Watching a movie (or TV show) with a STEM major be like 

Thx, now I realize what it's like to go to the cinema with me)

8 days ago gg

We're 4D. Like quaternion math. I keep hearing theories like "simulation", "holographic" or back to Leibniz' "contingent" universe. Those theories all make me think of the i, j, k in quaternions. Quaternion MATHEMATICS a complex number of the form w + xi + yj + zk, where w, x, y, z are real numbers and i, j, k are imaginary units that satisfy certain conditions. RARE/biblical a set of four parts, things or persons. (dimensions?)

3 sets of 3 dimensions. We're 4D, not 3D. 1D, 2D, 3D are spatial 4D, 5D, 6D are temporal 7D, 8D, 9D are spectral 1D, 4D, 7D line/length/continuous 2D, 5D, 8D width/breadth/emission 3D, 6D, 9D height/depth/absorption Thoughts? (I obviously think string theory is gobbledygook)

Yes

I don't see why it wouldn't, so yeah.

It makes sense, because he's family.

Im number 666 and im proud of this

Yes, and MURPH!!

Yep.

Techically, for computer, matrix is just list of lists, so... probably it's not invertible.

Is the matrix invertable? Because they didn't mention the determinant... Oh, is that the big reveal at the end? I'll unpause when I stop laughing... that is so funny!

​@@VK-sz4it I mean yeah, but I'd like to carry the joke furthur. Well a matrix is just a data set, usually two dimensional, which can be represented as a list of lists. In mathematics it usualy encodes a tranformation of a vector, and has certain properties. As long as certain conditions are met regarding input and output dimensionality, then the matrix is invertable, and this inverse is closely related to the determinant, which is esentially the scaling of space within the transformation, and only exists in the cases where the matrix is invertable. EDIT: Or rather, not "only exists", but rather, if the dertiminant is zero, then the matrix is not invertable.

@@austingarcia6060 btw invertible matrices of a given dimension is topologically dense in all such square matrices with respect to the Euclidean metric.

Seven what, seven slugs per square kilopascal

@@noahcarter3868 ohms

@@zzz-lo8vg ofc its ohms, thats the joke.

@@noahcarter3868 7probably khoms 7 ohoms is nothing

Lightning is a current source pulse of usually 1-10kA, and since amps are what kill you he's dead nomatter his resistance. (Its 500Ω for a human at high voltages, thanos is presumably made of water and salt so he's probably around the same, this math gives us .5-5million volts, he is deep fried from the inside out from that bolt) EE safety training is honestly terrifying at times. Only a few mA to the heart to kill or single digit amps across the whole body, lightning in the kiloamp range is not survivable for any living thing during a direct strike, people who say they survived a strike were actually more like 50ft away from the point of impact. (Also arc flash hazards)

No, it's just that when watching fast and furiuse you shouldn't think about it and should just enjoy the sense less action

I might not have much but I have family.

He threw that in there so nerds would comment on it

Lmao was just gonna comment this, I tip my hat you you fellow nerd

Just keep waiting, it'll take a while.

*Technically* π is just a lowercase greek p, so you could use it as a variable. Or the capital version Π.

I've already used π as a variable for the pressure in physics once. Well I was kinda forced to by my teacher, cause I really didn't want to...

nerds!! (i love it)

I love your family

Yeah I'm the only one who does that in my family and they all get annoyed at me

@@muenstercheese I adore your great tit (parlus major) pfp. You can always identify a seasoned or bonafide birder if they can confidently and correctly distinguish the nuances between the blue tit and great tit. They are both species within the taxonomic parlus, but there are a few phenotypic differences that are diagnostic to the great tit. Sorry for my ramblings, I tend to over-analayze any scene in media that features birds or other taxa. As long as the person doesn't come across as being pretentious, I'm fine with them expressing their passion in a constructive manner. This may only be tangentially related to the original comment, so I apologize. My mother is also quite nerdy when history is involved.

same!

So what I'm hearing is there are Appa-shaped-airplanes in our future

@@zman4002 as soon as we work out air bending.

@@parist6735 shouldn't be too hard tbh (this is a joke)

Pretty sure Mattpat did a theory on this!

