Which game is better? Red Dead Redemption Vs. Red Dead Redemption 2 

Logical.

You when someone has a different opinion 😡😡😡

This is right my friend. Some can cry or try to politize everything they want.. Red dead 1 is clear.

True

Also in my opinion, I think the stranger missions were better in the first.

Better replay value and side interests in RDR1 by far. Edit: oh and the horses I'd be remiss if I didn't mention the stable system in each game. Second one may have the first best on realism but God if I didn't just absolutely hate it

@@huntercollum869depends on your taste becuase for me i find that rdr2 has a better replay value, just so much you can miss on your first second or even third run. It does depend on how you like to play the game though if you’re more boots to action then ofc rdr1 is for you but some others prefer to take it slow and explore, in which i think we can both agree rdr2 has a far more detailed map

​@@huntercollum869 I haven't yet played rdr1 but I have the ps4 copy, right now I'm on a new game in rdr2 in chapter 3 but I have to say I had found in the beginning it is pretty tedious where you have get satchels if you want to hold more stuff or get trinkets to improve your abilities also if you want to upgrade the whole camp that includes pelts, also I always do every challenge in rdr2 to get full health, stamina and deadeye bar.

Rdr1 has much better writing, side characters, villains, dialogue, cutscenes, music, atmosphere, side quests, chapter variety, gunplay. Lol at your "better in every metric"

@@fightingtothepoint4u732 never said it was better or worse than in the other brother, just said one was more detailed than the other and caters to different styles of play; personally i think they both amazing games and have their own right to be called amazing games

Story is also better, wandering from camp to camp with no objective versus bringing in two guys to save your entire family, I know what I’m picking

Ya except no safe houses no random bandits dragging their enemy across town shooting in the air or random bandits attacking women which you can help , many interiors that were in the original game that arnt accessible in the new game , also fuckin Mexico undead nightmare, better online mounts ect…

I did the same thing as you. Played rdr2 before rdr, but I liked the first one better. Both are amazing games.

You have not played Red dead 1. Simple as that. Liar

​@@Dman130everyone who play both prefers the first one. Period

@@Rubrasileiro omg get a fucking life you sad git

I agree the tone of each is very different

Story for me would be equal for both games.

DLC= RDR1

How the hell is gameplay a tie?

@@cubsfan21547 I gave gameplay to RDR1 genius.

@glowinggames1561 what can't you do in rdr2 that you can do in rdr1?

Fair

Rdr1 story is shorter and more basic, but i think it is better Characters in rdr1 are more charismatic, overall it depends of the characters we talk about cause micah has no depth ( just a bad killer opportunist), dutch, as smart as he should be, is easy to manipulate,.... Map i think you're right but rdr2 map isn't western, which is sad imo Dialogues, in rdr1 mant dialogues are memorable when in rdr2 there's few really good ones Ending, in rdr1 it's more unexpected and we really feel lost as jack is when we start playing as him. The fact we know Arthur's gonna die hours before it happens make me felt way sadder for john ( also cause i prefered john, as attached i was to Arthur, i just was more to john) but epilogue was good in rdr2 Imo

Those challenges are ridiculous and out of pocket

@@Smellmyballz I agree, but I don't think that skinning two deer is that egregious of a request to make.

FACTS bro , I thought I was the only one who felt that way... RDR 1 gameplay is far better and has so much replay value (also much less stressful)

He is clear

John is so weak in the second game, first game he has so much confidence and humour and in the second game he’s like the dumbest character in the camp, acts like he’s 17 and shows no signs of the person he goes onto become.

First is better right

English isnt my first language

@@CynicGTAhow do you make Wheecliff out of Wiethoff? 😂

@@CynicGTA I understand and I forgive you

Rdr1 is clear.

"2 seconds into the video" I agree with your opinion and love the points you make (I really like hunting), but the video was probably halfway through you making the comment.

nah rdr1 had way way better side missions and marston is the goat, when you first get into mexico is one of the greatest gaming moments ever and when you add in undead nightmare it's not even close that's one of the greatest zombie games in itself

Bruh, Red dead 1 is clear buddy and I say it as a huge fan of this serie.

Nah. Not received. Red dead 1 clear no matter your opinion

@@Rubrasileiro What are you banging on about?

@@JLOCC23424 I correct you dumbo. Red dead 1 is clear, time will prove it.

i think he said wheatcliff?!?!

Glad I’m not the only one 😂

Nope red dead 1 is clear

@@Rubrasileiro clear? What u mean pal?

Can’t swim therefore the games bad

Humour 🤣 ok buddy

@@CodPatrol yeah????

@@ZW147 Arthur is not funnier than John in any capacity and even if you don’t mean him, nobody in the second games camp is funnier than Irish or West Dickens.

@@CodPatrol 😂😂😂 this is not a comedy club you egg I said the game has humour ain’t a competition between certain characters who’s the funniest be quiet

nah fun goes to rdr1 and by far

Fun and gameplay go to rdr1

Generally I'd say John and Arthur are equal, bias aside. All though personally due to nostalgia I like john more- Arthur, even though he has his own character and is very developed, is still used as something to further deepen John himself. Red dead redemption 2 has better Gameplay but that's entirely based off the time and the fact that these are the same Developers. Who actually have the ability to develop their own skill in terms of graphics gameplay etc. Out of the 5 categories I'm gonna go with this Fun = RDR1 (Preference based however.) Gameplay = RDR2 (More mechanics to use, improved mechanics at that. Horse plays really well in comparison to RDR1 and the shooting system feels more realistic.) Story= RDR2 (As the creator stated, RDR1 is much more straight forward and RDR2 has a lot of development to enhance RDR1 At a higher level, once you put them both together then RDR1 becomes the better game, because RDR2 is a prequel that is used to develop the story of RDR1 in general. World = (Equal. Where RDR2 lacks in terms of map and world, RDR1 is full of. Where RDR1 Lacks in terms of map and world- RDR2 Is full of.)

People who played RDR1 first were prepared for tragedy. People who played RDR2 were not prepared for tragedy. Arthur is the John Wayne of Red Dead about the idealism of the West, John is the Clint Eastwood of Red Dead about the realism of the West. Arthur died idealistically while John died realistically.

Fr it’s boring af lol

Skill Issue

He is the face of the franchise and you call him "bland".He was such a great character they downgraded him because they were afraid people wouldn't like arthur.

@@zombiekiller4313 being a face of something doesn’t give you more value. In comparison hes bland asf to Arthur and Dutch, his psyche is just weak asf. And also by them making John a scumbag in rdr2, it doesn’t hurt his character, if anything it boosts his character on a rdr1 replay with recontextualization from his history

@@Ceej601 It doesn't make him more likeable.They took the traits of john and retconned it.

@@Ceej601 easily 🤣 bland is every single side character in 2, try beating the trio of West Dickens, Irish and Seth

@@Ceej601 bland is changing your personality just because some guy coughed in your face, bet you weren’t even born when the first game was released