Underwood Ammo 90gr 9mm +P+ Xtreme Defender Ballistics Gel Test 

thats right. And best 45. check out grindhard ammo.

As someone with a background in physics I feel compelled to point out that these bullets would not damage ACTUAL tissue beyond the bullet's diameter, the laws physics confirm this... Firstly lets think about hollow points and their expansion. The more energy they dump into the target, by the law of the conservation of energy/momentum, the more force it is applying to the target, and as a result, this loss of energy slows the bullet as the bullet itself damages more tissue. So, if we assumed the mechanism of damage in the bullets works, that resistance-force, redirected as 4 focused perpendicular-vectors, can actually tear/cut gel, and that they are not just stretching gelatin beyond gelatin's extremely low elastic limit (aka tearing point), then an EXPLANATION as to why the bullet isn't slowing-down when doing so is needed. It should he slowing down if it is actually imparting damaging force to the tissue, and the gel is not stretching too much. if perpendicular vectors were damaging the tissue, and again not just stretching it beyond gelatin's extremely low elastic limit*, the bullet would slow down like any hollowpoints does when damag9ng additional tissue. It would have to expend tremendous energy as some kind of unknown terminal ballistics wounding mechanism, such as theorized "jets" of gelatin/tissue/fluid that people say this bullet uses. But if it did that, the amount of energy it would take to creates "jets", or some other mechanism, that is strong enough to CUT FLESH would SLOW the bullet tremendously just as any energy conversion does. If it was cutting tissue, with whatever mechanism the perpendicular vectors are using, it would DECELERATE the bullet tremendously, just as normal resistance in wounding does... this is undeniable physics! The fact this bullet doesn't slow down when producing, what assume to be, tissue damage is evidence that is creating those tears via exploiting the poor elasticity of ballistics gelatin, a material weakness that actual flesh does not have. *About gelatins low elasticity and tensile strength: If you bend block a block of ballistics gel in half, it will tear almost or entirely in half. If you bend or stretch animal tissue in the same ways you will get zero tears. The medium, ballistics gel, was not to test stretching forces created by fluting on the bullet face like these have. Its merely meant to show damage of a physical object has past through a section of it... that's why we know with rifle rounds tested in gelatin you don't count the "permanent stretch cavity" as actual wounding, because though it tore the gel, such stretching doesn’t tear flesh. The xtreme penetrators & defenders are creating small overly stretched focal point in the gelatin that leave marks similar to hollowpoints was their flattened sections pass through the gel. If you took engineering physics (especially if you took a curriculum on thermodynamics), you should understand that if this round was imparting enough force to damage the tissue BEYOND THE DIAMETER OF THE BULLET ITSELF (and just gelatin being gelatin and tearing when it stretches) the bullet not would penetration in the same manner a a FMJ / Ball round. If it was imparting enough force to damage tissue beyond its diameter, it would be the laws of physics, DECELERATE as it expends energy damaging the simulated tissue. Instead you are seeing gelatin stretch due to the shape of the bullet converted head-on resistant forces perpendicular vertical vertices of force expelled at the and of the channels/recesses formed between the screw-driver like blades. And even if you assume this mechanism works, you have to admit the tissue has the ability to stretch without ripping like gelatin... so AT MOST the bullet would create a temporary stretch cavity the length bullet path, bit focused in four perpendicular vertices of forces instead of an equal force in all directions due to the fluking on the bullet. Again stretch cavities do not damage real tissue and if they can, they will slow the bullet by the laws of physics.

@@testing2741 well from what I know the xtreme defender does indeed decelerate a huge amount. I’ve seen them being compared to the xtreme penetrators, (same weight same caliber), only differences being the depth of the bullet fluting; and deceleration is significantly a lot on the defenders. So via your explanation I’m assuming that the xtreme defender fluting is doing tearing and damage as intended. Thank you for putting a scholarly angle on the subject.

@@carlossolis9824 Yep , recognizing the velocity of the Underwood Defender being significantly higher and penetration being less than the slower hollowpoint when shooting into jell through cloth material would mean it's dumping energy more efficiently and with the ability to go through auto glass with little to no deflection would make this round a +P++ . Does anyone have a test of auto glass deflection and penetration with this round ?

