I would say the prince was NOT only 11 years old! he was at least a teenager. old enough to know not to treat others terribly especially because of appearance. you miss out on getting to know others if you judge based on look (even "beautiful people" are seen in a negative light. like some people think they're gunna be conceited jerks when it's not always true)
[fat old lady asks you what time it is and you dont have a watch] you: i dont have a watch [old lady turns into enchantresss] enchantress: true power to tell time lies within! i curse the and thy family and thy dog and thy toast and ice cream forever!
"The Enchanress is the only Disney villain who got away with everything" I think you forgot The Coachman from Pinocchio who got away with turning children into Donkeys and selling them to slavey
if you read "old as time" you would see just how bad "the asylum director" AKA monsieur D'raque can really be and a side of the enchantress you haven't seen
I still don't see how Maurice is a bad person, he went to the castle because he had no way to go, touched them because he couldn't believe his eyes, and sneezed because he was cold. And went to the scary road because he meant it was quicker, which was stupid but not evil
The beast definitely did some bad things but in all fairness he probably didn't exactly get ab education or a chance to mature emotionally after being cursed so I can't exactly blame him for his bad behavior Edit:an
@@controversialopinion5722 not exactly. Kids are entitled brats who learn to mature. How are you supposed to know standards if you are never taught them? Culture isn’t driven by instinct.
@@pineforest1442 The beast was certainly was an entitled brat. For that there is a certain level of understanding for his situation. However no matter what our differences may be, we must all come to accept responsibility for our actions. Society too shall hold you to that standard.
@@controversialopinion5722 sure. If after the fact he was like “yeah I was stupid and immature. But how the heck do you expect an isolated kid to recognize their mistakes unless they weren’t taught that it was a mistake to begin with?
@@pineforest1442 If he is too immature to recognize his mistakes even in adulthood, society will recognize them for him. Only by blame can we teach someone who doesn't know any better that they're actions are amoral. An entitled brat does not stop being entitled because of those that show unconditional kindness.
AAA while this does open a huge can of worms, there is still no sign that every single object in the castle is a transformed person. If it was the case how about the portrait of the prince that he clawed? Or the table with the glass case? Or the glass case of the rose itself?
@@WickedBinge Disney has made some laughably horrible moral arguments in movies. 10 years of twist villains, then Raya and the last dragon tells us we need to trust people more. Terrible company when it comes to moral lessons, but its humorous how toxic they are.
@@karolinakuc4783 Still a really weird curse. If it were me, the curse's terms would be less about romance and more about general compassion. The current terms feel a bit...Incel-ish.
Gaston is a representation of men during the time they lived in, during this movie: YOU had to be bold otherwise people would use you for their own wicked deeds, YOU had to be strong or people around would disrespect you, YOU had to be rich in order to control the environment (people and nature) around you or you would get consume by it, YOU had to be very versatile in order to be prepared for the hardship that could afflict you and your family. All these traits can have a negative effects on your own personality, you can become narcissistic, greedy, sociopathic etc etc but those traits doesnt necessarily turn you evil, more likely you become a ordinary asshole or a very closed off individual with a higher chance of survival. If you wonder what I got this ideas from I got it from that old serie pride and prejudice…...Peace.
I feel if Gaston is the "true villain" if the movie then why didn't the Enchantress go after him? Gaston is an adult while the Beast is an 11 year old child... who probably turned her away because "stranger danger" and that worked so well for Snow White. Him being the "villain" as the movie portrays him to be makes him the number one person the Enchantress to go after... but she never does. Even if the Beast's actions were unjustifiable... the Townspeople are no different if not worse. The Beast turned the woman away because stranger danger... the Townspeople shun Belle all because she reads a book. Is that enough reason the Enchantress to go after them too?
You really believe he turned old lady during an icy night coz he feared her? Come on! She is just a weak old lady. He just did not find her cool enough for company. A lone traveller had little chance to survive cold winter. Staying out would mean she had to watch fire all night coz one single blow of freezy wind could make fire die out.
@@Yahiko25 if you watch the prologue, the narrator said the rose would bloom until his 21st year and said he had to find love before the last petal fell. But there was no indication of how long it took each petal to fall. The narrator also said as the years passed he began to lose hope, so it indicates that it might have been some time between the falling of each petal. There is no indication of how long the curse was in place before his 21st year and no indication of how many years passed from his 21st year and when he meets Belle. If he was 11 at the time of the curse, how could there already be a portrait of him as a grown man, the one he shredded in the prologue that Belle recognized him from years later at the end of the movie? My guess is there was some sort of time freeze inside the castle while it went on as usual outside in the world, because Lumiere said they’d been rusting for ten years. But if you look at Chip, he was younger than ten and could not have been conceived when Mrs. Potts was a teapot. So we have to assume he was already a little boy when the curse was placed and that he didn’t age because Chip at the end of the movie was maybe five to seven years old.
