Top 25 BEST LEGO Star Wars Sets of ALL TIME 

All solid choices, Vader's Castle and the U-wing were considered for this list.

The U wing really is the most sleek and beautiful sets in my collection

I am dying for a U wing remake. I’ve told my friends if they release a UCS version, I’m buying it on the spot.

@@ZeeNoodle Would love a new version, but I'm not convinced LEGO will do it

Same here, wish mine was still built.

Yeah you’re probably right :/

Same here!

Thank you!

Yessss my thoughts exactly

Yeah, that set was revealed like 2 days after I made this video. When I recorded this the rumor was that set was going to be a Death Star play set.

Without the little robot from the game🥺👍

That set is not that good tbh. Way overpriced and smaller than past super destroyer

This video was uploaded before that set was revealed.

@@BrickologyProductions what do u think about it? I think it looks great

@@Blazey looks solid, but a bit too small. I’ll buy it eventually

That new one sucks it’s way to small and overpriced

I didn’t count the Tantive per my criteria

Thanks! I ultimately didn’t count that set because it was only available through LEGO

Nice!

Technically that is a UCS set so it did not count

Yeah that’s a good one for sure

I hate that set with a burning passion

Thank you!

@@BrickologyProductions no worries mate.

All worthy choices

I don’t have it and I think some aspects of the build have shown it’s age poorly. Not sure it’s in my Top 50

Yeah that set was revealed just a few days after I made this video

Huh?

All worthy choices!

Yeah you’re probably right.

Nah that is a different mold introduced in 2015.

@@BrickologyProductions i mean the a wing from 2019

Absolutely

I think that’s the most overrated set out there. Not a huge fan

@@BrickologyProductions interesting, was and is defnietly my favourite play set after the battle of endor

I can see a debate but the original started the trend. Had to give it some props

So you're saying I got 7 wrong?

@@BrickologyProductions Im saying I got 18 of the 25 you have listed

@@BrickologyProductions OMG mate Im just saying I own 18 of the 25 sets you have enlisted, nothing bad

@@gbrickstudios ahhhh that makes more sense

Not every set can make the list!

All good sets (besides the 1999 N-1 I hate that thing)

WHAAAA

Yeah the 2015 version. Great set but I prefer the one with the Vulture droid

I made it pretty clear at the start of the video that UCS sets were not eligible for this list.

I've never been a big fan of that set. The wheels look super off to me.

That’s a UCS set

@@BrickologyProductions Oh ok my bad

Cool set but doesn't feel Top 25 worthy

Yup

U mean sandcrawler?

@@yokolama ya sorry

Never been a huge fan of that set. The colors are weird to me and it was blown out of the water by the UCS version.

Well you shouldn’t base your entire opinion on the set based on figures. The build is one of the best I’ve ever seen.

Oh but I do! If they want to charge premium prices, with telling us they would provide only the best in their slogan. And it’s not up to that quality for that price, I will speak with my wallet and not buy it. 🤷‍♂️ If you just compare Star Wars and they’re minifigures to other themes and minifigs, there is sometimes a big gap in quality of their product. Even if it’s a good build, I refuse to spend money on the other flaws that could have easily been prevented. But till this day they refuse to listen to thousands of fans speaking out, than I refuse to spend premium prices on such flawed products. Everything was fine in the past, but somehow they just keep ruining stuf several years later.🤷‍♂️ I’d rather buy an older AT-TE just because the quality wasn’t only in the build, but in every aspect of the set.

I'm glad you're not buying it if you don't like it, but minifigurs are ultimately a very small chunk of the actual set. You should decide to buy a $140 set based on the quality of the build, that's 95% of the plastic included. The figures are also solid, and you get a lot of them. Is the print a little off? Sure, but it's not like the worst thing I've ever seen. Cody looks spectacular as well. Just sell the other figs if you truly hate them so much.

@@BrickologyProductionsyes I understand your perspective and opinion on it as well. But than I’d still give LEGO money for not putting in the effort to fix smaller but notable mistakes. This might just be how I see it, but minifigures are indeed a small portion of the set, but a very important one at that. You can have a cool Walker, but if the troops surrounding and controlling the Walker aren’t cool, it instantly downgrades the walker for me. Okay Cody is cool and the AT-TE is one of the best we’ve seen. But that’s not an excuse for all the rest being flawed. Such as the Spider droid, which should have been a Crab droid. LEGO’s respond to that? “Oh we hadn’t even considered that🤔” while in a lot of shots from the movie, there are clearly crab droids. Stuf like that is just research not done right. Like I don’t feel the love put in to the set as I do with some others. Just this set alone is an example. There’s countless other flaws to point out in other sets. Such as a lot of fake marketing these days, the new visual dictionary just copying and pasting old stuf that should’ve been updated on some pages, the inaccurate prints on the Commander Fox figure in de the newest gunship set. And than we haven’t even talked about the gunship itself … We could go on and on about all small things that could be fixed VERY easily.🤷‍♂️ Don’t know if you still want to read this, but if you did, I hope it explained my perspective on the matter a little better. I had fun discussing this with you, and I understand your point of view and opinions on this as well. I will just not support the flaws they make on such important things for a lot of fans.

