What on Earth Happened to the Indigenous Inhabitants of India? Adivasis and the Tribals 

but "Vasi" sounds like *inhabitants* "Adi" probably means early in *Adi-Manav* but I don't know about Adi-Vasi

It means people of the forest.

@@Vishnujanadasa108 some of them are nomadic

@@Vishnujanadasa108 it means early inhabitants.

@@Vishnujanadasa108 no...it means real owner of India.

Be proud and mantain your culture alive. Greetings from germany. Plese dont let your culture die

@@ottonormalverbraucher7835 there over 100 millions of us Living in India. 😅 so yes we are not going to extinct.

I am also Adivasi bro.

Read chapter on the different tribes in Highlands of Central India by Forsyth, from the 1800s. He compiled their poetry too. Great snapshot of an earlier time I dont think any other exists.

Just curious to listen to your stories. Are these stories on internet ?

I have ancestry from my fathers side in the Garasia-Bhil tribes of Gujurat

I'm from mundari tribe from Jharkhand.

U guys are most ancient group of indian land

@@ash_phoenix3282 I am Bhil from Maharastra.

I'm Santali tribe from Odisha

Liked

I'm probably 50% adivasi from DNA analysis. So I give you a thumbs up!

I thought you people were extinct. No offense

@@matheenarif8645 Lol...take offense at your ignorance dude!

Matheen Arif There’s literally so many adivasi tribes around the entire subcontinent stupiid.

/S_/H_/U_/K_/R_/A_/Y_/E / Take a 23andMe or Ancestry DNA test. You will see you are mixed, too. What is your background? I'm guessing Persian, East Indian, or something along those lines. I was glad to find out I'm not 100% European, even though my parents are immigrants of Eastern/Central European stock; I have some North Asian/Siberian ancestry. It also said I'm 3% from the British Isles, and I have NO known ancestors from there, so it might not be accurate.

Remnants of a divide and conquer propaganda somehow lingering till date

Nothing wrong with globalism, aside from the capitalist exploitation practiced by Western corporations, fattening the wallets of rich, middle-aged Western men. Colonialism was the ultimate evil, and today the neocolonialism practiced by Western corporations (benefiting Western millionaire pieces of shit) is the biggest problem on the planet. Psychopathic human greed drives it all.

I must say you are relatively woke.

Holy shit, how did you just get thrown insults at just for a humane comment????

Love you too

love you too bro.

WE 85% OF INDIAN,are Native of land... As a Native Indian,loves all the Native of World,they went their in search of New land... We Native shares same DNA throughout world 🙏

Love you too from Adivasi family ❤️🥰✊

Much love back from a fijian indian 💯🇫🇯

Munda are also not native to Indian subcontinent. They are Austroasiatic people who also came later

Munda derive from Southeast Asian hunter gatherer not Indian Hunter Gatherers. Munda actually mixed with AASI probably but that also doesn't mean theyre the first group of people who are native to Indian subcontinent

Also some Munda came even after Indo-Aryan migration so who's the real adivasi?

@@zhreyaz could you provide sources of this information?

@@alicekerketta4230 thats common knowledge mundas dont come under andaman aboriginals who live in modern day sentinal islands and natives of australlia mundas themselves came from what is today iran and iraq

So Austric you mean Munda?

@@yashagrawal88 The munda branch of the Austro Asiatic group, yes.

Though to my knowledge she's never been genetically tested, the ethnic Indian wife of one of my former best friends ("former" because I'm in California and he and his family now live in Colorado) is almost certainly part-Adivasi. I theorize that she must come from the extreme eastern part of the subcontinent, because while her skin is very dark, her eyes are noticeably slanted; the eyes of her two brothers are even more slanted. So she and the two brothers-in-law must be some combination of either Adivasi and Austric or Adivasi and Tibeto-Burman. (But her name is "Annie," because she's very Americanized.) My friend is definitely of European descent, and he and his wife have two little sons who are basically Caucasoid in appearance, but with slightly dark skin.

