WHY DID BRITAIN SAY 350 PEOPLE DIED WHEN IT WAS 1000+? | Jallianwala Bagh Memorial park 

You can read about Udham Singh to know more about the incident.

It is great that you are very interested in the ancient incident . And sometimes it really feels angry about your people and the work they have done . But the thing was happened and cannot be changed but I will asure you that you will be remembering the great time you guys have experienced here . Lots of Love from Uttarakhand ❣️

Hello sir if you are in Delhi please visit our place

379 is the official figure by the British, original number is way more than that..

I would suggest you to watch the movie “Sardar Udam Singh” to know more about the massacre. Lots of Love from 🇮🇳🙏

Agree! 🖤

"Lived for India and died for India". It is written on his rotten grave. Don't ask for soorryyy. He was hero for British people.

British Subjects - not citizens - not until they have a republic.

They got rich, because they were supported by natives, with soldiers, financiers etc, who thought their rule of law was better, than native corruption.

@@alani3992 I think that's everywhere , in current situation look at Sri Lanka, Pakistan is greate example of native support. We may name it corruption. But for me it's surrender by few people who thinks what they are doing is only way to come out of situation.

Yes, did you know that Indians were killed by Indians only (i.e. those serving in the British Indian Army). Here's something more that will burn your mind and skin - these Indian soldiers who killed other Indians continued to receive government pensions after 1947 till their death. In any other country, they would have been tried from war crimes (and in Independent India they were given pensions).

Forgive but do not forget.

@@newbiekhyber because India got dominion status followed by independence they didn't get it through revolution.

@@newbiekhyber There is a term for it called "Prisoners of War". People have two options, either suffer the wrath of colonization or join them to ensure protection and survival. The Indian soldiers became the British Raj army FOR British under the ORDER of British. Westerners are callous and unapologetic. No matter what anyone says, they will twist and mince words to justify their wrong-doings.

How can you blame Winston Churchill policies for cause of India Bengal famine when Winston Churchill did not become prime Minister until 1940 and Bengal was ruled by Indians mostly Hindus ruling Muslims, not British? Most of Indian Bengal government between 1935 and 1940 were Indians mostly Hindus ruling Muslims. Most of Indian Bengal government between 1940 and 1945 during India Bengal famine were Indians mostly Hindus ruling Muslims. .Blaming the Indian Bengal government for the mismanagement of the Indian Bengal famine of 1943, it's important to note that the government was democratically elected in 1940 by Indians, and there were 175 Hindus, 65 Muslims, and 10 scheduled caste elected officials. However, the Krishak Praja Party, a Hindu-majority party, in power in Bengal, had discriminatory policies towards Muslims, who made up a significant portion of Bengal's population, and this worsened the famine's impact on the Muslim population. The Government of India Act 1935 decentralized the administration of food and agriculture to the provincial governments, including Bengal. Natural disasters such as crop disease and cyclones had severely affected Bengal's food production. Additionally, the Japanese Empire occupied Burma/Myanmar, which had historically supplied rice to British India during famines, further reducing the food supply in Bengal. While the British Empire also played a significant role in the crisis, such as losing ships to German and Japanese submarines, making it difficult to transport supplies to India, and news of the fall of Burma leading to other Indian provinces refusing to help Bengal, it's important to acknowledge the role of the Indian Bengal government in mismanaging the crisis. As per the Government of India Act 1935, food and agriculture were provincial issues and Bengal was run by the Krishak Praja Party. Additionally, Marwari traders hoarded grain, exacerbating the food shortage. Canadian Prime Minister McKenzie King offered to send grain to Bengal, but British Prime Minister Winston Churchill preferred that grain be shipped from Australia, which was ordered to send 444,000 tons of wheat in the middle of a World War. Churchill also wrote to American President Roosevelt for shipping support for grain, but Roosevelt, who was pressing Britain to grant independence to India, refused to help due to his belief that the complete destruction of Germany and Japan was a more pressing priority than helping with the famine. In conclusion, the Bengal famine was a complex crisis that involved several factors, including natural disasters, the actions of the British Empire, but most of the the mismanagement of the crisis by the Indian Bengal government and the Indian Bengal government mostly Hindu government officials ruling over Muslims deserves most of the blame not the British. Mismanagement of food resources by India Bengal local governments played the key role in exacerbating this crisis - Marwari traders hoarded grain leading to reduced availability for ordinary people who needed it most; discrimination against Muslims population led them disproportionately suffer even more compared their fellow Hindu peers during this period; and ultimately according to Government of India Act 1935 food & agriculture related decisions were provincial issues so ultimately those mostly Hindus governing Bengal are responsibile for missteps or intentional neglect regarding handling such matters effectively.