I disagree with what you said about Maurice. He was against Belle taking his place and couldn’t stop it. About the last part about the old woman, there is a theory that the beast wasn’t 11 and was a grown man but they don’t age during the curse.
Awesome video but you got one thing wrong it's not a big thing but Louis the 15th was in the late 1700s he helped the Americans win the revolution before Napoleon took over France
My theory is that the curse was meant to go on for 21 years, and would become permanent after the last year ended if not broken. And the song Be Our Guest just meant that nobody had visited in ten years for fear of the beast, so the servants had been "rusting, needing so much more than dusting" since the last guest had visited. My reason for this theory is that Chip was just a child when the curse was placed upon the castle, and he and everyone else looked exactly the same in Enchanted Christmas, when the were cursed as they did in the end of Beauty and the Beast. It was like they hadn't aged a single day. So the prince was in fact an adult when the enchantress cursed him.
Why do people always say that he was 11 or 12 years old when the Enchantress placed a curse on him, and turned him into a beast? What about Chip, was he just a newborn when he was transformed to a teacup? It won't make any sense if the Prince was 11 or 12 years old when he was cursed. He must be 21 years old when it happened, and he remained 21 years old for 10 years, including everyone that were under curse. Chip was turned into a teacup when he was 10 years old, and remained 10 years old for 10 years.
Exactly! Also the destroyed portrait of the prince shows him as 21 year old. His facial features are those of a grown up, and the prince looked exactly the same when he was transformed back into a human. Actually I don’t see these direct-to-DVD sequels as canon…to me it feels more like fan fiction stories.
@@alexiacaceda1421 No there was no mention of "21st birthday" The narrator narrates that before his "21'st year" if he could find someone to love him despite his monstrous form, the curse will be broken, but if not he will remain as a Beast Forever." The "his 21st year" in that sentence meant that the curse has an ultimatum after 21 years. Find true love or remain curse forever. So they remain ageless when they were cursed.
@@seppi2148 The majority of times royals kids were portrayed as adults in the paintings.I discovered this a few years ago when I started to get into history.One day I saw a protrait of Marie Antoinette looking like girl in her 20's but then I saw that she was just a little girl when the artist did the portrait
You have seriously reminded me why I find the Asylum director so creepy. Also, let's be honest here people. Disney botched the whole Enchantress thing with the Enchanted Christmas flashback.
ok so i just have to point this out: gaston and the prince look A LOT alike. they have the same bodies, hairstyle, eye color, and facial features. whats more is gaston is too fit and adept to be just a hunter. looking at the rest of the townsfolk they are wearing cheap clothes and are unfit looking. gaston has clothing that is befitting a member of nobility and royalty [and even has a freaking servant]. gaston is physically stronger than everyone else ion the town and is trained in a manner that befits one of military or noble descent. the prince, being royalty would have a military, and normally royalty would have their military march through the cities keeping peace and collectig dues. if the enchantress were to come curse everyone at the castle the military members would likely be left out of the curse as they would be around the town. and seeing as everyone forgot the prince and his castle, the military would be nothing more than ordinary townsfolk. the castle guard would be left out of the enchantress' curse. what if gaston was a member of the royal guard or even the princes uncle, and happened to be spared the castle curse? as a result he would be left with no memory of his former life and this would entirely explain how he is trained in hand to hand combat, tracking and hunting, firearms, and just so happens to have both clothing befitting that of a noblemen and a personal servant. i think gaston was directly related to the prince or the royal family.
Yeah.The prince's facial features are more delicate version of gaston's, but that hairstyle was VERY popular in 1870's.Gaston's clothes are not befitting for royalty at all ,french royals would wear something like the prince's clothes in the final ball and even fancier(don't forget the wig).Not all royals were military trained (for example Louis xvi wasn't)but this is an interesting theory
I am sorry but putting maurice on the list is stupid. I mean he thought the castle was abandoned look at the castle its dingy. Second he's an inventor who lives in a small counrty village full of ignorant people, so of course some villagers would think hes nuts.
we are presented that Gaston is the villain, so that's what most everybody thinks of it; oh, by the way, the Enchantress is is filling the role for God
Gaston is the most evil villain in Beauty and the Beast. Gaston's personality is like Frollo, the most evil villain OF ALL: he wants a woman and he wants to kill the hideous looking main character. Then there's Gaston's assistant, Monsieur D' Arc, has the VOICE of Frollo!
