Engineering jobs in the future (probably) be like... 

I skip the integration constant so much that my thoughts went to "why would he add the speed of light" for a few seconds at first lol

@@Dalrocto punch a hole through space time that allows you to traverse the entire universe in an instance I feel like something has to be going the speed of light

In my uni toilet, there is a "Don't forget the c" on the wall:)

if i''m being honest that almost got me exploding from laughter and then he said blue eyes white dragon

Yeah 😂😂😂

Im 36, id prefer not

be rational, that'll be enough. #punIntended

@@Artaresto Should have probably suggested it 2 years ago.

Use irl_ceil() instead of irl_round(). See if that works. 🤷‍♂

A

Literally exact same situation for me

You take calculus because you need it for your career I take calculus to understand math jokes We are not the same.

Damn I actually thought it was a physics joke at first

Same. I learned about integrals yesterday, and this was the perfect timing.

Ahh... That's qhat it was. Last time I did intervals was like 2 years ago...

They had... You were looking at the AI the entire video...

​@@Michael-vf2mw I can confirm, this is how I argue with chat gpt. Already getting angry with it like it's a real person

not really its been 1 million years. we’re supposed to be existing in superpositions of a trillion dimensions by then, not JUST NOW discovering how to make wormholes teleporting us across the universe. IF WE ARE DOING THAT NOW, ONE CAN ONLY IMAGINE THE AMOUNT OF TIMES AI HAS OVERTAKEN THIS WORLD. I MEAN GODDAM 1 MILLION YEARS. ACCORDING TO PREDICTIONS FROM SCIENTISTS SUCH THINGS SHOULD BE HAPPENING WITHIN THIS CENTURY. Rather this future is probably the most pessimistic outcome.

They have...or how can in a wormhole project only 2 people are working?? Cause most of the jobs are done by AI.

@@ankitnmnaik229 You're an AI AI apologist from the future aren't ya? We all know ALL the future jobs are taken by your type.

ChatGPT will ask Skynet for an answer

@@DefinitelyNotEmma Yeah that’s more reasonable

The ultra duper model? Bro you're not even trying 💀💀

It can only answer something that has already been answered.

@@benoitb.m6461 It can't formulate original ideas though. It's the future for low level jobs but not for making advancements.

10 million engineers competing for 10 thousand jobs 😢😢 . future is looking very bleak. Only hope is that crime shoots up ,if too much unemployment arised ,then governments will do something.

@@pradhyudh the way i look at it is that the amount of people to be funemployed will push the wages of the jobs down since the unemployed will be forced to find other work, and eventually the roaming hordes of homeless will finally force the govt to do something...

@@internallyinteral we can apply robot tax ,why is nobody talking about it now ,6 years ago ,when bill gates said it , everybody laughed it down , Circumstances have changed now ,we need to think about that.

Nie każdy jest omnipotentem , przykładowo rodzic szukający "baterii" do zabawki dla dziecka może to kupić sugerując się etykietą.

Maybe society has moved past the need to be productive and we can have robots do all our work while we just kinda play and pursue our passions all day? Maybe we're evolving beyond capitalism?

That sounds like a really interesting problem! What makes packing problems so difficult?