@@SeasideDetective2 modern day Adivasi mix race people. I mean my mother is fair skin while my father have dark complexion even though both belong to same adivasi Community.😅

​@@DraykeSax-Macu look mixture of indo aryan and tribal

Abhinav Pandey maybe for you it was because you're already acquainted with it but I was confused more than anything. It wasn't clear to me whether he was suggesting there is a third original population or not, that he seems to suggest did not speak a Dravidian language? When you mention Iranian agriculturalists are you referencing the Elamites and other "native" Iranians and did their language evolve into Dravidian?

Theodore Stathopoulos Yes according to most studies there have been three waves of migration. First wave happened 70000 years ago. Second wave 6000 to 8000 years ago, they intermixed with first group (AASI)and formed Indus Valley Civilization people in North. These groups evolved Dravidian languages, that's the reason a pocket of Dravidian language is found in Western Pakistan, West of Indus river. This is also the reason Tamil language predates Sanskrit (Indo European) language. IVC too moved Southwards and mixed with AASI there and formed final ASI. Third wave happened between 3500 to 4500 years ago. They were Indo Aryans from Steppes. They formed ANI after intermixing with IVC in North. ASI and ANI extensively intermixed over next 2000 years. amp.scroll.in/article/874102/aryan-migration-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-study-on-indian-genetics

Abhinav Pandey thank you for the clarification' I really appreciate it! It makes total sense now I don't know why I assumed Dravidians were the original inhabitants of South Asia when the pattern in history is for hunter gatherers to be replaced culturally and linguistically by peoples bringing agriculture with them. In a way Dravidians represent the Neolithic expansion in the same way that native Europeans were replaced by farmers from the Middle East. From this point of view South Asia is extremely blessed to have this phase of history preserved and represented in its people, which has sadly often been erased by incoming people's such as in Europe

Abhinav Pandey 70.000years ago there were humans? 🤔 Interesting how many different theories exist. I read different numbers depending on the source and or beliefs

Ava S. Yes there were homo sapiens originated in Africa 300000 years ago. They migrated too. But the modern homo sapiens migrated 70000 years ago to West Asia, South and SE Asia and Oceania. They migrated to Europe 45000 to 30000 years ago replacing Neanderthal as dominant species. While different homonoids have been migrating since 2 million years, but they were all early homonoids and not homo sapiens. Can't say about creationist beliefs, that has never been my forte, but to best of my knowledge most scientific evidences come to consensus, that I mentioned above.

Yes we Adivasi are over 100 million in India. yet most of us don't know about Adivasi history.

Wow!

Wow - I didn’t know that !

He did do a video on Slavs.

Iran is too complicated!

Money-printers a lot of them are now mixed, my ancestors come from the vedda tribe but there’s been so much intermixing that i got light skin and dark skin cousins with all types of hair. i still see australoid features in my family still so she probably is mixed as well

@DARK yeah I am north indian brahman from UP and my uncle have pale skin like any Spanish or Italians I also have skin colour like Iranians and many people in my family or my ancestors have light colour eyes and but also majority of my relative have more Australoid features than aryan.

Aryans and Dravidians didn't cause genocide to Adivasis like Europeans

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE--lhuC9LOEP4.html he talks about his ethnicity at about the 9:35 mark in that video. Saw it the other day and then saw your comment and remembered I had heard him talking about it recently. He say's his mom is part Iranian and Black American and his dad is German Irish and Dutch.

The IVC farmers weren't just one people but a mix of even these AASI hunter gatherer who they taught how to farm. IVC had only two strata. The priest kings and commoner and many of the commoner were these AASI, the docile kind. The more volatile kind were the proper Hunter gatherer, and those lived around Central Indian plateau.

Bingo. Their genes are closely related. That's y Adamand ppl are mysteriously there.

Australoids

@@Cristian-hy3gz no such thing

Indian Is Caucasoid

South Indian Is Dravida

Is India paying them billions a year like Australia is?

sai teja Why are you using the English language?

@Telive Qwenton Indeed! You use brown women to divorce them and later pay them alimony!😂😂😂

@Telive Qwenton Caucasians are Chechen,Georgian,Circassians etc. You are most likely an AMERIMUTT!😂😂😂

@Telive Qwenton Quite funny! Because I am a High Caste Brahmin ftom the Himalayan region from India so I am one of the most fair skinned Caucasoid Indians!😎😎😎

What's so special about Flemish of all the people? :D

Vitalis they eat lots of french fries, Have no sense of humor and can't build any decent roads lol

As a Fleming myself I don't see why? Flemish people are a pretty standard western European people...

