I'm glad I got my 8320 about a year back for 120. There is basically no reason to buy an intel processor for gaming unless you absolutely hate your money. So enjoy spending double on your 4790s to gain 5 frames per second!
Kerrigan M true even on far cry 4 with the massive difference in the fps between the amd 8320 and the i7 the amd was still running above 60 fps and im ok with that....... pineapple
Lol... Fx8 CPUs can bottleneck a GTX 970. You may hit 80fps on a shitty fx8 but you will hit tons of FPS drops. Btw you can get a i5 and mobo for the same price of a fx8 and mobo because to achieve such high overclocks on these fx8s you need a high end mobo and high end CPU cooler to even keep,up with 4.5+ Ghz.
Maybe you are saving money in the beginning but you still using twice as much electricity power you have to pay for in the future so basically people who buy the i5 is saving money on electricity power.
+Kerrigan M it's depends on where in the world you live the electricity cost different all around the world!! Some places are cheap others are expensive and what kind of money you're making!!
definitely but make sure to oc to 4ghz+ very easy to do on those CPU. a ssd more ram or better gpu will net a much higher performance gain vs an i5 anyway
Niels __ exactly they are beasts at above 4ghz which is VERY easy to do. Then with the $200 saved by getting an AMD motherboard and CPU vs Intel I5 and Intel Motherboard you can get a 240GB ssd and 16gb of ram. Huge performance increase right there!
erm, with a proper liquidcooler the FX8370 can go up to 4.7Ghz-4.8Ghz which is more than the 8320 featured in the video, just thought id mention it for further reference if anyone watches this video now :)
This CPU war is all about where the budget is limited at. If you happen to be a rich man/woman, then please go for Intel because to be honest, intel does rock in most of the game titles. However, if you are looking for the best performance/price ratio, then please go for AMD cpu because they are cheap and they are pretty competitive when it comes to gaming performance as well. I own AMD fx 8350, and I love how this perform when I'm gaming! I've also tested my system by changing the CPU and motherboard to Intel, and I must say that they are better in gaming, but at higher cost. So the bottom line is that, go for intel if you got money, or just go for AMD. pce
i own amd fx 1337 its so fking fast i rage on every bideo cuz so hot gg i can overclock to 123918230981290381903283901239018239081092380ghz with 12093810-23819028390128390 dolalr ice cooler
9 лет назад
BetaBotReborn intel is lying about the tdp their processors
to bad you cant tAKE ADVANTAGE OF A HIGHER END GRAPHICS CARD THOUGH HUH!.....THERE ISNT 1 MANUFACTURER WHO MAKES A MOTHERBOARD WITH A PCI EXPRESS 3.0 SLOT FOR AMD PROCESSORS....HMMMM WONDER WHY THAT IS HMMMM...
+Yaseen Jamal Mustapha Apparently it won't even bottleneck a titan x sli, which is just crazy in my opinion. definitely the best cpu on the market right now. I would say the 6600k is right now, but 1151 motherboards and ddr4 memory really make it not worth it in the end compared to the 4690k
+Hech Well if ur upgrading from 3xxx or 2xxx it doesn't make any sense... But for me It's a bit of a different story. I still have the old ass kickin Q8400 which i clocked to 3.5 ghz (yeah can go to 3.7ghz but i can't i need MB active cooler to cool that NB down) but soon it's time for me to jump to the current tech and use it until it grows old just like Q8400. I need good CPU because of audio production. Q8400 shows signs even at 3.5 ghz clock. When it's a big mix it can't hold all the effects. I can optimize the mix for more CPU power but i need active FXs so i can change if i don't like it etc... So you see to me 6700k would be a huge upgrade, expensive... But huge. Also it's very much overclockable which i love. In a year or 2 i could buy adequate cooling solution and OC the CPU to around 4.8 - 5 ghz and run it stable and cool like that until it gets old enough to buy another upgrade. :)
sermerlin1 That's mainly what I think the new series is best at. If you have a newer, but still decently old i5 or i7, the upgrade really isn't worth it, but if you have a processor that's years old, and definitely far behind in performance, then it is worth it.
Sorry, Noob here. Does Tread mean "Multithreaded?" Like, does four Threads on a four Core Processor mean that each processor has Multithreading? I'm a lifelong console player but I am planning on switching to a PC. I'me blown away by the lowest end processors still playing games at over double the FPS of the Xbox One.
