We'll Never Know How Roger Federer Turned This Match Around! #2 

Haters be like: chokerer🤡

Because the players now are weaker.

@@masters.1000 Do you know, last night I was actually thinking about Big 3 dominance in slams since 2018, which is when Djoker resumed winning. Though this year is not yet over, the five-year period of 2018-2022 has 2 slams won by non-Big 3 opponents, in Thiem and Medvedev. The preceding five years, 2013-2017, had 6 slams won by non-Big 3 opponents, in Murray, Wawrinka and Cilic. Further, all three of those guys made finals in addition to their wins. Of the Next Gen, only Medvedev has made more than 1 final, but the most incredible stat is that every Next Gen slam finalist has lost a slam final from two sets to love up. Three straight years of this from 2020-2022. I don't know how many times this has happened in say, the last 40 years but, off the top of my head, I can think only of Mac-Lendl and Coria-Gaudio. Maybe there are a few more, but for this to happen from the same generation of players in quick succession like that has got to be a spectacular thing in men's tennis. But sure, Djoker and Nadal continuing to rack up slams at their age is because they're "just too good." Well, yes, 'cos the Next Gen are lacking in so many ways it's tragic. Fed should not have been reaching SFs and finals at age 38 either. Why, in your opinion, is FAA not doing better?

@@masters.1000 for the top level, yes there are fewer of them For the lower level, like outside Top 30, i disagree

@@masters.1000 that's a dumb argument, how do you know the players aren't better?

@@hello-mv6yg Because they lose to guys +10 years older, injured and without taking a set.