ReconPro Hey dude, masons already done a video about the native Siberians, check out his video on Turkish/ Turkic people's.

Ian Miles you mean the Sami? If not you have no room to speak.

And as far as the Aryan” decent as a male clan lineage was most likely a gradual process going both east and west of source.. indo aryan doesnt nesecarily mean the men were from europe itself, although euro aryan” males share do share a common father line in origin... they are more or less to northern indian males as brothers of different mothers as if this makes sense..

@@anirudhram-mohanram1717 yes. true being a adivasi myself we have fairly different culture than most others group. most us are hindus.

Unfortunately that is what happened everywhere in the world at some point. European colonialism is very recent so it is considered different from the rest

Indo European .lol

In ancient tamil, the word "Vedar" literally means hunters. That's where the British probably took it from. These ancient tribes had no link to Vedas, Vedic or Hinduism.

The term "Veddoid" came from the native Vedda tribe of Sri Lanka

That was again, like the AIT, another THEORY. Theory is not a law or an Axiom. PERIOD. Out of Africa is also a theory, so is Out of India. All these are THEORIES, out of which some have more evidences corroborating them than not. SIMPLE.

Nayan Tambe Ty for the informative video. Contrary to modern linguistic and prehistoric-anthropological theories, there was never an external invasion of a proto Indo-European culture into the Indian subcontinent. The Vedas never mention an original homeland outside of India, and if modern timelines for Indian history are accepted (with the aryans arriving ca 2000 bc, it’s not likely the theoretical proto Indo-Europeans would have forgotten their roots in such a short time period (ca 500 years, as the Vedas are arbitrarily dated by modern Indologists to 1500bc). It is no more likely than modern Americans forgetting their european origins.) Satellite imaging also revealed the Sarasvati riverbed, said to have dried up around at least 2000bc, yet the vedas describe it as spanning miles wide. Therefore the vedas would have to be dated much further into the past. Astronomical observations when vacillated backwards to descriptions of the stars’ location date the vedas even further back, up to 50,000 years. Note that such calculations are practically impossible to calculate retroactively without use of modern computers (the margin of error would be too great). The vedas are famous for their astronomical observations via the jyotisha Shastras such as Surya Siddhanta. They also give ages of the earth in epoch of billions of years, as observed by Carl Sagan. It was the Vedic Aryans [In its original context “aryan” simply denoted a follower of a civilization whose aim was self-realization*]...who gave the world some of the earliest philosophical texts on the makeup of matter and the theoretical underpinnings for the chemical makeup of minerals. Sanskrit Vedas from thousands of years before Christ implied that matter could not be created, and that the universe had created itself [note: the Vedas say everything eternally exists, not that the universe created itself]...the Indians of the fifth century A.D. calculated the age of the earth as 4.3 billion years [continued in comments]” Huston Smith, A Tribute to Hinduism, page 58

You are talking rubbish

yeah seriously, these upper caste freedom fighters were trying too hard lol so funny how things turn out to be. Then the RSS was born.

@@gaurangkarmakar4046 Out of africa is a more sought after and backed up theory than the political bs of "Out of India"

I watched this one yesterday and he might have more about Siberians ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aXzqI1r11eg.html

In Siberia they fuck animals because its legal there. I read about English tourists visiting Siberia only to fuck animals.

Most people will find that amusing and disturbing *Cheetos* . Shovel shaped teeth? What are those like? I mean they're probably like a shovel I'd presume. I had no idea it was an especially Indian feature of my teeth. Thanks for sharing that link *Ron Murray*

The Adivasis are the original inhabitants of South Asia while first the Dravidians and later Aryans migrated and settled the region. Clearly Indus Valley Civilisation was created by the Dravidians which later collapsed due to climatic changes. The Indo-Aryans migrated later and assmilated with some of the local people. Adivasis like the Munda people are clearly the aboriginal people of South Asia.

I think your analysis is probably closer to the truth compared to many other analysis.

