An alternate history of Russia in which the White Army win the Russian Civil War and crush the Communists! If you want a video explaining the logic behind the scenario tell me in the comments down below! Please like and subscribe!
Yes But they may help White and force White to give them independence and some land, White will be weaker than Soviet, Poland may even not need to make war against White and get lands in 1922's size.
agreed. This video makes no sense either. France could have not attacked germany like in our own timeline. There was no offensive plan to invade germany to that extend.
Well Poland is considering “white allied” since they mainly fought the Reds and the Blacks. Also I don’t understand how did Russia annexed All of Eastern Europe, it looks like if whites won their army somehow got better or something
Чел, это сделал западный чел который даже не углублялся в гражданскую войну и сделал так что после победы белых вернулась монархия и появился какой-то царь Кирилл, ты тупой?
Honestly, I can't come up with the reason of Germany committing such a suicidal act. If they had the backing of the Uk and Italy, I might believe it, but it's just unbelievable by themselves.
In my opinion, if Russia is that strong, the British may stay neutral even join the side of Germany. And Finland, Poland, and the Baltic states(Especially Lithuania in the three of Baltics) won't willingly be part of Russia or Russian puppets.
What I also (imo) find weird is that UK and France went to war. Originally UK and France would give Sudetenland to Germany to *prevent* the war. And Germany would never agree with being split up in Hannover etc like they did in the Morgenthau plan.
I don't know about that. Without Mussolini around to be inspired by and to be a baseline with which his own movement is formulated, would Hitler have established the German Reich? I'm thinking this is the definitive early end for communism; its radical ideological crusaders within Russia are killed, the movement is totally demonised and delegitimised, and by the modern day it's known as a failed idea that ultimately never got a stable foothold anywhere.
@@kinggodzilla309 There was only really 2 “large” Communist countries and those were the Soviets and the Chinese and you could argue that the Chinese only won because of soviet support and most “small” countries only had communist revolutions at all because of soviet existence and provocation.
I like this video but the one things that I have an issue with is that Russian industrialization was not included. Russia was a largely rural nation after the civil war.And would have need to massively industrialize in order to compete with the western powers .
My brother is a scientist and i'm an engineer so i think i can create you know a machine to take us to another timeline will take about 3 years but just wait
Same I feel very mad and envious but maybe you can try reality shifting to a reality with this timeline but it's not confirmed that if shifting is real or not
Germany would've probably united by 1990 under Prussian rule, like in our timeline wiht West and East Germany. Königsberg would probably stay under Russian rule because it was a Baltic state originally tho.
Though I think this video is unrealistic if the world truly comes to that situation, France and Britain may put west Germany and Austria together to build an economically strong Germany against Prussia which is in Russian control...
Yeah I thought the dismantling of Germany was particularly unrealistic. I imagine that, without the duration and sheer brutality of WW2 in our timeline, Germany would have been treated more leniently at the negotiating table. I think they would still lose East Prussia to the Russians, but aside from that would remain a united nation - retaining Pommern and Upper/Lower Silesia. The difference this time being no Polish Corridor, a more fair treatment that would not create the bad taste of Versailles, and more watchfulness from both the Western Allies and Russia over Germany to ensure German irredentism doesn't rise again. Also an exodus of ethnic Germans from East Prussia, the Sudetenland and Danzig to the new German mainland, this time a much more peaceful affair due to the aforementioned lack of genocidal brutality that the Nazis brought to the war in our timeline, which brought inevitable violent reprisals against ethnic Germans at the war's end
First time seeing this channel. Really like how you utilize maps to create a short, logical explanation as to how an alternate history may come about, rather than creating a thirty-hour verbal dissertation on why Myanmar sucks and could have been annexed in 1230 B.C by the Scottish Empire without any really solid reasoning.
