple month's 556i the U1 Ds limited edition of 500 and my favourite piece the Ezm 13.1. Because of your active life style diving etc. Sinn you just can't beat especially with the tech and price! #SinnCity

I certainly can relate to all the points you cited, but do think you should not be in a rush to sell. I had 4 Rolexes then sold 3 late last year. I'm glad I kept one. I experienced essentially the same emotions and feelings you cited. Do I regret it? Yes and no. Getting back into Rolex is not that easy if you want to buy from an AD, but you can enjoy having money back to try other brands. Perhaps sell one, see how you feel and how that goes. Selling a Rolex is a lot easier and faster than buying one at retail. Just my free advice.

I am of the opinion who has owned a Rolex can also sell a Rolex. Why, because you realize that a Rolex is also just a watch. I have a Datejust II and wear it very sporadically even before the hype. I simply have many more watches that I can wear without hesitation and that are just as fun. I couldn't bring myself to sell one yet for nostalgic reasons. But I would keep the Rolex Explorer GMT in your place.

I got the explorer 1. But also a sprite and a nodate sub. I have zero doubts that explo is a keeper. Most comfortable watch i ever had

Simple decision: sell the Explorer II. The other two are both great watches and I'd keep them; if you really want to sell two, sell the Submariner. The Explorer is pure class.

Meaningful to me means something really special like a bday gift, a big celebration. I love my exp 2 and I never plan to sell it. I love the size & weight. Seems like none really excite you, but I’d want at least 1 rolex in the collection. I still want a rb gmt but I’ll liking panerai lately. What a great hobby where we can trade &. Most items keep their value. It’s a win win. Regrets come when we sell the “irreplaceable.” Those are the gifts, special moment purchases…

I agree with the logic! If You don't want a watch that LIMITS and ENSLAVES You, You need a G-Shock. I heard people who admitted thay cannot clap or sweat when they wear their vintage Rolex. But not sweating and no clapping is not a perfect option for a Hollywood actor...

I think you are right…you can sell them all and find watches you can wear without having to fear to loose a lot of money. 👍

I would keep the Rolex Explorer 1 as i like small classic watches but the logical thing to do is to keep the Sub and sell the others.

Since you're not making a financial decision, it's really a matter of the heart. Which watch speaks to you most? Which do you pick up the most? I own an Explorer, Sub, and Explorer II (but slightly different generations than yours). I'd keep the Explorer as I like how low-key it is. Have you thought of selling all three? Then, if you really miss one, you're likely to be able to buy the same model for a similar price in the coming year or two? Great way to test which one you'd really miss.

I sold my 16613 and got two omegas. I’m keeping my 116610 for life.. one Rolex for me. These guys that have 4-5 Rolexes all similar (gmt, subs, Pepsi, Batman’s, hulks) are crazy. Sure it can be an investment but it’s stupid to collect the same watch in different colors. Let’s face it no one needs a watch these days, and Rolex is largely just to flex.

Small wrist so…I keep the 36 mm Explorer. Fine vid Sir

I sold all of my 4 Rolex models in the past 2 years and I don’t regret selling one! Don’t want to be a part of this Brand anymore…

agree 100%. My rolex reminds me of a point in time and marks that, nothing more. I'm just as satisfied marking occasions with JLC Zenith and Omega.

You need to keep all three. Your going to regret the loss of anyone of those. Don't do it.

Keep the sub! As many have commented one and done. Glad you made the video and stay true to your beliefs. At the end of the day, enjoy what you wear.

Nice video! I would sell all three and get a vintage Submariner or Explorer II instead. In my view the more recent sports models are simply all too big, while the Explorer I is too small.

Interesting question, and frankly a slightly surprising answer at the end. I actually thought you were going to end up keeping the Explorer 1, given that you compare both the Explorer 2 and Submariner to it and come up with it leading in both cases. So the order would be, in terms of what goes out: Explorer 2, Submariner, Explorer 1. That, by the way, would be my choice, with the nuance that I would ultimately not let go of the Explorer 1. It is too good, too classic, too versatile, and too beautiful a watch in my eyes.