🖤

@@parttimetravellingfamily Its not about you my dear friends...this incident we are talking about is 103 yrs ago. People were different then, their motivations were different. You have nothing to feel ashamed or embarrassed about. World has moved on since the Imperialist rule ages. People have moved on. And today we have WONDERFUL people like you visiting our land and appreciating our people, culture and history. We can't ask anything more from you except portraying the true face of India to the rest of the world through your travelogues and travel vlogs! And yes...maybe support our demand for an apology from British royalty...that would be a bonus...we would consider it as an unexpected gift from you for the way we Indians have supported you and tried to treat you as best as we could...virtually and in presence!! But...again...we don't mind! We are just happy if good hearted and earnest people like you are happy with your travel and stay in our country! God Bless!

If you look deeper, it was not the Brits, but the force of capitalism keeping the peace to protect resources. The same is being done today, where you will be silenced, oppressed or worse, by those at the top of the capitalist pyramid.

Why that guy is irritating them, have they not seen people from other countries?? Some people in our country are really irritating.. I am sorry from their behalf

@@parttimetravellingfamily shameless

Just today I saw a viral meme on social media. There was the signboard you mentioned on one side of the photo and on the other side there was a photo of a British Indian with his dog sitting in office. The person was Rishi Sunak😅

🖤 Wow!!

It was a different world to today's PC culture, where certain villagers were denied basic water, where widows were outcasts, or even burnt etc.

@@alani3992 I think you need burnol

आज ब्रिटेन की सब से ऊंची गद्दी पर एक भारतीय अपने कुत्ते के साथ रूल कर रहा है, तभी तो कहा जाता है कि इतिहास अपने आप को दोहराता है, हमें विश्वास था कि आने वाला समय हमारा ही होगा, एशियन नहीं खास कर भारतीय बोलो..... भारत माता की जय 🇮🇳🇮🇳

🖤

🖤

famine happened because of many reasons some was because of British policies some because of Indian themselves

@@jayd4ever don't try to cover up their mistakes ok? It's gaslighting

@@jayd4ever all the food stock was sent to world War 2 as extra stock pile but here in India they left people starving 😑 learn some history man .

Blame chrichill for that

Thanks Sandip 🖤

One of many. Including Bengal famine by racist Churchill, who is a hero in UK but hated Indians.

it was done by the british with help of indians

The movie Sardar Udham is based on the real life story of Udham Singh, an Indian revolutionary who assassinated Michael O'Dwyer in 1940 in revenge for the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre. The movie takes some creative liberties with the story, such as adding a fictional romance between Udham and a British woman, but overall it is a faithful retelling of the real story. However, some viewers have noted that the film fails to accurately portray the full scope of Singh's revolutionary activities and fails to provide any meaningful context for his actions. The film also fails to accurately portray the massacre at Jallianwala Bagh and its aftermath, leaving the viewer with a highly sanitized and inaccurate version of history.

Sarar Valabh Bhai Patel wrote in a letter to Lord Irwin, the then Viceroy of India, that "the Jallianwala Bagh massacre was not the doing of the British but of the Indian soldiers." He went on to say that "the responsibility for the massacre lies entirely with the Indian soldiers who fired on the crowd." Patel also wrote in the same letter that "the Indian civilians were killed by the Indian soldiers due to the lack of proper orders, discipline and control."