Well,the video is certainly good,the plot is here,map,music-everything fits But history...well,as a man from post-soviet space,I will try to make some things here 1-Death of Lenin would surely be tragic,but it wont be like Kaiserreich scenario,mostly because it was the centralized AgitProp which ran the propaganda and news for the soldiers so the Red Army while perhaps would collapse,would do it much much later than 1920 2-A number of new allies. Definetly not Finland,hello Karelian uprising of 1921 Ukraine-Pavlo Skoropadsky regime was not by any means pro Russian and stood for Ukrainian independence,just like regimes in Belarus and especially the Baltics 3-Poland Closed within the borders of the XVI century, cut off from the Black and Baltic Seas, deprived of the land and mineral wealth of the South and Southeast, Russia could easily pass into the state of a second-rate power, unable to seriously threaten the newfound independence of Poland. Poland, as the largest and strongest of the new states, could easily secure a sphere of influence that would extend from Finland to the Caucasus Mountains- - Y. Pilsudsky Point 2 and 3 combined to the new annexations made by Russia 4-Constitutional monarchy A good half of Russian white generals supported the idea of the Republic and fought for the constitutional assembly. 5-Tsar Nicholas and grand Knyaz Mikhail Both would be dead,Nicholas shot with the first signs of Whites victory and Mikhail Alexandrovich would be abducted from the hotel and killed. 6-Resurgent Germany in 1925. In 1925. Resurgent. 7-Panslavism was mostly approved only by Russia and Yugoslavia,Czechs,Poles,Bulgarians and for some reason here-Greeks had none of that. Even if due to religion or hate for Turkey(Which would also lose more of its north east because of Russian intervention and of course-supporting Armenians,and Ataturk having harder time fighting without his only supplier-Soviet Russia) Greece was stuck between England who for all times did not wanted Russians close to Medditeranian and Russia. Also yes,Finland declared its independence with the abolition of Russian monarchy,so why is it in Russian alliance. 8-They would not neglect Russian agricultural base 1500 tractors for entire Russia by 1913,most of them are used as cargo transport that is what I call a neglect of industry. No mechanization,no fertilizers,a third of land is still in the hands of aristocracy,and neither the tsarist government,nor the provisional seemed to care,and it was one of the first reasons why peasants rebelled. 9-Preventing soviet era famines They would still face the famine of Transvolgan region neverthenless. And now would have the repetition of famines of 1840.1842.1873, 1880, 1883,1891,1905 and 1911 and what leaded to them-epidemics(thanks to no mass vaccinations which the Soviets irl enacted),no literacy programs for spreading methodics(Thanks comrade Lenin for LikBez-liquidation of illiteracy), hoarding of grain by the Kulaks(Forced confiscation of grain started in 1916 for the exact same reason) And the fundamental land problem which collectivization solved. Peasants are not farmers,peasants send to the market only part of their products while the rest feed their families. When father dies,his land is splitten between the sons. And what happens next-correct,more men,same amount of men-the amount of products to the market drops. You can counter argument me by presenting Stolypin reform-but no,the reform was one of the fuels for the peasant riots as it tried to break apart their many-centuries old communal farming and made them vulnerable to kulaks who most peasants hated. 10-Kulaks as political opposition I see that Whatifalthist content made it here. Which is very sad because its simply wrong. Lets start with definition of who were the Kulaks,no not the most hard working-such honor belonged to Serednyaks or Middle peasants. Kulaks got a lot of their wealth through banal usury,and lending their land and quipment at high interest rates or corvee works. Why Soviet government started collectivization only in 1927-the answer is simple. Bread preparation programmes for the cities and exports failed because....right,Kulaks never agreed on state-imposed prices and simply held grain until the price would rise. Plus,the collectivization allowed for massive mechanization of agriculture. Most of peasant lands were of small square,2-3 hectares. Kulaks-more but not astronomically high. Peasants did not had the money to properly buy any agricultural equipment,price is simply too high. And cant use it properly-most of the land plots are too small. Collectivization simply did what was done in the west just at a much higher speed-concentration of assets. 