Тёмный

Tough Choice: Which Fighter Jet is Best for the Philippines Against China? F-16 or JAS Gripen? 

Defense News
Подписаться 3,4 тыс.
Просмотров 29 тыс.
50% 1

In an effort to strengthen its air defenses, the Philippines is considering two main fighter options: The F-16 from the United States and the Saab JAS 39 Gripen from Sweden. Both aircraft have their own advantages and disadvantages that make the selection an important strategic decision for the Philippine military.
#defensenews #f16fighterjet #saabgripen

Опубликовано:

 

11 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 158   
@user-uc9tt1kd4u
@user-uc9tt1kd4u Месяц назад
Ok..buy Grifpen and F-16 the two half of them...Go...go...we need badly MRF fighters jet indeed to booster our air defense.. Mabuhay Philippines 🇵🇭👍👍💪
@CoffeBuz
@CoffeBuz Месяц назад
Philippines faces the same issues as the Thai Airforce. Either Gripen C/D or F-16 Block 50. (Though Thailand's situation is Gripen E vs. F-16 Block 70). It's a tough choice. Gripen make sense economically for small countries with less Defense budgets than United States. On the other hand, there's GEOPOLITICS at play. As for the Thai case, there's still 3 squadrons of old F-16's waiting to be decommissioned. SO who ever wins the first round ensures that they'll be selected for the entire 2 remaining squadrons. Fleet diversification is highly unlikely as it increases operational costs long term. Thai major point of tender is Offset policy. Probably the make or break point actually. The datalink is also the big issue. According to the Airforce's preliminary evaluation between F-16 block70 and Gripen E, 10 criteria points of comparison were used. With the Gripen E beating 9/10 total criteria. The Gripen has a better radar, Infrared sensors, more advanced avionics for the pilots, the ability to use METEOR, dispersed deployment on upcountry roads, cheaper to operate, 10min of turnaround with only 5 crew, Datalink and electronic warfare jamming suite all inside the airframe. In many ways, I think the public sentiment in Thailand feels the Gripen E is like the lower budget F35 that Thailand first wanted but was denied by USAF. Overall, I think the Airforce believes the Gripen E stands a better chance at survival in the battlefield than the F-16b70 despite having less aero-performance. As a system, it's a more complete choice. However, the biggest issue is the need for Earieye radar support aircraft to fly in a mission. This is a huge downside. Gripen E costs $85M, F-16b70 is $80M. But like I said, it's not a done deal. Because theres the OFFSET policy that each manufacturer still have to answer to. Soon. We will hear of that. Hope the Philippines decides what's best for Philippines. Combat readiness is the most important issue here. No point to have expensive jets when you can't afford to put them up in the air for training. You need the jets to fly so it's always ready to defend. The same issue is for Thailand. Eventhough the defense budget of Thailand is higher than the Philippines, the same issue exists nonetheless. Flight cost per hour is a Huge deciding factor.
@educationcitystadiumclinic2709
@educationcitystadiumclinic2709 Месяц назад
only in the philippines suffer budget constraints and defense but in terms of money and corrupt it's easy on their pocket, but i understand our government and military that our capability to aquire new technological weaponry must be upgraded and eradicate the corrupts in the government, I am confident to the latest administration that he will do his best to achieve the goals of the country (philippines) to boost the moral of our soldier, improve the economy and prevent unemployment in the country, prevent corruption, and utilizing the tax budget of the country for the filipino people etc.
@PrayerWarriorUSA
@PrayerWarriorUSA Месяц назад
I believe the Japanese made multi-role fighters are the best ones to buy.. perhaps the Mitsubishi F-2 right now are cheaper than the Korean made T-50. Also the F-X will be coming soon? We can now acquire F-2 multi-role fighters since Ph signed a defense pact with Japan a few days ago.
