Veteran Sherman S EUC Teardown - What's inside this electric unicycle!? 

I think we will start making this a habit with our new repair centre and extra space

Agree! Would love to see a T4 teardown.

yah, why not mounting connectors in place witgout going to controller box. Thats more actual on OG or Max Sherman, as there is plenty of room

Thanks Zen!

HAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!

Thanks Trevor! We appreciate you watching!

Albert knows his stuff. Me on the other hand…. 😂

Keep in mind, this is a pre-production model. Veteran is taking our feedback before going into production.

Thanks for watching!

Keep in mind, this is a pre-production model. Veteran is taking our feedback and making changes before going into production.

You want something to break to absorb the energy of a crash. Plastic parts that stick out are smart. They will be cheap and easy to replace. It’s metal where it needs to be. So far so good.

@@darkstar4494 No, you don't want anything to break. Build a hard shell to take the blunt and outer rubber to absorb the shocks. Build a PVC plates for the battery packs and rubberized the outer shell.

@@eevees Well, I hope so, but Im skeptical if they really will do work on it. They might, they might not (hopeful not the later). But even so, it is possible that we get a "fixed" wheel only six months later. I really hope they fix those problems, because imo compared to other EUCs or the max right now it shouldn't be 4100+ usd.

@@BigBoss-gb4cx I can’t think of a better teardown on any other new wheel. No major concerns. We just pointed out any possible negative we could find. Personally, the teardown has got me more excited about the reliability of the Sherman-S.

Speed test is happening today. Range test will come later.

Don't hold your breath, V13's suspension is mediocre that it was not even made it on the bullet points of their presentation.

Time will tell

Good point Wen a BMS needs to be standard practice on these. I wouldn't be concerned about tire change time taking the tire off and putting another on blows enough I would be less concerned about getting to it imo

Great question. To our surprise, they didn’t change anything.

Very easily replaced but we requested that they beef it up before going into production

Seems like just better visability at night. They project red lines on the ground in a v shape behind you.

There’s not too much to it. We went over it a bit in our last video. It’s beefy and the best suspension system I’ve seen to date

Go with the SKF 6208 2RS

@@eevees Thank you so much for that! 🙂

parts.eevees.com/search?q=Sherman+battery

Correct. This is a pre-production version. Refinements will be made based on our feedback to Veteran for the production version.

You look like great expert. How much power has Abrams’ mainboard? Or Sherman Max one? KS22? How much power you got if connected 100 kW motor to V12HT mainboard?

@@maximlapshaev I have no clue, i didnt say anything about mainboards. I know how many watts the motors are though lol.

@@HumbolSkitso motor power is zero without the mainboard. In fact it’s one device - the motor and the board. If there is not enough torque, that’s mainboard’s current limit as usual. If there is not enough speed, that is concerning Kv and battery voltage. IRL motor power of EUC means almost nothing. Torque and free spin speed mean much more. What’s more we don’t measure the torque, we just feel if it’s enough or not. We can measure speed and do that. We never say like “yesterday I made 5 kW on my Abrams”. We cannot measure it and compare to each other, completely useless number.

@@maximlapshaev Ok i see your point. So in theory we could keep our same wheels and just upgrade our mainboards? And the result could be more performance with increases in speed and torque? I feel like the motors Wattage has to become a limiting factor at some point right? I wish i knew more about electronics, sadly i only know whats advertised. So in my head, 3500watts beats 3000W.

@@HumbolSkitso now you’re making some progress in understanding that stuff 😉 one motor can have more power if used with 100 volts battery and mainboard than with 84 volts gear. All known things about the Sherman S motor are: equal numbers of slots and poles to the original Shermans’ motor. So, the only thing that differs - is mainboard. They could use slightly more wires in phase windings, but there is really small room for improvements if basic configuration is the same. We can mark an electric motor as one with bigger power if we just improve its cooling. You can see how side covers of the new motor look like. They can deliver a bit more heat outside the motor with their edges in comparison with old ones. So we have almost the same motor with new mainboard with higher phase current limit. And new number of kilowatts. Testers say that the torque is great. Ok, I can see bigger phase current from mosfets to the motor in that statements. To the same old motor, you know🙂