11-Slightly slower No,it will be a lot slower,to get the necessary rates of industrialization,Russian Empire will have to do what it did in 1900s-Export grain but starve "We wont eat enough,but will export!" -Alexander Vyshnegradsky,minister of finances. The Russian Empire ranked 5th in the world according to the index of industrial production. This is what supporters of the monarchy are mostly proud of. Production really developed. But this is due to the backwardness of the country, where the vast majority are peasants. The late development of industry gives a high growth rate in any country. One of the main factors-effect of low base. Where even slight increase of production would result in high percentage increase. And while economy progresses those percent numbers are more and more complex to achieve. Example: To double yearly production of cars from 100,we would need to add in 100,then 200,then 400,then 800 and the numbers would grow leading to lower and lower growth by percents. But there are subtleties in the development itself, which are not always mentioned by the apologists of tsarism. Yes, the resources necessary for the development of industry were extracted. Mining was one of the successes of the Russian government, but the trouble is that the resources were mainly used not for development, but for sale. Most often they were mined by foreign companies. The Swedish company "Nobel" not only extracted oil on the territory of RE, but also used its own equipment, with the help of which production increased many times, but clearly not in the interests of Russia. This was beneficial primarily to foreign capital. Investments in oil production are an illustration of the influence of foreign capital on the Russian Empire. From 1910 to 1914 . Britain invests 134.6 million rubles, and domestic investments for the same period - 9.58 million rubles (Vavilin I. Foreign capital in Russia. L.: Priboy, 1925. p. 67). It was foreign capital that monopolized the extraction of individual resources. British and French capitalists were engaged in the production of platinum, their share in the Russian Empire was 90%. Foreign capital actively participated in almost any production and extraction of resources. And RE became a sales market, a source of resources and cheap labor. Domestic industry developed poorly. Basically, equipment and machinery were bought in the West. In many spheres from engineering to chemistry estimate Russia's dependence in terms of production capacity from 70 to 100% (Rozhkov N. Russian History in comparative historical Coverage (fundamentals of social dynamics) Leningrad - Moscow, 1926-1928, vol. 12, pp. 166-167). Therefore, when they remember "prosperity", do not forget that the lion's share of everything that was mined simply went to the west, because foreign corporations owned the production. There was still development in isolation from them, and impressive, but this is clearly not the 5th place among all countries of the world. 12-Much wealthier population Where do I even begin...with 40% literacy? With 27% child mortality before 1 year? With medium life expectancy of 35 years? From child labour which took 17% of all labour force? 10.000 people-1.3 doctors Pay for 1914-most prosperous year was only from 10-25 rubles for 60 hours work week. England by comparison-41 for 52 hours.Germany:31 for 56,US:72 for 53. No centralized healthcare,and only a nascent central education system which was for most people outside of Moscow and petrograd simply too expensive. "If we recall how much of the national income comes annually to the treasury, how much is absorbed by the clergy and other social groups that are not involved in the production of material values, we cannot but come to the conclusion that the share of the main creators of the national income accounts for an even smaller share of it." -Rubakin. Russia in numbers.1912 13-Social programs Labourers of Lensk mines would like to hear that story. 13.5 Both you and Whatifalthist forgot about one little detail in 1929 which caused entire world economy to collapse and Russian would collapse too. Not only because of global integration,but because the Reds succesfully cancelled all debts of Russian Empire,and I mean all of them-national debt,civilian debts and the Enormous War Debt. 14-No purges I mean those generals already lost to Reds which didnt had many experts,while Whites got the cream of Russian officers. But I give you a credit for starting the war earlier and with aid of allies,because otherwise if things went down OTL,Russia would end up behind the Urals. 15-Intimidate Moldova Hello ww3,Romania is guaranteed by France and England 16-Chinese Republic Hello warlordism,but neverthenless-far better than Mao.
Ay man, although it is not worth it to spend THIS much of your time commenting an entire essay on a random video, i would like to thank you because i read the whole thing and learned a fk ton of stuff
@@HansleyLucky a really,really flawed one. Kulaks as political and not economic enemies Social programs during the great depression Anti-Russian regimes letting to annex themselves. I don't need to be a cook to say if something is wrong with the meal I am currently eating.
My English is not very good, so I used Google Translate. That video was interesting, but the setting is also extremely upbeat and fanciful. It is strange that no country reacted to Russian expansion (Crimean War) and that the White Government/Monarchy prevented the famine, with the Russian Empire being marked by mass famines and political persecution (not unlike the Soviet Union).
No worries about using translate, glad you found the video interesting, and I can understand what you mean about it being upbeat, think of this as "best case scenario" preventing the famine would be easier without Stalin, though I admit there may be more resistance to Russian expansion. Thanks for your comment.