@@parist6735 Have you ever been close to a helicopter, that would mean a lot of wind going along with it. Of course I could calculate it right now, but the plants next to him should be moving a little.

How your comment is 4 days ago

Holy shit you time traveled…that’s not possible by our current understanding of physics so that’s not very realistic

@@Wildbeaver224 0:27

Remember: if it's in physics, it's in-vertible.

To carry the joke further and to be a tad more annoying. Unless the determinant is zero, it is invertable. the big reveal at the end is that the determinant is zero, that's why its such a big secret.

@@austingarcia6060 the secret to the universe is not 42, but that the determinant is zero. This is F'ing amazing.

@@austingarcia6060 over an arbitrary commutative unital ring, the determinant just needs to be a nonunit.

@@Grassmpl I think I met my match, had to double check that. But if we were dealing with rings, wouldn't it be called 'The matrices'?

You're a legend, please come with me when I go to the cinema

This comment is SO underrated. Here’s you a reply to get you to the top so Zach will see

Surely!

Do you really want engeniring classes on youtube through movies?

@@GeekNewz Yes, yes I do.

@@austingarcia6060 yea, you've got a point

Quantum

And you over thought a normal phrase

@@guythat779 Oh yeah, 100%. No hypocrisy here, I'm _definitely_ guilty of overthinking. In fact, to a fault. When I started my management position, the COO and owner of the company swiftly called down on me for over-explaining points in emails. Answers that should be "yes" or "no", I turned into sentences. What should have been single sentences were paragraphs. And what should have been paragraphs were entire essays. The COO, my boss, gave me an entire lecture on how communication needs to be brief and concise, with no more information added than needed. I was crushed, and defended myself with the logic that "Well, my thought process is that I can get ahead of any questions, by answering all possibilities beforehand, eliminating your need to ask, thus saving you time and effort. So for instance, if you ask me if I think we can cover a customer PO in 2 days, but I think it'll take 3 days, I don't want to just tell you ' _no_ ' . I'd rather explain to you why it will take 3 days instead of 2. Well long story short, she told me "No, stop doing that. Stop. All I need to know is if it's possible. We don't have time to comb through extremely lengthy emails for tiny bits of relevant information. I know you know how to do your job, so I trust the answer if you just say it can't be done. If I or anyone needs explanations, we will just ask you to elaborate. You are way overthinking what we're requiring of you. _PLEASE_ stop sending us such long emails." I was mortified because I thought I was doing everyone favors by mapping out all possible questions and answering them beforehand. It didn't occur to me that I was making it harder for people because they had to use valuable time combing through tons of information to find the important bits.

@@PsQueak2 lmao I am similar to you but my parameters are different, before I explain You really over explained "I wanted to get ahead of questions" in a meeting discussing your over explanation? That's kinda radical Anyway, I am unfortunately gifted in understanding ppl so I can imagine such is quite annoying so for a long time I decided to let ppl ask when they want. Experience has taught me that never happens, ppl WILL WITHOUT FAIL decide their own idea of what's happening is right and elaborate out of their ass, or they will completely rely on you in every big or small thing So I started explaining myself to the world again.... but ppl dont listen cause at the moment they want one word and they're waiting on it but with my grp's attention span that simply didnt happen and I just ended up unheard till wayyy later when what I was pointing out happened and I just tell everyone, "told you so" I've learned to make my speech info dense yet smooth (I was completely isolated in covid time however and that did ruin my skills a tad) which I try to modulate in a way that covers only the necessary bases but ppl have proven to be absolute oafs Now, as much as I relate and empathize with you our problems are very different, you actually over explain, I can clearly see that, the useful info can be given in a shorter sentence without losing any meaning I just don't know what breed of animals I'm dealing with in my uni projects I do wish you the best good sir and as a token of goid will from text wall brother to brother have this advice Say the important stuff first as an introduction, give all the necessary quick answers and then afterwards as a massive footnote explain to your heart's desires, perhaps you can list it as points too and learn to be more efficient with your word usage so that the bullet points you write can actually be referenced again later and be helpful This way you can have your cake and eat it too :) (I learned that through great pain)

@@PsQueak2 that's very relatable, I definitely have a tendency to do that as well. thanks for taking the time to type it out! :-)

@@PsQueak2 What industry? Engineering or tech or..? You must have been writing essays in your emails for someone to get annoyed enough to intervene, yeah? Usually when I write emails like that for work (electrical engineer), I give the short and sweet answer at the very top, with a short bullet list or few lines giving specifics. Readability is very important. Walls of text without blank lines, paragraphs, and bold/underlining (sparingly) makes it mentally harder for people to read, and can cause them to perceive the contents as much longer than a formatted version. Just offering advice, hopefully you have already learned to adapt.