Stick a rack of thick ribs in a kevlar vest and a few layers of denim in front of your gel. Your JHP will become a ball round and not penetrate and the Lehigh will be 12-13" into your gel with the same damage. Your test is flawed, this round was designed to be "barrier blind". Realistically, it's barrier 20/10. You can shoot through tempered auto glass without breaking it's trajectory & it certainly won't petal on the glass before it's trajectory is broken. I bought up Underwood +P and +P+ from Midway USA @.$85/round when it was new on the market. My grandfather carries a little Sig P938 in Wyoming up in the mountains on his land and the Extreme Penetrator saved his life from an attacking grizzly. You'd need to mag dump a drum of gold dot's or any JHP to even pray for those results. Lehigh/Underwood are the bee's knee's!!

I have hst and also +p 68 for my carry. Hst because it shows bigger initial wounds. Underwood for everything else plus its known for tumbling a few times on slow mo.

I've seen a video from another guntuber that compared this ammo with critical defense. Somehow, when shot through wood, the critical defense' hollowpoint cavity was sufficiently clogged to prevent expansion despite the polymer flex tip intended to prevent that. The overpenetration that ensued was kinda nuts. The xtreme defense seems to be the best 9mm round Ive seen so far. Have you seen anything comparable?

Exactly. The lehigh/underwood is more reliable to perform under any conditions.

I use Extreme Defense in all my pistols, and Controlled Chaos in my long guns. Hope to avoid trying it on a 2 legged target, but I have confidence that it will perform admirably.

Yes can u imagine them in 45 that's two holes in and out

@@TheRealZJE313 Yep- I rock the Underwood in .45 SUPER. - 120 gr Extreme Defender @1600Fps./700ft/lbs. It's remarkable. It works. Looks a .308 in gel.

I just bought some for my 92 also. I got over exited and also order 2200 more rounds in +p

Eyy 92c carry gang the rounds just have a built in flash bang. If you want to have fun run the 150gr hst micro out of the 92c. Didn’t have any issue cycling and felt like I was shooting a 32

The government actually tested these on beef and found out that their performance was vastly superior to every other round. drive.google.com/file/d/1Z6gdk_JdqKkYlUHqABWwb8Bh8dK2rHqo/view

How does the +p+ underwood do in your hellcat? Any issues? Recoil? I’m considering buying some for mine. I’ve ordered a stronger guide rod/spring in preparation.

Yea but keep in mind that tissue affected by the temporary stretch cavity only gets damaged when you have rifle velocity around 2000fps or more.

@@rickterrance4981 Not necessarily. Dr. Fackler's estimation of ~2200 fps, and others' around 2000 fps, are limited to ammo/variables then at hand. Projectile velocity, BC, mass, sectional density, and shape all affect whether TSC --> PWC. For instance, a .300 BLK super pushing around 1800-2000 fps out of a 5.5" pistol/SBR will produce rifle wounding within 100-150 yds. An Underwood .458 SOCOM at 1840 fps (same fluted projectile from Lehigh) produces DEVASTING rifle wounding under the presumed magic velocity number: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OVkWPerR6kE.html (IraqVeteran8888's video entitled "Underwood Ammo .458 SOCOM").

@@rickterrance4981 I don't agree with that. That's like saying being hit with a baseball bat has no real damage on your body because it was too slow and only temporary damage. It's still going to cause busted blood vessels and hemorrhages and damage.

@@rickterrance4981 THANK YOU! These are just making little micro "permanent stretch cavities" that, if you know how to interpret ballistics gel, are showing the left-over tears from stretching more than gel can handle; and this does not equate to damage in actual tissue - real tissue doesn't rip in half when you bend it, not like bow ballistics gel does. Gelatin is only good for showing where projectiles and objects have passed through it, it is not good for measuring stretch forces AT ALL. These rounds are tricking people by exploiting gelatins inability to stretch like real tissue

Any body ever been shot? I got shot from the side and then from behind while disarming an attacker that was trying to break into my house, I was taking my garbage out when I walked around a corner and was face to face with him. (I was shot by the get away driver) the first shot hit me in the side and wasn’t immediately incapacitating. The second hit me an inch to the right of my L1 vertebrate and the shock totally disrupted my nervous system in ways I didn’t know was possible. My legs buckled and my nerves went completely haywire for a second. They ran to their car and I got up and went inside to call a wambulance.

