VFX Artists React to SPIDER-MAN 2s Bad & Great CGi 

The amazing spider man was like green lantern it was horrible

The fight scenes in TASM MOVIES were great y’all tripping

Love you guys! Wish I could work with you!

Ufff yeah, still can't watch the fist three movies because each time actors get animated they fly about hollow styrofoam muppets.

Let's hope they continue to do that in the new upcoming Spiderman movie with Doc Oct in it. I'm worried they'll just CG the fuck out of everything leaving out the wonderful Sam Raimi practical SFX.

Yup ..but that's what alfred molina isn't worried about now is the cgi .. coz the puppets are heavy for his back ..that's what he said on interview with willem defoe and jamie foxx ...

@@MattJett doubt it. In the trailer it already looks like the arms are going to be only cg

And also having the practical effects as a reference probably helped the animators to think about how the tentacles should move to sell the illusion better, even if there were limitations to it.

It would pretty much look like me putting all my effort into anything. There's no separate "Train stopping face" that happens only in that scenario. Toby just has a dumb 'best effort' face. Love this movie though!

Exactly, I kind of like that he's just giving it his all regardless of how it looks. Makes it more authentic than Captain America grabbing the rail from below to stop Bucky from escaping in the helicopter just so they could shoot a juicy bicep curl. All these superhero movies give the impression that those huge amounts of effort wouldn't cause your face to distort. So yeah, I appreciated Maguire's silly face because it's finally some realism.

There's never a scene of a superhero having diarrhea so he can't fight crime, or sitting on the toilet right when things are happening so they have to choose between wiping and saving someone. Or imagine if batman had a cold so he'd sound even more dumb, I'd wanna see that

@@asdfffs That sounds amazing XD And yeah, while I can absolutely understand that's it's not compelling tv to have superheroes go through the day-to-day of going to the bathroom or shaving etc., often stuff is written in such a way that it's extremely unlikely they'd have the time or opportunity to do that stuff. Does Captain America shave every time before he goes out the door? Does Black Widow get regular haircuts so her hair doesn't change much over longer periods of time? If they're on a mission that takes all day, where do they go to the bathroom? Are they taking clean underwear with them or do they all have horrible infections? Why aren't their teeth falling out or is there an allotted moment during the day where they're all brushing their teeth? So many questions! XD

Plus I really would like to see that. Wren would look hilarious.

Tobey* Maguire*

@@englishatheart Do you just chill in the comments waiting to correct everyone on Tobey’s name?

@@englishatheart bruh what is your obsession with Tobys name

@@Broccoli_32 What is wrong with correcting someone's spellings? Would you appreciate someone writing your name wrong?

@@dragonbane44 It’s about the 5th comment she’s made correcting someone on it. Also yeah I don’t care if someone I don’t know spells my name wrong lol

Hell yea, though amazing 2’s story is a bit wonky, those movies are underrated and its effects are incredible

That's what everyone says

@@chato. Nah, it's pretty fairly rated, really bad writing, mediocre at best directing, pretty decent/good effects overall is the consensus as far as I'm aware

@@alexhobson5478Loads of folks mention Garfield’s and Stone’s undeniable chemistry as a high point in the Amazing Spider-Man franchise too.

its definitely a case of style over substance, but its still enjoyable lol

Tobey Macguire's Spiderman always got injured, sometimes badly. It made it more believable somehow, even though other superheroes get hurt too

That's part of what makes the train scene so good. His sceams and facial expressions perfectly match somebody getting pulled limp from limp

@@owens.studios Exactly! When the couch smiled and laughed at Tobey's grimacing while saving the train, I thought, "Dude, those are the EXACT faces a human would make if they were just durable enough to survive this shit."

Yea but there are also some good things about spiderman two as well as spiderman two

@@King_Neptune69 what about Homecoming?..

And it was 2004 when computer games were still at world of Warcraft level

yea dude, they knocked it out of the park.

If you downgrade the resolution and watch it on an old TV (like people used to do at that time), will be really hard to notice anything.

its*

How does everyone notice CGI so easily??

It's actually something too you yourself have no control over. When I lift weights the muscles in my face does what it want no matter how I try to resist it.

I think the problem is Tobey's face itself, people also critique his crying face. He's a pretty goofy looking dude, it serves Peter Parker well, spider-man not so much, imo.