I think the exp 1 is the one to keep. It means something, non show off watch, low key...the fact that it was released to commemorate the 1st ascent to the summit of Everest gives it sentimental character. The size makes it a true enthusiasts watch....the size is a celebration of its heritage. Not for someone who wants to give of the...hey look at me im wearing a rolex vibe..I think you should keep it man

Personally, I’d keep the Explorer 124270, imo it’s the best offering in the current Rolex catalogue, but this opinion is obviously highly dependent on personal taste and preferences, as with all watches.

Although i won't be able to ever own a Rolex, unless someone buys one for me or i inherit one and although all three are awesome choices, i would choose the Explorer II out of the three , mainly because of the size and because of the more toolish character that it projects, while still remains both dressy and casual. I would wear it all the time!!! Good luck with your choice!

If someone wants to sell his worn Rolex watch to Rolex they will be be searching for it's serial number in their database. If it isn't in the database they will refuse to buy it. This simple fact will be pushing price of such "gray market" pieces down. This is also reason why to sell gray market Rolexes now.

We are going in opposite directions. I have a 16570 polar Explorer II on my wrist and I'm collecting an Explorer 124270 from my AD tmorrow. Diver is a 2551.80 Seamaster. But if I had to choose, I'd keep the Explorer for its true versatility and understated coolness.

I'd sell Sub first. I've had a couple of Subs in the past and ended up selling. I think you have a similar dilemma that I do. I like diver watches, and there are a ton of good divers out there. It may be the strongest watch "category" overall. So it's quite easy to find watches I like wearing just as much as the Sub. I also have an Omega Seamaster like you, and I love it. Also have an Omega PO. Some Seiko divers. As a diver lover, I couldn't just have one like the Sub. And that would lead to the dilemma you currently face - a lot of money locked up in a watch not getting much wrist time AND can be easily substituted with something else. There's a huge gap between the Sub and the other two in terms of ease of selling. But the next one would be Explorer I. Similar thought process. There are a lot of good time-only simple GADA type watches out there. Tudor's BB36. Omega AT. Basically if you have an Explorer I, you have to commit it to it being your ONLY watch, or at least your main watch. Otherwise it kind of gets lost in the shuffle and loses wrist time. Last one I'd sell (and the one I think you should keep) is the Exp II. Seems to be the only one of the 3 that has a tangible sentimental connection. But most importantly, it's a watch that doesn't have as many true competitors, and is a bit more unique than the above two. It's kind of easy to give it wrist time, especially if you get over your fear of scratching it up and losing value. If you commit to really wearing it, I think it's a watch that rewards you. But overall, I think you should do really keep both of the Explorers. They make a really good combo. Again, the Sub is the easiest sell because there are so many good divers out there.

Totally agree. No desire to wear a transactional watch like a Rolex. There's no enjoyment in it. I'd rather wear something that is a "hidden gem", that I'm unlikely to see anyone else wearing - and no one but a fellow watch enthusiast will even recognize.

Currently thinking off selling for that reason. I’ll replace with a GS quartz

I had a similar situation. Had the sub no date, explorer 1 but a moon watch instead of exp2

my first rolex is the 114060 sub no date. i hate to use the overused word, iconic, but it is just that. perfect size, perfect dial symmentry. just my opinion.....it will always stay in my collection.

Nice talk… but what we want to know is what watch are you wearing?

Keeep all 3. But if it can only be one..... Submariner, no brainer

Sell all three and get an older Explorer1. It has the 20mm lugs and is from a time when it was a true tool watch, not a fashion item.

Tough decision for you. I have the Polar 216570. Bought this in my mid 50ies as my 1rst Rolex and start of a good collection. Will keep the Polar and give it rotating to my sons…later… ♣️

Its stupid to sell now, as the prices will increase in the future due to Rolex entering the pre-owned market, people that think that Rolex will sell pre-owned for less are wrong and I tell you why: - The AD will have to get the pre-owned models to re sell them. - The AD will have to spend money servicing these pieces to allow them to get the certified pre-owned seal - Rolex never intended to make their models popular, they are shooting for exclusivity, in which case having the "certified pre-owned seal'' is a plus, hence a premium will be charged - every 2 years or so Rolex increases their MSRP, therefore they would have to pay more money when buying pre-owned, although they will pay less than a gray dealer, but they will sell it at a price above the gray market value due to the premium of the "certified pre-owned seal"

As a fellow fan and owner of a Spinnaker Dumas, it goes to show that price tags matter. I like the Dumas and the Rolex Sub, I also don't worry about banging up my fun chunky Spinnaker.