It is funny how in this scenario the Russian Empire takes half of the World and dosent even stop after, but yes it is fiction. Something like this, even if the Reds had lost, would never happen, and the Whites would have a colossal debt to the Western Allies even in the Civil war, not even mentioning new power hungry Nations to fight against, which truly desired land in the East, as for example, Romania, Poland, Czechoslovakia. Then Japan and the lands they occupied in the Civil war, plus the Japanese Imperialism, and the will to expand. Then Fascism in Germany, which was based not only against Communism, but against all Slavic Nations seen as Eastern Hordes. And many factors ,which would have reduced White Russia into ashes even before the 1950s. Not to even mention the Effects after the Civil war, the great Depression and the Crushing debt to the Americans, French and English for Aid and support in the Civil war.
I agree with you, even White won the civil war, their power will decrease a lot and lose control of his neighborhood. Poland won't be supposed to be a Russian puppet, the Polish-Soviet war proves that. And White maybe even weaker than red at the same time with the different parallel spacetimes. Ukraine, Belarus, and the Baltic states would be independent, too.
@@mappingowo3966 I truly believe that if the Whites would have won, even the Todays Russian Federation would not even exist, And the only Russian State that would exist if Nazi Germany would had lost the War in that Scenario, would be a Mini Russia in Europe, only with the lands mostly populated by the Russian People..
GOD SAVE THE TSAR LONG LIVE TATIANA LONG LIVE NICHOLAS II LONG LIVE OLGA LONG LIVE MARIA LONG LIVE ANASTASIA LONG LIVE ALEXANDRA LONG LIVE ALEXEI LONG LIVE THE ROMANOVS LONG LIVE THE MONARCHY!
this video was only 9 minutes yet somehow it seemed to last so long... this is the first time something enjoyable has gone by slowly for me. -Very good video -Underrated creator -10/10 would recommend
My only issue with this is that there were barely any monarchists in the White army, most were trying to uphold the republican regime and the legacy of the February Revolution. There were quite a lot of socialists as well.
Right after watching this video, I immediately gave like and subscribe. As Czech and patriot, I have always considered the question of whether Czechoslovakia should defend itself against Germany in 1938, when United Kingdom and France refused to help. I know that the vast majority of German tanks in 1938 were obsolete PzKpfw I. Furthermore, most of the German air force consisted of obsolete biplanes. And most importantly, they only had supplies of fuel and ammunition for one month. Half of the German army and up to two-thirds of the German generals regarded the attack on Czechoslovakia as stupidity. Czechoslovakia had a numerically weaker army, but our men were perfectly armed and trained, and especially determined to defend their homeland to the last breath, just like the Finns in 1939. Although it is said that in the event of war, Poland and Hungary would attack us - that is just a myth. Hungarian regent Miklos Horthy was afraid of Romanians and Polish leader Ignacy Moscicki was afraid of the Soviets. The Romanian army was much larger and stronger than the Hungarian. It even had dozens of our tanks LT 35, which at the time were among the best in the world. Although the Soviet Union had a non-aggression pact with Poland at the time, Stalin threatened to repeal the pact in the event of the Polish attack on Czechoslovakia. This would be an ideal opportunity for Stalin to reconquer Poland, which belonged to Russia 23 years ago. Therefore, I am convinced that we would successfully defend ourselves and the German army would be exhausted by their attack. If Hitler did not make a truce with Czechoslovakia in this case, he would be in danger of being forcibly removed. Then, sooner or later, there would be a civil war in Germany.
Indeed, I think we screwed you over by not standing to fight, I think had we done so, it'd have been over in a year. I agree on Poland and Hungary not getting involved, the polish wouldn't want to lose the favour of the British and French in case of a future German or soviet invasion and I don't think Horthy would've been dumb enough to invade. Also thanks for liking and subscribing, great to have you joining us.
Even though I'm Polish, i have to say that Czechs fell mainly because of Poland. In 1938 Poland and Czechoslovakia weren't allies, but their common ally was France. France asked Poland if it can send some troops on german border but Polish government refused. Instead of helping our ally and southern neighbour we chose to become "friend" of austrian painter by sending Czechs ultimatum to give back Zaolzie. Even Czechs historians like Jan Němeček and Eduard Stehlik say that Czechoslovakia did surrender because it was afraid of polish intervention and war with both Poland and Germany. Taking Zaolzie was the biggest mistake in whole interwar period.
