What I said at the Oxford Union | Populism debate 

Excellent point well made. It ought to be reversed.

*claps into mic*

Love podcasts. Is that what they are calling these 🤣

@@williamsulman2646 Yet you insist on hate watching... its sad really

@@williamsulman2646 No. It is a debate in a University, that's a place you can never go because of your low IQ and gullibility.

@@zoranblackie5921 not for the video maker I've got the premium. In only here for the comments. I listened to a few. Not for me. Really easy bites on the comments section tho 😉 You just proved that 🤣

What?

Just like sunaks government giving multi-million contract to a company his wife has shares in?

@@evelbsstudioNot exactly the same no, but same issue of those in power thinking rules and standards don't apply to them

Can you imagine a world where politicians were not entitled to anything that wasn’t readily available to every single citizen in the country.

Are u surprised?

@simplySY8 no, but its pretty eye opening for those who do not follow politics, I mean it's right in your face ridiculous hypocrisy that cannot be denied or defended, even by her own side

Type Winston Marshall

​@@user-dt3iv5oc6f Thank you👍

Exactly that. These people are too wrapped up in their own self worth they cannot read between the lines

The left can't meme, full stop

Because he's just another average Joe

Poppadoms _are_ a threat to democracy, though... that's what my naan always taught me.

That is not _all_ that populism is, of course. Presenting such a narrow sliver of a definition doesn’t seem fair to the conversation

Socialism' a term without a consensus definition, meaning different things to different people, but was typically used within a context of more power for workers in a system based on worker ownership of the means of production.

It denotes time spent. Each speaker gets a set time to speak. The bell signifies the end of their slot.

Naive young trust-funded lefties like the one in the clip, for starters

Mainstream parties imposing mass migration on their people and transforming towns and cities by making them worse.

It was a case, empty and inert, NOT an actual complete and intact cartridge.

2010.. bit late mate.

Don't disagree though I would expand a bit on the idea that it's both right and left. While there are some extreme leftists they are far less in number and the group who are typically labeled as far left are moreso authoritarian reactionaries than they are lefties. I also don't think "polarized" is the best term and political scientists here in the US are staying to reassess the idea that we are divided - basically, it's not that both sides have moved but Rather it's the right that has moved away from the rest and become radicalized to a point that those on the right who resisted are now forming coalition with the left/Dems (which further supports that it's not polarization since centrists and center right are being welcomed into the "tent") But either way, you mostly summed up my thoughts and observations. Regardless of the actual nuances, those who sell to destroy democracy &/or NATO are exploiting the tension and have vast networks to help. The arguments about whether or not we will be at war in 3-5 years have been making me want to shout because authoritarians (and especially Russia) have considered themselves at war with us for over a decade! We really need to wake up & get our sht together by working together to push back and build defenses

@@DJWESG1 i said since as in on-going implying still doing so in present day.

@@sempressfi Well thanks for your reply and your own opinion on the situation, i agree also with your sentiments for the most part. What i mean by both left and right, if we are talking numbers then ofc the far right is outnumbering the far left by a great deal. My point is and through my own observations, is that the far left or extreme left if you will can be equally if not more dangerous than the nastiest of far right groups, in that they use a different kind of insidious approach by cancelling out others that do not absolutely conform to there ideas, i'd be happy to give a number of examples but it's a bit messy here on the tube due to the comment box being so clustered, not sure if your part of any communities or such but do lemme know and i'd be happy to write further. The reason i used the term 'polarized' is because it has kinda become an issue of your either in this ultra leftist camp or ultra right wing camp, there doesn't seem to be any longer a middle ground. Often threats such as Russia to touch on your point of war go unasserted, the likes of Putin history has taught us they are nothing more than bullies, the sad reality is though unless one stands upto a bully they will continue to do the things they do. The war in Ukraine likely would never have occurred, if for two things, first the west should have taken immediate firm action on the first invasion of Crimea, Putin was clearly testing the Wests resolve in that matter and we utter failed and shown nothing but complacency which then gave him the incentive to push further. Second NATO has indeed expanded, and from the perspective of your every day Russian it could be perceived as encirclement and encroachment on traditional spheres of influence, especially the older generations whom lived in the Soviet years, this was then manipulated by Putin to give him a internal mandate / excuse if you will to invade Ukraine under the idea that NATO has encroached on Russia's sphere of influence. After the Cold War there was a kind of status quo, which was a fine balance between the West and Russia, this became de-stabilized when the afore mentioned expansion of NATO occurred which at the time wasn't needed as we had peace. Now China has built up slowly in the background and all are trying to outdo one another for supremacy over controlling the world agenda, something which traditionally America has done for years. Also take into account the many proxy wars between America and its allies including us here the UK vs Russia / China, good examples are the proxies Syria / Syrian rebels, Iran using the likes of Hamas whilst we use Israel (all be it the latter due to terror attack) but u know what i mean these super powers never directly fight one another or even engage in diplomacy much these days, instead opting for proxy wars and such. Sadly though it's becoming clear the time is near for a full blown world war and direct confrontation, probably between America and the Western Alliance / NATO vs the Axis of Russia/China/Iran and possibly satellite states such as North Korea. The politicians who represent the people seem intent on hurdling toward such aggression which is opening the door as well for these extreme right and left groups to take advantage. This is why i say there doesn't seem to be any reasoning any more no center / centralist outlook, either way it's terrifying to watch it slowly unfold.

Can he use proper English though?

​@williamsulman2646 I understood him fine, what ya talking about?