In Indus civilization, no weapons were ever excavated even though their population rose upto 1 million at the highest point. These are the true dravidians.

This is actually the best analysis! And most probably what happened! But these eurocentrics believe that Hinduism was a European religion that the aryans brought with them. They completely leave out the fact that hindu temples in tamil Lands predate those found anywhere in the north!

@@Sajjatayaan modern day Hinduism is a mixture of vedic religion and pre vedic traditions

Facts they really dont 💯👁🙏

@japanese 101✇ ignorance my friend 🙂

@dash Rex no Andamanese were not proxy for AASI recent studies proved that AASI themselves were mixed group of ancient caucasian and probably group like admanaese and another extinct group. Nonetheless yes today there's no real proxy for ASSI but paniys are considered as close and it's no wonder because today no single group on earth is pure, everyone mixed and mixing is no sin right just process of evolution and surely after 500 years from now there will be single human race with every race mixing with other yeah so we shouldn't care much

@DARK no that's not correct it's outdated assumption that aasi is adamananese recently it was updated to paliyar tribal populations as they're closest to original aasi

@DARK Not true that's just misconception of those who don't dig deep into genetic studies Adamananese like dna is just one component out of 3 which makes up AASI at first even I use to think adamananese are pure aasi but when I got deep into studies and various publications i understood real differences and why no longer adamananese are taken as proxy for aasi

@DARK yes they're native to india

nubihotep That's what I'm saying!!!!! They look just like black people but aren't! Its confusing I know but interesting. Amazing how isolationism affects people.

Mr Person01 No they look more like Australian Aboriginals

+nubihotep...their different appearance is also due to them having Neanderthal DNA...every ethnic group outside sub Saharan Africa has at least 1-4% of it..the texture of their hair is not African at all...

2 points 1) all Africans might not have kinky hair, but the overwhelming majority do 2) its not just about kinky, its texture...a black woman can straighten her just like a white woman, but the texture of her natural hair wont feel the same as the white woman...Indian people dont have kinky hair, they have a hair texture similar to Caucasians and Asians...African people are the only group to have kinky or textured hair

matthew mann Cant see it though. They look Saharan to me.

He already did.Check his Vdo about Iran nd Afghanistan.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-z26S0XgduYc.html

Debo Datta yeah and they destroyed NATO army and raped and looted all of india

arsam kiani lol all of Peshawar and pashtuns was conquered by the small empire of Ranjit Singh

Sick Revolting Piss And all of North India was conquered by Ghaznaveds (afghan pashtons)Koshanian,Ahmad shah durani and more Afghan Pashtons ruled ancient north India Plus Peshawar was conquered by the British NOT INDANS

And they descend from africa around 70000 years ago

They are from Africa

E1b1b is also the haplogoup of the Horn of Africa (Ethiopians and Somalis), which is probably what the ancient Egyptians looked like. There could also have been some Nilo-Saharans/Nilotes as well (haplogroup A or B). Haplogroup J is foreign to Africa. But the African E1b1b is still dominant over the Middle Eastern/Greek J in North Africa. North Africans are mixed like any other group.

arda rid you mentioned west Africans eliminated all other Populations what exactly do you mean by that ? Meaning did they mix them out of circulation or did they kill them off ? I never heard the above I would like some more information on it perhaps some sources maybe I can do some research on it myself to be brought up to speed cause this is the first time I’m hearing it, & I’m interested it sounds like you know & I enjoy learning from those who know it only makes me smarter.

Tim Salter I will not deny the ancient nile valley Africans were mixed was inhabited by inhabitants who were mixed between Asiatics and Nilotics you can tell by their features if I had to guess many of them looked like how horn Africans of today looked. The Ancient Egyptians or as I like to say kemetian ppl were not a homogeneous ppl they had features ranging from light brown all the way to burnt crisp, I’m not one of the Afro centrics who will deny the admixture they were Afro Asiatic largely that’s still painting a broad stroke on a population which was not homogeneous.