@@justnatsuki9027 It is true that if interwar Poland relinquished its claim to Zaolzie and helped Czechoslovakia, it would not be conquered by Germany and the Soviet Union a year later. But I think the Munich Agreement, on the other hand, is our fault. Interwar Czechoslovakia was very nationalistic, even though it was a democracy. Germans, Poles, Hungarians, and even Slovaks lived in appalling conditions, especially during the Great Depression, when they were most affected by unemployment. I further condemn the war in 1919. After we defeated communist Hungary, we should immediately find common ground with Poland. President Masaryk wanted Zaolzie to remain in Czechoslovakia at all costs, because of the coal-fired power plant and the railway connecting the Czechia and Slovakia. That's why the war for Zaolzie began. I think that if we handed over Zaolzie to Poland in exchange for an alliance, and helped you fight the Russian Bolsheviks, there would be an immortal alliance and friendship between us Czechs / Slovaks and you Poles. Unfortunately, President Masaryk and Edvard Benes were selfish idiots who cared more about politics than the happiness of nations.
@@YresTAcommunism was way worse than any system Russia could've been put under, if Russia wasn't under communism for such a long time they wouldn't be backwards to this day
I doubt in timeline the empires would fall because no 6 year long world war 2 would make them likely to hold onto their colonies not till the same time as our timeline but likely seeing them still to this day and if Russia was seen as a big enough threat France and Britain might unify into the Franco British Union making the collapse of their empires impossible. Very good video I hope one day you will do one on the Franco British Union
The Empires probably don't fall completely, they probably keeps parts of their empires and decolonise the rest at a much slower pace, also the Franco British Union is definitely a timeline I plan on making
This is interesting, however - would the 1945 Nuclear bombs still happen? I assume the Japanese did the same as in real life, Pearl Harbour, and further expansion, so they're at war with the US. However, Germany was overwhelmed relatively quickly - would their top scientists still have the time to work and develop nuclear bombs, and would they be able to escape to the US, seeing as the US wasn't involved in the European Theatre (I assume so, since Britain did not have support of the US in keeping Germany united.) So would the Manhattan Project be started, and completed in time to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
one problem in this scenario is russia splitting konigsberg with poland makes no sense. in our timeline the reasoning behind taking east german lands was the deportation of germans west as revenge for the holocaust against slavs. however in this timeline with the nazis apparently dying in 3 years, and not being able to even take poland they wouldnt have been able to genocide as many people as they did in our timeline meaning there would be no revenge from russia
Idk about Pan-Slavism - the idea never had a huge amount of support outside of the Balkans (beyond small intellectual circles in the Bohemian lands), and unlike shown here would never have been accepted by non-Slav Greece or Finland. Apart from this, Poland had never subscribed to Pan-Slavism, having been partitioned thrice by Russia and very roughly Russified in the 19th Century, with Russia brutally suppressing the 1831 and 1863 uprisings. Also, do you think they would have attempted to reassert control over Finland militarily?
Greece is there mostly for religious reasons and them both hating Turkey, its not due to pan slavism, sorry should've made that clearer, Poland is essentially like post ww2 Poland in that its a Russian puppet just not communist, as for Finland, I don't know if they'd actually fight a war there, as the Soviets found out the Fins aren't ones to mess around with, however, the white movement did win in Finland so maybe they remain allies due to that along with the "army in being" doctrine acting as a threat to them.
Actually Mannerheim was a loyal general of Russian imperial army. Why would they go to war? In opposite Finland would be a very first ally of White Russia.
@@fkjl4717 Probably becouse he wanted to be independent. Fins colud capture Piotrograd. But decided that it wolud help whites. Who didn't acepted free finland.
@@patrioticbritishmapper8352 One thing is certain in all timelines. Poles hate Russians and it goes way beyond the communism thing or even partitions. This rivalry got started in medieval times and its just keeps going. Poles hate Russians more than Germans and Germans wanted to exterminate them.
Проблема в том, что непонятно какие именно "белые" победили бы. Потому что белыми называли вообще всех, кто против большевиков: бунтующих матросов в Кронштадте с которых началась эта революция, Колчака, Деникина, социал революционеров, которые интернационал пели, анархистов, бунтующих крестьян и тд.