Try telling fudds about how 9mm is more than capable of taking bear and prepare for a shitshow. You can try and explain how bigger caliber handguns are harder to shoot (from the 1st shot to successive shots) and keep on target, but it's just a waste of time.

@@calcosPR yeah they're capable with the right ammo and some well placed shots but seeing how large they get late fall I'd still prefer a 10mm or 454, Alaska has some of the deadliest animals and can't ever underestimate em or get over confident with just a 9mm, I've seen some take a shot with the .338 n still charge, I'm just saying the Underwood ammo a better chance of small calibers being a more effective defense roumd

@@calcosPR yeah they're capable with the right ammo and some well placed shots but seeing how large they get late fall I'd still prefer a 10mm or 454, Alaska has some of the deadliest animals and can't ever underestimate em or get over confident with just a 9mm, I've seen some take a shot with the .338 n still charge, I'm just saying the Underwood ammo a better chance of small calibers being a more effective defense roumd

@@calcosPR yeah they're capable with the right ammo and some well placed shots but seeing how large they get late fall I'd still prefer a 10mm or 454, Alaska has some of the deadliest animals and can't ever underestimate em or get over confident with just a 9mm, I've seen some take a shot with the .338 n still charge, I'm just saying the Underwood ammo a better chance of small calibers being a more effective defense round

I think that was their penetrator. These are a little different. One of the videos I watched the guy said the brown bear they had heard of, it was 8 shots of the 9mm penetrators and the autopsy couldn't determine which shot was the killing shot.

That's awesome to hear! It's a shame that you had to use it, but I'm glad it worked for you. I did a video simulating the FBI Barrier Test using the Underwood and a Gold Dot. Suffice to say, the Underwood was pretty damn good through most barriers

Phil. I’m soo grateful you were able to get out of that situation and let us know your experience with the Underwood in a real life situation. Out of your Shield, we’re you using the 68 or 90 grain +P?

I'm going to. Already got the video planned.

Absolutely! Underwood will amaze and Define logic. Most of the ballistics I seen it was consistent all the time regardless of what it was penetrating. Which makes it far superior in my book.

As someone with a background in physics I feel compelled to point out that these bullets would not damage ACTUAL tissue beyond the bullet's diameter, the laws physics confirm this... Firstly lets think about hollow points and their expansion. The more energy they dump into the target, by the law of the conservation of energy/momentum, the more force it is applying to the target, and as a result, this loss of energy slows the bullet as the bullet itself damages more tissue. So, if we assumed the mechanism of damage in the bullets works, that resistance-force, redirected as 4 focused perpendicular-vectors, can actually tear/cut gel, and that they are not just stretching gelatin beyond gelatin's extremely low elastic limit (aka tearing point), then an EXPLANATION as to why the bullet isn't slowing-down when doing so is needed. It should he slowing down if it is actually imparting damaging force to the tissue, and the gel is not stretching too much. if perpendicular vectors were damaging the tissue, and again not just stretching it beyond gelatin's extremely low elastic limit*, the bullet would slow down like any hollowpoints does when damag9ng additional tissue. It would have to expend tremendous energy as some kind of unknown terminal ballistics wounding mechanism, such as theorized "jets" of gelatin/tissue/fluid that people say this bullet uses. But if it did that, the amount of energy it would take to creates "jets", or some other mechanism, that is strong enough to CUT FLESH would SLOW the bullet tremendously just as any energy conversion does. If it was cutting tissue, with whatever mechanism the perpendicular vectors are using, it would DECELERATE the bullet tremendously, just as normal resistance in wounding does... this is undeniable physics! The fact this bullet doesn't slow down when producing, what assume to be, tissue damage is evidence that is creating those tears via exploiting the poor elasticity of ballistics gelatin, a material weakness that actual flesh does not have. *About gelatins low elasticity and tensile strength: If you bend block a block of ballistics gel in half, it will tear almost or entirely in half. If you bend or stretch animal tissue in the same ways you will get zero tears. The medium, ballistics gel, was not to test stretching forces created by fluting on the bullet face like these have. Its merely meant to show damage of a physical object has past through a section of it... that's why we know with rifle rounds tested in gelatin you don't count the "permanent stretch cavity" as actual wounding, because though it tore the gel, such stretching doesn’t tear flesh. The xtreme penetrators & defenders are creating small overly stretched focal point in the gelatin that leave marks similar to hollowpoints was their flattened sections pass through the gel. If you took engineering physics (especially if you took a curriculum on thermodynamics), you should understand that if this round was imparting enough force to damage the tissue BEYOND THE DIAMETER OF THE BULLET ITSELF (and just gelatin being gelatin and tearing when it stretches) the bullet not would penetration in the same manner a a FMJ / Ball round. If it was imparting enough force to damage tissue beyond its diameter, it would be the laws of physics, DECELERATE as it expends energy damaging the simulated tissue. Instead you are seeing gelatin stretch due to the shape of the bullet converted head-on resistant forces perpendicular vertical vertices of force expelled at the and of the channels/recesses formed between the screw-driver like blades. And even if you assume this mechanism works, you have to admit the tissue has the ability to stretch without ripping like gelatin... so AT MOST the bullet would create a temporary stretch cavity the length bullet path, bit focused in four perpendicular vertices of forces instead of an equal force in all directions due to the fluking on the bullet. Again stretch cavities do not damage real tissue and if they can, they will slow the bullet by the laws of physics.