Tim Salter the point that I’m getting at is the field of Egyptology has been dominated still dominated by a Euro-centered paradigm which has often followed an agenda to obfuscate the African origin in presence of the ancient Nile valley Civilization even went as far as removing Egypt/Kemet from Africa and denying any African or negroid involvement to the development of that ancient African civilization in their obviously white supremacist minds there was no way a less intelligent, less civilized, less advanced race could accomplish or have any involvement in the development of such an advanced ancient civilization. What they were really looking to establish is to claim ancient Egypt for themselves as European/white/caucasoid civilization, have gone as far as saying the horn Africans and the ppl of Northern Africa although dark skin are still European/white simply disgusting, I guess the Greeks and Romans weren’t enough they had to take Africa too lol.

Tim Salter you seem to know a thing or two about Haplotypes I’m obviously not as knowledgeable about it as you I will make it my due diligence to learn more about it cause you can’t study race/ethnicity/phenotypes without it. I believe the out of Africa theory is flawed although highly accepted as the consensus in the field of paleo anthropology, anthropology and archeology.

Tribes fight each other . Be a global migrant like aryans lol

@@scpathak050 pointless..

@mao zedong For your kind information... Adivasi aren't SC.... They're ST... doesn't matter if they're black or fair....and I agree... some looks dravidians..

King Dewoot wHaTs SuGoNdEsE?

@@rudrapatel5509 SuCk On ThEsE BaLlS BiCh

Voidisyinyang Voidisyinyang Brahui

Proud Adibasi ❤ Santhali

Proud adivasi.

ᱧ ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲ ᱠᱤᱱᱤᱧ , ᱯᱟ.ᱨᱥᱤ ᱛᱤᱧ ᱫᱚ ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤ 👈 ᱫᱷᱚᱨᱚᱢ ᱛᱤᱧ ᱫᱚ ᱥᱟᱨᱱᱟ , ᱵᱚᱝᱜᱟ ᱛᱤᱧ ᱫᱚ ᱢᱟᱨᱟᱝ ᱵᱩᱨᱩ- ᱡᱟᱷᱮᱨ ᱟᱭᱚ - ᱥᱤᱧ ᱪᱟᱸᱫᱚ |

yes. Adivasi are not Dravidian.

Because Adivasi are mostly remnants of AASI. Iranian Neolithic farmers mixed with AASI to create IVC people who again mixed with AASI to create ASI. Dravidian/South Indians later came from ASI. So the adivasis are the bedrock on which Dravidian came into be.

@@cobidbeksin5200 thanks for the info. But I am saying that in this video he is portraying bad things done with Adivasi as bad things done with Dravidian people which is wrong.

@@cobidbeksin5200 but they are still very different

@Reality is Truth when they don't speak dravidian languages they are not, when they do, then they are

All of them are south indians

ki kit No. Watch it again. Most south Asians gets Melanesian. I’ve seen Pakistanis and Punjabi and Bengalis also get the same.

@@xzds3915 You are fucking dumb. I'm kashmiri and I didn't get a single drop of melanesian.

@@xzds3915 I have been told that i look european

@@kashyapdhar7821 cuz ur descended from Russians/central Asian 💀😂😂 y’all don’t look us indians anyway. U probably don’t have any Indian genes.

@Yeti W Thank you.☺️

Other Indian are intermixed especially in Odisha Chhattisgarh Jharkhand

@@swayamsouravdash704 those who follow Adivasi culture and belong to those Communities concider as Adivasis now... because of most us are mixed now.

@@Batman099 you are right.where are you from

@@swayamsouravdash704 Maharashtra.

What about ihdi

It's a race channel.Not religious.

AIT is completely false we didn't find any single proof of any type of invasion till date in IVC But AMT has truth in it there was gradual migration of people from steppes toward indian subcontinent. And lot of intermixing between people which designed the current population of indian subcontinent.

Indo Aryan invasion theory is a myth

/S_/H_/U_/K_/R_/A_/Y_/E / what about your dreams? You must have Caucasian dreams from where your ancestors came as thieves stealing native land

Yes agree

dravidians migrated too

You dravidians look more whiter than north Indians so kindly shut the fuck up and stop perpetuating bullshit.

i dont think so the only migrants from africa ever recordded were 50000years ago

Not the olmecs - I don’t care how “African” they look Everyone basically came from Africa at some point

It's not outdated at all 🤷🏽‍♂️