@defensenews1844
@defensenews1844 Месяц назад
Thanks for your comment
@kornkernel2232
@kornkernel2232 Месяц назад
If Japan can export them and if they offer cheaper deal with support and weapons for it, then maybe yeah. F-2 is basically larger and bit more capable F-16. I believe Philippines needs at least huge numbers of fighters on its arsenal. Fewer fighters even if they are 5th Gens won't cut it. Speaking of 5th Gen, maybe Philippines just skip it and wait for future 6th Gen, maybe there will be some cheaper 6th Gen from other allied countries. PH just only need few of those to compliment existing 4.5 Gen fighters
@hernangatchalian5925
@hernangatchalian5925 Месяц назад
Gripen E Jas39 are more wise choice and lower maintenance with advance sensor and more leathal weaponry that F16 are too expensive for the Phillippines.
@louilustrisimo8142
@louilustrisimo8142 Месяц назад
Upgraded F-16 is also best for PH, or half n Half as well as for Griffin..❤️🇵🇭
@RossanoRuiz
@RossanoRuiz 2 дня назад
The best choice for urgency's sake is 2nd-hand hand F16. Quick delivery and quick defense and at least 24 units for the country.
@randygloria1037
@randygloria1037 Месяц назад
Ang Magandang Tanong Dyan ay kung may balak bang bumili ang pilipinas.kasi ang tagal na nyan.kahit isa wala man lang nabili.paulit ulit na Lang Balita nakaka umay na.
@MrYoda1972
@MrYoda1972 Месяц назад
ang tagal na nilang pinag-iisipan, panahon pa ni Digong, wala pa ring napili? F16 at SAAB Gripen lang naman, hindi limang fighter jet ang pipiliin. walang nang mangyayari dyan. matatapos nalang ang term ni PBBM wala paring mapili.
@jbats0428
@jbats0428 Месяц назад
I agree. Same information over and over again.
@richiecabale3829
@richiecabale3829 Месяц назад
Ay nko ang budget nakuha na sa eleksyun ngayung 25, wala mg aasahan..
@RalphPeligrino-mm3gr
@RalphPeligrino-mm3gr Месяц назад
Another botbot
@RalphPeligrino-mm3gr
@RalphPeligrino-mm3gr Месяц назад
Another botbot
@jay-nalbay7914
@jay-nalbay7914 Месяц назад
Gripen less maintenance, can operate in rough runways can be refueled and re arm by only 5 person. Cheaper acquisition cost with enough sensors for quick react and detection. NATO operable.. There's no need for expensive f16. Philippines need more numbers of active jet not to pour in all the budget for few jet.
@johna3142
@johna3142 Месяц назад
Gripen E costs more than F-35 and F-16V
@benktlofgren4710
@benktlofgren4710 Месяц назад
@@johna3142 You can not only count for the acquisition, you need to count flight hours and maintenance for at least 10+ years. The F-16 will become more expensive in a year or two. The lower acquisition price is just for American salesmen bogus.
@spider-man910
@spider-man910 Месяц назад
Bit small for most countries , its almost the size of a lot of trainer aircraft .....
@johna3142
@johna3142 Месяц назад
@@benktlofgren4710 interesting case is Czech Republic’s new fighter jet selection recently.
@benktlofgren4710
@benktlofgren4710 Месяц назад
@@johna3142 well they going for F-35 it looks like, they have no border to Russia so makes sense in a way. That does not make an expensive old repainted F-16 a better choice. F-35 is not a question for the Philippines it's as expensive as a Gripen E but its maintenance, turnaround, and flight hours costs are insane. You need to sign mechanics service contracts with American firms and so on.
@misterbig9025
@misterbig9025 Месяц назад
Can The Philippines afford any of them? Has it considered Indian HAL Tejas?
@timskigonzalo4074
@timskigonzalo4074 Месяц назад
Better to buy them both
@Hiho-p9x
@Hiho-p9x Месяц назад
1unit F16 = 1,000 figthing drones.
@rainnelmaclang4803
@rainnelmaclang4803 Месяц назад
F-16 is from a 1970s obsolescent design. It may have good performance now, but it can no longer take next generation weapons upgrades in the next ten to twenty years. Our potential opponents' new crop of fighters with new generation of missiles and sensors can outclass the F-16s now. We are better off looking at newly designed models like JAS-39, FA-50, HAL Tejas, etc... and future ones like KAI KF-21 Boramei and Saab-Boeing's fighter variant of the T-7 Red Hawk.
@danieltang1680
@danieltang1680 Месяц назад
I’d say the Eurofighter with the latest update is the optimal choice.