I think a very important metric you missed was Minimum frame rate. Average fps is important, but if a processor averages 60 in places, but drops down to 20 fps, it can definitely affect user play.
hi i AMD fan i think gaming build we could pair titan x 4 way SLI with fx 6350 no bottlenecked since the cpu can be over clocked to 999ghz with my 10k dollar antarctica cooler stay cool AMD
The Domikonis close, 8350 is 8 core = true 8350 is 3.5ghz = false 8350 has a baseclock of 4.0 ghz www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113284
I have an FX 8320 paired with a GTX 970 windforce. I regret it, and I wish I had gotten an i5. Nothing about this video is wrong, it's just that some of my favorite games, like the Total War series, are very dependent on single thread performance. My bet on an 8-core CPU was a bad one, imo.
+Philip Boardman LOL, how about you OC your chip? If you buy an FX chip, and leave it stock, that's your fault... I'm extremely happy with my 8 core 8370E, but I have it clocked at 5GHz, and my RAM is clocked at near 2133MHz.
Firetor - It is amazing for games that use a lot of threads. Everything is maxed and smooth in Dragon Age Inquisition. My point is that CPU bound games are often bound because of poor distribution of the workload. It doesn't matter how much Chronicblazer overclocks his CPU; it's still not going to compete with a higher end intel CPU in performance per thread. That's not a dig at AMD. Their chips are amazing at what they do.
+Philip Boardman lol, CPU-Z gives my chip @4.8GHz 1500 points in single thread, while the 5960x @ stock speeds has 1580 points. so you're saying a 5960x doesn't have what it takes to run games smoothly?
i7 is better, but it costs a $hit load more than the i5. but if you are building a pc on a budget it would be better just to buy an i5 and invest rest into a graphics card
I've been playing with a i3 1st or second gen processor for about 5 years. Attila total war was a wake up call in terms of needing a new computer, the campaign map itself was lagging at the lowest setting, just think how the battle map looked like. almost impossible to play. My friend has an i7 that is not too old but certainly not any new generation and his gaming rig out preforms mine by FAR. im currently building one for the future because i want to play the new Warhammer Total war the comes out and I KNOW my computer will not cut it. This video and the help of my brother showed me that i don't need a i7 to play games at the ultimate setting and have a good frame rate. now my future rig has a i5 picked out and isn't going to cost me $1000 dollars ($780)
Processor - AMD FX 8320E Black Edition VGA - Sapphire R9 390 NITRO MOBO - Sabretooth 990FX R2.0 Memory - Ripjaw 4 x 4 gig 1866 PSU - SEASONIC MI2ii EVO 850W Cooler - ICE BLADE PRO v2.0 Casing - FRACTAL design ARC MIDI r2 Windowed Played BF4 and Call of duty Advance warfare in ultra setting and performs great. No sweat at all. I play DOTA 2 for 12 hours straight and did not experience any slowdown and CPU temp did not go up to 50 degree celsius and VGA temp. play on 67 to 69 degree. Never been wrong choosing AMD for my gaming rig.
TheDutchGunners U also know it still isnt as good as a i7-4790k? the GHz is not the actual power you get from a CPU, you can have 5Ghz but if the CPU is shit, a 3.5GHz one can beat you and btw I easily could go on 4.8GHz but it already is pretty much OP
TheDutchGunners It might be good but I also will upgrade my Strix 970 OC to one or maybe with the time two ROG Strix 1080 OC, I got 16GB G.Skill High Performance Ram on 2666MHz and an Asus ROG Maximus VII Hero, I want to play anything in UHD on Ultra settings and an i5 or AMD CPU isn't a good choice then. And we all know AMD isn't the best gaming CPU maker, even if the power per €/$ on their GPU's is pretty good..
YellowPeaches Lol what did you play? Minecraft? the 4790k has got way more power, but sure its more expensive, but AMD could have made more threats in an 8 core cpu. The 4790k is on place 9 of the best CPU's whilest the 8320 is on 180. place. The effective speed is 68% higher than the 8320 ones. Thats why the 4790k is named Devil's Canyon. cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-4790K-vs-AMD-FX-8320/2384vs1983
I have 5820k, playing very match FB4 and CSGO it's match better than my old 2500k, but i doing a lot of action videos, thats why i have the i7-5820k. This processor is match faster than I7-6700k in rendering, but the same in games.
+XboxFanBoi I can guarantee that an i5 can get more out of 290. Here the important thing is the minimal fps, and a good CPU makes a difference in that respect.