No Step Back DLC is too TNO in my opinion but it’s still amazing and this reminds me of it when you can restore the Empire and do what Taboritsky wanted to do
@@patrioticbritishmapper8352 Though the Soviet Union is bad, but Russian Empire isn't better... And you're right, we still have chances for a much better world.
@@schnitzel4584 Oh, yep. You're right, but this video lets Russian Empire still exist, which means Monarchists still controlled this country, isn't it? And Russian Empire is economically poor, even Russian government have a great ruling skill, it's impossible for a weak and needs to recover's country to put that much country into its puppet. (Especially Poland, Polan was strong when it got independence) And other European countries isn't always nice, they helped Russian Empire once, the Russian need to pay back or even more. If Russian Empire still controls the Baltic, Belarus, and Ukraine, they must often face rebellions, a country in a confusion is difficult to get stronger...
@@mappingowo3966 I think if the whites had won, Russia would have borrowed and tried to get better, but people still inspired by lennin would have rebelled. (I am afraid here, I am afraid that he will be worse than the tsar's len and commit even greater rebel massacres) Russia would be worse because of these debts and would be a puppet of England and America. In World War II, it would probably invade. Even if the generals were good, because for those who did not enter industrialization, the weapon problem would be more than the Soviets.
Interesting, plus I see you kinda implemented my Balkanized Germany idea so cudos for that 😂 I had a few other ideas I came up with recently: • What if Duke Konstantin Pavlovich of Russia traveled to Greece during their War of Independence and used it to restore the Byzantine Empire in the 1820’s with himself as “Emperor Constantine XII?” • What if France had another revolution in May 1968? • What if the “Golpe Borghese,” a planned neo-fascist coup in Italy, actually happened in 1970? • What if Mikhail Gorbachev’s reforms succeeded in saving the Soviet Union but transitioned it out of communism into democratic socialism?
@@googs8869 it is not stupid or unrealistic, it is simply an interpretation, in Alternate history we all have our opinions as we are simply speculating, if you have a different opinion on how things would've have played out than I do, that's fine, and I'd be happy to hear your opinions.
nice video dude, really liked it. could you possibly link the world map (the world war 1 type map) that you use in your videos? that would help a lot. if you could also, explain what you use to colour and edit these maps. thanks in regards
Hi, glad you liked the video. To colour and edit the maps I use paint 3d. The ww1 map is an edited version of the modern world map, (I had to redraw all the borders) I can put it in my discord and you should be able to download it from there, maybe once I learn how to upload images to the internet they'll be an easier way to get it.
Same I wish that the Russian Empire still existed and India never partitioned, I'm sure the US and Russia would have some rivalry after world war 2 but they would probably have worked to together in advancements in technology like space travel, cure to cancer, significant industrialization etc as well as solving world hunger, protecting environment etc and with India never be partitioned it could have been a huge world player and would have been a major supporter and assistant of the US and Russia along with it being very developed and having an extremely low poverty rate but yet again we should be thankful that we were born in this timeline because we could have been born in bad timelines like a world destroyed by nuclear war and very primitive or in a world that is very undeveloped and many countries are under tyranny
I would say my only issue with the video is Yemen remaining disunited, it was only split during the Cold War due to the southern half being controlled by communists, which wouldn’t have happened in this world
Only thing I didn’t like was how the Germans were stopped that easily and how weird it would’ve been that they suddenly invade Poland which would open up Russia even more and give a worse situation.
This is the great masterpiece I enjoyed to both reading and watching world getting pleased with Russian Empire. Thank you SO MUCH Great brilliant British mapper!! You really made my day go light! And I hope more grand masterpiece stories certainly from YOU will proceed🤩🤩🤩🤩😍😍😍🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
I generally don't believe that there would be a new Tsar though. Before the Communists, there was already a revolution to force the Tsar to abdicate and form a Republic. It wouldn't really make sense if Russia just completely forgot about that and reinstated the Tsardom.
These two would inevitably both claim Istanbul, Greece because Constantinople and Russia because it's the gateway to the Mediterranean. No way could this be done to the satisfaction of both sides.