@@testing2741 apparently you need to watch more ballistics tests with this round including tests with meat targets. Many of the tests show without a doubt that there's damage beyond the diameter of the projectile. Most physics are undeniable and proven but physics still require proper calculation and all the factors to be considered. For instance you failed to consider the amount of energy it takes to bend the metal projectile into it's classic mushroom/flower expanded shape. That is a tremendous amount of energy that has little to do with tissue damage. That energy is divided into two parts. The resistance of the tissue that it takes to bend those ears back and the resistance of the metal as it is bending back. Then it's a larger diameter and also has cutting properties. There is also I thing called trauma. The temporary stretch may not do permanent damage in your opinion to tissue but blood vessels are also tissue and they most certainly sustain permanent trauma damage from a projectile of this type beyond the diameter of the projectile. If you don't believe that, 1: you need to watch more videos on the ballistics projectiles of this type. 2: you have to apply your physics to the military use of the 556 round which is no larger in diameter than a 22 cal. There have been billions of rounds fired of 556 that prove that hydrostatic shock is real and produces more damage than just the diameter of the projectile. You need to go back to your calculator and do some figuring because you're missing something in your calculations.

@SilentDiablo exactly! Using the logic of "testing2741": a bowling ball will never be able to make a complete strike it will only knock down the 123 pins. I think he needs a refund on his Physics degree.

I record the videos mostly at one time. Even if I looked at the slomo on my phone, it's a lot less telling on a 6" screen than a 27".

I've compared the two in a simulated FBI barrier test. The Xtreme Defender is the one I said won but the gold dot didn't do bad

@@TheKalkara131 - That's consistent with what I've seen for Gold Dot barrier tests. No, not "as good" as the XD, but not far behind, and certainly acceptable. However, by pure laws of physics, with the XD being solid copper that does not rely on deformation in order to do it's job (maximum damage while not sacrificing penetration) it is understandable why the XD performs slightly better than the deformation reliant Gold Dot. I will be carrying the Gold Dot this summer as I am going to be shooting out my XD rounds that I've been carrying for almost 3 years. When cold weather comes again I will be buying more of the XD, but switching back to Gold Dot when it gets warm again.

From what I've seen coming from other guntubers, the xtreme defender generally ignores everything up to, and including light barriers such as dry wall, wood, and sheet metal with consistent terminal effects (penetration/cavity) to the target as if they were naked. Meanwhile, hollowpoints generally had the negative habit of getting their cavity clogged, preventing proper expansion after passing through a material at least as dense as wood, causing minimal wound cavity width/possible overpenetration. Military arms channel did this test. The xtreme defender, like full metal jacket rounds, is effectively a barrier-blind round with comparable/superior terminal ballistics to hollowpoints used against a naked target. Also, according to military arms channel, the 90grain +P+ load seems to have enough velocity behind it to at least beat 2A body armor. The round overall seems to be absurdly good to the point I think the only other 9mm bullet worth considering for possible niche use in self defense would be 50 grain liberty civil defense for being slightly more effective VS soft armor such as 3A due to its velocity.