Well said, I have two Rolex which I got it many years ago was basically celebration and for special occasion, I get so pissed with Rolex now as you can’t buy them and their stores are basically ghost, while non AD has heaps of it and overpriced. To me this brand has turned into a brand that only serves people who are not genuine, many has came to be offering higher value to buy my Rolex but I decline as it holds sentimental values.

Sell them all, get a 14060M and keep the change.

From an innovative horological standpoint, Glashütte Original, the Oris 400 movement and the co-axial movements are much more inreresting. From a financial standpoint you ought to keep the Rolexes.

Sell all three buy a Casio f91w Jkg (not really but anyway) I’d keep the sub. The explorers are nice but the sub can do their job better in all aspect.

Why don’t you sell them to Rolex? They’ll pay you 25% above retail… so no one looses on their retail purchase

NO attachment whatsoever to ANY of them? Not even the Sub? Only sell them if you're absolutely sure you have a better way to use or invest the money you'll get for them, or if you actually NEED the money right now for something important. There are much worse ways to park or invest your money than modern (or vintage) Rolex stainless steel sport watches, even with what's going on in the economy and stock market. They're a pretty good tangible (and usable) asset for you, including as a hedge against inflation. Anyway, I enjoy your videos, and wish you luck in the sale(s). You do good work.

I agree with all of your reasoning for selling. Hard to justify owning such expensive pieces that don’t get wear. I sold my Explorer 2 and sold my Sub C no date and picked up a Grand Seiko SBGW231 and the new Omega Speedmaster Sapphire sandwich. I still own the 39mm Explorer 2 Mk2 and 39mm white oyster perpetual.

I wouldn't sell any of them. People who hold onto their Rolex watches for the long haul, through good times and bad, are the ones who are always rewarded in the end. My Rolex watches will get passed onto my sons eventually, and will hopefully be a special thing they can each wear and will remind them of their father when I'm gone.

Great vid and really well shot!

So what did you end up selling? All three? My dream Rolex is your exact 124270 Explorer. I’d keep that over all else.

Imho the Explorer II is a stripped GMT. Therefor I'm not a fan of it. The Explorer is a simple watch, and a great everyday watch. I wouldn't worry too much about scratching it. But it's a little bland. The Submariner is the ultimate tool watch, and the quintessential dive watch, but everyone and their grandma has one. For me it'd a toss up between the Explorer and the Submariner, if you were to keep one. Me personally, I'm saving up for my grail Rolex: The SD4K 116600. It's a Submariner on steroids, better balanced visually, and a severely underrated watch. It's a Submariner, but not the one everyone has, and is a far more interesting watch because of it. The only 40mm date watch without a cyclops. A helium escape valve. A limited production run. And a depth rating of 1220m. Of course I will take it diving, and it will incur scratches and dings no doubt, but it will be a watch with a history.

Im going to give an unconventional answer. Grand Seiko Winter, save the rest of the cash to buy stocks and other assets on sale when prices tank in 2023-2024, then in a few years you have way more than $30k to do whatever you want with. The watch choice is totally my subjective taste, tons of options in that price range.

One year ago I sold most of my watches to buy a Sub no date. One year later and I'm still searching for one, the AD's are laughing and the Grey market in Europe it's ridiculous expensive. Glad I kept my gshock!

Never sell rolex :😜

Where did you end up selling these? I struggle to find a good source to sell expensive watches. How was your selling experience any videos on it?

Rolexes are hard for other people to get primarily because there are people who solely want to use them as alternatives to cash in saving account. Watches should be for use. It’s a shame that these “opportunistic investors” are strong enough of a presence that even with millions of level production volume it’s still not able to serve the real crowd who truly need to use them as tools.