I understand your point of view, I just disagree that these flaws make or break the set. I ultimately buy LEGO for the builds and building experience. I love figs as much as the next guy, but they don't ruin a set for me (unless the build is garbage). I also think the figures look pretty good and better than they used to. When I was a kid, we'd be lucky to get back printing. Now everything has crazy detail and people complain when something isn't print all over or has a slight inaccuracy. It's a topic I might discuss in a video at some point, I think we as LEGO fans are getting too entitled.

10?!? Wanna give me one?

You're beating me, I only have 7!

I've always thought that set is overrated

I don't have the set, but I'm not sure it's better than anything I listed here

@@BrickologyProductions Dang, you’re really missing out on a great set.

NOOOOO that's tragic. Awesome memories though.

Honestly all good sets, maybe besides the Conveyex (that thing is super inaccurate)

Mine hasn't had any issues, but I do not have any kids haha

I agree. I don’t really think of it as a Playset. It is great for display. Looks amazing next to Krennic’s shuttle. I have both on stands with Scythe in front forming Overlapping V angles

That’s a hot take! Love it. I never even considered that set TBH

I specified at the beginning of the video it wasn’t eligible

NGL I kind of forgot about 9500. Great set and has a strong argument for this list.

Short run, got two myself

As do I

Solid choice

@@BrickologyProductions at least I can hold it by the sides and doesn't have any gaps

Cody was not in that Turbo Tank set. It’s 327th Star Corps (Phase 2).

@@BrickologyProductions damn, i just looked that up, and you are absolutely right! I‘m sorry, my fault. At least that seems like a common mistake, and is wrong labled in many reviews and online sells.

2006 X-Wing is a HOT take

It’s a 2003 set. The standards are not the same and it’s way ahead of it’s time

@@BrickologyProductions Does not change the fact that every time I touch it, its head falls, and splatters like a watermelon, leaving me to have to rebuild it.

@@Betterthanyoustudios I personally don’t have that issue with mine. Old pieces tend to be more brittle

Something about the big troop carrier is super appealing to me

Was considered, but I don’t think LEGO has ever truly nailed one of those builds

Can only include so many. Comment with your personal picks!

I specified no UCS very early on.

Nice!

The 2002 one?

Was not eligible

@@BrickologyProductions I know.. I typed that before starting your video.

Yeah that whole situation was very bizarre

@@BrickologyProductions Worse it was all founded on a lie. No one since 1983 when ROTJ came out EVER made this association… you can thank warping of political correctness and instilling incorrect symbolism in peoples minds for this kind of thing, not to mention no outright deception.

I considered it, but seniority wins sometimes

@@BrickologyProductions eeeeeh i really disagree specially that and the og AT AT

It's a tiny detail on one piece of the figure. I really don't think it's that big a deal.

Thank you!

In the video I clearly stated those sets would not be considered for the countdown. Also, the Death Star came out in 2008, not 2010.

@@BrickologyProductions regardless that Death Star is the best. I just looked at the picks but why not include those sets. The 2007 mtt, Star destroyer, clone wars at te. Those are the best sets by far. Everyone wanted those back in the day for a reason.

@@barkley8285 If I included UCS sets, the whole list would be UCS. It wouldn't have been as interesting. Did you even watch my video? The MTT was literally no. 2 on the list.

@@BrickologyProductions I mean I don’t understand disregarding those sets when you have the mtt or other big ships. When I think of UCS I think of the stupid giant Death Star or other ships that had no minifigures. The Death Star was the ultimate set with 20, it was just a bigger version of the 100$ sets like the barge, gunship, at te, etc. I’ve never considered any of those to be ucs.

@@barkley8285 because UCS sets are bigger, have more detail, and are less accessible. I wanted to make the list play scale sets only. Simple as that

Okayyyyy

L take. I included plenty of sets from movies/shows that aren't good. The basis for the list in not the quality of the source material, it's the actual set itself.