@@CaptainARR show your face then pretty boy

He looks like he’s taking a shit

His face in general throughout the movies was just cringe worthy.

Tobey*

@@englishatheart do you spend all day correcting people about tobey's name?

@@horseoperamarker maybe she does

Just like Nick Cage in the Wickerman bees section.

JGrace Calm down, it’s just a simple correction! It should be obvious that it’s informative rather that malicious.

But also makes 0 sense on how he got up in the air...

@@metalcrusader6662 Dude, You're finding " sense" In Superhero Movies? Are You Insane Or something?

@@metalcrusader6662 he jumped of a helicopter

@@metalcrusader6662 u don't make a fuckin sense

@@metalcrusader6662 he can literally catapult himself in the air, he's done in it in every spiderman series

Its the best

Damn straight

frr

The Og trilogy still the best

yeah I love spiderman 2

Trust me you aren't. I actually really enjoyed the reboots.

Yep, you are nowhere near alone with that opinion. Especially with all the new discussion about after NWH, more people are saying how much they loved those movies and more people are going back and seeing that they are still good, or at least, nowhere near as terrible as they thought.

i totally get you. tasm2 was the first big superhero movie that i ever watched in theaters when i was 12 and i became obsessed with those movies because of it. i always loved andrew’s version of spider-man and his overall portrayal (visually) in his movies but always, too, felt so disoriented by all of the hate that his spider-man received until very recently. i also just rewatched the sequel a couple weeks ago and, with more mature eyes, completely recognized the dog trash writing and obnoxiously convoluted plot it suffered from. But i still deeply enjoyed watching it. I’m choosing to settle on the conclusion that this movie consists of some of the most polarizing aspects in cinema history. The performance that garfield gave was so unbelievably good that it couldn’t be ruined by the trash dialogue, his onscreen chemistry with emma stone was too real to not get hopelessly invested in, and the visual craftsmanship was just so grounded in reality that it made the most outlandish superhero feats fill me with awe rather than disbelief. everyone doing the heavy lifting in this franchise did their jobs perfectly while people that were giving directions went completely off the rails. after seeing some of the scenes that were cut from the final version, i honestly wouldn’t have wanted to see where this franchise was heading before being cut short, but i did want more of andrew’s spidey. his version, in the most specific sense, deserved better.

@@mairenoates8294 I totally agree. TASM 2 was the first big movie I remember being super excited for, and back then it totally paid off. I was obsessed with Electro at that age, and when I re-watched it recently, I wholeheartedly expected it to be a pile of garbage that I had been looking at through nostalgic lenses, but what surprised me was that it was somehow even better than I remembered. The way the cinematography, the visual effects, the art design, soundtrack and sound design is so meticulously crafted astounds me now just as much as it astounded me as a kid, and I now see more clearly than ever that that movie was the first spark which led me to a love of filmmaking which I now pursue as a career.

I slept midway through the movie

Hey heavy spoilers

Hey spoiler man.

It’s our friendly neighborhood spoiler-man!

Man I want these puppets to return in nwh

Oh shit, this is like nick fury showing up at the end of iron man

One thing I realise is that he always cut to a close up with practical suits on between the cgi sequence, this help make it less noticable, while in mcu case they make the scenes fully cgi and didn't use close ups as much which made the action less easy to follow

Raimi: "You know, I'm something of a VFX artist myself"

The CG shots are still framed in camera like they could’ve been shot practically. Too many filmmakers rely on a completely digital background and a digital camera in which it just starts to feel like a cartoon

Cinnamon Goo?

Apparently Sam Raimi and Mark Webb have been consulted for the production of No Way Home also. I REALLY hope the take Raimi's advice and it works out. The movie is gonna be amazing!

Sometimes its nice tho when a movie does something REALLY good and you just geek the hell out about it.

I would say it's TASM2

There are some obviously CG scenes, it's still got to be top 5 superhero movies ever though. It's petty much my favourite.

i also thought it was good i was like hmmmmmm spider-man very cool epic movie

I remember someone visiting the housw like 4 years ago and we rewatched it and there was a scene where it was obviously a doll being thrown instead of a real person haha.

@@UnknownedYt very epic arachnoid moment

Oh please do!!

And the horror jack frost movie too same episode

Could do Rise of the Guardians too.