@romeosanga6109
@romeosanga6109 11 дней назад
Uninterrupted Supply chain is a vital factor to consider
@CzettCzarron
@CzettCzarron Месяц назад
No doubt, the F16 is a very excellent fighter. However, the Gripen offers the best value-for-money as it has the lowest through-life cost (Program Unit Cost) and Operating Unit Cost. Hence, the Gripen is the more flexible aircraft to own and operate.
@PrayerWarriorUSA
@PrayerWarriorUSA 27 дней назад
MRF will come down to the feedback given by Filipino pilots, value, reliability, features, financing, post sale support, and reputation/combat history. Having said this.. the F16 is the obvious choice as Japan, Singapore, Korea, Indonesia have incorporated the F16 variants into their military.. that should tell you something.. its like shopping for a car and you have a choice between toyota or saab.
@infinitechi3544
@infinitechi3544 9 дней назад
The Philippine Government should support local manufacturers by assembling any fighter jets purchased or acquired overseas, whether F-16, F-15 -USA, Grippen -Sweden even SU-30 Russia-fighter jets?Philippine Executive,Philippine Senate and Philippines Congress needs to make a provision that procure, purchase jets needs to be assembled in the Philippines for Job creation and cost effectiveness in maintenance training and cost, two Jet engines at-least and one-two cockpit configuration. Peace
@johna3142
@johna3142 Месяц назад
Gripen E- if you want "low cost" to operate, BVR, EW advantage F-16- if you want logistics, user base and quantity advantage
@defensenews1844
@defensenews1844 Месяц назад
Thanks for your comment
@marukudo8532
@marukudo8532 Месяц назад
Good point. However, Gripen less cost to operate is far more better so that our pilots can train more.
@edwinsalindong4989
@edwinsalindong4989 Месяц назад
Gripen-E ang pinaka-matindi sa lahat..Dun pa lang sa Cockpit na Flat Panel display ay malaking advantage na para maging madali ang trabaho ng Piloto..Kung pag usapan naman ang Sensor system ay lamang na lamang ang Gripen para ma-detect agad ang kalaban kahit malayo posisyon.. Kahit walang GPS ay alam ng Gripen kung saan ang posisyon nya...Ang pinaka-maganda ay meron malakas na Internal Jammer ang Gripen para lituhin ang kalaban at hindi sya ma-detect nito..
@cesarvelchez6527
@cesarvelchez6527 Месяц назад
kahit wharthog lang okay na!
@defensenews1844
@defensenews1844 Месяц назад
Thanks for your comment
@Kihfytgfcd
@Kihfytgfcd Месяц назад
F16 💪🇺🇸🇵🇭💪
@alesh2275
@alesh2275 Месяц назад
Sweden is in the middle of its own Gripen upgrade and, from what I know, doesn’t really have the capacity to ramp up its Gripen production for other markets ..
@benktlofgren4710
@benktlofgren4710 Месяц назад
F-16 is not on par with Gripen E, anyone who claims so is a US fanboy. Also, to have an effective jet, you need a well-trained Pilot who knows the plane in and out. The maintenance and flight hour costs are extreme on the F-16 side, F-16 does nothing good if you can not afford to have the personnel trained in a top-notch manner. I do not even have to mention the bonus of dispersed usage of the Gripen, it is already clear what the winner is.
@edwinsalindong4989
@edwinsalindong4989 Месяц назад
Agr😮ee..The weapon system alone that is included is already a winner.. It has many sensor system that you cannot find in F-16 even the latest version.. The Canard, Flat Panel Display, MAW, Internal Jammer for Electronic Attack and Supercruise ability are all the essential component that you cannot found in F-16..
@benktlofgren4710
@benktlofgren4710 Месяц назад
@@edwinsalindong4989 correct and on top of it F-16 is designed for US style of warfare and supply chains. None of that fits the Phillipines while the Gripen checks all boxes. The Philippines needs a jet that can act as a deterrent to prevent attacks in the first place, and defend the Philippines if the worst happens, and do as much damage as possible until foreign aid arrives.