Oh no, he wants to provide direction to a woman who doesn’t have a strong male in her life. The horror! AND he wants to kill a literal monster who kidnapped, enslaved, and hostage-traded two people from their village?! That’s terrible! And how he let that stubby fat little man be his sidekick?! Why couldn’t he be a better person like the beast who treated his servants like garbage despite being responsible for them being furniture! And wanting to be the provider for belle and practicing abstinence from the floozies? Saving himself? Despicable. A good guy would treat an old lady like trash, and then totally simp when she reveals herself to be beautiful and young, only lusting about looks.
@@ScummyRebel Are all the incels and nice guys so lacking in self awareness? Yes they are. Are you so lacking in confidence that you instantly bought into John Doyle's bullshit? Yes you are! -Gaston is the real simp: A man who thinks that he is entitled to sex just for being superficially polite and has the same self awareness of one, which is none and flies off the handle and blames Belle for rejecting him.
Of course he is going to be a hero to all of you: Gaston is what you envision yourselves to be, a guy with muscles who has all the women throwing at his feet with no effort.....and has the same self awareness as you have, which is zero to none.....overcompensating for something boys? Just admit that you are envious of the Beast because he has game and you don't. See the difference? -Beast is a gentleman: A man who despite his personal insecurities, tries to improve himself for the person he cares about. -Gaston is a "nice guy". A man who thinks himself entitled to sex just for being superficially polite and insulting the girl for rejecting him...flying off the handle because he has the maturity of a two year old.
@@skeinofadifferentcolor2090 The Beast is no simp, because he has something a simp lacks: Self-awareness. Gaston is the simp because he doesn't have it. You want a girlfriend? Stop spewing incel bullshit.
The thing about Maurice is that most of his actions were just poor judgement. He didn't want Belle to trade herself. When she did, he ran to the village to get help, and he still tried to save her by himself when nobody listened.
I disagree about LeFou being more evil than Gaston since Gaston is the main antagonist, LeFou is his henchman, and they are examples of the trope Vile Villain, Laughable Lackey.
Agree; and he did "not" storm the castle because he loved Belle and wanted to protect her. It's because he saw that Belle cared for the Beast more then she ever did for him and therefore wanted to kill the Beast so he could have Belle all to himself. Gaston only saw her as a prize to be won; not as a person. Also the whole stock-home syndrome thing is complete BS. Belle willingly stands up to the Beast when he's acting like a jerk and it's not until he actually tries to be nice and improve himself that Belle starts being nice to him.
@@MaryC861 Those people self inserted on Gaston and they were angry that their pairing never became canon, like some Zutarians in Avatar: The Last Airbender.
In the moral spectrum, I see few differences between King Triton and The Beast, but I’d place King Triton below the Beast because we actually had a lot more time to see the Beast go through a redemption arc despite his own sins... that and he did not trident-blast all of Belle’s personal belongings like what Triton did with his daughter’s, the Beast only destroyed his own personal belongings out of regrets and frustrations rather than DESTROY ALL HUMANS!
I am still kinda upset that the Enchantress turned the innocent servants into household objects! WHAT DID THEY EVER DO THAT WAS SO BAD?! They are literally just nice people who wants to work to earn money and live peacefully!
If I was the beast and had to spent the rest of my childhood and adult years as a monster, I'd be angry too. The enchantress is a coward because she targeted a child, an orphaned one to be more likely since there's no mention of his parents
If you’re gonna name Maurice in here, at last place was a good idea cause he’s not evil, just a few mistakes was made. The Enchantress is definitely an evil one: doing the math, she cursed an 11 year old child & his servants of the castle because he turns her away for “her haggard appearance” & now gives him 10 years to learn real love. Of course he wouldn’t let you in, he’s a spoiled brat who’s still learning.
Beast didn't kidnapped Belle, she made an agreement with him to save his father, the Beast clearly didn't know what to say and then maybe he realized she would be the last chance to break the course. Maurice trasspassed his caatle, maybe he didn't want Maurice to tell the people about hs existence (the Beast said to Maurice "So, you've come to see the Beast, haven't you"?) ,maybe the Beast thought that if he had released Maurice , he would told the villagers about the Castle and the monster. The Beast is not a saint, but he doesn't deserve to be as high as Gaston and Lefou
While we're on the subject, Gaston is only one person, versus a bunch of townspeople who literally let him get away with murder, worshiping the ground he walks on instead of calling him out on his wrongs and/or standing up for the people he has wronged.