And more Iron Man 3 coverage since it's a Christmas movie.

Odd seeing you on a non halo video

Like Peter 3’s Eyes

With how constantly "over-realism" gives away the CG parts, one saying (that very much may be a quote from some fictional character, can't quite recall it) comes to my mind: One difference between the lies and the truth is that the latter doesn't have to be realistic

imagine a mocap web swing

I think it is more because the movie was going for the 60's esque vibe from the comics. Best example I can think of for that is the Daily Bugle, all the colors are simplified, the architecture is art deco, even the glass in the windows is hazy and unclear like an old building that was made in the 20's.

I can suspend my disbelief for that how engaging that scene is. Or you could just say the Marvel-verse New York isn't the same as ours

I was in NYC a couple years ago and rode an elevated subway so im not sure what youre talking about

I get that you're trying to say there isn't an elevated train in that specific area that spider man was in but I would just like to remind everyone that Harlem is in fact part of the island of Manhattan

@@baqcasanke Right? I was there in 2014 and remember riding them too.

It does a lot to sell Otto's conflict. Without being able to "feel" that "dialogue" his internal struggle would just seem like angsty "woe is me" bullshit. Instead, due to Molina's masterful acting and the acting of the tentacles themselves, you genuinely understand some of what is going on inside him. He *genuinely* isn't wholly in control. Mix that with the glimpse we get of Otto's relationship with his wife, and how he feels responsible for her death, and suddenly everything he does is no longer villainy. It's entirely reasonable from his point of view and it's heart breaking. Molina's Doc Ock was never an evil man, he was a loving husband and idealist who had everything but his work taken from him. That was all he had left. So of course he let it consume him.

Nailed It ! Also did you know that in the official novelization of the film, they actually showcase the internal dialogue between Otto and his tentacles

Totally... because the robot arm AI would give even a single shit about him finishing his experiment.

@@RadicalSalman999 oh that's really cool

Yeah a nice addition from raimi

MCU Spidey is smoooove lol

I was high when I read this and my brain did not like it

That is why is so good. Spiderman looks like an own character himself.

Yeah, I really liked how they updated Mysterio in that way. Really clever

Spider man in this movie is compleat, is the spider man we should have, Gwen perfect, But out of this characters The entire movie is bad But the villains The lines from them The story of peters parents is just super meh But Peter and Gwen And spider man And specially the cgi just perfect... That's why I love this movie. And I understand people hated... But this is my favorite spider man film tho be honest.

@@ailoxtime4479 the cgi in that movie is fucking AMAZING like I literally love how in the 2nd one they made the suit not skin tight so it didn't look like a skin tight man running around they made it look good like no shade to Sam raimi or Jon watts love those movies but I reckon this movie has one of the best cgi in spiderman movies

TASM 2 is my all time favourite Movie, The Costume looks so freaking awesome (like in the Ultimate Spider-man Comics, which are my favourite Comics) the action with electro, the shoots where you are as near on spider-man as possible, the love between Gwen and Peter, The sad scene at the end and the Music from Hans Zimmer makes it one of the greatest Movies for me. +it was in 3D in cinemas, and that was freaking awesome!

Im tobey generation but Tasm 2 is my favorite spidey movie

It's not something to feel guilty about. It's a good spiderman film. Story is kinda wack yes but the new ones are even worse narrative wise. It's justtthat most people arent spidey fans so they dint know shit. The new ones look like common drama so ppl like them more

Couldn't be said any better than that bro

And the music/ sound effects are incredible

There's more magic to the effects in the Raimi Spider-Man 2 in my opinion.

FUCKING FACTS

@@anthonymartensen3164 cause it’s okd

💯

TASM 2 makes me cry every time, the grieving scenes are too real. Between the director's choices on those and Andrew's acting immediately after the impact, it's a real tear-jerker

I really enjoyed The Amazing Spider-Man 2 and have never understood what's bad about the writing? A little cartoonish at times, but bad? Not in the slightest.

Well, it's certainly better than The Amazing Spider-Man 1 in my eyes. Not that it is to say much, since I was never a fan of Andrew's movies, but eh.