This would be absolutely correct and all the more reason to use this ammo, 100% barrier blind and 100% fail proof to preform

I'm curious as to why there is such a large discrepancy between this gel and the Knox 10% gel used by Guns&Cars ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-76TNHmoW1eM.html when testing the Xtreme Defender 68gr+P and 90gr. Guns&Cars says that the largest point of PWC was ~2.25"+ wide.

That's it, barrier blind for penetration of obstruction or obstacles in overcoming the potential bad guy and likewise bear 🐻 able.

@@Roboticdoughbull3k for sure. Everyone always talks about over penetration but that’s a factor with any projectile unless you never miss!!! I’m also of the belief that you should know what’s beyond your target, but sometimes you have to make split second decisions. In that event surviving and protecting others is the first priority and stopping the threat ensures that. That round does everything well and doesn’t really on bullet expansion. It’s expensive but we’ll worth it. I grab it from Gorilla too.

Check out the FBI Barrier Test I did for this

I'm planning a follow up to this video, testing the two rounds against barriers. Just have to build and source the materials and find more of the ammo in stock.

@@TheKalkara131 Military arms channel sorta beat you to the punch there, but I would be interested in seeing the 90grain +P+ xtreme defender go head to head against the 50 grain liberty civil defense on 2A and 3A soft body armor, and barriers with ballistic gel behind it. MAC sorta established the xtreme defender put almost every popular hollowpoint to shame in consistency through barriers. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0piGeTVMZWs.html Would be more interesting to see something more niche such as the liberty civil defense go up against it with it's abnormally low weight, high velocity, and potential to punch through 3A body armor. Outside of that, the xtreme defender in +P, and +P+ seem to be THE rounds to have.

@@mghegotagun I'll add the Liberty to what I want to test, but it's the same issue as the Underwood, finding it in stock somewhere for not $2 a round.

Earlier HPs presented the risk of clogging with fabric and never expanding. In order to facilitate more reliable expansion, the front end of HP bullets began to be constructed weaker and weaker, like the crumple zones of modern automobiles. But this made them vulnerable to hard barriers, which could just as easily crumple hollow point structures inwardly as they triggered expansion. So some modern JHPs seek to strengthen and reinforce their noses once again, in hopes of finding a happy medium. But these bypass all that by being constructed of a solid hardened material while still achieving an expansion effect without the projectile having to expand, itself.

.45 super in a 5” barrel makes even better use of it. @1,700 FPS the extra large flutes do bizarrely well in gel. I wish someone would make a RU-vid quality video of it.

I have not. Pretty sure I have a slomo video of a 115gr zipping straight through two blocks of ballistics gel, didn't know they made a 68gr.

I can look into it, no promises if or when I'll get to it. I didn't even know they redid the bullet type.

If your state bans anything not lead core, I'd stick with tried and true hollow points. Speer gold dot or Federal HST. Overpenetration is if you hit your target, your bullet may continue onwards through them. Can it happen? Yes, however, in my opinion, people worry about it more than they should. Look around you. As a general rule, there's a whole lot more empty space than human bodies around you at any given time. I have some videos testing overpenetration also

@@TheKalkara131 Thank you

Wth?

Well, I've done a couple FBI barrier penetration tests, and one of the stages includes cloth material.

The issue is that technically there's no standard for +P+ ammunition, so different companies can load them to different pressures. You'd be taking a risk, but your Glocks could probably run them just fine. I've shot them through my G45. If you're really worried about it, just run the +P version.

I'd agree. As soon as I can find them in stock again, I'm going to do some barrier tests on them also.

It's from Clear Ballistics

Check out the FBI test I did of these two. Underwood did better I think, but both were impressive.

Already planning on it. I'll reserve my opinions until after I do my further tests.

50 cents, you where buying wrong

@@mblake0420 seems to me that defensive ammo was often selling for about 20 or $25 for a box of 20 or 25. I will have to dig up receipts I guess because I bought some Underwood Xtreme Defender before the ammo crisis and during the crisis and it was the same price. And now it is up a couple bucks a box but everything is up right now due to inflation. Thanks Joe😡

@@steveh7108 you buy by the 50 for 30 bucks

@@mblake0420 come on now you know as well as I do a lot of the higher-end defensive ammo only sells in 20 and 25 round boxes. I know you could get it in 50-round boxes of some Brands but a lot of it does not sell that way. Usually it's only the cheaper stuff that sells 50 rounds self defense ammo.