☺️ Thank you so much 🖤

No offense to any ethincity but English peoples have a epic and deadly history. I mean English peoples were firstly crusaders and then colonisers and then human right activist in the name of their capitalist bullshit

bro these brits should be ashamed of themselves because they still haven't apologised for the jallianwala bagh incident and they have looted India, which used to be one of the most richest countries in the world and when Rishi Sunak has became the prime minister of the UK these Brits only now complaining and spreading hate spread against Indians and for these people colonization, torturing, looting and killing of people are ok. What a joke!!!!!!! and you are telling her not to be embarrassed.

Typical asslicking Indian ready to defend the colonizers at the drop of a hat! Feeling guilty is the least these britishers can do.

@@shreyas9507 these people are so shameless that they are defending a brit who did nothing good to India but only did worse for it, for its own benefit.

Oh we'll see another one. This time it will be in England.

Thank you 🖤

And the worst part, no repercussions. The Allies portrayed themselves as angels, protectors and the ones freeing everybody when they were the devils in their own backyard.

indians love foreigners more than own

Thís is not the worst thing that has been done to us ....😶

Jalliawala bagh massacre is just a hint of what they did...the planned negligence during the great Bengal femine of 1943 resulted into the persish of 2.1million+indians ,mass killings,drain of wealth, doctrine of lapse (a doctrine according to which If a ruler of the state doesn't have a biological hier /son the land will belong to Britishers)....there are many

British Authorities are still busy in promoting Racial hate against Indian people, They never tell people about British crimes against Humanity, nor they tell about 45 Trillion US Dollars worth Gold and other precious items they had stolen from India. School books only tell about Great British Empire. Queen has stolen diamonds in her crown like The Koh-a-Noor. During the WW2 British starved millions Indian by steeling all the food from India, for storage in UK.

@@anji9967 malnutrion is still problem in india

🖤

I didn't forive them because even today many Britishers in RU-vid are rude. How can u forgive someone when they still praise their empire and mock us??

@@Naveenbr-kp8gc1yi3d I understand your emotions you are right they cant be forgiven but it looks like people have forgave them that 's why they are always fantasize about western culture . Also too be honest who are we to forgive them when they are the real culprits of our ancestors who suffered a lot becoz of them .

Sarar Valabh Bhai Patel wrote in a letter to Lord Irwin, the then Viceroy of India, that "the Jallianwala Bagh massacre was not the doing of the British but of the Indian soldiers." He went on to say that "the responsibility for the massacre lies entirely with the Indian soldiers who fired on the crowd." Patel also wrote in the same letter that "the Indian civilians were killed by the Indian soldiers due to the lack of proper orders, discipline and control."

🖤

I know.. 😒 Very embarrassing 🖤

Sarar Valabh Bhai Patel wrote in a letter to Lord Irwin, the then Viceroy of India, that "the Jallianwala Bagh massacre was not the doing of the British but of the Indian soldiers." He went on to say that "the responsibility for the massacre lies entirely with the Indian soldiers who fired on the crowd." Patel also wrote in the same letter that "the Indian civilians were killed by the Indian soldiers due to the lack of proper orders, discipline and control."

@@donkeydesiamericanprofessor any reference?

Thank you so much 😀 🖤

Thank you! We will 🖤

British Authorities are still busy in promoting Racial hate against Indian people, They never tell people about British crimes against Humanity, nor they tell about 45 Trillion US Dollars worth Gold and other precious items they had stolen from India. School books only tell about Great British Empire. Queen has stolen diamonds in her crown like The Koh-a-Noor. During the WW2 British starved millions Indian by steeling all the food from India, for storage in UK.

Iam not going to forgive because their people still are kind of rude in RU-vid.

@@Naveenbr-kp8gc1yi3d which RU-vidr bro?

No, General O'Dwyer was not present when his soldiers fired on civilians at Jallianwala Bagh. However, he did take full responsibility for the action in his testimony and described it as a "deep regret". The majority of the soldiers present at Jallianwala Bagh were Indian, with approximately 400-600 Indian troops and 40-50 British personnel in attendance when the order to fire was given. Who fired on Indian civilians? There were 50 soliders with Dyer. 25 were : Balochis from Balochistan on what is now the Pakistan-Iran border. The other 25 were from a Gurkha regiment( nepal).