@defensenews1844
@defensenews1844 Месяц назад
Thanks for your comment
@benktlofgren4710
@benktlofgren4710 Месяц назад
@@defensenews1844 also no mention of Meteor and RBS 15 Mk4 Gungnir, named after Odin spear that never misses and is so well balanced so anyone can throw it :) When I think of it SAAB produces most of the things the Philippines needs, Subs, Jets, Ships, small, Assault boats, Torpedos, Anti-ship Missiles, and a lot more. All designed to defend a huge archipilago that contains even more islands than in the Philippines. As a Swede, i hope we strengthen the connection between our nations even more. If you want tech transfer and a chance to have some produced at home, SAAB is who you want to deal with.
@TheBongReyes
@TheBongReyes Месяц назад
This has become pretty comically. It seems every 2-3 months the Philippines finds ways not to make a decision. I really think the Philippines will never decide on either the Gripen or the F-16. And, eventually, will settle on more upgraded FA-50s. It’s really not that hard of a choice. Either the Gripen or the F-16 will be a significant upgrade to their Air Force. I’ve seen comments for months… “The right price…” Well, both are similar in cost. Gripen is cheaper to maintain. F-16 is more numerous and have a large worldwide stockpile of parts. If the Philippines wants to bargain shop then just buy more FA-50s from South Korea. They’ll be able to achieve 70-75% the capabilities provided by the Gripen or the F-16. Better than what they’ve had before.
@spider-man910
@spider-man910 Месяц назад
F 16 far more superior , the latest block variant has a whole host of upgrades from all weather radar to advanced avionics ...to the latest air to air missiles ...
@Munchkinz11
@Munchkinz11 Месяц назад
The maintenance though compared to the Gripen which just needs few personnel to maintain.
@chillxxx241
@chillxxx241 Месяц назад
I’m not sure if the can afford the newest variant of F-16. Not many militaries would pick the Gripen. Very few operated by just Brazil, South Africa, Czech Republic, Thailand and Hungary. Seems to be more of a “stop gap”. Thailand now uses more F-16s. Brazil is in negotiations to purchase 24 F-16s. Czechia is upgrading to the F-35. Hungary would like F-16s, but can’t afford them. South Africa really no longer has an Air Force.
@johna3142
@johna3142 Месяц назад
@@Munchkinz11 maintenance and support will not be a problem since there are a lot of third parties which can supply spare parts or can do MRO services of F-16s. Also the current existing EDCA provisions, VFA and JUSMAG where US sourced hardwares owned by PH have advantages in sustainment.
@johna3142
@johna3142 Месяц назад
@@chillxxx241 Thailand and Hungary are leaning towards a Gripen E buy. And Brazil, they are studying to buy used F-16 since their soon to be retired AMX jets need replacement and producing more batches of Gripen E takes a while and costs more.
@chillxxx241
@chillxxx241 Месяц назад
@@johna3142 Wasn’t aware of this news. It also seems they are still looking to send Gripens to Ukraine in the future too.
@luisitobanez7616
@luisitobanez7616 Месяц назад
Just to please the US, PAF should consider purchasing 1 Squadron of F16, the rest is Gripen EF variants or 2 Squadrons of FA 50's with upgraded version
@regorflora7915
@regorflora7915 Месяц назад
best agains china is not a fighter plane nor more warships. we simply cannot compete against china, they will always have more. Mpapagastos lang tayo dyan. what we need is a small tactical nuclear missiles. mas low maintenance, at requires less manpower compare sa eroplano at barko, at higit sa lahat kamak na mas epektibong deterence laban sa china. A nuclear arm PH will gain china's respect.
@seekersoul3439
@seekersoul3439 Месяц назад
Buy both.
@JuanitoCabanit
@JuanitoCabanit 22 дня назад
The Philippines will buy both
@josephmariealba8483
@josephmariealba8483 Месяц назад
Gripen is more suitable to Philippines as an archipelago. The planes can easily be distributed all over the country.
@jasonchia2352
@jasonchia2352 Месяц назад
suggest F15 and F35
@infinitechi3544
@infinitechi3544 11 дней назад
RP government should get 20 jets whether Grippen vs F-16 request the variant with larger wing span than regular F-16 wings with provisions on transfer of maintenance technology. Get a high end 30 drones size of MQ-1 or latest model drones with dual use for the coast guard and military requirements from different branches of the DND) with variant that can carry missiles and bombs, also capable in electronic warfare jammers or communications intrusion. Peace
@TonyChua-y3q
@TonyChua-y3q Месяц назад
Why don't we bought 12 units of F-16 and 14 units of Griffen which Sweden offered as last year.