FX 8320.. Period. You are not making a mistake. Intel is a price mistake. You wont see the fps diffrence. JayzTwoCents I agree.. so i dont want any of butthurt Intel fanboys here GTFO k m8?
***** Intel lasts longer? What? So how you explain this? Those are my AMD and my friend's Intel that he bought for 150% price of my FX. www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/167784/spy/39849# Same with i7. I'm getting same fps in games and in benchmarks like my fathers i7 3770 .... so how the hell Intel lasts for longer time? Please use real life arguments instead of Intel "marketing". Regards.
***** you say AMD is hot .... my i7 3770k @ 4.4Ghz generates 86 C degrees ... if we are talking about temperatures. Without OC, both - AMD and Iltel are cool, running at similar temperatures. My 8350 is running 50 degrees max after 1h of full load, not bad for 4.3Ghz (on air). Stop making myths, both - AMD and Intel are cool and quiet, so like I've said - please stop with "Intel Marketing" if you have no idea what you are talking about.
Hey so I'm kinda a noob when it comes to computer building and everything, and I understand most of what you're saying in the video, but my problem is that my AMD FX-6300 isn't 64-bit compatible. I don't know if they're supposed to be and I'm doing something wrong, or if I messed up when I bought it, but when I go to upgrade it won't let me. After looking on some support sites for how to upgrade, I found the app CPU-Z and after I ran it found out that my CPU doesn't have the requirements for 64-bit even though it says x64 based processor in the system menu for my PC (I'm using windows 10 btw). So I'm here to see if i can find a good CPU that is 64-bit compatible and will still have my computer running smoothly and all that, and I just want to know if anyone can help me? My computer savvy friends have given me mixed feedback and advice, and at this point I don't know what to do.
Try installing a 64 bit version of your OS instead of a 32 bit one. FX 6300 is a 64 bit cpu, but in being a 64 bit cpu it is also compatible with 32 bit os. Just gotta install the right OS Skiz!
Alrighty, I hear what you're saying and thanks for the advice, but I'm currently using a 32-bit Windows 10 OS. I just wanna upgrade to 64 and there are tons of guides online that show you how, however I followed their steps and got an error message, and when I used CPU-Z to check to see if I had one of the correct whatevers (AMD64 or E64somethingsomething) I didn't have either, so I concluded that I must either need a new CPU or somehow install those thingies to my CPU. Any advice on what I should do?
yea, free upgrade from 8. BTW guys thank you for all your feedback and help and stuff, but I finally resolved the issue. It took about 5 hours but at least I didn't spend any money
+SkizShot45 you're on 32 bit? Ah, that's the problem. You can't simply upgrade from 32 bit to 64 bit. Instead you will need to reinstall Windows 10 with 64 bit. You can go to here to create a Windows 10 usb flash drive installer: download.microsoft.com/download/1/C/4/1C41BC6B-F8AB-403B-B04E-C96ED6047488/MediaCreationTool.exe Then just install Windows 10 on your PC. You can use the product key that came with your windows license you bought for Windows 8 (assuming you built your PC). Note: This will erase ALL your files, so make sure to have a backup if there's anything on your PC that you want to keep! Also, if you have more than 4 gb ram this should make it so you can use more than 4 gb ram on your computer! (32 bit can't use more than 4 gb ram!) Hope this helps! :)
Tyler Weigand So, I think I said this a bit earlier, but I fixed it all. I have a 64-bit system and everything and I'm fine. I think I posted on this comment chain I got it all fixed and stuff.......so thanks for the advice, but I got it.
This really helped a lot. I was looking for these exact benchmarks for a long time. I have a FX 8320 and I've finally decided to make the jump to Intel. I'm going with the i7-5930K and this really opened my eyes to how much of a difference Intel makes. I thought this video was awesome, straight to the point and very well put together. You've earned yet another subscriber, and I have already liked the video :)
Yeah most but not ubisoft titles at ultra :p and gtx 970 also has 3.5 gb ram gate issue which in realtime doesn't matter but you should keep in mind with that or go with another gpu like amd r9 285
watched alot of your voids now and I'm really impressed with you. keep up the good work. I'm planning my first build around max settings on fallout 4. would love you to do a vid on that
Can you guys please explain what is the difference between i5 4690k vs i5 4690 non-K version? I'm not planning to overclock btw. Does the stock speed perfomance differ?