The enchantress is not evil. She saw an evil in man and cursed him. The beast fucking kidnapped and brainwashed belle. That’s evil. Not someone turning a dude into a monster.
@@ScummyRebel And you missed the point of the movie: Gaston is a monster on the inside, Beast is a monster on the outside. What? Nobody taught you that you are not entitled to sex just for niceness? You make me laugh, but only because you are pathetic🤣
I agree with you about the Enchantress; it's not safe to let strangers into your house, & some 11 year olds don't know how to take care of theirselves like grownups. So I see it as if the beast was just trying to protect or keep himself safe like you would, & his friends could have helped him know how to take care of himself like our parents do. The Enchantress should have thought about that before she put the spell on him & his friends.
Your very right actually!!! But he didn't directly have to say " "Your not welcomed here your ugly" he could have politely turned her down but still he's just a kid like girlie you just came to him you could see he's a kid also stranger danger!
Don't forget that guy from Pinocchio also did evil stuff and got away with it I'd say him and the enchantress r the only disney villians that get away with what they did and go unpunished
WickedBinge you should’ve left The Beast off of this list! But, if I’m honest, I really love him when he transforms back into The Prince, Prince Gabriel, (NOT Prince Adam), at near the end of the Movie! Changing for “selfish reasons”? I don’t think so!
I would not put the witch at the very end of the list coz first if she were an ordinary lady she would freeze to death. Plus at least she had good intention in making that boy suffer. We see rose telling him how much time is left and portrait that ages with him and shows how he will look like when the spell is broken. Asylum headmaster however takes sheer pleasure in torturing and breaking people.
Lefou was not really evil more as pathetic and a weasel. He hyped Gaston up bc why not be besties with the most handsome,strongest ,most respected man around. And if u take into account the remake he was just a man with a crush on on him Then all of your scenes that you used to back up your points about Gaston and Lefou were very contrary
Definitely the Enchantress even if she wanted to punish the beast she didn't have to punish the innocent servants who probably had friends and family so she kept them separated for years and even erased all memory of them from the world and all because she wanted to teach the beast a lesson.
doing the math when the enchantress cursed him when he was 11! And he only has had contact with his staff so he will act like one he never really had any circumstances were he would have to use adult logic at this time in his life
LeFou (the animated version) is infatuated with the three silly girls, so it's definitely not in love with Gaston, it's just the classic little, miserable, pathetic adoring sidekick of a bully!
Just like Gaston is a dark mirror of the Beast, Lefou is this to Cogsworth: While both act as the right hand men to their leaders, Cogsworth is independent and stands up to the Beast, Lefou is dominated by Gaston to the point he has no will of his own.
I have to agree with you on the asylum Director. based on his reaction to Maurices black male, how many other innocent people are in the asylum for the same reasons? really makes you wonder. also, the comment on The asylum Director made me think of a documentary that I watched long ago called locked up and forgotten. It took a look at mental health in India. basically, if a man got tired of his wife, they could do the same thing that Gaston tried to do with Maurice, just shut them up in an asylum no questions asked.
The inchantres was horrid but belle might not of met the beast if it wasn't for her but lafoo is horrid as well gaston might have just married one of the 3 girls that seem to be around him if lafoo hadn't talked him into it and the the villain that wants to take bells dad away is horrid as well but I don't think bells dad is a villain
Other than the asylum guy. I would say there are no “bad guys”, just antagonists. Gaston isn’t bad, he’s just a jerk who does stupid things but for what he believes are the right reasons. That doesn’t make him evil. Just prejudiced and an a-hole. The Enchantress doesn’t need to go around throwing curses on anyone, just because they don’t want to let in the house. Even though it wasn’t here place to be doling out lessons, she did so anyways.
I certainly didn’t see all of these “bad guys” as bad guys- of course the original bad guys will always be Gaston and… The villagers? I never liked them for going along with the plan at the end of the movie.. it wasn’t until recently when I actually watched the remake, God forbid that awful piece of trash remake😬 The enchantress was definitely a villain even if she was put in the new story as a medium for the moral it doesn’t make up for all the trouble she caused
My Opinion On Most Evil: 1st Place (Most Evil):Lunimere He could have burned down the entire castle somehow during those 'Ten years we've been rusting, Needing so much more than dusting' years, I mean, HE WAS A CANDLE FOR 10 YEARS, AND HE MADE HIS HEAD FLAME BIGGER. And that's my opinion.
The only way for the Beast to redeem himself is to serve the gods for 10 years and they will forgive him for killing his wife and child... wait, where am I?