Sarar Valabh Bhai Patel wrote in a letter to Lord Irwin, the then Viceroy of India, that "the Jallianwala Bagh massacre was not the doing of the British but of the Indian soldiers." He went on to say that "the responsibility for the massacre lies entirely with the Indian soldiers who fired on the crowd." Patel also wrote in the same letter that "the Indian civilians were killed by the Indian soldiers due to the lack of proper orders, discipline and control."

That is correct! The movie "Sardar Udham" does take creative liberties with the real story of Udham Singh, and some viewers have noted that it fails to accurately portray the full scope of his revolutionary activities or provide any meaningful context for his actions. Additionally, the film also fails to accurately portray the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and its aftermath, leaving the viewer with a highly sanitized and inaccurate version of history.

Beautifully put Priyanka 🖤

@@priyankadesai4167 good for thought but the world doesn't work your way.

@@sancho3179 Sad it doesn’t work your way either.

@@priyankadesai4167 what did you delete. Your original comment makes sense. But just like Germans apologised to Jews, it would be very appreciative if the state of UK can apologise for their colonial rule and the bengal man-made famines where 4 M people died starving to death. Unless that is done, tensions will creep in from time to time.

@@priyankadesai4167 and since Indian school history is still colonial, i am not sure you know anything about India at all.

Thank you so much Sanjeeb 🖤

🖤 Thank you

@@parttimetravellingfamily thank you for visiting India 🙏❤️

That is correct! The movie "Sardar Udham" does take creative liberties with the real story of Udham Singh, and some viewers have noted that it fails to accurately portray the full scope of his revolutionary activities or provide any meaningful context for his actions. Additionally, the film also fails to accurately portray the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and its aftermath, leaving the viewer with a highly sanitized and inaccurate version of history.

Sarar Valabh Bhai Patel wrote in a letter to Lord Irwin, the then Viceroy of India, that "the Jallianwala Bagh massacre was not the doing of the British but of the Indian soldiers." He went on to say that "the responsibility for the massacre lies entirely with the Indian soldiers who fired on the crowd." Patel also wrote in the same letter that "the Indian civilians were killed by the Indian soldiers due to the lack of proper orders, discipline and control."

No, General O'Dwyer was not present when his soldiers fired on civilians at Jallianwala Bagh. However, he did take full responsibility for the action in his testimony and described it as a "deep regret". The majority of the soldiers present at Jallianwala Bagh were Indian, with approximately 400-600 Indian troops and 40-50 British personnel in attendance when the order to fire was given. Who fired on Indian civilians? There were 50 soliders with Dyer. 25 were : Balochis from Balochistan on what is now the Pakistan-Iran border. The other 25 were from a Gurkha regiment( nepal).

More like Indians were forced to fight.

British Authorities are still busy in promoting Racial hate against Indian people, They never tell people about British crimes against Humanity, nor they tell about 45 Trillion US Dollars worth Gold and other precious items they had stolen from India. School books only tell about Great British Empire. Queen has stolen diamonds in her crown like The Koh-a-Noor. During the WW2 British starved millions Indian by steeling all the food from India, for storage in UK.

🖤

Thank you Anuj 🖤

🖤

British Authorities are still busy in promoting Racial hate against Indian people, They never tell people about British crimes against Humanity, nor they tell about 45 Trillion US Dollars worth Gold and other precious items they had stolen from India. School books only tell about Great British Empire. Queen has stolen diamonds in her crown like The Koh-a-Noor. During the WW2 British starved millions Indian by steeling all the food from India, for storage in UK.

Link

@@rahuldutt1358 search krle bhai mil jaega

@@rahuldutt1358 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RXUtJfSOIXU.html

Wow!! Thank you so much... I'm lost for words. I'm glad it is calming for you. Oh 100K subs would be nice... I think we have a while to go yet. As long as we can carry on travelling and educating ourselves we are happy. Thank you again, All the best 🖤🖤🖤

Thanks for watching! 🖤

🖤

Thank you Aravind ☺️ 🖤

🖤

🖤

🖤

See all these famines were in northern and north eastern part of india..yet south people call us poor and underdeveloped..they dont see the history of how worst we were effected..probably more than them

Thank you Aditya 🖤

Thank you Hitesh 🖤

We did open our eyes.. which is why we thanked all of the kind people who we met 🖤

Enjoy your visit to India beautiful everywhere you go to nice beautiful family, beautiful food, beautiful building, 💯👍👍👌👌🤠

We will do. Thank you Simarjit 🖤

Couldn't agree more 🖤

@@parttimetravellingfamily We as a civilization has always been forgiving and accepting.Gandhi had no role in developing this character in common hindus.GANDHI was infact the reason why INDIA was partitioned.