@@gengarzilla1685 assuming they're allies after the partition, Russia wouldn't have to lay claim to Instanbul. 1. Because it's back in Orthodox hands and 2. Because a Greek client state would allow for them to access the Mediterranean
На самом деле я не думаю, что всё пошло бы таким образом. Под конец существования РИ, она была полуфеодальной державой, да и курс монархии был довольно устаревшим, так что Россия при монархе или при парламенте должна была бы семимильными шагами (такими же темпами, как и в СССР) пройти 2 индустриальных революции, чтобы одержать победу над Рейхом
I liked the scenario, but, in the absence of the threat of Nazi Germany, I do not think the United States would have developed the atomic bomb. France may have (its research was pretty far along in 1940), but the US would not have had the incentive to do so.
It's an impossible scenario. Your country would have been turned into a dismembered collection of Western controlled banana republics upon white victory.
Went completely off the rails when the video got to Germany. I have yet to see any alt history videos remotely get Germany right but i suppose thats the point of alt history
@@thegangstachimp Free healthcare No illeteracy No unemployment Free housing The right to work 8 hour workday Equal gender rights Equal rights for all nationalities Defeat nazism Free education Free universities Free public transport Free water Free electricity
Where do you think India would lie in the 2021 Tri Polar Cold War in this alternate history? Because chances are, major powers would want the boost of India on their side, since India's population and economy could help them. Any side India joins, would have a significant boost in power. So in the instance that this alt history is extended, who would they join?
I can't see India aligning with China, whether they're communist or capitalist. Probably either the US or Russia, but I can see India benefit from playing both sides.
@@gengarzilla1685 Yes, I feel like India would be non aligned, so they profit from either side of the conflict. India and China allying seems unlikely, so they are left really to align with the US or Russia, where the latter seems more likely due to proximity. There is a big difference in area between the US and India, and they are significantly close to Russia. Plus, how will the US help India in the case of war? Russia wants to take down China, like India, so it would make sense to help Russia. They could also help the US, maybe for economic reasons perhaps and a close relation to the UK. But I think, India would be most likely neutral, profiting from both sides.
this is actually a good thing for my country finland because we wouldn’t have got some economic depression shit in the early 90’s and the thingy with soviet union so yea
@@Young_Nationalist in europe we don’t have races, people insult each other by country and after country it’s province after province it’s city/town/village after city/town/village it’s a part of the city/town or village after the part people insult eachoter by house after the house people insult eachother by what floor they live in lol yea
I guess Russia would retake Finland and Poland as part of it's territory after Civil War. And of course it would become constitutional monarchy at least after WW2
Russian empire was already constitutional monarchy in 1905 to 1917. Also if White army had won, it would have made Russia be in crisis, protests, because Russians never like the foreign army stay in their state. Not to tell, White armies only had one similiarity, anti communist, other than that, they just loot people's weath, had different ideas, even turning Russia to absolute monarchy not to tell they coorperated with separatists, made Russia lost a lot of lands
@@Alexander_Lyumen do you pretend you don't know anything? This is exactly how wiki writes: Brest-Litovsk Treaty was considered as a treachery of the Russians by the Entete, and they decided to intervene the civil war after the Great war ends. Not to tell they relied on separatists governments, make Russia lost a lot of lands. The intervention wasn't to prevent communist at all, it was mainly for their own benefit.
@@elfbeaned no doubt about it. But i told about The Emperor's power. The Emperor before Civil War still had pretty big power even if officially Russia was constitutional monarchy. And even if Whites had won in Civil War Emperor eventually would have become just a symbol of power like in tge UK or Japan. And the main figure would be Prime Minister
I'm actually thinking the world in 2022 might be less developed, since there wasn't a Soviet threat everyone was worrying about, i mean there was still the Russians but it likely wasnt at the same level of the cold war.
Wow, a Cold War between the Authoritarian Totalitarianism monarch east and the democratic capitalist west is the most creative shit I have ever seen, round of applause to this man right here🎉
Russia at least would have tough constitutional bindings on its monarchy here. Already it sounds miles better than the authoritarian Putinist mess from our timeline.
Basically a cold war between monarchy and democracy, intresting and would also mean that the US and Russia could still be engaged in a cold war but I think it would be a better timeline overall