People won't agree with me but honestly for me TASM movies are almost as good as sam raimis ones, tho TASM has totally nailed the look and the feel of spider-man, his movement, shooting and swinging webs. I don't like the tom holland movies as much because they feel way to childish, and I cant get over the more mechanical suit :(, I always imagined spider-man in a batman movie style, super dark, badass and scary, meanwhile the new movies are going for a romantic comedy type bs (haven't seen no way home yet, so maby Im in for a surprise)

@@PolajLive Boy oh boy do I have good news for you man.. the new one is exactly the sort of tone you seem to be looking for. Obviously there's some obligatory marvel humor but the vast majority of it is much more gritty

@@muffinman3052 dude xd now u got me hyped even more, currently stuck in quarantine so cant go watch it with the bois yet

do you mean friends?

Hot damn, I know that guy. You’re famous. What would bjj do with the tentacles? 😝

Wrong

@@masonwright7700 no Mason, I’m WRIGHT!

At the end of Far From Home Spiderman is zipping around the bridge solving problems and obliterating drones left and right and that, to me, is the most Spiderman action sequence I've ever seen in a Spiderman movie. Also, it's an Aerial fight, so I'm not sure I agree with you on that one.

@@alanroberts6086 yeah, I just feel like there were more fights while swinging through the city and stuff.

Needs more wall crawling fights!

Far more admirable than MCU's overuse of CGI which is a joke quite frankly.

Exactly, some of the best stuff comes from using practical effects first, then using CG to elevate them.

Nerdwriter1, am I right?

@@MABlacksmith I believe so, yes. I hadn't heard of the channel before seeing that video, so I'm not familiar, but that sounds right. I'd have to go back and look for it to be sure. It was, like... a month or two ago. It popped up in my suggestions (which I usually ignore) and I clicked. All I know for sure is, he was spot-on.

Let just hope he didn't resign from Doctor Strange (2&3) because of 'creative difference' between him and Feige

I think the cheesiness is part of the charm of hismovies i think

@@naiknaik8812 yes, the charm is what made me love the trilogy so much, I love how loveable doc ock and Green goblin are but they are also menacing and a thread to Peter

Steady shots, simple cuts that follow motion, action movies need to stop being so lazy and plan their shots better. It’s cool having all this crazy technical gun-fu sure but it comes at the expense of storytelling imo

@@fysean this!! sometimes with a lot of mcu and holland’s spider-man fights it’s quite hard to follow what’s actually happening because there’s so much going on but not enough cuts and varying shots to actually show us

The power of the sun....

Er, what? The tentacles have literally nothing to do with a biological octopus.

Mind = Blown!

They really do. By a long shot tbh.

Oh absolutely. It’s not even close

Cap

They really do. I wonder wtf happened with MCU/Sony Spidey . I rarely believe i am looking at Tom Holland or even a double in a suit.

@@alwaysxnever I'm pretty sure alot of the stunts are done by Tom Holland At least as much as he can The more dangerous one's are double

The eyes are way too big Tom and Tobey suit is better

@@Elamado97 exactly, ikr

Lord of the Rings might have it beat but it's still close

Attack of the Clones looks amazing too if you rewatch it on Blu-Ray on a nicely calibrated screen.

@@laying_dormant5424 I think Dead Man's Chest is phenomenal from a VFX perspective, but the first one looks pretty rough by today's standards

@@laying_dormant5424 I agree. That goblin glider looks real rubbery in some scenes

no way home vfx arent even done yet

That movies kinda not very good lol

@@plywoodruntz hahahaha true, but the cgi is

@@adamfabry4625 lol it must be, I never would've guessed

@@plywoodruntz I've seen the movie once and I thought it was pretty good. Don't really know what would make it such a bad movie.

@@gagetaylor192 it grossly misunderstands the point of the story. Making Nick into this completely nice person betrays the point of the narrative. He's sort of judgemental and a bit of a dick with women in the book. I normally don't mind it when adaptations make changes but in this case it really messes with the idea that nobody is blameless. It's really important to what Fitzgerald wrote.

Same.I also wish the MCU suit could look as detailed and realistic.

@@alwaysxnever It really bugs me how both Disney and SONY have all these resources but squander them through laziness and poor direction.

That's such a good point, I never thought of it like that, but he talks about a fake multiverse and then causes the real one, that's fantastic!

He didn't cause the multiverse to explode though. That's Loki and Kang.