@@josephdaquila2479 The problem space. Imagine a 3×3×3 volume to be fille by L pieces made of 3 unit cube. You can see that numerically, 9 of such L would fill the cube. But is there such configuration ? Well, if you color each cell to fill either black or white such that two face adjacent cells do not have the same color, you get 14 blacks and 13 whites. (I decided that the "corner" cells would be black) Now, your L have one cell of one color and two cell of the alternate color. Also, you've exactly 9 L. To have 14 blacks, you need 7 L with 2 blacks. But you would miss 2 L. Ok, so, 12 blacks with 6L. Then +3 for the remaining L ? Nope. 10 black wit 5L, then 4 black with 4L...That works! But does that do 13 whites ? 10+8=18...nope! Hum, let's go full algebra. Let say we have pieces of type A which has 1 black and 2 whites. We have pieces of type B which has 2 blacks and 1 white. We know that: there is 9L -> a+b=9 There is 14 blakcs -> a+2b=14 There js 13 whites -> 2a+b=13 14-13=a+2b-2a-b 1=b-a So: 1=b-a 9=a+b 10=2b b=5 a=4 We satisfy all the relation, so the packing is doable. It's also the only solution. But we are not done yet, we just showed that we need 5 pieces with 2 blacks and 4 pieces with 2 whites. (We actually proved it) Now, we need to fit those pieces im space. Note that we can't fill a face with L pieces. This can be proven by exhaustion. If your piece isolate a cell, it can't be positionned that way. So, you're forced to place your first two pieces in a 2×3 arrangement. The remaining space can't be filled! So, we need to go 3D. We need to place 2 pieces so they occupy a 2x2 volume (So, a L with double depth) and you can see that we just made the same issue "worse". Hence, you can't fill your 3x3x3 cube! And all the "math" did check out. But when adding the spacial constraint...you can see it's not feasible (with a bit of spacial reasoning). Also, I voluntarily took a simple example where we can use tha parity trick and even get a nice way to even know which kind of pieces we would have. It didn't help. A basic spatial reasoning did help. Now, you need to tell the computer to do that. The computer can "brute force" by testing each combination, but you enter in a problem space that is non polynomial. Something that quickly snowball into incomensurable numbers! That's partly why those are damn hard. So, you resort to "quite good" algorithm, like trying to find the best fit for each piece. Like Tetris players!...And it works quite well ^^ Untill you add additional constraints ^^

@@josephdaquila2479 Bonus: there is a puzzle called "soma cube". Biy one amd you will not regret ^^

@@programaths do you have a professional portfolio or a LinkedIn? It'd be nice to see what kind of work you do. Or is youtube the best place to stay in touch with you?

@@josephdaquila2479 I deactivated my LinkedIn. RU-vid and Twitter are my only socials (that I am aware of).

Hey congrats!

Zach, will I have to use sig figs in engineering? I’ve learned about sig figs in chemistry but I didn’t know I had to use them in other fields. Thank you.

@@mibeutbig8909 Do you understand the purpose of significant figures or did you just do them without thinking at all?

​@@GallicNine lol i think he's an Asian because it's just rote learning (hard memorization) there.

MCU

yea that sounds like some weak ass type III civilization shit, my bro out here tryna get laid yo

Sure, but is a wormhole taco also a wormhole sandwich?

Haha, no kidding. That was my favorite part of the video because I totally did not see that coming.

Heck with air resistance. Try big-bang photon resistance! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greisen%E2%80%93Zatsepin%E2%80%93Kuzmin_limit#%3A%7E%3Atext%3DThe_Greisen%E2%80%93Zatsepin%E2%80%93Kuzmin_limit%2Cintergalactic_medium_to_our_galaxy.?wprov=sfla1

that's not how rounding work! You meant 10M subscribers,

@ɐɯɹɐʞ ɐıuɐɯ 🤣 😂

Nah it's just too weak, obviously a 500 millicochrane subspace field isn't gonna hold open a stable wormhole against it's gravimetric shear and tetryon pressure, when it's supposed to cross the transwarp barrier and extend across the whole universe. Or maybe Ea Nasir sold you shitty dilithium.

I feel sorry for you already :)

@@neilgerace355 Why? O.o

@@neilgerace355 haha,can feel u

i am in my second year of electrical engineering and god did i used to think like that back in highschool... I am not discouraging you by any means but i have started to finally lose interest in my degree, its fvking hard

@@dontreadmyusername6787 hard,irrelevant and arrogant professors

There is?? How?

@@tOo_0dd well, mostly random bits of dust and gas out in the literal middle of nowhere. You're looking at accounting for numbers on the level of 10^-20 moles per cubic light year. in other words, basically zero but not exactly zero.

😂😂😂

Nah, you just got the wrong framework to think about, and you wouldn't want me to give the answer. Too much goddamn university and no creativity, everybody doing the same shit and expecting different results.

Green salad, please

@@glarynth I know many vegetables that are very clear on that point