@Ophirian-kt8ep
@Ophirian-kt8ep Месяц назад
Go for Gripen😊
@TonyChua-y3q
@TonyChua-y3q Месяц назад
Dapat bumili na may budget na ata pra sa PAF. Yaan Air force Ang ist line of defense nation second Ang PN.. kaya importante na bumili na as soon as possible. PAF
@spider-man910
@spider-man910 Месяц назад
Gripens disadvantage is it's range and ceiling height , its powerplant is 1/3 rd less that of its rival ...weight to thrust ratio is a disadvantage. .... compared to. F 16 ...
@berniemorales9072
@berniemorales9072 Месяц назад
Pwede naman drop tank
@ryanreclozado5072
@ryanreclozado5072 Месяц назад
Buy a dozen F16 and a dozen Gripen E and that's it ! 😊
@Psalm_96_2_KJV
@Psalm_96_2_KJV Месяц назад
Hindi po sila pwede bumili ng parehas. dapat 1 lang ang piliin nilang multirole para pareparehas at hindi malito ang mga sundalo sa paggamit.
@yousteady
@yousteady Месяц назад
JAS Gripen E, is cheaper to operate and has more time to patrol in the air. Less crew and less runway to operate.
@JuanitoCabanit
@JuanitoCabanit 22 дня назад
The Philippines will buy both so there is no competition.
@nitinat8181
@nitinat8181 Месяц назад
I believe that in the end the Philippines will definitely be forced by the Americans to buy the F16.
@lancegallego1862
@lancegallego1862 Месяц назад
Why not both?
@efrenplaza
@efrenplaza Месяц назад
When we, US tax payers, give Philippines $500 million to help upgrade their military capability, it's prudent to reciprocate by buying US made and also for interoperability with US aircrafts and ease of implementing future upgrades. Utang na loob na nga babayaran mo ng pagbili ng iba. Hindi naman ugali ng Filipino yun.
@memodelapena2890
@memodelapena2890 Месяц назад
F15 EX 😊
@arminjoemarblanche1948
@arminjoemarblanche1948 21 день назад
Gripen is better for long term
@infinitechi3544
@infinitechi3544 10 дней назад
Forget that F-16 or Grippen buy a modern version of mig-29 with caveat that mig-29 (50) order will need to be manufactured in the Philippines with a transfer of technology as of now, Lockheed and SAAB will not transfer the technology of F-16 or Grippen even purchasing 60 fighter jets the USA also purchase mig-29, as an archipelagic country it requires a twin engine jet fighters with one and two seater configuration. The Philippine need to follow Taiwan they designed and built their own version of F-16. Peace
@rab3492
@rab3492 Месяц назад
Depende yan magkano maipasok sa bulsa...
@user-ic4dp3bl2z
@user-ic4dp3bl2z Месяц назад
❤❤❤❤❤
@Mudbakit
@Mudbakit Месяц назад
Why not buy F35 instead
@wenwensr.8718
@wenwensr.8718 Месяц назад
BUY NOW!
@divinavergara1432
@divinavergara1432 Месяц назад
Both of them. EMV777
@bennuredjedi
@bennuredjedi Месяц назад
The F2 or Tejas Mk1A or the KA50 upgraded single seat variant
@defensenews1844
@defensenews1844 Месяц назад
Thanks for your comment
@leon-z6r
@leon-z6r 28 дней назад
F16 latest version 12 units
@rolandjosef7961
@rolandjosef7961 Месяц назад
F-16V
@r_ic7
@r_ic7 Месяц назад
Warthog only you can afford
@mikhelmartires4755
@mikhelmartires4755 Месяц назад
Para sa akin GRIPEN... KNG ANO ANG KAYA NG BUDGET DON DAPAT MAG FOCUS NG MAGKAROON AGAD TYO DI UNG PURO ISIP ISIP WALA NMANG SAPAT NA BUDGET KAYA HANGGANG NGAYON WALA PA TYON MRF JETS 😭😭😭😭
@quazars236
@quazars236 26 дней назад
mas maganda yung pinaglumaan at araw araw maghingi ka ng code para makapag paandar.. puppet is life!
