I tried to open an bank account under my company name and EIN but all the banks required my personal SSN.. Why can't they find these people is beyond me. The bank is look to shift the liability and are garbage.
@@SpecialAgentNoble77 that's the biggest cap I've ever heard specially cs if it's under your actual ssn then your "company" has no credit as that's your credit goofy😂
Chase has someone on the inside who's perpetrating this crime. I had a fake check that fortunately looked dissimilar to our actual checks nearly get through, but Chase caught it based on the different look of the check compared to our actual checks and sent me an email so I was able to stop it. The amount was similar to another check and the check number was within the scheme of my check run. The inside scammers have realized that their fake check needs to be nearly identical to the actual check so the Chase fraud software lets it through the system.
Since banks are federally regulated, she needs to immediately file a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission.
Dude. I'm a vet, and nothing I ever did in service compares to the most amazing effort you and your colleagues give to protect and enlighten the public in general to this horrendous threat to innocent people. Much respect For this GrindTechiei guys,;
Used to be you could just cancel the check. They do make copies of it so get it and see who cashed it. I never rely on banks, I tracked down a guy who cashed a $500.00 check this way as soon as I mentioned the cops he payed it back.
If the banks did their jobs properly, yes there should be a paper trail for fraudulent checks and even for wire transfers. Banks should know who their customers are “Know Your Customer” (KYC) and not allow fraudulent accounts to be opened to accept stolen funds. If they did this, stolen funds could easily be recovered. Even wire transfers can be recalled. Banks that allow funds to be stolen and banks that allow fraudulent accounts to be opened to accept stolen funds should be held financially liable. That would pretty much put an end to these types of scams.
CLEARLY all the writing on the check EXCEPT the signature was removed and rewritten by the thief...How is that NOT AN ALTERED CHECK???????????????????? Can't she sue or something? The bank hasn't a leg to stand on!!!!!!
I rarely write checks anymore. If a scammer gets ahold of one they have your account number, your signature, your address, your phone number, your check number sequence, and what your checks look like. With laser printer technology checks are easy to duplicate. Banks are also sloppy. They’re supposed to have a policy of “Know Your Customer” (KYC). This means that they verify who is opening accounts with them with proper IDs. That way, if they deposit or cash a fraudulent check, police know exactly who they are. Banks don’t seem to be doing this.
Don’t keep the bulk of your money in your checking account, just enough to cover your expected charges. With online banking, it’s so easy to move your money around nowadays.
So the check was at the very least fraud. And at the very worst counterfed How is she liable for any of that regardless of the time? That's an important part of having copy printed checks so you have a record.
Chase, always Chase. I opened and closed a personal savings account within a month because they were so screwed up. My advice is to pull your money and run, don't walk.
Chase bank never brother to do anything for the customer. Whenever came to an issue with the account. All they can do put their customer in to accountable.