@@steveh7108 hst, gold dot everything else is a gimmick or over priced

Bottom of the bullet

@@zeeg928 I believe you, but would need an electron microscope to read it.

@@thomasjohnson6808 wish I could send a pic of what im lookin at

@@zeeg928 I see the markings, but cannot read them. I color coded the whole box by using a red Sharpie for +P+ and blue for +P. That - or I could shoot myself in the hand with both and see which one stings more...

@@thomasjohnson6808 right after ther R in luger .. But good Idea 🤣🤣

midwayusa 20$ for 20 rounds right now just ordered 60 rounds

Lookout Now: they are in stock now

Cheapest Underwood right now is $1.17 + shipping!

Alaskan Ballistics has a few 45 Super videos. He has a few 45 Super vs 10mm as well.

@@357Franknitty I know, but no extreme defender 45super on the youtube. Gel, body armor ect

@@zackzittel7683 Yea I'd be interested in body armor myself. Especially the Liberty Civil Defense and the Fort Scott Munitions. All of thier 9mm and 10mm go through body armor and I'm really eager to see what the 45acp's can do.

Yep- I rock the Underwood in .45 SUPER. - 120 gr Extreme Defender @1600Fps./700ft/lbs. It's remarkable. It works. Looks a .308 in gel.

@@johndoe-td2xd I get 1800-1830 in a 5”

As soon as I get a 45 ACP handgun that isn't a Hi Point haha

@@TheKalkara131 ok.

Underwood makes both penetrator and defender in +p+.

@@TheKalkara131 yes the penetrator is the +P+ the defender is a +P

go to their website they literally +P+ Xtreme Defenders just bought some.

@@SoWavvyy just bought some yesterday to refresh our carry pistols, +P+ these things are pricey.

@@USMCPFC1 Cheaper than Buffalo bore’s awful shipping price

So what do you carry instead of hollow-points? FMJ? Frangibles?

Lehigh defense Underwood Xtreme Defender 90 grain and 68 grain the solid copper

Hey you.

@@flintrocks Everyone else but you understood by implication that he was now carrying Underwood bullets. 🤡

I think you are confusing the Penetrator with the Extreme Defender.

What's your source on the 90grain +P+ Xtreme Defender beating 3A soft armor? If that's the case, that makes even 50grain liberty civil defense look redundant.

@@JohnLloydScharf No sir, he is correct. The penetrators are clearing 30" of gel and even more.

Dude, I'm just an old incandescent, I can't hold a candle to you. I truly aspire to be as bright as angrysheepdog9744, with his illustrious, well thought out, and in depth content. Surely he has a few hundred thousand followers. I do tend to ramble, and this was one of my earliest videos, admittedly. Since this, I've done several videos on the Xtreme Defender and demonstrated that it works very well. It's what I personally carry.

@@TheKalkara131 What can I say your wattage has definitely increased Kakara131, there's hope for you yet. Just saw your 68gr video. Not a big fan of that weight either due to it's instability...maybe at SBR rifle speeds in 357SIG it makes sense. Can't go wrong with 90gr XD in 9mm / 90gr XP .380 for pocket carry. More +'s the better.

Use ammoseek.com

Shit, you're a lucky man. Did the round glance off your skull or something?

@@TheKalkara131 it fully expanded but just didn't do the job

Play the lotto🙏😂

Lol badass

I'm so glad your alright and we'll enough to talk about it, and I agree. My 9mm's would see nothing but HST's or Hydra Shocks for the expansion pedals or even better the +p+ rounds to really make 9mm have a good impact on the intended target.

Alright it's bugging me, I don't remember this video much at all. What do you mean??

@@TheKalkara131 dry firing down the table haha. Not judging I just thought it was funny. Everyone has their own ways

There's already timestamps but thanks

As soon as I can find more +P+ Lehigh in stock, I'm going to compare these two against the barriers used in the FBI ammo tests.

@@TheKalkara131 Roger that!

Oh I'm sorry, would you like a refund?

Buh-bye Harry. You've been voted off the island.

Harry is a 🤡

@@TheKalkara131 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Oh yeah? Well you annoy me too Humphry. Whiney, bitchy, no content having ass. If you don't like my videos, there's this foreign concept you can embrace: don't watch