Owning 2/3 of these , I found myself wondering what if I sold them ,too, but I really like the explorer 1 and Sub . I also think how hard it would be to rebuy any of them , me being a rebuying person :)). Keep in mind also this new preowned program that will probably raise the prices up a bit on the preowned market, so maybe hold on to them for a few more months. Also before selling any of them , think long and hard on what would you replace it with and if that watch would check more boxes , hold its value more or less etc. I think your train of thought is good , I would also sell the explorer 2 first , the explorer 1 second and probably get buried with the Sub 😂

I like the Submariner no date. Like my older Railmaster, easy to pick from the shelf, some cranks and ready to go. But prefer the slimmer lugs models, so would sell them three and buy one that make your heart tick. Your Seamaster is an easy daily wearer, and those twisted lugs, there's just something about it. Just wish they would bring back those late 60's model.

Sad to see these go, but that’s a lot of $ parked there, specially if you don’t have a connection to them!

First time viewing one of your videos. I enjoyed it very much. I’ve been in a similar dilemma multiple times and have had most of the sports steel Rolexes in and out of my collection. The concern for re-acquiring at a premium is real but not impossible to overcome if you are patient. I’m currently in a Sea Dweller 16600t, 2006, Z series. I have a 7.5 wrist and am 6’2”, 220. I usually gravitate to larger watches, not so much for wrist presence but for visual balance between my wrist and hand size. Divers are my favorite. My budget is decent but not limitless so I’m often feeling uptight when there’s too much money tied up in any one piece. The other issue is ubiquity. It really bums me out to see so many subs (for instance) on other wrists. Yes, it confirms the quality of the watch, but also points towards the simple status value of wearing a Rolex to most of the people wearing them. I traded out of a maxi-case Sub into this Sea Dweller (and took some money off of the table). It wears a little smaller in dial size and diameter but has the subtlety and uniqueness I’ve been wanting in a Rolex (if that’s possible). I’ve had the 43 SD, a 41 Sub/date, a no date aluminum bezel (14060), same with date, not to mention numerous GMTS, explorer IIs. I’ve never felt comfortable keeping any of them. Or that emotionally attached. And I couldn’t figure out why. So this video was very helpful to understand my feelings which I could hear in your expression of your dilemma. I’d say sell them all and don’t look back. If you need to buy back one that you miss, you will find a deal if you are patient. I’m currently downsizing my collection to make more room for future acquisitions and to enjoy fewer watches. Too many becomes a headache for me personally and I feel like I’m neglecting them. I’ve thought of the Explorer I many times because I admire it as a marvelous design, but it’s frankly just too small visually for me and more of a museum type piece than a watch I would wear. If you keep anything, I would keep the EXP II; it’s unique and not one held by many collectors. Subs are everywhere, and with good reason, but I think there’s a compunction to have one as a collector that doesn’t stick ultimately for me. Hence, why I’ve bought and sold so many. I think this Sea Dweller is a keeper. I’ve adjusted to the visual size and the wearability (and I will wear it daily) makes it an ideal piece. It’s not one that everyone has and still scratches the Rolex itch in the diver category which is my favorite. I will miss the modern bracelet, which is a marvel. I will say the older bracelet type with solid end links wears light and still has a feeling of luxury and quality. I also wear it on a black strap from Everest that gives it a real skin diver feel. Thanks again for the content!

Life's too short to own watches you're not absolutely crazy about. Sell them all.

Nothing wrong in flipping Rolexes, right?

I’d keep the EX2 - in my eyes it’s the complete watch.

Sell all three. Replace with Grand seiko SBGE255, Tudor Ranger, and Omega 300M sandwich dial. All three would cost the same amount as the submariner.

Rolex let you sell the watch TO THEM not to grey dealers. Rolex just want to profit from grey market, which I totally approve it. Because if Rolex makes money out of used watch, stealing money from grey market, they gonna reinvest in the new models, so they (instead of grey dealers) gonna sell them to people as they can increase production, so the people are more willing to enter their AD and let’s say wait 1 or 2 months instead of 1 year. This is a plan to (rightfully) reappropriate and relocate funds and resources FROM grey disgusting market (which has nothing to do with Rolex), TO mother Rolex. I totally approve this.

I’d keep the Sub, all day everyday. If Polar Exp 2 were in the equation, then the decision would be much more difficult. I am in a similar situation. I have 4 Rolex , Sub , Polar Exp 2, OP41 Blue and DJ36 white dial with jubilee bracelet. Which one do I keep?

Paul Newman Daytona has many scratches, right ? Was a bad sell ? Nope.