A Fx 6300 is about the same performance as a skylake I3. For a 100$ old CPU you have to admit that is good. Intel Fanboys can spend 130$ on Dual core shit that will Bottleneck any modern GPU.
why dont you look for some benchmarks, the i3 6100 has only 2 cores and is the worst intel cpu, but it completely destroys the 8350 in games it also is cheapper, newer, and it consumes a lot less and has a lot lower TDP I am not fanboy, I say the true, I hope the amd zen series that will be released in october to be good processors, not like the FX series that were so bad, so intel at least would have some competence and the prices would be lower
armando esteban quito tbh the 8300 series weren't that bad when they came out, and even now perform well. I do agree that bulldozer was terrible though. But they do hold up well considering they are pretty old chips now.
Just built a new gaming rig with an AMD 8350 8 core 4ghz processor ($170), 240gig ssd, ASUS motherboard, ASUS GTX 970 OC, 16gigs of GSkill Rip Jaws ram, Antec 750 watt power supply, & now case, & only spent about $1100. I bought a couple parts at a time from newegg over a few months. When you plan on building a new pc, pick your processor first, then build from that. Don't cheap out on the motherboard & make sure it can run the fastest clock speed ram. Upgrade to a good aftermarket CPU cooler to avoid overheating during heavy loads & long gaming sessions.
gooo606 get the 8320 or 8350 there both under 200 bucks and kickass especially when overclocked the i3 which is dual core on certain titles dual core cpu's wont run games like farcry 4.
steven schumm i3's have no problem running games like Far Cry 4 because they have Hyper Threading. The CPU that suffers the most is the Pentium G3258 as it's a true dual core chip.
***** half of me agrees with you the other half thinks that is just a waste of like 20 bucks when its just for gaming lol like that's it I have a workstation for programming with a xion and Quattro GPU I almost think the 8320 is over kill I wish I just knew what is the exact amount of cpu power I would need to not bottle neck xyz gpu
What a terrible poop comparison. all CPU's are from different generations, all use different architectures, one of them technically isn't even a CPU, but rather an APU! Ofcourse the FX 8320 performs like shit compared to an i7 5820K. This is comparing apples to stones to airplanes!
It's actually pretty impressive that the Athlon 5350 can keep up with playable framerates even in CPU-intensive titles. People on a budget who want's current-gen console quality could probably look into pairing the processor with a GTX 750Ti/950 and get a rig that is both responsive and can play games rather well. The impressive thing is that you can probably play The Witcher 3 reasonably well with medium/high settings 1080p30fps for a fraction of the money it will cost to go for the i5 or i7. However, a i5 or i7 will most definitely be more future proof as modern titles tends to be more taxing on CPUs. Anyway, I'm getting a am1 for the living room, I could probably even go completely silent with a Arctic Cooling Alpine M1 passive and a semi-passive silverstone-sfx power supply :)
Fredzar Untill then you can save up for another powerfull GPU. Grab something stronger from amd and later buy another one. That's just my recommendation.
+A Helpful Person I guess I have a good computer and only get 80 fps and I see streamers with good computers get 500-800 and u want to build a computer
A Tribe Called Quest thats good but a gtx 1050 and an intel core i3 might be better (amd is usually worse for gaming but better for rendering at similar price points)
A Tribe Called Quest holy shit, that's a really good deal for the rx. A10 is just slightly worse than intels for content creating, but it's really cost efficient and the gap isn't gigantic like it is with gaming, so you made a good rig cheers
+PyroRaider I have an amd 8350 paired with a 970 and I don't have a single problem. I run fallout 4 with texture mods at 1080p maxed out settings averaging 70 fps while streaming
Plus I have it over clocked too but hey...I don't really see why you would but an 8320 anyways about 50 bucks more you get an 8350 plus a boost in stock core clock
+DR VAPE33 (Sr. Vapes) try a game thats not heavily multicore dependent. Most triple A titles are using more cores so the fx series is coming into light, but play some games like arma or dayz that use a couples cores very heavily and you will see the difference is night and day when your using an fx vs intel.
I've seen a few of these videos now. It seems pretty evident that CPU's aren't really that important if all you wanna do is get 60fps at reasonably high-medium settings at 1080p. It seems like a better choice to get a lower end cpu, most likely AMD, over clock it to whatever you can get with stock cooling, and put more money into the graphics card. I've been researching a lot over the past week and ultimate opted to go with Intel and Nvidia i5-4590 and GTX 960. Not the most price efficient, but I do more than just gaming. I do a lot of work with Virtual Machines and I want to start gaming on Linux and in the Linux community it's pretty much unanimous that Radeon drivers suck on Linux. Happy Hardware hunting to all of you.