@@JADNCK i mean do we know what actually caused the multiverse to split for sure? There's a moment where Kang stops being able to see and control the time stream, and I suspect it could be Dr Strange in NWH who causes that to happen

@@JADNCK He exposed Peter Parker who then ripped open the dimensional fabric by botching a spell of Doctor Strange. If Mysterio hadn't done anything then the multiverse of madness wouldn't have happened. Loki simply turned the multiverse back on. Peter Parker and Strange blew the reactor. Its kind of like a WW1 causing WW2 thing. If WW1 never happened the events that caused WW2 wouldn't have existed. Yes, there are agents in the story more directly responsible, but in the MCU Spideys fight with Mysterio is like his World War 1 event.

@@MrMisanthrope84 Peter didn’t botch the spell, that’s what Strange thinks but it’s always been Loki and Kang.

Taika Waititi is a god among men.

There's definitely issues with directors who aren't experienced with action trying to do action scenes. Chloé Zhao did Eternals with basically no film experience that wasn't dramatic films with huge sweeping environment scenes.

I think shang chi is a great example of this. They brought in a majority of jackie's team for choreography and filming the action scenes, and since a decent amount of people in the stunt viz were directors themselves, they were constantly working with the pre viz team and the director while filming action scenes, and it shows, shang chi had one of the best fight choreography up there with winter soldier. Having an experienced stunt/action team is a huge advantage.

@@parry111 One of their previous videos had them bring on the Iron Fist coordinator as a guest and he explained how they had a whole stunt crew choreographing every fight scene and the directors and cinematographers would just ruin everything they did on the day of shooting.

@@chitoryu12 I was wondering why Chloe was chosen to direct their epoch-spanning drama about space gods and the ancient eldritch beings that made them, when her entire imdb page seems to be about indie cowboy movies. I wonder which shots in the film are actually hers, and which are the previz team, because the only time I was really engaged in Eternals was when Gemma Chan's character would go into space and talk to their god. Oh and without wishing to spoil, Omni Man is still the best subversion of The Superman.

Sam is a visionary. His take on biologically convert him to have spider like powers instead of a device to shoot webs which is something true to comic books, but hey creative liberties. It was such a genius move. Spiderman 1 was a great origin story

@@thecompanioncube4211 wholly agreed.

Honestly, you're one of the few people that I've seen who appreciates both Raimi films and The Amazing films. The TASM movies are special to me because of Andrew's portrayal and the slo-mo scenes that showed his Spidey senses were amazing to witness but they have shitty writing no doubt whereas Spider-Man 2 will be one of the best superhero movies of all time. It really understood the character a lot better.

@@WilliamButtlicker oh yeah I feel that my dude, it's extremely rare to find somebody like that. So it's a pleasure to speak with you, and I completely agree, fundamentally Sam Raimi really cared about the character Spider-Man and was able to pull off a damn good movie as well. Spider-Man 2 in my opinion is essentially perfect as far as movies go. Like how much that movie resonated with me as a kid I probably couldn't realistically describe. Aside from saying that it just makes you want to be a better person and Spider-Man is very inspiring. And I actually have heard some information talking about how Mark Webb wanted to make the movies pretty different from how they turned out. Some corporate BS got in the way though. That doesn't change the fact that those movies are really damn fun to watch. That scene where he was saving the people on the stairs in Times Square blew my fucking mind. The Slow Mo in that moment was so well done and so cool. And this is probably unpopular but I really don't care at all about the Disney Marvel franchise version of Spider-Man. Because just like all of the other characters in their Universe there are no consequences. Nothing bad actually happens to the characters, at least not anything that would have a lasting impact. And we know to expect that because it's Disney and they only care about making a franchise. Like they obviously don't care to understand Spider-Man as a character. And it sucks, like I wish that they would care to make more films that feel like they have an actual impact. That's just me though, does that make sense?

@@jordanfelt5978 Exactly, I mean that'd have been the first time we'd have seen the Sinister Six in live action if Webb had got his third film. I still think that just like Ben Affleck's Batman, Andrew deserved more time with Spider-Man. He had genuine love for the character and he looked more comfortable to me than both Tobey and Tom. I hope we see him in No Way Home. And about the MCU version, I know where you're coming from because it's already a pretty big universe with loads of character and sometimes it does feel that the character of Spider-Man isn't getting the charm that it deserves in the MCU. Homecoming was a good film ngl but Far From Home kinda irked me too. And I'm a huge fan of the MCU so that is saying something. But atleast we're getting to see three different versions of Spider-Man in live action so that's a win. And I hope No Way Home serves that question of the impact that has been missing from this version. Whatever the case, It's a good time to be a Spidey fan lol.

