Tiny Whoop King? moBeetle by HappyModel, better than Mobula6? 

Thanks! 😃

🤙 thanks Chris!

you were right! (Although to be fair, the mob 6 was my fav whoop bnf before this). You recognized the greater potential to be unlocked. Does the mobeetle meet your standards?

@@JonE5FPV Nope it didn't meet my standard: -I wish they made a molded canopy rather than using my worst design without telling it. -I wish the make the motor with lower KV, no PCB on motor base and no unibell since my experience prove me that brass bushing will wear out faster and it doesn't prevent magnet from slidding (ask Nick burns). -I wish they finally ditch that C-clips on top of the bell. -I wish they made it sub 16g (totaly doable) -I wish they don't add that useless carbon frame and sell it cheaper... 150€ for a HM BNF... NO THANKS !!! -I wish we have a new UL analog cam rather than that nano 3 that keep getting worst each year. -I wish they made the FC with no RX since EP2 are only 0.5g and ELRS SPI is a pain in the a*s to update and too much power asking for F4. -I wish the VTX ground pad worked... (don't waste your time at soldering dipole or CP antenna, it make absolutely no change) -I wish the VTX power aren't random (on 3 FC 2 are noticeably worst than the other) -I wish HM stop using used components. -I wish they stop being cheap and replace the DOA FC rather than asking people to pay for shipping them back. -I wish they made a new 65 frame after 4 years using this one with awfull duct design. -I wish they shipped it with 250mAh LiPo. Yes, as Joshua said I'm too picky but we don't improve by licking a*s !!! Keep the good work Jon !👊

Yes that frame design is a non sense, just a bad rip of my 11g build: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xdfTLfIJprA.html Please don't use it unless you want to bend some shaft and motor base...

@@DonJohnsonFPV can it be easily modded to NOT suck? Or just trash carbon frame Don? 😕🤷‍♂️ I trust ACTUAL R.C. folks over ChYnAh corp.commie

yes, the cc2500 chip doesn't go as far as the vtx, the elrs version is worth it

Most whoop frames are a standard size and swappable

It does. There’s three holes in the back part of the TPU to choose different camera angles.

@@lestarfpv coolio😎

Hmmm could be need to change settings from ntsc to pal (or vice Versa ) in betaflight. Try that. But normally could just be a bad camera if that doesn’t work.

Yes, i believe it has teeny tiny pads.

mobeetle6 1s

both will have similar video performance as they both use a tiny whip antenna.

The canopy has 3 slots to set the angle, also can lower it by cutting the tpu a bit

@@eedok Brilliant thanks!!!

I would for sure differ to ciotti’s guidance on whoops. He is the whoop master. Thanks for passing it along.

lol, well to be fair my mob6 vtx still works. so results inconclusive here

I have the same question 🙋‍♂️👍

Well... Let's go: 1 - the antenna is too big, so to be TBS Tracer would be a better option. 2 - TBS's stuff is proprietary, not open source. So no one can make receivers compatible with their systems. 3 - TBS doesn't make those little boards either...

@@MCsCreations so could Tracer in theory work then? Cheers for your answer brother ✊🤗

@@bugsy742 Sure, it's 2.4Ghz. The issue is to find a board with a Tracer receiver onboard. And ELRS isn't compatible, unfortunately.

@@MCsCreations you forget to talk about the latency... crossfire latency is so baaaaad, especially when flying tight spot !

lol, need to make a belly button lint-centric 2nd channel

i do wish they were a little better, maybe ive been lucky, since i have only killed the 2S larger version so far, but i dont hardcore race whoops *(yet)