These AMD fanboys are making me cringe. "OOH PAY $100 MORE FOR 8 MORE FPS." And a lower power bill, and better performance, and better performance per core, and more reliability.
+AlphaLineGaming PC power consumption under 1000W is nothing compared to your water boiler or a fridge which basically run 24/7. 1-2% bill increase can be worth saving 150$ on CPU and buying a more powerful GPU. Plus, your CPU will produce more heat and your room will be warmer in winter, so your electric warming won't need to be used as often - there won't be any difference when you put it in "keep the room warm during winter" perspective.
+AlphaLineGaming 8fps doesn't really seem like much to be scoffed at either.. Lots of people blow more money on stupid collectors edition games, or more on absurd amounts of ram, or needless showboat light up parts.. Nearly 10 extra fps is just about the difference between an entire graphics card tier, which interestingly, is also about $100! : )
Dude you have no idea how much this video helped me out I'm trying to build a PC for the first time and I didn't know what would be the best processor for me now I know i5 all the way I thought it was going to be crap
My gpu is msi radeon r9 380 4gb I have an amd a6-6400k that can run assassins creed unity at 15 fps (in crowded areas) I am planning to buy the i5 4690k Is it a good improvement or not?
+Nariva TV Ohh men dual core cpu, bottleneck, if your mobo is a FM2+ upgrade to Athlon x4 860K, if not, find a Quad Core Richland o Trinity with K and overclock it to 4.00GHz (without overvolt)
Still gaming with 3 1080p monitors, im using a watercooled phenom 955 @ 3.8ghz and 8gb ddr2 1066. My video card still is and always has been the bottle neck, started with an ATI 4890, AMD 6870, AMD 7950, AMD 7950 x 2 in that order. Only now (6-7 years later) do I genuinely think my £120 CPU is starting to show its age in real world use, although it never seems to be an actual bottleneck! It still outperforms my video cards generally speaking. Many may disagree.
A first gen i7 (CPU from '08) with a 750ti can run Far Cry 3 at 1080p on high with 45 FPS average, so the FX is all that's really needed if 60 FPS is your aim and medium settings don't bother you. Then there's 4k, which just fucks up most rigs' FPS.
I have the 5820k, 16 GB Ram and GTX 980Ti the Performance is awsome ! Run all Games in 4K. By expensiver and run the next 4 to five years or replace in 2 !
Thanks for the interesting comparison using the lowly Kabini 5350 And the I7 12 thread monster. I was really surprised at how well the 5350 performed for such a low powered basic computer. :) I would probably get a Intel 6 core 12 thread CPU for future proofing and better single core threaded capabilities though.. Nice review :)
Paid £107 for my 8320 2 years ago, I already had an evo 212 which cost me £25. Got me to 4.4Ghz and I'm still pretty damn happy with its performance to this day for how much I paid.
At the prices mentioned, it would seem as the 8320 is the actual bang for buck deal. But where I live, 8320 is actually slightly costlier than a i5 4440 (which performs on the same level, faster in some games), and just a bit cheaper than 4690 [ 4440 is around 11.5k INR, 8320 12.5k and 4690 is 14k ]. In such a situation, I would find the i5 to be a better overall choice.
I'm planning to upgrade my PC, but I need some help. Right now I have the Nvidia Geforce GTX 660 Ti and a AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core Processor and 16 GB's of RAM. I was thinking of buying the Intel Core i7 4790K, but combining that processor with such a weak graphics card wouldn't be such a good idea right? So I figured I'd also get a new graphics card, the 4096MB Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 Windforce (970 and 980 are a bit too expensive) I don't actually plan on overclocking, so would the Non-K version of the processor be smarter? I will mostly use the PC for gaming, but also some Video-Editing and rendering and stuff like that. I've heard that the change from an i5 to an i7 doesnt really matter for gaming, the I7 is mostly good for Editing and multitasking, is that right? Because then maybe I should get the Intel Core i5 4690K 4x 3.50GHz? Please let me know what some of you guys think. Sorry for the questions, I just want the best price-performance ratio. Thanks in advance.
