Please test the latest Huawei Watch GT5 and GT5 Pro if possible, particularly on how well they do with sports, with and without external sensors. Maybe even compare it/them with the Amazfit T-Rex 3? Thanks!!
Just upgraded from my Watch 2 to Watch 5 and im pretty happy and software wise (yeah its similiar) pretty impressed how nice it feels and looks now - like a "real" Smartwatch before the software on my older watch 2 felt a bit meh and cheap. Still not a FULL Watch like an Apple Watch but for the Price? Yeah and the sensors on Huawei Watches are always pretty accurate on the better side.
there is also the cmf neckband pro 2 that you should look into, I'm using it and it's good, can dual connect android+ios, has low lag, and anc/transparency
Seems like great value for money in both cases. Makes you wonder about the mark-up on garmin or Apple. Will be good to see how they perform in a run etc. nice one.
Can honestly say don't bother with the watch if you want even mild Accuracy. It's terrible for training. But then you wouldn't expect it to be good at this price point. As a basic smart watch however it's worth the money. The buds pro 2 on the other hand I think deliver great sound quality and features for the price. I use them as a backup, but that's because I use airpods mostly.
@@ChaseTheSummit I kinda do have to question a watch that records a heart rate of 68 when it’s not even being worn. But for sure it’s going to be interesting to see your results and how accurate you find it.
@@blackhawk69100 that can happen if you're near a light source that has a flicker frequency close to that of a heart rate. Even expensive watches can exhibit that strange anomaly! But yes, I need more testing on this one.
Super interested in how well the watch performs out and about. As a watch it seems great! I really think watches are absolutely overpriced nowadays (everything has a premium price, for no premium reason besides 'they can'). We need more disruptors like Carl Pei (founder of oneplus and nothing) to remind people we are being ripped off. Market rate does not equal good value. Coros kinda did this too, but admittedly I feel they have stagnated a bit.
@@scriptosaurusrex I’ve had the watch pro 2 for nearly 2 months. It’s not accurate by a long shot. In fact for me personally HR on a run was shockingly bad. Says I didn’t get over 145bpm, but according to my polar H10, I peaked at 172bpm. The correlation between both didn’t watch at all. Sleep tracking was fairly accurate I will say. Most tech is over priced but there’s a limit to how cheap you can go. Pro 2 is fine as a cheap watch to measure general vitals with a pinch of salt. But it’s best used as a smart watch really. On that front it’s good value for money.
@@ChaseTheSummit cool, I am staying with my 15 Pro Max 😜 not impressed by 16 yet due to apple's AI delays...just in wait and see mode ..anyhow 15 Pro's support AI to most part
@@ChaseTheSummit yup, 👍 16 Pro increased its weight to 199g even though its dimensions are pretty similar to 15 pro except screen estate from 6.1 to 6.3 with slimmer bezel, needles to let you know you being pro and reviewer of phones now a days 🤣🤣
I would agree that it's unlikely an Apple Watch or Garmin user would switch to a CMF Watch Pro 2. This is a budget option for those who want to spend under $70. The E-Waste statement... I can't confirm until I fully test. Thanks for tuning in!
Nothing watch 1 had all these features. NONE of them worked. Step count didnt work sleep didnt work workouts didnt track anything accurately. Nothing has changed for watch 2. If you want a watch that tells time go for it but if you want anything that accurately tracks anything (besides the time) stay away.