@Abdul_hanif123
@Abdul_hanif123 Месяц назад
Gripen more relevant it can landing at hiway Luzon and Mindanao Island
@prafullamohantakumar8941
@prafullamohantakumar8941 19 дней назад
Gripen is a best fighter jet than F16
@alvinsangutan6266
@alvinsangutan6266 Месяц назад
Bilhin na yong dalawa grepen f16 tag 1sguadron para malakas pang depensa sa west ph sea
@senioritovictorioofficial4317
@senioritovictorioofficial4317 Месяц назад
SAAB Gripen E is good
@defensenews1844
@defensenews1844 Месяц назад
Thanks for your comment
@johnvball9
@johnvball9 Месяц назад
F-16…because the proven aircraft.
@r_ic7
@r_ic7 Месяц назад
KF - 21 no maentenance less expensive, deadly and Sophisticated only for philippines
@rumjundelgado7822
@rumjundelgado7822 Месяц назад
2trillion defense budget this year..
@kalayaanngbayan
@kalayaanngbayan Месяц назад
Sa panaginip mo lng yan naniwala kpa😂😂😂
@HuwagSalangin
@HuwagSalangin 26 дней назад
Go get the F16 and then upgrade to KF-21 next.
@ireneclark745
@ireneclark745 Месяц назад
after US gave 500M usd, you have no options 😅
@sh1nyarm0r
@sh1nyarm0r Месяц назад
F-35
@MilagrosCaguin
@MilagrosCaguin Месяц назад
F50 din kz Lockheed Martin din yn
@WilfredoMarin-w1k
@WilfredoMarin-w1k Месяц назад
get them both pra lalong mlkas
@sergegenobaten4418
@sergegenobaten4418 17 дней назад
Hahay until now wala pa tayong mrf
@gilbertvoy6422
@gilbertvoy6422 Месяц назад
😂😂😂😂😂yung mga nag cocomments akala mo meron talagang maraming alam sa mga uri ng fighter jets😂😂😂😂
@MilagrosCaguin
@MilagrosCaguin Месяц назад
Na sa piloto yn
@michaelcalderon1405
@michaelcalderon1405 Месяц назад
Gripen E is more expensive than F16 blk 50/70 . F16 is more proven fighter jets than gripen jets.so please pick f16.
@BasilLeaf-o4c
@BasilLeaf-o4c Месяц назад
Philippines is undergoing a famine at the moment many are starving. I think the Philippines can better spend tax payers money on feeding the people than on weapons.
@Yannickille
@Yannickille Месяц назад
Rafale is the best😂😂😂
@marukudo8532
@marukudo8532 Месяц назад
F2 ng Japan.
@byron8657
@byron8657 Месяц назад
Yah F16 high cost high maintenance JAS Gripen 39E low cost easy low maintenance k!
@jhingabrigo6974
@jhingabrigo6974 Месяц назад
Tora-tora nalang, hahahaha😂
@reydetomas7912
@reydetomas7912 Месяц назад
Habang corruption Hindi makakabili
@Jung-p3k
@Jung-p3k Месяц назад
Gripen, F16 현명한 선택으로 좋은 전투기 구입하길 바랍니다.
@avionicsmanteddy
@avionicsmanteddy Месяц назад
Both aircraft will not sale to Phil. 3 president have negociate nothing has come on story for vlogging 😂😂😂😂
@itch4travel
@itch4travel Месяц назад
Kanino gagamitin yan, wala naman airforce ang NPA ? 😁😅🤣😂
@gerardoavila2141
@gerardoavila2141 Месяц назад
F-16
@danieljuanson5502
@danieljuanson5502 Месяц назад
F-16
Далее
The F-35 Has Met its Match
44:16
Просмотров 254 тыс.
F-16 vs Gripen E - Which would win?
9:49
Просмотров 1,1 млн
China's NEW Giant Aircraft Carrier is a Nightmare
21:13
Pinakamalakas na Fighter Jet ng Pilipinas
9:32
Просмотров 368 тыс.
Exercise Iron Wolf tests NATO forces in Lithuania
8:20