@@WilliamButtlicker oh yeah I agree with what you said about Marc Webb Spider-Man, I actually really liked Andrew Garfield as Spiderman. He was goofy as hell and it was enjoyable to watch and of course the romance in those films was great. As far as the MCU goes, I'm excited for the upcoming no way home for the same reasons you are basically. I just don't know if I trust Disney to do it right. Outside of that pretty much all their films feel like the same thing now, over and over again with different characters in my opinion. The movies literally all feel the same and they're not interesting anymore, we already know to expect that there are no real consequences for their characters. Honestly, does it not feel way too 'samey'?

@@WilliamButtlicker 1 doesn’t have bad writing at all imo

Tobey suit didnt even work when the movie came out, for real look at reviews from 2001. The suit looks terrible. The only reason that the suit looks even slightly okay is because there is a real suit that you can think about instead of the weird gumby suit. Your brain basically excuses the shit cg suit and think about the practical suit

@@sebastianlarsson6053 of course people in 2001 thought the suit looked terrible.. they never saw it until 2002

I mean according to corridor crew it's because of their scheduling but still...

I mean they wouldn't deliberately do it through CGI as it would cost them a lot more. It maybe because they don't really have a choice because of the scheduling of every star in the film. And imo, if it isn't noticable, it's a really good job.

Oh but did you notice that he wasn't there when you watched it? I bet not, so what is the problem?

At this point it's the actors choice. If it is important to them to be on stage, then they should be flexible with their schedule.

I agree. I think the actors should be together as much as possible. They can feed off of each other's energy that way.

I completely agree with you!

Yeah, I'm blown away that Wren wasn't joking about not liking Spider-Man 2 (2004). Everyone I personally know thought it was even better than the original (I like both pretty equally.)

@@dmtustan ew

Ew

"He's not alone"

Your use of commas really threw me off

well it's still image works working on no way home (and also far from home)

Electro was no longer that blue smurf you see They went with the more comic like kind Where he has his human skin with yellow electricity

@@lag00n54 And I'm happy their respecting the comic accuracy to that (cause Jamie lookin better like that), but I'm hoping it'll be as we saw in the trailer with hopefully some similar effects that his time in TAS2 had with the lightning flow from how he moves and his strikes but with of course the yellow lightning touch

@@danieleanzaldi Yeah I know but just hoping they'll keep similar to the work they've done past from TAS2 Electro but just his visual electric effects from ways of his movements and attacks

Yep definitely agree.

@WETA♥️ what 💀🗿

So you're excited for Spider Man too?

@@erictuthill9029 nothing gets past you

Toby spiderman 3 didn't get good reviews, third andrew garifeld movie never came, so I hope this will redeem the trilogies.

@Dzie Kuje Spiderman 3 was garbache.. I said I hope this movie will redeem the fact that spiderman 3 was bad and Andrew gardield was non existant. What’s your problem?

Andrew did a great job playing both sides of the character, not just the Spider-Man side.

@@theatheistbear3117 I really hated his portrayal of Peter. I can maybe agree with the banter of Spider-Man, but Tobey's Peter is someone I would love to hang out with and learn from, Andrew's Peter is someone I desperately want to 'teach a lesson.'

@@anonymousaccordionist3326 that's why we love his Peter Parker version

@@anonymousaccordionist3326 his Peter Parker is a very realistic teenager/highschooler, so I like his. He reminds me of myself years ago, but obv Tobey's Peter is better

@@theatheistbear3117 Sorry, but I really disagree, Peter is supposed to be a super nerdy, shy kid. Andrew was way too cool to play him properly.

They already did in another video just look up the amazing Spider-Man.

Nope. They did practical swinging for the MCU version too.

@@skepticalbadger interestingly, both Holland and Garfield were gymnasts when they were young

Yesss, I would love that! ^-^

I love that show yea they should do that

I second this!!! I would adore seeing that

+1 to this, it would be really nice ;p

I wanted to comment exactly this, but i was like, someone probably has already asked this, and yes, here it is

You see photography, it’s about lighting. Composition. Drama