Sarar Valabh Bhai Patel wrote in a letter to Lord Irwin, the then Viceroy of India, that "the Jallianwala Bagh massacre was not the doing of the British but of the Indian soldiers." He went on to say that "the responsibility for the massacre lies entirely with the Indian soldiers who fired on the crowd." Patel also wrote in the same letter that "the Indian civilians were killed by the Indian soldiers due to the lack of proper orders, discipline and control."

Thank you Raj.. 🖤

Thats not her fault and she shudnt be sorry. It shud be tht Thief family who shud b sorry.

🖤

🖤

🖤 Thank you

Thank you 🖤

🖤

But we should never forgive them. I will always hate them!

@@KING-ni4ze hate is chemical soup generates within you which makes you feel bad and it is abt you,to fir dusre ke paap ko tum kuin jheloge..yaad to rakhna hi chahiye,taaki dubara na ho.

Ahh thanks Prashant 🖤

Sarar Valabh Bhai Patel wrote in a letter to Lord Irwin, the then Viceroy of India, that "the Jallianwala Bagh massacre was not the doing of the British but of the Indian soldiers." He went on to say that "the responsibility for the massacre lies entirely with the Indian soldiers who fired on the crowd." Patel also wrote in the same letter that "the Indian civilians were killed by the Indian soldiers due to the lack of proper orders, discipline and control."

@@donkeydesiamericanprofessor planning, scheming, identifying the spot, timing, implementation and final order to fire 🔥 was from Gen dyer and British govt. Indian soldiers fired because they are British Salt and were duty bound.. jalianwalaa Bagh remains one of the cruelest massacre in human history..

🖤

That is correct! The movie "Sardar Udham" does take creative liberties with the real story of Udham Singh, and some viewers have noted that it fails to accurately portray the full scope of his revolutionary activities or provide any meaningful context for his actions. Additionally, the film also fails to accurately portray the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and its aftermath, leaving the viewer with a highly sanitized and inaccurate version of history.

Sarar Valabh Bhai Patel wrote in a letter to Lord Irwin, the then Viceroy of India, that "the Jallianwala Bagh massacre was not the doing of the British but of the Indian soldiers." He went on to say that "the responsibility for the massacre lies entirely with the Indian soldiers who fired on the crowd." Patel also wrote in the same letter that "the Indian civilians were killed by the Indian soldiers due to the lack of proper orders, discipline and control."

No, General O'Dwyer was not present when his soldiers fired on civilians at Jallianwala Bagh. However, he did take full responsibility for the action in his testimony and described it as a "deep regret". The majority of the soldiers present at Jallianwala Bagh were Indian, with approximately 400-600 Indian troops and 40-50 British personnel in attendance when the order to fire was given. Who fired on Indian civilians? There were 50 soliders with Dyer. 25 were : Balochis from Balochistan on what is now the Pakistan-Iran border. The other 25 were from a Gurkha regiment( nepal).

🖤

No, General O'Dwyer was not present when his soldiers fired on civilians at Jallianwala Bagh. However, he did take full responsibility for the action in his testimony and described it as a "deep regret". The majority of the soldiers present at Jallianwala Bagh were Indian, with approximately 400-600 Indian troops and 40-50 British personnel in attendance when the order to fire was given. Who fired on Indian civilians? There were 50 soliders with Dyer. 25 were : Balochis from Balochistan on what is now the Pakistan-Iran border. The other 25 were from a Gurkha regiment( nepal).

Thank you so much 🖤

Thank you Pravin 🖤

Yes i've watched them 🖤

Thanks Ramandeep 🖤