If you like being taught stuff for free, why not sign up for a free account with Grammarly? Just trying to help my boy Zach out 😁

I do this with my little sister. She knows too much for her age now

@@yannickrzf1142 Knowledge is never wrong at any age, I believe... Well, children shouldn't watch inappropriate stuff to begin with, so... All good, I guess 😁

Woah! You have so many videos in your playlists! You must be spending a lot of time on RU-vid. I do too.

@@kepspark3362 Actually not so much (but usually more than on other platforms) 😂 I do however follow specific topics I am interested in 😊

If I've been laughing at seeing myself in this video due to the fact that I overanalyze the scientific plausibility of scenes in movies, yet I did not major in STEM, could it then be said that I in fact should have been a STEM major or could it be that in a parallel reality, I am in fact a STEM major(with a supermodel girlfriend), and have become entangled by quantum particles from that dimension, altering my perception of this reality?

@@ghostnike901 I’m gonna guess first one. Believe the second tho if you wanna!

So accurate tho…

@@ghostnike901 Why not both?

Specifically, this behavior is prevalent for 1st And 2nd year students, IMO. Especially in EE, year 3 means if you get a free hour to watch a movie, the last thing you want to obsess over is technicalities (Junior yeah is easily the most difficult and soul draining year). By senior year, you are either dead inside from last year, or you just don't give a shit about sci-fi movies not being 100% accurate

A friend of mine has the luxury of having such a friend. Perhaps this person I won't mention here is not as bad as in this video, but he certainly goes into this direction.

And the weak nation got utterly destroyed leading to imbalance among the remaining 3 nations.

@@nicolasmahmoudieh-kraetz6772 you say that, but the weak nation has nukes and transmutation

​@@purplenanite An OVA episode involving the aftermath of a nuclear war between the four nations?

@@purplenanite Yeah but the electromagnetic nation can seriously mess with electronic technology and weaponry. But this doesn't even mention their more powerful fighters who can suspend biochemistry - instantly killing their adversaries.

@@Pinefoxo the gravitybenders could all power their stuff through mechanical bits, gravity-powered, and produce spacetime knots for interesting purposes, and the weak-benders can basically power any device thermally. The strong force is mostly out of luck though.

didnt learn it from them, they got the ability to bend from the turtles and by mimicking their element`s animals they were able to master it

@@vingvingduy1779 in the og show he is right korra just retconned it

@@martinscarton4561 the original show was never so specific. It just said something similiar to: "by watching the original benders we were able to learn it", this phrase is still correct after korra. You had to learn it from the original benders to actually master it, otherwise its just super weak, barely enough to survive outside the lion turtle cities. Not a fan of korras introduction with raava and that evil spirit, but in this regard its fine...

Thank you

I don't feel like doing the math right now, but wouldn't that be thousands of pounds of force pressing on the door before it was opened? That would have to be a pretty strong door not to have been ripped off the hinges.

@@chitlitlah assuming a 1mx3m door, the total force would be 4.5 metric tons (ish)

@@turtledruid464 So the weight of three mid-sized cars... No problem if they're in a bank vault.

morbius strip

Ikr 😂 me too

it would be even more amazing if you moved that time stamp to 3:14

@@gwenzero2906 I felt like everything kinda made sense until he said 'as pi approaches infinity loloololool

@@solidwaterslayer Only a crazy person uses pi as the variable

Can Aang fly though?(without that stick device) Avatar state only. Therefore, is Appa constantly in an Avatar state? That would make sense.

It's a power series. Hopefully it diverges since we enjoy these videos so much.

isnt pi(x) approaches infinity just infinity

Another question. Is the matrix unimodular?