I have selected R9 380 GPU for my build but for CPU, confused between i5 4160k or FX8350. will be using the same setup for next few years. So, future compatability is important
i got the fx8350 because it had viritualization so i can run virtual machines better and also since it has"8" cores i can divide up my tasks over the processor when for example live streaming or hosting local servers and playing at the same time
$150 Dollars and some easy overclocking of the FX-8320 Holds a good passmark about 12,500 at 4.7 GHz. Yes, you can overclock a $600 CPU as well, but matching it at a 4th the cost is great. Just means I can buy more video cards.
iceagex Sorry but you'd be wrong. DX12 will allow the full use of the CPU during gaming, as opposed to using 2-4 cores. So for an 8-core FX cpu, who could only utilize 4 cores in a DX11 gaming environment would experience a huge performance boost utilizing all 8 more efficiently, in DX12.
THE REAL SOLID BUILD FOR GAME ALLWAYS START WITH A CPU!! You can get a new GPU anytime later without bottleneck issues if you spend more on the CPU. Also get new DX, more VRAM and fresh temps on newer card models later.
Hi i have an it 4690k and a gtx 970 but i want to upgrade tot 980 TI, will it bottleneck my current cpu the gtx 980 ti ? and also i have a seasonic m12ii-620w evo editionion is my PSU enough for my 4690k 4.4 GHz and a 980 TI ? Thx for your help !
I remember my instructor used an 8-core fx chip for a server. That thing overheated and overheated. This was before the chips came with radiators. We put a bigger heatsink on and hooked everything back up. Turned the power on and zap. The motherboard shorted out near the cpu socket. Had no idea what happened. Maybe the cpu was on its last legs when the rush of power came from turning it on.
To be perfectly honest, any reasonably new CPU will run anything you throw at it. If you have good RAM and good graphics, and perhaps an SSD, then you're good to go. I run an AMD FX-9590, which is a 5ghz power eating beast, which is also nowhere near the benchmark results when compared to a high-end i7 but it runs anything at 1080p at reasonable FPS. I also have a FX 8150, much slower than the 9590, which also runs everything at 1080p. I do have an AMD R9 290X and 16GB of DDR3 at 1800mHz and a 1TB Samsung 850 Evo SSD and this combination seems to be the sweet spot.
Thanks for the video man, I was deciding on getting the i5 or paying a bit more for the i7, but I decided to get the i5 because it has same or close FPS compared to the i7.
I just love my i5 4690 :D It's super efficient and shows off some great results over all, and looking at these benchmarks it can even compete with the newer i7's.
my solid foundation is a cool room if the room is hot as hell 50/80 range the cpu will not run good if 20 even to 35/45 temp you will get a smooth gameplay experience. if a cpu is running good and the GPU is overheating it won't matter if the gpu is overheating the cpu will cover the loads. if kept cool in the range of 20/35
Results seem inconclusive outside of the benchmark. Problem is some games utilize the CPU more than others. Another problem with your testing is that you used different motherboards and didn't measure or calculate for differing bus speeds.
7:45 of course the CPUs will perform similar if you have the graphics maxed out. This happens because not the CPU is limiting the framerate but the graphics card. So it's not a very meaningful test.
Hello thank you so much for your video, great job and it helps very much. I have a question: I want to set up a PC for 4K video editing (i use panasonic GH4) could please say which affordable Motherboard, CPU and Graphic Card should I buy? thanks
Hell i decided to go with the fx8320. It does great in 1080p gaming and thats really enough for me. I know it's an old architecture and all but why does that matter if it performs well. I will pair it with a gtx 770 and expect butter-smooth gameplay.
From thsi there really isn't a reason to get the latest CPU then. Knowledge that was already out there, but this veido certainly does prove it. All you need is about a $175 dollar cpu and youre golden. Unless the extra 5-6 fps makes a difference to you. Good video.
My basic requirements are video editing and graphics. Working DAW like cubase, FL Studio, avelton etc and lastly gaming. Which processor should I choose? Also What's the difference between amd APU/Athlon/FX etc etc? My budget is really tight. Also which graphics card will be suitable?
How much difference do they make on CPU based games? Minecraft especially Modded minecraft puts a pretty heavy load on CPUs. Specifically there is no CPU that it can't eventually overwhelm.
Thankyou bro for making such a good video.I have a question for you that,if Iam buying FX 8320 then can I play GTA 5 game on it .PLZ GIVE ITS ANSWER .... ....